September, 12 2024, 11:14am EDT
PREPARED REMARKS: Sanders Leads Bipartisan Hearing on Steward Health, CEO Ralph de la Torre, & Private Equity Influence in American Health Care
This was the first subpoena issued by the HELP Committee since 1981. Despite the subpoena, Dr. de la Torre failed to appear today for the hearing.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP), today led the committee in a hearing titled “Examining the Bankruptcy of Steward Health Care: How Management Decisions Have Impacted Patient Care.”
Ahead of the hearing, the committee authorized a subpoena in a bipartisan vote to compel Steward CEO Dr. Ralph de la Torre to appear today as a witness and provide testimony. This was the first subpoena issued by the HELP Committee since 1981. Despite the subpoena, Dr. de la Torre failed to appear today for the hearing.
Sanders’ remarks, as prepared for delivery, are below and can be watched live HERE:
The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions will come to order.
In America today, we have a health care system that is broken, dysfunctional and cruel.
Too often it is a system that is designed not to make patients well, but to make health care executives and stockholders extraordinarily wealthy.
There could not be a clearer example of that than private equity billionaires on Wall Street who are making billions by purchasing hospitals throughout our country, stripping all of their assets and loading them up with debt that they could never afford to pay back.
Perhaps more than anyone else in America, Ralph de la Torre, the CEO of Steward Health Care, is the poster child for the type of outrageous corporate greed that is permeating throughout our for-profit health care system.
Working in partnership with the private equity firm Cerberus, Dr. de la Torre became obscenely wealthy by loading up hospitals from Massachusetts to Arizona with billions of dollars in debt and selling the land underneath these hospitals to real estate executives at Medical Properties Trust who charged unsustainably high rent.
As a result of Dr. de la Torre’s elaborate financial scheme, Steward Health Care, and the more than 30 hospitals it owns in 8 states, declared bankruptcy with some $9 billion in debt.
But let’s be clear: Steward’s severe financial problems did not happen overnight. They have been going on for more than a decade.
It has been estimated that at least 15 patients at hospitals owned by Steward died as a result of a lack of medical equipment or staffing shortages and that at least 2,000 other patients were put in serious risk according to federal regulators.
Since 2019, federal inspectors have cited Steward-owned hospitals over 30 times for putting patients in “immediate jeopardy” – meaning that patients died, were put at “grave risk” or were injured.
In 2014, Steward shut down the Quincy Medical Center in Massachusetts with the exception of its Emergency Room – which it shut down six years later. Today, Quincy is the largest city in Massachusetts without an Emergency Room.
In 2018, Steward shut down the Northside Regional Medical Center in Youngstown, Ohio closing the only labor and delivery unit in that city for pregnant women and their babies and laying off 468 health care workers in the process.
Last year, Steward shut down the Texas Vista Medical Center, the main health care option for San Antonio's south side after it missed over $650,000 in payments to medical suppliers leaving the hospital with a severe shortage of respiratory masks among many other things.
Last month, state regulators required Steward to shut down St. Luke’s Behavioral Center in Phoenix, Arizona after they found that it had been without air conditioning as temperatures soared past 100 degrees putting more than 70 patients at risk of heat exposure.
Steward has also shut down pediatric wards in Massachusetts and Louisiana, closed neonatal units in Florida and Texas, and eliminated maternity services at a hospital in Florida.
We know that Steward has gone bankrupt. We know that several of its hospitals have already been forced to close their doors because they ran out of money.
But how is Dr. de la Torre doing financially? While hospitals shut down, while patients go without care, while health care workers lose their jobs, how has Dr. De La Torre been doing financially?
The reality is that Dr. de la Torre is doing phenomenally well.
While Steward was busy shutting down hospitals,
the companies he owns received $250 million in compensation over a 4-year period. Let me repeat, he personally received hundreds of millions of dollars, some of which he used to purchase this $40 million yacht. (Chart 1: Yacht.)
While Steward’s hospitals were severely understaffed, Dr. de la Torre was able to afford this $15 million custom-made, luxury fishing boat. (Chart 2: Luxury fishing boat.)
While Steward-owned hospitals could not afford to pay for life-saving medical supplies, it had enough money to purchase a $62 million private jet and, incredibly, a $33 million backup jet that Dr. de la Torre and his family used for non-business trips throughout the world. (Charts 3 and 4: Private jets.)
While Steward’s hospitals were laying off hundreds of workers, Dr. de la Torre made a $10 million charitable contribution to an exclusive prep school in Dallas that was fully paid for by Steward Health Care, not his own personal funds.
How many of Steward’s hospitals could have been prevented from closing down, how many lives could have been saved, how many health care workers would still have their jobs if Dr. de la Torre spent $160 million on high-quality health care at the hospitals he managed instead of a yacht, two private jets, a luxury fishing boat and a massive contribution to a wealthy prep school?
