SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
For Immediate Release
February, 04 2025, 02:14pm EDT
Contact:
Tel: +1-212-216-1832,Email:,hrwpress@hrw.org
Suspend Arms Transfers to End US Complicity in Israeli Abuses
US-Supplied Weapons Linked to Israel’s Atrocities in Gaza
The United States will be complicit in the Israeli government’s grave violations in Gaza so long as it continues to provide arms and other military aid, Human Rights Watch said today ahead of a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Israeli authorities have committed war crimes, crimes against humanity, and acts of genocide during the country’s assault on Gaza.
The US has provided unprecedented security assistance and arms sales to Israel since the Hamas-led attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. Despite the Israeli forces’ repeated use of US weapons to carry out apparent war crimes in Gaza, the Biden administration continued to transfer arms, making the US complicit in their unlawful use.
“If President Trump wants to break with the Biden administration’s complicity in the Israeli government’s atrocities in Gaza, he should immediately suspend arms transfers to Israel,” said Bruno Stagno, chief advocacy officer at Human Rights Watch. “Trump said the hostilities in Gaza were ‘not our war’ but ‘their war,’ but unless the US ends its military support, Gaza will also be Trump’s war.”
US military assistance to Israel has increased since October 7, 2023, at least $17.9 billion in the year since, a Brown University study found. In March 2024, the Washington Post reported that the US had approved more than 100 military sales to Israel since the previous October, “amounting to thousands of precision-guided munitions, small-diameter bombs, bunker busters, small arms and other forms of lethal aid.” In early January 2025, the Biden administration informed Congress of an additional planned $8 billion sale of arms to Israel.
Gaza’s Health Ministry has reported that Israeli military operations in Gaza have resulted in the killing at least 47,000 Palestinians, and most likely many more. Israeli authorities have forcibly displaced virtually all of Gaza’s population, used starvation of civilians as a weapon of war, deliberately deprived civilians of water, electricity, medical aid, and other objects necessary for their survival, and damaged or destroyed Gaza’s essential infrastructure and the majority of homes, schools, universities, and hospitals. These actions amount to war crimes, crimes against humanity, and acts of genocide.
Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and dozens of media reports, including by CNN, NPR, the New York Times, the Washington Post, and AFP, have identified US weapons being used in Israeli attacks that killed and maimed scores of civilians and aid workers and most likely violated international humanitarian law.
Despite overwhelming evidence of the Israeli government’s disregard for the laws of war, then-President Biden did not stop US weapons shipments to Israel, beyond withholding at least one shipment of 2,000 pound bombs in the context of its “concern” about their use in the then-planned assault on Rafah in southern Gaza.
The International Law Commission said in a 2001 report that a state that significantly aids or assists another state in an internationally wrongful act is responsible for doing so if it does so with knowledge of the circumstances of the act. The commission noted: “For instance, a State may incur responsibility if it ... provides material aid to a State that uses the aid to commit human rights violations.”
Biden administration officials were well aware of the mounting evidence that Israeli forces have committed grave abuses in Gaza, including with US weapons. Human rights and humanitarian organizations and independent experts have submittedextensive documentation to the US government, and civil servants have said they submitted similar reports internally.
The International Court of Justice concluded that claims South Africa put forward in its case against Israel under the Genocide Convention of 1948 were “plausible” and the World Court’s provisional measures to safeguard Palestinians put the Biden administration on notice about the risk of atrocity crimes in Gaza.
Biden administration officials spoke openly about the Israeli government’s abuses. In November 2023, Secretary of State Antony Blinken said that “far too many Palestinians have been killed” by Israeli forces. A month later, President Biden described Israeli government attacks as “indiscriminate.” He later said that, days after the October 7 attacks, he told Netanyahu that Israel “can’t be carpet bombing” Gaza.
The Biden administration’s report to Congress in May 2024 on National Security Memorandum 20 concluded that Israeli security forces had most likely used US-provided arms in manners “inconsistent with its IHL [international humanitarian law] obligations.” Biden went further in a May 2024 CNN interview: “civilians have been killed in Gaza as a consequence of those bombs and other ways in which [Israel goes] after population centers,” which factored into withholding 2,000-pound bombs.
President Trump has approved releasing the 2,000-pound bombs to Israeli forces and called to “clean out that whole thing [Gaza],” which would amount to an alarming escalation in the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in Gaza.
US officials could also be found criminallyliable for “aiding and abetting” war crimes by Israeli forces. US forces have provided extensive intelligence that has been used in Israel’s targeting operations and closely coordinated with Israeli forces on planning military operations, as US officials haveacknowledged. Biden in October 2024 said that he “directed Special Operations personnel and our intelligence professionals to work side-by-side with their Israeli counterparts to help locate and track [Yahya] Sinwar and other Hamas leaders hiding in Gaza. With our intelligence help, the IDF [Israel Defense Forces] relentlessly pursued Hamas’s leaders.”
Multiplenewsagencies have reported that the US military, Central Intelligence Agency, and other US agencies have deployed troops and other operatives to work with Israeli authorities, including providing signals intelligence (information gleaned from surveillance of telecommunications) and “ground-penetrating radar.” The US also flew surveillance drones in the early days of the hostilities; while US officials linked this to hostage recovery, they have reportedly acknowledged that these efforts were invariably “intertwined” with the search for Hamas leaders.
The Intercept reported that the US Air Force in November 2023 sent US officers “to provide satellite intelligence to the Israelis for the purpose of offensive targeting.” US intelligence reportedly helped identify the location of four hostages whom Israeli forces rescued in a May 2024 operation that killed, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry, 274 Palestinians. US intelligence also reportedly stated that Palestinian armed groups operated within Al-Shifa Hospital, which Israeli authorities subsequently attacked, killing scores of people.
The Israeli government and Hamas reached a ceasefire agreement in January 2025, but Palestinian civilians in Gaza continue to suffer from a dire humanitarian situation and extensive damage from Israel’s unlawful blockade and assault.
The US should suspend military assistance and arms sales to Israel so long as Israeli forces commit widespread, serious abuses amounting to war crimes against Palestinian civilians with impunity. Given US provision of weapons used to carry out apparent war crimes, the US should also contribute to reparation and reconstruction in Gaza, Human Rights Watch said.
Providing military assistance to Israel also violates US law. Several statutes, including Section 502B of the 1961 Foreign Assistance Act, prohibit arms transfers to countries that do not adhere to the laws of armed conflict. Another section of that law bars the US from sending weapons to any country that “prohibits or otherwise restricts, directly or indirectly, the transport or delivery of United States humanitarian assistance,” which multiple US government agencies said Israel had done and Human Rights Watch had documented.
“President Trump said that the US will measure success in part by ‘the wars we never get into,’ but he promptly lifted a pause on 2,000-pound bomb shipments to the Israeli government,” Stagno said. “Trump should instead be taking steps to end support for Israeli government atrocities in Gaza.”
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Trump Has Begun Deportation Flights to Feared 'American Gulag' at Gitmo
"The administration's claim that there is a migrant 'invasion' is unfounded, and its mislabeling immigrants as 'terrorists' is diversionary—and neither makes offshore detention lawful," said one rights advocate.
Feb 04, 2025
"America can and must be better than this," said U.S. Rep. Pramila Jayapal Tuesday as the Trump administration announced it had begun operating deportation flights bound for Cuba, where President Donald Trump has said he wants to detain undocumented immigrants at the notorious Guantánamo Bay naval base and prison.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that the first flights authorized last week by Trump were underway, with the Department of Defense having deployed Marines to the U.S. base in Cuba on Sunday to begin expanding detention facilities.
Trump has called for the prison to be expanded to hold 30,000 people.
The flights announced Tuesday are the latest step in Trump's militarized anti-immigration operations, with 1,500 soldiers and Marines deployed to the southern U.S. border and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) conducting major immigration raids across the country.
According to reports, roughly half of the people arrested in cities such as New York and Chicago have had no criminal records and were guilty only of overstaying a visa or crossing the U.S.-Mexico border without going through a port of entry—civil violations of U.S. immigration laws rather than criminal offenses.
Last week, Leavitt said all undocumented immigrants, not just those who have committed violent crimes—whose arrests Trump had previously said would be prioritized—were criminals who had "invaded our nation's borders."
At Slate on Sunday, Pedro Gerson noted that Trump's "entire political rise is tethered to the idea that immigrants are invading the country and that only he can fix it."
"Trump intends to build in Guantánamo purposely to reify the same message that propelled him to power: Immigrants are criminals and they are here to hurt you," wrote Gerson. "But now Trump is going further: Some of these immigrants are not only criminals, they are equivalent to terrorists. Frighteningly, this move may also be Trump signaling an intent to strip undocumented immigrants of even more rights and treat them under similarly abusive conditions as recent Guantánamo Bay detainees have experienced."
Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem was vague in an interview with NBC News' "Meet the Press" on Sunday about who exactly would be sent to Guantánamo Bay, commonly known as Gitmo, via military planes.
When host Kristen Welker asked whether "women, children, and families" would be imprisoned there, Noem reverted back to the administration's previous claim that it is "targeting the worst of the worst" and detaining people who "are making our streets more dangerous."
"After that, we have final removal orders on many individuals in this country. They are the next priority," said Noem. "We're going to use the facilities that we have."
"Setting up an American gulag in the Caribbean in response to forced displacement in the Americas is a shameful low in U.S. history."
The mass detention facility was built by the Clinton administration to hold 12,500 inmates, and became infamous during President George W. Bush's administration for its detention of suspects in the so-called "War on Terror." Detainees have been held without charges in violation of the U.S. Constitution and have been subjected to torture. Fifteen detainees remain at the prison following the Biden administration's transfer of 11 people to Oman last month.
Trump's planned expansion of Gitmo's prison would result in "a detention facility of unprecedented size in the American context," wrote Gerson at Slate. "The Tule Lake Japanese internment camp, for example, had a capacity of around 18,000. If the Trump administration actually builds the detention camp in Guantanamo, it'll double in size Auschwitz-Birkenau's original design and be bigger than Dachau and Treblinka combined."
As Yael Schacher, director for the Americans and Europe at Refugees International, said in a statement, the U.S. prison was also used to "inhumanely [detain] Cuban and Haitian asylum-seekers in the 1990s."
"The Trump administration's use of military planes to send immigrants to detention at Guantánamo Bay epitomizes the administration's gratuitously cruel, illegal, expensive, and burdensome approach to immigration policy," said Schacher. "Guantánamo's Migrant Operations Center, which the Trump administration is sending Marines to expand, is truly a black box that no nongovernmental organization has been allowed to visit."
"The administration's claim that there is a migrant 'invasion' is unfounded, and its mislabeling immigrants as 'terrorists' is diversionary—and neither makes offshore detention lawful," Schacher added. "Members of Congress should investigate the move as a misuse of military assets. Setting up an American gulag in the Caribbean in response to forced displacement in the Americas is a shameful low in U.S. history."
Amy Fischer, director of refugee and migrant rights at Amnesty International USA, warned that mass deportation to Gitmo will "cut people off from lawyers, family, and support systems, throwing them into a black hole so the U.S. government can continue to violate their human rights out of sight."
"Sending immigrants to Guantánamo is a profoundly cruel, costly move," she said. "Shut Gitmo down now and forever!"
Keep ReadingShow Less
DOGE's Tentacles Aim to Squeeze Department of Education
Feb 04, 2025
The U.S. Department of Education is reportedly the next agency in the crosshairs of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, an Elon Musk-led White House team tasked with slashing government regulation and spending.
Roughly 20 people with DOGE are working inside the Department of Education with the aim of cutting spending and staff, The Washington Postreported Monday, citing three unnamed sources familiar with the situation and records the outlet obtained. The Wall Street Journal also reported that representatives from DOGE are working out of the Department of Education building, and sources told the outlet that DOGE is eyeing the agency as a target for its efforts to slash bureaucracy.
But in the long term, the Trump administration has even more drastic plans for the department that was established by Congress back in 1979. Both papers report that the administration is prepping an executive order aimed at dismantling the agency entirely.
According to the Journal, officials are discussing the an executive order that "would shut down all functions of the agency that aren't written explicitly into statute or move certain functions to other departments" and would also "call for developing a legislative proposal to abolish the department," according to people familiar with the matter. Timing and specifics are still being hammered out.
Because the agency was created by Congress, it therefore can only be fully eliminated by Congress, according to the Post.
Musk on Monday night wrote on his platform X that U.S. President Donald Trump's efforts to fully dismantle the Department of Education "will succeed." Trump pledged to get rid of the Department of Education on the campaign trail and the priority was also listed among the Heritage Foundation's "Project 2025" policy proposals.
"They want to destroy public education," wrote Alejandra Caraballo, an instructor at Harvard Law School Cyberlaw Clinic, in response to the Post's reporting.
Since Trump's inauguration, Musk and his lieutenants at DOGE have moved swiftly to gain influence over multiple government agencies. Last week, DOGE fired officials at the U.S. Agency for International Development and earlier this week Musk said he intended to shut it down completely. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Monday that he's now in control of the agency.
DOGE representatives were also given access to a Treasury Department payment system that processes trillions of dollars worth of financial transactions and holds personal financial data on millions of Americans. Two unions and an advocacy group sued Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and the Treasury Department in federal court Monday for giving DOGE access to the system, citing privacy concerns.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Federal Workers Sue Over Musk-Led 'Exfiltration' of Data Using Illegal Server
"Millions of Americans and the collective interests of the United States desperately need emergency intervention from the courts," said a supporter of the new lawsuit. "The constitutional crisis is already here."
Feb 04, 2025
A pair of unnamed federal employees filed a lawsuit on Tuesday seeking to stop lackeys of billionaire Elon Musk from using an illegally connected server to "ingest and store vast quantities" of highly sensitive personal information about government workers and contractors.
The complaint and request for a temporary restraining order, first reported by Wired, was filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, and it marks the latest in a flurry of high-stakes legal actions aimed at countering Musk's lawless and hostile takeover of key federal agencies and operations.
The new lawsuit was filed against the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), an obscure but important agency that has effectively been
seized by Musk associates.
"At some point after 20 January 2025," the complaint states, "OPM allowed unknown individuals to simply bypass its existing systems and security protocols and install one or more new systems to ingest and store vast quantities of [personally identifiable information] about Executive Branch employees (as well as an unknown number of contractors and Judicial Branch employees) for the stated purpose of being able to communicate directly with those individuals without involving other agencies."
"In installing these systems, OPM ignored entirely the rules Congress established in the E-Government Act of 2002 which would safeguard the personal data being transferred into and stored by these systems," the lawsuit continues. "In utilizing these systems to send numerous email messages to individuals across the Executive Branch and beyond, and then insisting that Executive Branch employees must reply by email to the same systems, OPM further exacerbated the situation."
"We are witnessing an unprecedented exfiltration and seizure of the most sensitive kinds of information by unelected, unvetted people with no experience, responsibility, or right to it."
The complaint points to reporting from Caleb Ecarma and Judd Legum, who wrote Tuesday that "a new server being used to control [government databases] has been placed in a conference room" at OPM "that Musk's team is using as their command center."
An anonymous OPM worker described the server as "a piece of commercial hardware they believed was not obtained through the proper federal procurement process," Ecarma and Legum reported.
According toReuters, "some senior career employees at OPM have had their access revoked to some of the department's data systems" including "a vast database called Enterprise Human Resources Integration, which contains dates of birth, Social Security numbers, appraisals, home addresses, pay grades and length of service of government workers."
Sean Vitka, policy director at the Demand Progress Action Fund—an advocacy group that's supporting the new lawsuit—said in a statement Tuesday that "Elon Musk and his team's incompetent and rapid efforts are putting millions of Americans in danger."
"We are witnessing an unprecedented exfiltration and seizure of the most sensitive kinds of information by unelected, unvetted people with no experience, responsibility, or right to it—all orchestrated by the richest man in the world, with billions on the line in other countries, including ones that have recently hacked exactly this kind of sensitive data," said Vitka. "Millions of Americans and the collective interests of the United States desperately need emergency intervention from the courts. The constitutional crisis is already here."
As the two federal employees brought their lawsuit, top Democrats on the House Oversight Committee demanded answers about the "server of unknown nature and origin" that was reportedly installed on OPM premises by Musk associates.
In a letter to Acting OPM Director Charles Ezell, Reps. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) and Shontel Brown (D-Ohio) demanded the names of "the individuals who installed and/or accessed the equipment" and information on "whether they were OPM employees at the time of their installation/access of the equipment."
"At best, the Trump administration's actions at OPM to date demonstrate gross negligence, severe incompetence, and a chaotic disregard for the security of our government data and the countless services it enables our agencies to provide to the public," Connolly and Brown wrote. "At worst, we fear that Trump administration officials know full well that their actions threaten to break our government."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular