SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A participant wears a hat during a Hands Off! protest against US President Donald Trump and Elon Musk in downtown Toronto, Canada, on April 5, 2025. Hundreds of people rally in Toronto, one of more than 1,000 demonstrations globally, for a march organized by Democrats Abroad, an organization representing millions of Americans living abroad.
(Photo by Mike Campbell/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
On Second Thought, Maybe We Should Embrace Acquisition of Canada
The United States at the moment sure could use more good people with better politics. And Canada is full of them.
Apr 07, 2025
Do Americans who want to acquire Canada understand what we would be getting? Do they understand how much it would disadvantage Republican politicians?
Few of us know much about Canada. Teaching at a Michigan college less that 75 miles from Canada, I used to poll my freshman class to determine what they knew about the world. When I asked them to name the capital of Canada, most of them couldn't! Can you name it? If so, congratulations.
My students were intelligent, but just didn't know. But we would consider Canadians who can't identify our capital to be really dumb.
How many people in the U.S. know that Canada is a constitutional monarchy whose head of state is King Charles III of the United Kingdom?
Canadian statehood would make it much harder for Republicans to ever capture the White House again.
How many of us know that Canadians have national health insurance, a fact shared with nearly all other advanced countries other than the United States?
How many know that Canada is a federal system, with regional governments called provinces that are analogous to our states? How many of us can name even a few of those provinces? (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, and Quebec are the largest ones by population. Then throw in New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland/Labrador. )
If Canada were to become the 51st state, it would have a greater population than California, currently our largest state. If, instead, each of its provinces were to become states, only Prince Edward Island would have a smaller population than Wyoming, currently our smallest state.
Although Canada has conservative and liberal parties, most of its conservatives would be considered liberals in the United States.
If a united Canada became a single state, it would have the largest number of seats in our House of Representatives, and these seats would predominantly be held by people we would consider liberals. It would have two senators, who most likely would also be liberals.
On the other hand, if the ten Canadian provinces each became a state, each would have two seats in the Senate, mostly held by liberals, a total of 20 more senators.
Remember that the Electoral College through which our presidents are chosen gives each state one vote for each of its senators and members of the House. Canadians would have considerable leverage here.
Now consider the political situation in the U.S. if Canada, one way or the other, became part of our country. It would make it much less likely that we would ever elect another Republican president. And it would be a cold day in Honolulu before Republicans again controlled the House of Representatives.
If the ten Canadian provinces each became a state, each would have two seats in the Senate, mostly held by liberals, a total of 20 more senators.
It would require an act of Congress to admit Canada or its provinces into the Union. Congress has been unwilling to admit Washington, D.C. as a state, because Republicans fear—reasonably—that its two senate seats would always go to Democrats. How much would you bet that these self-same Republicans would support statehood for Canada? Under one scenario, statehood would probably add two safe senate seats for Democrats, and given the other scenario it could add as many as twenty seats for Democrats.
Let me repeat: Canadian statehood would make it much harder for Republicans to ever capture the White House again.
If you believe that Congress could ever support Canadian statehood, please contact me—I can offer you a great deal on a certain bridge.
If Mr. Trump really wants to incorporate Canada into the U.S., would he have recently decreed that English is our sole official language, given sentiments about language in Quebec, where French is the official language?
Given these political realities, what sense can we make of Donald Trump's persistent demands that Canada join the United States? My best guess is that he is trying to divert public attention from other things he is doing.
But I could be wrong. What do you think he is up to?
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Paul F. Delespinasse
Paul F. deLespinasse, who now lives in Oregon, is professor emeritus of political science at Adrian College in Michigan. He can be reached via his website, www.deLespinasse.org.
Do Americans who want to acquire Canada understand what we would be getting? Do they understand how much it would disadvantage Republican politicians?
Few of us know much about Canada. Teaching at a Michigan college less that 75 miles from Canada, I used to poll my freshman class to determine what they knew about the world. When I asked them to name the capital of Canada, most of them couldn't! Can you name it? If so, congratulations.
My students were intelligent, but just didn't know. But we would consider Canadians who can't identify our capital to be really dumb.
How many people in the U.S. know that Canada is a constitutional monarchy whose head of state is King Charles III of the United Kingdom?
Canadian statehood would make it much harder for Republicans to ever capture the White House again.
How many of us know that Canadians have national health insurance, a fact shared with nearly all other advanced countries other than the United States?
How many know that Canada is a federal system, with regional governments called provinces that are analogous to our states? How many of us can name even a few of those provinces? (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, and Quebec are the largest ones by population. Then throw in New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland/Labrador. )
If Canada were to become the 51st state, it would have a greater population than California, currently our largest state. If, instead, each of its provinces were to become states, only Prince Edward Island would have a smaller population than Wyoming, currently our smallest state.
Although Canada has conservative and liberal parties, most of its conservatives would be considered liberals in the United States.
If a united Canada became a single state, it would have the largest number of seats in our House of Representatives, and these seats would predominantly be held by people we would consider liberals. It would have two senators, who most likely would also be liberals.
On the other hand, if the ten Canadian provinces each became a state, each would have two seats in the Senate, mostly held by liberals, a total of 20 more senators.
Remember that the Electoral College through which our presidents are chosen gives each state one vote for each of its senators and members of the House. Canadians would have considerable leverage here.
Now consider the political situation in the U.S. if Canada, one way or the other, became part of our country. It would make it much less likely that we would ever elect another Republican president. And it would be a cold day in Honolulu before Republicans again controlled the House of Representatives.
If the ten Canadian provinces each became a state, each would have two seats in the Senate, mostly held by liberals, a total of 20 more senators.
It would require an act of Congress to admit Canada or its provinces into the Union. Congress has been unwilling to admit Washington, D.C. as a state, because Republicans fear—reasonably—that its two senate seats would always go to Democrats. How much would you bet that these self-same Republicans would support statehood for Canada? Under one scenario, statehood would probably add two safe senate seats for Democrats, and given the other scenario it could add as many as twenty seats for Democrats.
Let me repeat: Canadian statehood would make it much harder for Republicans to ever capture the White House again.
If you believe that Congress could ever support Canadian statehood, please contact me—I can offer you a great deal on a certain bridge.
If Mr. Trump really wants to incorporate Canada into the U.S., would he have recently decreed that English is our sole official language, given sentiments about language in Quebec, where French is the official language?
Given these political realities, what sense can we make of Donald Trump's persistent demands that Canada join the United States? My best guess is that he is trying to divert public attention from other things he is doing.
But I could be wrong. What do you think he is up to?
Paul F. Delespinasse
Paul F. deLespinasse, who now lives in Oregon, is professor emeritus of political science at Adrian College in Michigan. He can be reached via his website, www.deLespinasse.org.
Do Americans who want to acquire Canada understand what we would be getting? Do they understand how much it would disadvantage Republican politicians?
Few of us know much about Canada. Teaching at a Michigan college less that 75 miles from Canada, I used to poll my freshman class to determine what they knew about the world. When I asked them to name the capital of Canada, most of them couldn't! Can you name it? If so, congratulations.
My students were intelligent, but just didn't know. But we would consider Canadians who can't identify our capital to be really dumb.
How many people in the U.S. know that Canada is a constitutional monarchy whose head of state is King Charles III of the United Kingdom?
Canadian statehood would make it much harder for Republicans to ever capture the White House again.
How many of us know that Canadians have national health insurance, a fact shared with nearly all other advanced countries other than the United States?
How many know that Canada is a federal system, with regional governments called provinces that are analogous to our states? How many of us can name even a few of those provinces? (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, and Quebec are the largest ones by population. Then throw in New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland/Labrador. )
If Canada were to become the 51st state, it would have a greater population than California, currently our largest state. If, instead, each of its provinces were to become states, only Prince Edward Island would have a smaller population than Wyoming, currently our smallest state.
Although Canada has conservative and liberal parties, most of its conservatives would be considered liberals in the United States.
If a united Canada became a single state, it would have the largest number of seats in our House of Representatives, and these seats would predominantly be held by people we would consider liberals. It would have two senators, who most likely would also be liberals.
On the other hand, if the ten Canadian provinces each became a state, each would have two seats in the Senate, mostly held by liberals, a total of 20 more senators.
Remember that the Electoral College through which our presidents are chosen gives each state one vote for each of its senators and members of the House. Canadians would have considerable leverage here.
Now consider the political situation in the U.S. if Canada, one way or the other, became part of our country. It would make it much less likely that we would ever elect another Republican president. And it would be a cold day in Honolulu before Republicans again controlled the House of Representatives.
If the ten Canadian provinces each became a state, each would have two seats in the Senate, mostly held by liberals, a total of 20 more senators.
It would require an act of Congress to admit Canada or its provinces into the Union. Congress has been unwilling to admit Washington, D.C. as a state, because Republicans fear—reasonably—that its two senate seats would always go to Democrats. How much would you bet that these self-same Republicans would support statehood for Canada? Under one scenario, statehood would probably add two safe senate seats for Democrats, and given the other scenario it could add as many as twenty seats for Democrats.
Let me repeat: Canadian statehood would make it much harder for Republicans to ever capture the White House again.
If you believe that Congress could ever support Canadian statehood, please contact me—I can offer you a great deal on a certain bridge.
If Mr. Trump really wants to incorporate Canada into the U.S., would he have recently decreed that English is our sole official language, given sentiments about language in Quebec, where French is the official language?
Given these political realities, what sense can we make of Donald Trump's persistent demands that Canada join the United States? My best guess is that he is trying to divert public attention from other things he is doing.
But I could be wrong. What do you think he is up to?
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.