Today, we will be hearing from nurses in Massachusetts and from public officials in Louisiana who have first hand knowledge of the harm Steward has caused to patients, health care workers and the communities in which they live. I look forward to hearing from them soon.
As the Chairman of this Committee, I look forward to working with Ranking Member Cassidy, Senator Markey and every Senator to hold Dr. de la Torre accountable for his financial mismanagement and his greed.
But let’s be clear: Dr. de la Torre did not act alone.
Who else besides Dr. de la Torre benefitted financially as a result of Steward’s bankruptcy?
Cerberus, the private equity firm he partnered with, made an estimated $800 million profit from its investments in Steward Health Care.
From 2017 through 2021, the CEO of Medical Properties Trust received about $70 million in bonuses, stock awards and salary. How much of his total compensation came as a result of its financial arrangements with Steward?
The collapse of Steward Health Care is just one extreme example of the damaging role private equity is having on our health care system.
Private equity firms have bought up hundreds of hospitals, thousands of nursing homes, and tens of thousands of medical practices – saddling them up with unsustainable debt – and stripping their assets to make huge profits for their executives and investors.
Study after study has shown that, on average, when a private equity firm takes over a hospital, a nursing home or another medical provider, the price of health care goes up, the quality of health care goes down, and health care workers are asked to do much more work with fewer and fewer staff.
The issue of private equity in health care is an issue this Committee must look into. We cannot allow wealthy private equity executives to treat our health care system as their own personal piggy bank.
Health care in America must be a fundamental human right for all, not a privilege for the wealthy few.
Senator Cassidy, you are recognized for an opening statement.
LATEST NEWS
UN Chief Warns of Israel's Syria Invasion and Land Seizures
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres stressed the "urgent need" for Israel to "de-escalate violence on all fronts."
Dec 12, 2024
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said Thursday that he is "deeply concerned" by Israel's "recent and extensive violations of Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity," including a ground invasion and airstrikes carried out by the Israel Defense Forces in the war-torn Mideastern nation.
Guterres "is particularly concerned over the hundreds of Israeli airstrikes on several locations in Syria" and has stressed the "urgent need to de-escalate violence on all fronts throughout the country," said U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric.
Israel claims its invasion and bombardment of Syria—which come as the United States and Turkey have also violated Syrian sovereignty with air and ground attacks—are meant to create a security buffer along the countries' shared border in the wake of last week's fall of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and amid the IDF's ongoing assault on Gaza, which has killed or wounded more than 162,000 Palestinians and is the subject of an International Court of Justice genocide case.
While Israel argues that its invasion of Syria does not violate a 1974 armistice agreement between the two countries because the Assad dynasty no longer rules the neighboring nation, Dujarric said Guterres maintains that Israel must uphold its obligations under the deal, "including by ending all unauthorized presence in the area of separation and refraining from any action that would undermine the cease-fire and stability in Golan."
Israel conquered the western two-thirds of the Golan Heights in 1967 and has illegally occupied it ever since, annexing the seized lands in 1981.
Other countries including France, Russia, and Saudi Arabia have criticized Israel's invasion, while the United States defended the move.
"The Syrian army abandoned its positions in the area... which potentially creates a vacuum that could have been filled by terrorist organizations," U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said at a press briefing earlier this week. "Israel has said that these actions are temporary to defend its borders. These are not permanent actions... We support all sides upholding the 1974 disengagement agreement."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders Says 'Political Movement,' Not Murder, Is the Path to Medicare for All
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," he said. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together."
Dec 12, 2024
Addressing the assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson and conversations it has sparked about the country's for-profit system, longtime Medicare for All advocate Sen. Bernie Sanders on Wednesday condemned the murder and stressed that getting to universal coverage will require a movement challenging corporate money in politics.
"Look, when we talk about the healthcare crisis, in my view, and I think the view of a majority of Americans, the current system is broken, it is dysfunctional, it is cruel, and it is wildly inefficient—far too expensive," said Sanders (I-Vt.), whose position is backed up by various polls.
"The reason we have not joined virtually every other major country on Earth in guaranteeing healthcare to all people as a human right is the political power and financial power of the insurance industry and drug companies," he told Jacobin. "It will take a political revolution in this country to get Congress to say, 'You know what, we're here to represent ordinary people, to provide quality care to ordinary people as a human right,' and not to worry about the profits of insurance and drug companies."
Asked about Thompson's alleged killer—26-year-old Luigi Mangione, whose reported manifesto railed against the nation's expensive healthcare system and low life expectancy—Sanders said: "You don't kill people. It's abhorrent. I condemn it wholeheartedly. It was a terrible act. But what it did show online is that many, many people are furious at the health insurance companies who make huge profits denying them and their families the healthcare that they desperately need."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system," he continued, noting the tens of thousands of Americans who die each year because they can't get to a doctor.
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," Sanders added. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together and understanding that it is the right of every American to be able to walk into a doctor's office when they need to and not have to take out their wallet."
"The way we're going to bring about the kind of fundamental changes we need in healthcare is, in fact, by a political movement which understands the government has got to represent all of us, not just the 1%," the senator told Jacobin.
The 83-year-old Vermonter, who was just reelected to what he says is likely his last six-year term, is an Independent but caucuses with Democrats and sought their presidential nomination in 2016 and 2020. He has urged the Democratic Party to recognize why some working-class voters have abandoned it since Republicans won the White House and both chambers of Congress last month. A refusal to take on insurance and drug companies and overhaul the healthcare system, he argues, is one reason.
Sanders—one of the few members of Congress who regularly talks about Medicare for All—isn't alone in suggesting that unsympathetic responses to Thompson's murder can be explained by a privatized healthcare system that fails so many people.
In addition to highlighting Sanders' interview on social media, Congressman Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) pointed out to Business Insider on Wednesday that "you've got thousands of people that are sharing their stories of frustration" in the wake of Thompson's death.
Khanna—a co-sponsor of the Medicare for All Act, led in the House of Representatives by Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)—made the case that you can recognize those stories without accepting the assassination.
"You condemn the murder of an insurance executive who was a father of two kids," he said. "At the same time, you say there's obviously an outpouring behavior of people whose claims are being denied, and we need to reform the system."
Two other Medicare for All advocates, Reps. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), also made clear to Business Insider that they oppose Thompson's murder but understand some of the responses to it.
"Of course, we don't want to see the chaos that vigilantism presents," said Ocasio-Cortez. "We also don't want to see the extreme suffering that millions of Americans confront when your life changes overnight from a horrific diagnosis, and people are led to just some of the worst, not just health events, but the worst financial events of their and their family's lives."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)—a co-sponsor of Sanders' Medicare for All Act—similarly toldHuffPost in a Tuesday interview, "The visceral response from people across this country who feel cheated, ripped off, and threatened by the vile practices of their insurance companies should be a warning to everyone in the healthcare system."
"Violence is never the answer, but people can be pushed only so far," she continued. "This is a warning that if you push people hard enough, they lose faith in the ability of their government to make change, lose faith in the ability of the people who are providing the healthcare to make change, and start to take matters into their own hands in ways that will ultimately be a threat to everyone."
After facing some criticism for those comments, Warren added Wednesday: "Violence is never the answer. Period... I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Reports Target Israeli Army for 'Unprecedented Massacre' of Gaza Journalists
"In Gaza, the scale of the tragedy is incomprehensible," wrote Thibaut Bruttin, director general of Reporters Without Borders.
Dec 12, 2024
Reports released this week from two organizations that advocate for journalists underscore just how deadly Gaza has become for media workers.
Reporters Without Borders' (RSF) 2024 roundup, which was published Thursday, found that at least 54 journalists were killed on the job or in connection with their work this year, and 18 of them were killed by Israeli armed forces (16 in Palestine, and two in Lebanon).
The organization has also filed four complaints with the International Criminal Court "for war crimes committed by the Israeli army against journalists," according to the roundup, which includes stats from January 1 through December 1.
"In Gaza, the scale of the tragedy is incomprehensible," wrote Thibaut Bruttin, director general of RSF, in the introduction to the report. Since October 2023, 145 journalists have been killed in Gaza, "including at least 35 who were very likely targeted or killed while working."
Bruttin added that "many of these reporters were clearly identifiable as journalists and protected by this status, yet they were shot or killed in Israeli strikes that blatantly disregarded international law. This was compounded by a deliberate media blackout and a block on foreign journalists entering the strip."
When counting the number of journalists killed by the Israeli army since October 2023 in both Gaza and Lebanon, the tally comes to 155—"an unprecedented massacre," according to the roundup.
Multiple journalists were also killed in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Mexico, Sudan, Myanmar, Colombia, and Ukraine, according to the report, and hundreds more were detained and are now behind bars in countries including Israel, China, and Russia.
Meanwhile, in a statement released Thursday, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) announced that at least 139 Palestinian journalists and media workers have been killed since the war in Gaza began in 2023, and in a statement released Wednesday, IFJ announced that 104 journalists had perished worldwide this year (which includes deaths from January 1 through December 10). IFJ's number for all of 2024 appears to be higher than RSF because RSF is only counting deaths that occurred "on the job or in connection with their work."
IFJ lists out each of the slain journalists in its 139 count, which includes the journalist Hamza Al-Dahdouh, the son of Al Jazeera's Gaza bureau chief, Wael Al-Dahdouh, who was killed with journalist Mustafa Thuraya when Israeli forces targeted their car while they were in northern Rafah in January 2024.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular