To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
U.S. Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) participate in the news conference in the Capitol in Washington, D.C. on March 9, 2023.
As the election nears, Senate Democrats could capture the narrative by holding high-profile hearings interrogating oil industry bigshots.
With a divided Congress and an election fast approaching, congressional Democrats have little opportunity to enact any landmark legislation, but they need not sit on their hands. Congressional committees have the power to conduct hearings, investigations, and issue subpoenas. As the majority party in the Senate, Democrats should be using this authority to aggressively critique corporations that harm the public’s health and pocketbooks.
Public hearings bring issues to the forefront of conversation and create an opportunity to leverage successes electorally. Ideally, committee chairs would regularly harness this power to hold industries or specific bad actors accountable. In practice, it’s more of a mixed bag, representing a massive missed opportunity politically.
Nowhere is this clearer than the lack of hearings on oil and gas industry malfeasance and pollution. In May, the FTC accused ex-Pioneer CEO Scott Sheffield of a price fixing scheme with OPEC. A week later, Trump initiated an outrageous quid pro quo with industry executives when he requested $1 billion in campaign contributions in exchange for a rollback of environmental regulations. In March, a Stanford study found that methane leaks account for 3 percent of gas produced in the U.S., three times greater than the EPA’s 1 percent estimation. The result? A cost of at least $9.3 billion in climate damage per year.
If asking nicely isn’t inducing cooperation, perhaps a subpoena and the specter of jail time will.
Surely the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources has something to say about collusion and bribery in the energy sector, right? Obviously the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Work investigated the causes of excess methane emissions? Sadly, no. It’s hardly surprising for the Energy and Natural Resources committee—Senator Joe Manchin (I-WV) is the chair. Rather than hold the oil industry to account, Sen. Manchin would rather grill Interior Secretary Deb Haaland over the administration's plan to reduce oil and gas leases on federal lands.
Delaware Senator Tom Carper’s leadership of the Environment and Public Works committee is less explicable. To be fair, the committee has conducted oversight in the past: they brought in the CEO of Norfolk Southern to testify in the wake of the East Palestine derailment in March 2023. But there have been no hearings of that sort since, despite ample opportunity to do so.
One month after the study on methane emissions was released and widely covered in the press, the committee held a hearing “Examining the State of Air Quality Monitoring Technology.” This was a great opportunity to probe why the EPA estimates of methane emissions were drastically lower than actual emmisions and question whether companies took proper precautions to prevent leaks. Instead, methane was mentioned only once during the two hour hearing.
While these committees sat idly by, the Budget and Finance committees actually took steps to address Trump’s quid pro quo. In May, the committees jointly sent letters to industry leaders, including Chevron and ExxonMobil, requesting materials from the event, information about campaign donations, and copies of draft policy proposals. It was a good first step. But what happens when asking nicely doesn’t work?
Surely the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources has something to say about collusion and bribery in the energy sector, right?
Nearly four months after their first letters, having received “insufficient” responses with “inaccurate claims,” Senate Democrats followed up with … more letters. “Inaccurate claims” is merely a polite way of saying “lying” and, last I checked, lying to Congress is against the law. If oil and gas executives did not cooperate the first time, and are willing to lie in their statements to Congress, there’s no reason to believe they’ll do anything different two months out from an election that their partner-in-crime may win.
Democrats need to hold them accountable before it's too late, and the only way to do so is with subpoenas, both for the documents they’re seeking and appearances of the executives in front of Congress. Polling from More Perfect Union and Data For Progress showed that voters want Big Oil to face consequences for their role in pollution and high gas prices, but don’t think the government is taking action. Hearings that interrogate oil executives would signal to the public that Democrats in Congress aren’t letting oil companies off the hook and raise awareness of Trump’s promise to let oil interests run roughshod over Americans.
Thankfully, some Senate Democrats understand the importance of aggressively conducting oversight. In July, the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions’ (HELP) issued a subpoena to hospital executive Ralph de la Torre. As The American Prosepct previously reported, Torre is accused of woefully undersupplying his hospital chain while extracting millions to finance his extravagant lifestyle that features multiple yachts and private jets. Torre is defying the subpoena, but the HELP committee is not simply giving up—or asking again nicely. Committee Chair Bernie Sanders issued a statement stating that the HELP committee “will not accept” Torre’s efforts to skirt the subpoena. Senators Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey called for Torre to be held in contempt of Congress, which could lead to jail time, if he fails to appear.
Senate Democrats overseeing the oil and gas industry would be wise to learn from the HELP committee’s examples. Americans are fed up with corporate abuses across the economy, and they need to see their representatives in Congress cracking down on bad actors. Letters requesting information are good, but rolling over when executives refuse to comply is unacceptable. If asking nicely isn’t inducing cooperation, perhaps a subpoena and the specter of jail time will.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
With a divided Congress and an election fast approaching, congressional Democrats have little opportunity to enact any landmark legislation, but they need not sit on their hands. Congressional committees have the power to conduct hearings, investigations, and issue subpoenas. As the majority party in the Senate, Democrats should be using this authority to aggressively critique corporations that harm the public’s health and pocketbooks.
Public hearings bring issues to the forefront of conversation and create an opportunity to leverage successes electorally. Ideally, committee chairs would regularly harness this power to hold industries or specific bad actors accountable. In practice, it’s more of a mixed bag, representing a massive missed opportunity politically.
Nowhere is this clearer than the lack of hearings on oil and gas industry malfeasance and pollution. In May, the FTC accused ex-Pioneer CEO Scott Sheffield of a price fixing scheme with OPEC. A week later, Trump initiated an outrageous quid pro quo with industry executives when he requested $1 billion in campaign contributions in exchange for a rollback of environmental regulations. In March, a Stanford study found that methane leaks account for 3 percent of gas produced in the U.S., three times greater than the EPA’s 1 percent estimation. The result? A cost of at least $9.3 billion in climate damage per year.
If asking nicely isn’t inducing cooperation, perhaps a subpoena and the specter of jail time will.
Surely the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources has something to say about collusion and bribery in the energy sector, right? Obviously the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Work investigated the causes of excess methane emissions? Sadly, no. It’s hardly surprising for the Energy and Natural Resources committee—Senator Joe Manchin (I-WV) is the chair. Rather than hold the oil industry to account, Sen. Manchin would rather grill Interior Secretary Deb Haaland over the administration's plan to reduce oil and gas leases on federal lands.
Delaware Senator Tom Carper’s leadership of the Environment and Public Works committee is less explicable. To be fair, the committee has conducted oversight in the past: they brought in the CEO of Norfolk Southern to testify in the wake of the East Palestine derailment in March 2023. But there have been no hearings of that sort since, despite ample opportunity to do so.
One month after the study on methane emissions was released and widely covered in the press, the committee held a hearing “Examining the State of Air Quality Monitoring Technology.” This was a great opportunity to probe why the EPA estimates of methane emissions were drastically lower than actual emmisions and question whether companies took proper precautions to prevent leaks. Instead, methane was mentioned only once during the two hour hearing.
While these committees sat idly by, the Budget and Finance committees actually took steps to address Trump’s quid pro quo. In May, the committees jointly sent letters to industry leaders, including Chevron and ExxonMobil, requesting materials from the event, information about campaign donations, and copies of draft policy proposals. It was a good first step. But what happens when asking nicely doesn’t work?
Surely the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources has something to say about collusion and bribery in the energy sector, right?
Nearly four months after their first letters, having received “insufficient” responses with “inaccurate claims,” Senate Democrats followed up with … more letters. “Inaccurate claims” is merely a polite way of saying “lying” and, last I checked, lying to Congress is against the law. If oil and gas executives did not cooperate the first time, and are willing to lie in their statements to Congress, there’s no reason to believe they’ll do anything different two months out from an election that their partner-in-crime may win.
Democrats need to hold them accountable before it's too late, and the only way to do so is with subpoenas, both for the documents they’re seeking and appearances of the executives in front of Congress. Polling from More Perfect Union and Data For Progress showed that voters want Big Oil to face consequences for their role in pollution and high gas prices, but don’t think the government is taking action. Hearings that interrogate oil executives would signal to the public that Democrats in Congress aren’t letting oil companies off the hook and raise awareness of Trump’s promise to let oil interests run roughshod over Americans.
Thankfully, some Senate Democrats understand the importance of aggressively conducting oversight. In July, the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions’ (HELP) issued a subpoena to hospital executive Ralph de la Torre. As The American Prosepct previously reported, Torre is accused of woefully undersupplying his hospital chain while extracting millions to finance his extravagant lifestyle that features multiple yachts and private jets. Torre is defying the subpoena, but the HELP committee is not simply giving up—or asking again nicely. Committee Chair Bernie Sanders issued a statement stating that the HELP committee “will not accept” Torre’s efforts to skirt the subpoena. Senators Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey called for Torre to be held in contempt of Congress, which could lead to jail time, if he fails to appear.
Senate Democrats overseeing the oil and gas industry would be wise to learn from the HELP committee’s examples. Americans are fed up with corporate abuses across the economy, and they need to see their representatives in Congress cracking down on bad actors. Letters requesting information are good, but rolling over when executives refuse to comply is unacceptable. If asking nicely isn’t inducing cooperation, perhaps a subpoena and the specter of jail time will.
With a divided Congress and an election fast approaching, congressional Democrats have little opportunity to enact any landmark legislation, but they need not sit on their hands. Congressional committees have the power to conduct hearings, investigations, and issue subpoenas. As the majority party in the Senate, Democrats should be using this authority to aggressively critique corporations that harm the public’s health and pocketbooks.
Public hearings bring issues to the forefront of conversation and create an opportunity to leverage successes electorally. Ideally, committee chairs would regularly harness this power to hold industries or specific bad actors accountable. In practice, it’s more of a mixed bag, representing a massive missed opportunity politically.
Nowhere is this clearer than the lack of hearings on oil and gas industry malfeasance and pollution. In May, the FTC accused ex-Pioneer CEO Scott Sheffield of a price fixing scheme with OPEC. A week later, Trump initiated an outrageous quid pro quo with industry executives when he requested $1 billion in campaign contributions in exchange for a rollback of environmental regulations. In March, a Stanford study found that methane leaks account for 3 percent of gas produced in the U.S., three times greater than the EPA’s 1 percent estimation. The result? A cost of at least $9.3 billion in climate damage per year.
If asking nicely isn’t inducing cooperation, perhaps a subpoena and the specter of jail time will.
Surely the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources has something to say about collusion and bribery in the energy sector, right? Obviously the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Work investigated the causes of excess methane emissions? Sadly, no. It’s hardly surprising for the Energy and Natural Resources committee—Senator Joe Manchin (I-WV) is the chair. Rather than hold the oil industry to account, Sen. Manchin would rather grill Interior Secretary Deb Haaland over the administration's plan to reduce oil and gas leases on federal lands.
Delaware Senator Tom Carper’s leadership of the Environment and Public Works committee is less explicable. To be fair, the committee has conducted oversight in the past: they brought in the CEO of Norfolk Southern to testify in the wake of the East Palestine derailment in March 2023. But there have been no hearings of that sort since, despite ample opportunity to do so.
One month after the study on methane emissions was released and widely covered in the press, the committee held a hearing “Examining the State of Air Quality Monitoring Technology.” This was a great opportunity to probe why the EPA estimates of methane emissions were drastically lower than actual emmisions and question whether companies took proper precautions to prevent leaks. Instead, methane was mentioned only once during the two hour hearing.
While these committees sat idly by, the Budget and Finance committees actually took steps to address Trump’s quid pro quo. In May, the committees jointly sent letters to industry leaders, including Chevron and ExxonMobil, requesting materials from the event, information about campaign donations, and copies of draft policy proposals. It was a good first step. But what happens when asking nicely doesn’t work?
Surely the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources has something to say about collusion and bribery in the energy sector, right?
Nearly four months after their first letters, having received “insufficient” responses with “inaccurate claims,” Senate Democrats followed up with … more letters. “Inaccurate claims” is merely a polite way of saying “lying” and, last I checked, lying to Congress is against the law. If oil and gas executives did not cooperate the first time, and are willing to lie in their statements to Congress, there’s no reason to believe they’ll do anything different two months out from an election that their partner-in-crime may win.
Democrats need to hold them accountable before it's too late, and the only way to do so is with subpoenas, both for the documents they’re seeking and appearances of the executives in front of Congress. Polling from More Perfect Union and Data For Progress showed that voters want Big Oil to face consequences for their role in pollution and high gas prices, but don’t think the government is taking action. Hearings that interrogate oil executives would signal to the public that Democrats in Congress aren’t letting oil companies off the hook and raise awareness of Trump’s promise to let oil interests run roughshod over Americans.
Thankfully, some Senate Democrats understand the importance of aggressively conducting oversight. In July, the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions’ (HELP) issued a subpoena to hospital executive Ralph de la Torre. As The American Prosepct previously reported, Torre is accused of woefully undersupplying his hospital chain while extracting millions to finance his extravagant lifestyle that features multiple yachts and private jets. Torre is defying the subpoena, but the HELP committee is not simply giving up—or asking again nicely. Committee Chair Bernie Sanders issued a statement stating that the HELP committee “will not accept” Torre’s efforts to skirt the subpoena. Senators Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey called for Torre to be held in contempt of Congress, which could lead to jail time, if he fails to appear.
Senate Democrats overseeing the oil and gas industry would be wise to learn from the HELP committee’s examples. Americans are fed up with corporate abuses across the economy, and they need to see their representatives in Congress cracking down on bad actors. Letters requesting information are good, but rolling over when executives refuse to comply is unacceptable. If asking nicely isn’t inducing cooperation, perhaps a subpoena and the specter of jail time will.