SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Immigrants who are going through the asylum-seeking process get off a van after being released from the Port Isabel Detention Center in Brownsville, Texas, ahead of the end of the Title 42 measure on December 17, 2022.
Lawmakers must act swiftly to enshrine the right to fundamental dignity and fairness into law by guaranteeing high-quality representation for all people whose life, liberty, or community ties are at risk in the immigration system.
As Jonathan languished in U.S. immigration detention he reflected on how he had fled terror and violence in El Salvador as a teenager. He was unaware that he was eligible to remain in the United States under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NACARA), a 1997 law passed to help tens of thousands of Central Americans in the 1980s. He had never heard of NACARA, and would have almost certainly been deported, if a publicly funded attorney had not stepped in to help protect his rights.
People facing deportation—and especially those detained by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)—enter a dehumanizing and opaque system that is almost impossible to navigate, much less escape without an attorney. If they cannot afford legal representation, they are all but doomed to deportation.
Like Jonathan, Ramon had a legal path to remain in the United States. Ramon came to this country when he was 10 years old. After many years of living in the United States and raising three children in Los Angeles, his life was disrupted when he was sent to Adelanto Detention Facility. He spent six terrifying months there before a publicly funded attorney helped him prepare a bond package—including paperwork like pay stubs, letters of support, and evidence of community involvement—that won his freedom and allowed him to stay near his children.
Legal representation can mean the difference between family reunification and deportation
In response to injustices like these, a growing number of municipalities now offer publicly funded attorneys to protect the rights of their neighbors, friends, and co-workers who face deportation. By helping to keep families and communities together, legal representation increases stability and makes communities safer and stronger. From Los Angeles to Philadelphia, from Nevada to Colorado, elected officials in more than 55 jurisdictions in 21 states see deportation defense as an investment in their communities. However, millions of people are still left out.
These local programs provide a roadmap to justice nationwide, one that the Fairness to Freedom Act promises to implement. The bill, introduced in Congress by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and Rep. Norma Torres (D-Calif.) last week, would establish federally funded universal representation that guarantees quality representation for everyone facing deportation. People across the country are in favor of this and agree that no one should face immigration court on their own. This is a bi-partisan issue: two in three people in the United States support government-funded representation for people facing deportation, including 80 percent of Democrats and more than half of Republicans.
Legal representation can mean the difference between family reunification and deportation, especially for people like Ana. Ana fled violence in Guatemala and was separated from her young son at the U.S. border, before a Long Beach Justice Fund attorney helped her get out of detention and apply for asylum, a painstaking process that requires reams of complicated paperwork.
Since 2001, 93 percent of people granted relief from deportation have had legal representation. Detained immigrants without lawyers prevail in just three percent of their cases. The need even extends to people who were born in the U.S. and are U.S. citizens, since some have been deported when they did not have an attorney to protect their rights. The Fairness to Freedom Act changes that, bringing the principles of justice behind public defense to another part of the legal system. About 60 years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional to force someone unable to afford an attorney to defend themself against the full weight of the state in criminal court. But right now, that’s exactly the situation before nearly 60 percent [LN3] of people in immigration court proceedings, which are considered civil, not criminal, matters, despite the dire consequences.
No one should be deported simply because they can’t afford an attorney.
In our respective work, we have partnered with more than 170 civil rights organizations, immigrant justice groups, legal service providers, and government leaders to build publicly funded deportation defense programs that have helped people like Paul, a Nigerian immigrant who presented himself at the border and requested asylum as the law allows. He was shackled and sent to a jail in Albany, New York, and then a detention center in Buffalo. He languished there for 15 months before a publicly funded attorney helped secure his release.
Passing the Fairness to Freedom Act will help deliver justice in cases like these nationwide, establishing the right to counsel for people who cannot afford it and creating a nonpartisan entity called the Office of Immigration Representation to implement it nationally. This will help ensure all people facing deportation have high-quality, holistic legal representation.
Congress must act swiftly to enshrine the right to fundamental dignity and fairness into law by guaranteeing high-quality representation for all people whose life, liberty, or community ties are at risk in the immigration system. This is consistent with our highest aspirations as a nation, including our fundamental belief in due process and justice for all. No one should be deported simply because they can’t afford an attorney.
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Nicholas Turner is the president and director of the Vera Institute of Justice, a national organization of advocates, researchers, and policy experts working to transform the criminal legal and immigration systems until they’re fair for all.
Nicole Melaku is the executive director of the National Partnership for New Americans (NPNA). Nicole brings over a decade of experience working on immigrant and refugee issues at the local, state, and national levels. As NPNA’s executive director, she works to harness the collective power of NPNA’s 60 member organizations across 40 states to advance immigrant inclusion efforts through advocacy, organizing campaigns, and policy initiatives. Prior to joining NPNA, she led the Colorado Immigrant Rights Coalition where she expanded the coalition to over 90 members and who worked together to pass some of the nation’s most affirmative immigrant and refugee policies in the nation including the passage of Colorado’s first legal defense fund in the City of Denver.
As Jonathan languished in U.S. immigration detention he reflected on how he had fled terror and violence in El Salvador as a teenager. He was unaware that he was eligible to remain in the United States under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NACARA), a 1997 law passed to help tens of thousands of Central Americans in the 1980s. He had never heard of NACARA, and would have almost certainly been deported, if a publicly funded attorney had not stepped in to help protect his rights.
People facing deportation—and especially those detained by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)—enter a dehumanizing and opaque system that is almost impossible to navigate, much less escape without an attorney. If they cannot afford legal representation, they are all but doomed to deportation.
Like Jonathan, Ramon had a legal path to remain in the United States. Ramon came to this country when he was 10 years old. After many years of living in the United States and raising three children in Los Angeles, his life was disrupted when he was sent to Adelanto Detention Facility. He spent six terrifying months there before a publicly funded attorney helped him prepare a bond package—including paperwork like pay stubs, letters of support, and evidence of community involvement—that won his freedom and allowed him to stay near his children.
Legal representation can mean the difference between family reunification and deportation
In response to injustices like these, a growing number of municipalities now offer publicly funded attorneys to protect the rights of their neighbors, friends, and co-workers who face deportation. By helping to keep families and communities together, legal representation increases stability and makes communities safer and stronger. From Los Angeles to Philadelphia, from Nevada to Colorado, elected officials in more than 55 jurisdictions in 21 states see deportation defense as an investment in their communities. However, millions of people are still left out.
These local programs provide a roadmap to justice nationwide, one that the Fairness to Freedom Act promises to implement. The bill, introduced in Congress by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and Rep. Norma Torres (D-Calif.) last week, would establish federally funded universal representation that guarantees quality representation for everyone facing deportation. People across the country are in favor of this and agree that no one should face immigration court on their own. This is a bi-partisan issue: two in three people in the United States support government-funded representation for people facing deportation, including 80 percent of Democrats and more than half of Republicans.
Legal representation can mean the difference between family reunification and deportation, especially for people like Ana. Ana fled violence in Guatemala and was separated from her young son at the U.S. border, before a Long Beach Justice Fund attorney helped her get out of detention and apply for asylum, a painstaking process that requires reams of complicated paperwork.
Since 2001, 93 percent of people granted relief from deportation have had legal representation. Detained immigrants without lawyers prevail in just three percent of their cases. The need even extends to people who were born in the U.S. and are U.S. citizens, since some have been deported when they did not have an attorney to protect their rights. The Fairness to Freedom Act changes that, bringing the principles of justice behind public defense to another part of the legal system. About 60 years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional to force someone unable to afford an attorney to defend themself against the full weight of the state in criminal court. But right now, that’s exactly the situation before nearly 60 percent [LN3] of people in immigration court proceedings, which are considered civil, not criminal, matters, despite the dire consequences.
No one should be deported simply because they can’t afford an attorney.
In our respective work, we have partnered with more than 170 civil rights organizations, immigrant justice groups, legal service providers, and government leaders to build publicly funded deportation defense programs that have helped people like Paul, a Nigerian immigrant who presented himself at the border and requested asylum as the law allows. He was shackled and sent to a jail in Albany, New York, and then a detention center in Buffalo. He languished there for 15 months before a publicly funded attorney helped secure his release.
Passing the Fairness to Freedom Act will help deliver justice in cases like these nationwide, establishing the right to counsel for people who cannot afford it and creating a nonpartisan entity called the Office of Immigration Representation to implement it nationally. This will help ensure all people facing deportation have high-quality, holistic legal representation.
Congress must act swiftly to enshrine the right to fundamental dignity and fairness into law by guaranteeing high-quality representation for all people whose life, liberty, or community ties are at risk in the immigration system. This is consistent with our highest aspirations as a nation, including our fundamental belief in due process and justice for all. No one should be deported simply because they can’t afford an attorney.
Nicholas Turner is the president and director of the Vera Institute of Justice, a national organization of advocates, researchers, and policy experts working to transform the criminal legal and immigration systems until they’re fair for all.
Nicole Melaku is the executive director of the National Partnership for New Americans (NPNA). Nicole brings over a decade of experience working on immigrant and refugee issues at the local, state, and national levels. As NPNA’s executive director, she works to harness the collective power of NPNA’s 60 member organizations across 40 states to advance immigrant inclusion efforts through advocacy, organizing campaigns, and policy initiatives. Prior to joining NPNA, she led the Colorado Immigrant Rights Coalition where she expanded the coalition to over 90 members and who worked together to pass some of the nation’s most affirmative immigrant and refugee policies in the nation including the passage of Colorado’s first legal defense fund in the City of Denver.
As Jonathan languished in U.S. immigration detention he reflected on how he had fled terror and violence in El Salvador as a teenager. He was unaware that he was eligible to remain in the United States under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NACARA), a 1997 law passed to help tens of thousands of Central Americans in the 1980s. He had never heard of NACARA, and would have almost certainly been deported, if a publicly funded attorney had not stepped in to help protect his rights.
People facing deportation—and especially those detained by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)—enter a dehumanizing and opaque system that is almost impossible to navigate, much less escape without an attorney. If they cannot afford legal representation, they are all but doomed to deportation.
Like Jonathan, Ramon had a legal path to remain in the United States. Ramon came to this country when he was 10 years old. After many years of living in the United States and raising three children in Los Angeles, his life was disrupted when he was sent to Adelanto Detention Facility. He spent six terrifying months there before a publicly funded attorney helped him prepare a bond package—including paperwork like pay stubs, letters of support, and evidence of community involvement—that won his freedom and allowed him to stay near his children.
Legal representation can mean the difference between family reunification and deportation
In response to injustices like these, a growing number of municipalities now offer publicly funded attorneys to protect the rights of their neighbors, friends, and co-workers who face deportation. By helping to keep families and communities together, legal representation increases stability and makes communities safer and stronger. From Los Angeles to Philadelphia, from Nevada to Colorado, elected officials in more than 55 jurisdictions in 21 states see deportation defense as an investment in their communities. However, millions of people are still left out.
These local programs provide a roadmap to justice nationwide, one that the Fairness to Freedom Act promises to implement. The bill, introduced in Congress by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and Rep. Norma Torres (D-Calif.) last week, would establish federally funded universal representation that guarantees quality representation for everyone facing deportation. People across the country are in favor of this and agree that no one should face immigration court on their own. This is a bi-partisan issue: two in three people in the United States support government-funded representation for people facing deportation, including 80 percent of Democrats and more than half of Republicans.
Legal representation can mean the difference between family reunification and deportation, especially for people like Ana. Ana fled violence in Guatemala and was separated from her young son at the U.S. border, before a Long Beach Justice Fund attorney helped her get out of detention and apply for asylum, a painstaking process that requires reams of complicated paperwork.
Since 2001, 93 percent of people granted relief from deportation have had legal representation. Detained immigrants without lawyers prevail in just three percent of their cases. The need even extends to people who were born in the U.S. and are U.S. citizens, since some have been deported when they did not have an attorney to protect their rights. The Fairness to Freedom Act changes that, bringing the principles of justice behind public defense to another part of the legal system. About 60 years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional to force someone unable to afford an attorney to defend themself against the full weight of the state in criminal court. But right now, that’s exactly the situation before nearly 60 percent [LN3] of people in immigration court proceedings, which are considered civil, not criminal, matters, despite the dire consequences.
No one should be deported simply because they can’t afford an attorney.
In our respective work, we have partnered with more than 170 civil rights organizations, immigrant justice groups, legal service providers, and government leaders to build publicly funded deportation defense programs that have helped people like Paul, a Nigerian immigrant who presented himself at the border and requested asylum as the law allows. He was shackled and sent to a jail in Albany, New York, and then a detention center in Buffalo. He languished there for 15 months before a publicly funded attorney helped secure his release.
Passing the Fairness to Freedom Act will help deliver justice in cases like these nationwide, establishing the right to counsel for people who cannot afford it and creating a nonpartisan entity called the Office of Immigration Representation to implement it nationally. This will help ensure all people facing deportation have high-quality, holistic legal representation.
Congress must act swiftly to enshrine the right to fundamental dignity and fairness into law by guaranteeing high-quality representation for all people whose life, liberty, or community ties are at risk in the immigration system. This is consistent with our highest aspirations as a nation, including our fundamental belief in due process and justice for all. No one should be deported simply because they can’t afford an attorney.
"The FTC is an independent agency founded 111 years ago to fight fraudsters and monopolists," said fired commissioner Alvaro Bedoya. "Now, the president wants the FTC to be a lap dog for his golfing buddies."
U.S. President Donald Trump said he fired the two Democrats on the Federal Trade Commission Tuesday, a move blasted by consumer rights and democracy advocates as yet another illegal abuse of power by the twice-impeached Republican felon.
The White House announced the termination of Commissioners Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya from the FTC, a five-member body tasked with enforcing civil antiitrust law and protecting consumers.
"Today the president illegally fired me from my position as a federal trade commissioner, violating the plain language of a statute and clear Supreme Court precedent," Slaughter said in a statement. "Why? Because I have a voice. And he is afraid of what I'll tell the American people."
Just got a statement from Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, a Democratic FTC commissioner, who was unlawfully fired today, furthering a showdown in the courts over control of independent agencies.
[image or embed]
— David Dayen (@ddayen.bsky.social) March 18, 2025 at 2:22 PM
"The administration clearly fears the accountability that opposition voices would provide if the president orders Chair [Andrew] Ferguson to treat the most powerful corporations and their executives—like those that flanked the president at his inauguration—with kid gloves," Slaughter continued, referring to multibillionaire tech CEOs Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, and Mark Zuckerberg.
Last month, Ferguson endorsed the fringe legal theory that the president can terminate commissioners without cause—despite federal legislation against this. Bolstered by obsequious Republicans in his administration and Congress as well as a Supreme Court that critics say has granted the president king-like powers, Trump has moved to assert greater control over the federal government, including agencies meant to be independent.
Bedoya
wrote on social media: "The president just illegally fired me. This is corruption, plain and simple."
Full statement of @bedoyaftc.bsky.social, in my opinion the best FTC commissioner ever to commish, who was just fired by Trump
[image or embed]
— Evan Greer (@evangreer.bsky.social) March 18, 2025 at 2:22 PM
"The FTC is an independent agency founded 111 years ago to fight fraudsters and monopolists, our staff is unafraid of the Martin Shkrelis and Jeff Bezos of the world. They take them to court and they win," Bedoya continued. "Now, the president wants the FTC to be a lap dog for his golfing buddies."
"I'll see the president in court," he added.
Responding to Trump's move, Jeff Hauser, founder and executive director of the watchdog group Revolving Door Project, said that "on the surface, this constitutional crime is about law and process and other abstract topics people often tune out—but underneath, it is motivated by good old-fashioned greed that will hurt every one of us who isn't a corrupt financier."
"Americans are rapidly losing their defenders against corporate fraud and malfeasance," Hauser continued. "First, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was gutted illegally by billionaire Elon Musk and his lackeys. Now, Trump is attempting, without a legal basis, to fire the FTC's two Democratic commissioners."
"As antitrust enforcement dies out and a handful of corporations accumulate even more economic power, Americans will only have one person to blame for the new fraud economy: Donald Trump," he added.
Emily Peterson-Cassin, the corporate power director at Demand Progress Education Fund, warned: "President Trump's illegal attempt to fire Alvaro Bedoya and Rebecca Slaughter opens the floodgates to unfettered corruption and self-dealing. This reckless attack on the FTC invites a return to the rampant, corporate graft that brought on the Great Depression."
"Billionaires like Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and Jeff Bezos paid a lot for their concierge access to the White House and now President Trump is repaying their investment," she continued. "The FTC is currently investigating or suing many of the biggest corporations—including Google, which announced a multibillion-dollar merger just this afternoon."
"These illegal firing attempts put these investigations in doubt and could seriously curb the agency's power and responsibility to protect everyday Americans and honest, Main Street businesses from being scammed and trampled by megacorporations," Peterson-Cassin added. "With this action, the president is choosing to please his billionaire cronies, wreck the rule of law, and do generations of damage to a critical consumer protection agency."
"My arrest was a direct consequence of exercising my right to free speech as I advocated for a free Palestine and an end to the genocide in Gaza, which resumed in full force Monday night."
"My name is Mahmoud Khalil and I am a political prisoner."
That's the beginning of a letter from a former organizer of pro-Palestine protests at Columbia University who is fighting the Trump administration's effort to deport him. The letter, which he dictated from the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in Louisiana where he is now detained, was posted on social media Tuesday by groups representing him in court.
Khalil finished his graduate studies at Columbia in December. He is an Algerian citizen of Palestinian descent and was living in the United States with a green card when he was arrested by Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officers in New York City earlier this month. His family—including his wife Noor, who is a U.S. citizen and expecting their first child—shared a video of the arrest on Friday.
"DHS would not tell me anything for hours—I did not know the cause of my arrest or if I was facing immediate deportation," Khalil said Tuesday. "At 26 Federal Plaza, I slept on the cold floor. In the early morning hours, agents transported me to another facility in Elizabeth, New Jersey. There, I slept on the ground and was refused a blanket despite my request."
"My arrest was a direct consequence of exercising my right to free speech as I advocated for a free Palestine and an end to the genocide in Gaza, which resumed in full force Monday night," he continued. "With January's cease-fire now broken, parents in Gaza are once again cradling too-small shrouds, and families are forced to weigh starvation and displacement against bombs. It is our moral imperative to persist in the struggle for their complete freedom."
Khalil also called out administrative leaders at Columbia for not only enabling his arrest but also "the expulsion or suspension of at least 22 Columbia students—some stripped of their B.A. degrees just weeks before graduation—and the expulsion" of Grant Miner, president of United Auto Workers Local 2710, which represents thousands of student workers, on the eve of contract negotiations.
"If anything, my detention is a testament to the strength of the student movement in shifting public opinion toward Palestinian liberation," Khalil said. "Students have long been at the forefront of change—leading the charge against the Vietnam War, standing on the frontlines of the Civil Rights Movement, and driving the struggle against apartheid in South Africa. Today, too, even if the public has yet to fully grasp it, it is students who steer us toward truth and justice."
The letter came a day after Khalil's attorneys filed a motion asking the federal court in the Southern District of New York to immediately release the "recent Columbia graduate student, activist, soon-to-be father, and legal permanent resident."
Samah Sisay, staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights, said Monday that "as a result of the federal government's unlawful decision to detain and transfer Mahmoud Khalil to Louisiana in retaliation for his support for Palestinian rights, he faces the loss of his freedom, a profound silencing of his speech, lack of meaningful access to legal counsel, separation from his pregnant U.S. citizen wife, and the prospect of missing the birth of his first child. We filed an emergency bail motion because these extraordinary circumstances require Mr. Khalil's release—and the court has inherent authority to release him and send him home."
Crystal Carey is a partner at Morgan Lewis, the "top choice of union-busting rat bastards everywhere," one labor journalist said, highlighting how "Amazon has taken full advantage of their evil talents."
Amid widespread frustrations with U.S. President Donald Trump's attacks on working people, including his pursuit of an economic agenda "of, by, and for billionaires," the Republican is reportedly considering yet another betrayal: installing a partner at "a go-to union-busting law firm" as the next general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board.
That's according to David Dayen, executive editor of The American Prospect. Shortly after taking office in January, Trump fired NLRB General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo—and Democratic board member Gwynne Wilcox, who is fighting her ouster in court. Dayen exclusively reported Monday that Trump plans to replace Abruzzo with Crystal Carey from "the notorious anti-union law firm Morgan Lewis."
Carey is "a former NLRB attorney with experience on both the general counsel and board sides of the agency," according to her biography on the firm's website. Now, "she represents employers" across a wide range of industries for collective bargaining, labor law counseling, and NLRB investigations and litigation.
Since the 1950s, her firm has been "involved in some of the most prominent labor battles in America... from the 1981 air traffic controllers strike to efforts by McDonald's to resist the Fight for $15," Dayen explained. "One of Morgan Lewis' biggest current clients is Amazon, which used algorithmic management and surveillance tactics to prevent unionization at its warehouse in Bessemer, Alabama, in 2021. Amazon also has an active lawsuit that seeks to declare the NLRB unconstitutional."
While Dayen's multiple sources didn't know when a formal announcement would be made and the White House did not respond to a request for comment, the journalist—and many readers of his report—highlighted that "the selection would confirm that any talk of the second term of President Trump being in any way pro-labor was largely lip service or sheer fantasy."
The Philadelphia Council AFL-CIO said on social media: "Union-busting is disgusting, especially when it's coming from the highest office. When unelected billionaires have the ear of an already corrupt president, workers and working families will continue to be on the chopping block. This is what oligarchy looks like, folks."
Labor journalist Kim Kelly sarcastically said, "More great stuff from the 'pro-worker' administration."
"To emphasize how much this sucks, Morgan Lewis is *the* top choice of union-busting rat bastards everywhere and Amazon has taken full advantage of their evil talents to harass and intimidate low-wage workers in the South out of organizing," she added.
Jimmy Williams, general president of the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, said Trump's reported selection of Carey "comes as a complete shock to No ONE."
Some critics took aim at International Brotherhood of Teamsters president Sean O'Brien, who has repeatedly faced backlash for cozying up to Trump's GOP since he spoke at the Republican National Convention last summer. He also came under fire for praising Lori Chavez-DeRemer, Trump's labor secretary pick, who was confirmed last week.
Dayen noted that "labor secretary is not a big policymaking job, at least not compared to the NLRB general counsel. The general counsel sets priorities for NLRB cases, which govern union elections and rights in the workplace. The Labor Department has important priorities as well, but the work to end the slide in union density in the United States really begins at the NLRB."
In response to Dayen's reporting, Emma Lydon, managing director of government relations at Progressive Change Campaign Committee, said: "Great work, Sean O'Brien. Cozying up to fascists and billionaires really worked out well for all of us."
Jonathan Cohn, political director for Progressive Mass, similarly quipped, "Congratulations to Sean O'Brien!"
The labor podcast Work Stoppage said: "Thanks Sean O'Brien for claiming Trump wants to help U.S. workers! He just gave the most powerful labor law post in the country to one of the lawyers fighting the Teamsters at Amazon."
"Allying with the right didn't work for Teamsters" under former Presidents Richard Nixon or Ronald Reagan, the podcast's account added, "and it won't work now."