SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The Euro-American complicity in the genocide in Gaza has irreversibly shattered its normative power.
It is not only astonishing that Israel and its allies have utilized virtually every propaganda twist and lie to portray genocide as a “just” war of self-defense, but also that they have every confidence that the public will be repeatedly deceived.
“Buying time” to accomplish the destruction of Gaza is the ultimate objective of the deception campaign, as stated by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in October 2023.
The vaunted Israeli hasbara (official narrative-spinning) borrows from the well-tested and widely applied Euro-American colonial discourse to dehumanize the Palestinians.
Palestine is entwined with the broader struggle against colonial structures, ethics, and knowledge that has for decades licensed and abetted exploitation and eliminatory violence against colonized nations.
High-ranking Israeli political, military, intellectual, and media figures have presented Palestinians as “human animals,” “sons of darkness,” savages, uncivilized, terrorists, beheaders, burners of babies, sexual predators, new Nazis, and the like, all to paint genocide as a legitimate course of action.
Therefore, it did not take much for the Western liberal establishment and corporate media to embrace this discourse and to go even further by erasing Palestine and the Palestinian dispossession from the narrative. The New York Times is a case in point.
Tactics of deception worked during the early weeks of the wholesale onslaught on Gaza as Western political leaders acted as cheerleaders for the onslaught. Israel bought time to subject 2.3 million beleaguered men, women, and children to a relentless campaign of extermination, displacement, destruction, and starvation without much external distraction.
When the propaganda campaign lost its effect under the heavy weight of the unfolding genocide, Israel and its supporters turned instead to quashing those who bore witness and any dissenting voices.
From the outset, Israel resorted to physical methods. While foreign journalists were not allowed to report freely from Gaza, Israel has killed over 100 local journalists, and members of their families, since 7 October.
Recently, Al Jazeera, the only international media channel reporting live from Gaza, was forced to shut down.
Initially, liberal democratic, Western governments and institutions employed soft tactics to suppress dissent, including censorship, exclusion from mainstream media, smear, and character assassination.
However, as protests started to penetrate the intellectual base of society, particularly among university students, suppression tactics shifted to physical repression.
Thousands of university and college students and faculty were arrested and assaulted by the police and other security agents. Certain E.U. countries went as far as banning academics from voicing their dissent, both in person and online.Antisemitism has been cited to justify a physical crackdown on dissent in the West.
Israel and its allied Western governments and corporate media intensified their efforts to thrust center-stage the faux equivalence between anti-Zionism and antisemitism.
To do this, the U.S. and many European countries, including the U.K., France, and Germany, have utilized both judicial and extra-judicial tools developed since the release of the heavily criticized IHRA working definition of antisemitism in 2016, which has been weaponized and “intentionally used to create a chilling effect” on academic freedom as stated by its lead author Kenneth Stern.
This marks a further attempt to silence the growing critical voices of Israel, especially among university students and faculty.
This equivalency turns things upside down. Not only does it interdict dissent, freedom of speech and assembly, and academic freedom, but it also misleadingly presents the struggle and protest against settler-colonial oppression, apartheid, and genocide conducted by the Israeli state, government officials, and army as expressions of racism and hate speech against all Jews.
Such an equivalency is both anachronistic and inconsistent, particularly in its wholesale association of all Jews with Israel and Zionism, which in itself is an antisemitic generalisation. In reality, many Jews have never been or want to be associated with Israel or Zionism, and some are explicitly anti-Zionist.
It is worth recalling that in 1917, Edwin Montagu, the only Jewish member of the then British government, forcefully opposed Zionism on theological and political grounds.
These structures lay the foundations and background knowledge that can inform the development of similar practices to shut down protests of other subjugated groups and social movements.
This makes Palestine more than a provincial struggle for justice and freedom.
Palestine is entwined with the broader struggle against colonial structures, ethics, and knowledge that has for decades licensed and abetted exploitation and eliminatory violence against colonized nations, both in the Global South and Global North.
Israel’s settler-colonization of Palestine is part and parcel of these colonial structures. Israel not only applies western technology and weapons to kill en masse, but also uses the same knowledge, reason, and ethics to justify it.
The Palestinian quest for freedom and a non-colonial future powerfully vivifies the double consciousness, to use WEB Du Bois’s concept, of the oppressed across the globe.
On the one hand, Palestine evokes memories of exploitation, dispossession, humiliation, stolen children, slavery, Jim Crow laws, apartheid, white supremacy, and genocide inflicted by the Euro-American colonial powers. These colonial crimes were also justified and rationalized as moral practices and just wars.
For the Global South and Indigenous nations of the Global North, including Indigenous nations of the most liberal democratic states such as Sweden and Norway, such supremacist and colonial discourse and practices serve as reminders of their past and present experiences of Liberal oppression and colonialism, as perceptively captured by Naledi Pandor, the minister of international relations and cooperation in South Africa.
Western support to buy Israel extra time to carry out further extermination and destruction in Gaza did not, and will not, stop the struggle for transforming Palestine from the damned place of the Earth to a place of non-colonial humanity, where freedom and justice prevail for all from the river to the sea.
Through the lens of Gaza, Namibia’s President Nangolo Mbumba saw Germany’s atrocities in Africa, particularly the genocide of the Herero and Nama peoples between 1904 and 1908, to which it has “yet to fully atone,” as he put it.
On the other hand, the Palestinian struggle has reinvigorated our focus on Indigenous metaphysics, cultures, traditions, histories, knowledge, languages, and spirituality, elements that colonial Europe either suppressed, locked, or destroyed.
This development creates new pathways for decolonial thinking and emancipation beyond the shackles of colonial models.
The awakening of consciousness is unfolding at a crucial global juncture, as Western dominance in the realms of power, economy, and knowledge is receding.
In addition to brute force, Euro-American dominance relied on normative or soft power, particularly assertions of universal truth, objectivity, civilization, and recently the so-called rules-based international order. Colonial normative power has served as a bulwark that has alienated colonized nations and blocked their confidence.
The rise of the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) has marked the end of Western global dominance.
Meanwhile, the Euro-American complicity in the genocide in Gaza has irreversibly shattered its normative power. Such complicity goes beyond official state power and institutions associated with bodies that underpin this power, such as corporate media, university administrations, society elite, senior philosophers, corporations, and many others.
For centuries, Euro-American powers have amassed immense privileges at the expense of colonized, oppressed, and racialized people all around the world.
Losing privileges leads to disorientation and mental breakdown. Therefore, the application of physical force to quash dissent is likely to escalate in liberal Western democracies, especially when normative masks have fallen off.
What we are witnessing, the repression and restriction, might be just the beginning.
The Palestinian sumud (steadfast resistance) in the face of the genocidal war during the last eight months has repositioned the Palestinian moral and just cause at the center of the ethical struggle, shifting away from fixed ideologies as the younger generations on university campuses have demonstrated.
Western support to buy Israel extra time to carry out further extermination and destruction in Gaza did not, and will not, stop the struggle for transforming Palestine from the damned place of the Earth to a place of non-colonial humanity, where freedom and justice prevail for all from the river to the sea.
In the long struggle for freedom and equality, colonial oppression will ultimately be defeated.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
It is not only astonishing that Israel and its allies have utilized virtually every propaganda twist and lie to portray genocide as a “just” war of self-defense, but also that they have every confidence that the public will be repeatedly deceived.
“Buying time” to accomplish the destruction of Gaza is the ultimate objective of the deception campaign, as stated by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in October 2023.
The vaunted Israeli hasbara (official narrative-spinning) borrows from the well-tested and widely applied Euro-American colonial discourse to dehumanize the Palestinians.
Palestine is entwined with the broader struggle against colonial structures, ethics, and knowledge that has for decades licensed and abetted exploitation and eliminatory violence against colonized nations.
High-ranking Israeli political, military, intellectual, and media figures have presented Palestinians as “human animals,” “sons of darkness,” savages, uncivilized, terrorists, beheaders, burners of babies, sexual predators, new Nazis, and the like, all to paint genocide as a legitimate course of action.
Therefore, it did not take much for the Western liberal establishment and corporate media to embrace this discourse and to go even further by erasing Palestine and the Palestinian dispossession from the narrative. The New York Times is a case in point.
Tactics of deception worked during the early weeks of the wholesale onslaught on Gaza as Western political leaders acted as cheerleaders for the onslaught. Israel bought time to subject 2.3 million beleaguered men, women, and children to a relentless campaign of extermination, displacement, destruction, and starvation without much external distraction.
When the propaganda campaign lost its effect under the heavy weight of the unfolding genocide, Israel and its supporters turned instead to quashing those who bore witness and any dissenting voices.
From the outset, Israel resorted to physical methods. While foreign journalists were not allowed to report freely from Gaza, Israel has killed over 100 local journalists, and members of their families, since 7 October.
Recently, Al Jazeera, the only international media channel reporting live from Gaza, was forced to shut down.
Initially, liberal democratic, Western governments and institutions employed soft tactics to suppress dissent, including censorship, exclusion from mainstream media, smear, and character assassination.
However, as protests started to penetrate the intellectual base of society, particularly among university students, suppression tactics shifted to physical repression.
Thousands of university and college students and faculty were arrested and assaulted by the police and other security agents. Certain E.U. countries went as far as banning academics from voicing their dissent, both in person and online.Antisemitism has been cited to justify a physical crackdown on dissent in the West.
Israel and its allied Western governments and corporate media intensified their efforts to thrust center-stage the faux equivalence between anti-Zionism and antisemitism.
To do this, the U.S. and many European countries, including the U.K., France, and Germany, have utilized both judicial and extra-judicial tools developed since the release of the heavily criticized IHRA working definition of antisemitism in 2016, which has been weaponized and “intentionally used to create a chilling effect” on academic freedom as stated by its lead author Kenneth Stern.
This marks a further attempt to silence the growing critical voices of Israel, especially among university students and faculty.
This equivalency turns things upside down. Not only does it interdict dissent, freedom of speech and assembly, and academic freedom, but it also misleadingly presents the struggle and protest against settler-colonial oppression, apartheid, and genocide conducted by the Israeli state, government officials, and army as expressions of racism and hate speech against all Jews.
Such an equivalency is both anachronistic and inconsistent, particularly in its wholesale association of all Jews with Israel and Zionism, which in itself is an antisemitic generalisation. In reality, many Jews have never been or want to be associated with Israel or Zionism, and some are explicitly anti-Zionist.
It is worth recalling that in 1917, Edwin Montagu, the only Jewish member of the then British government, forcefully opposed Zionism on theological and political grounds.
These structures lay the foundations and background knowledge that can inform the development of similar practices to shut down protests of other subjugated groups and social movements.
This makes Palestine more than a provincial struggle for justice and freedom.
Palestine is entwined with the broader struggle against colonial structures, ethics, and knowledge that has for decades licensed and abetted exploitation and eliminatory violence against colonized nations, both in the Global South and Global North.
Israel’s settler-colonization of Palestine is part and parcel of these colonial structures. Israel not only applies western technology and weapons to kill en masse, but also uses the same knowledge, reason, and ethics to justify it.
The Palestinian quest for freedom and a non-colonial future powerfully vivifies the double consciousness, to use WEB Du Bois’s concept, of the oppressed across the globe.
On the one hand, Palestine evokes memories of exploitation, dispossession, humiliation, stolen children, slavery, Jim Crow laws, apartheid, white supremacy, and genocide inflicted by the Euro-American colonial powers. These colonial crimes were also justified and rationalized as moral practices and just wars.
For the Global South and Indigenous nations of the Global North, including Indigenous nations of the most liberal democratic states such as Sweden and Norway, such supremacist and colonial discourse and practices serve as reminders of their past and present experiences of Liberal oppression and colonialism, as perceptively captured by Naledi Pandor, the minister of international relations and cooperation in South Africa.
Western support to buy Israel extra time to carry out further extermination and destruction in Gaza did not, and will not, stop the struggle for transforming Palestine from the damned place of the Earth to a place of non-colonial humanity, where freedom and justice prevail for all from the river to the sea.
Through the lens of Gaza, Namibia’s President Nangolo Mbumba saw Germany’s atrocities in Africa, particularly the genocide of the Herero and Nama peoples between 1904 and 1908, to which it has “yet to fully atone,” as he put it.
On the other hand, the Palestinian struggle has reinvigorated our focus on Indigenous metaphysics, cultures, traditions, histories, knowledge, languages, and spirituality, elements that colonial Europe either suppressed, locked, or destroyed.
This development creates new pathways for decolonial thinking and emancipation beyond the shackles of colonial models.
The awakening of consciousness is unfolding at a crucial global juncture, as Western dominance in the realms of power, economy, and knowledge is receding.
In addition to brute force, Euro-American dominance relied on normative or soft power, particularly assertions of universal truth, objectivity, civilization, and recently the so-called rules-based international order. Colonial normative power has served as a bulwark that has alienated colonized nations and blocked their confidence.
The rise of the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) has marked the end of Western global dominance.
Meanwhile, the Euro-American complicity in the genocide in Gaza has irreversibly shattered its normative power. Such complicity goes beyond official state power and institutions associated with bodies that underpin this power, such as corporate media, university administrations, society elite, senior philosophers, corporations, and many others.
For centuries, Euro-American powers have amassed immense privileges at the expense of colonized, oppressed, and racialized people all around the world.
Losing privileges leads to disorientation and mental breakdown. Therefore, the application of physical force to quash dissent is likely to escalate in liberal Western democracies, especially when normative masks have fallen off.
What we are witnessing, the repression and restriction, might be just the beginning.
The Palestinian sumud (steadfast resistance) in the face of the genocidal war during the last eight months has repositioned the Palestinian moral and just cause at the center of the ethical struggle, shifting away from fixed ideologies as the younger generations on university campuses have demonstrated.
Western support to buy Israel extra time to carry out further extermination and destruction in Gaza did not, and will not, stop the struggle for transforming Palestine from the damned place of the Earth to a place of non-colonial humanity, where freedom and justice prevail for all from the river to the sea.
In the long struggle for freedom and equality, colonial oppression will ultimately be defeated.
It is not only astonishing that Israel and its allies have utilized virtually every propaganda twist and lie to portray genocide as a “just” war of self-defense, but also that they have every confidence that the public will be repeatedly deceived.
“Buying time” to accomplish the destruction of Gaza is the ultimate objective of the deception campaign, as stated by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in October 2023.
The vaunted Israeli hasbara (official narrative-spinning) borrows from the well-tested and widely applied Euro-American colonial discourse to dehumanize the Palestinians.
Palestine is entwined with the broader struggle against colonial structures, ethics, and knowledge that has for decades licensed and abetted exploitation and eliminatory violence against colonized nations.
High-ranking Israeli political, military, intellectual, and media figures have presented Palestinians as “human animals,” “sons of darkness,” savages, uncivilized, terrorists, beheaders, burners of babies, sexual predators, new Nazis, and the like, all to paint genocide as a legitimate course of action.
Therefore, it did not take much for the Western liberal establishment and corporate media to embrace this discourse and to go even further by erasing Palestine and the Palestinian dispossession from the narrative. The New York Times is a case in point.
Tactics of deception worked during the early weeks of the wholesale onslaught on Gaza as Western political leaders acted as cheerleaders for the onslaught. Israel bought time to subject 2.3 million beleaguered men, women, and children to a relentless campaign of extermination, displacement, destruction, and starvation without much external distraction.
When the propaganda campaign lost its effect under the heavy weight of the unfolding genocide, Israel and its supporters turned instead to quashing those who bore witness and any dissenting voices.
From the outset, Israel resorted to physical methods. While foreign journalists were not allowed to report freely from Gaza, Israel has killed over 100 local journalists, and members of their families, since 7 October.
Recently, Al Jazeera, the only international media channel reporting live from Gaza, was forced to shut down.
Initially, liberal democratic, Western governments and institutions employed soft tactics to suppress dissent, including censorship, exclusion from mainstream media, smear, and character assassination.
However, as protests started to penetrate the intellectual base of society, particularly among university students, suppression tactics shifted to physical repression.
Thousands of university and college students and faculty were arrested and assaulted by the police and other security agents. Certain E.U. countries went as far as banning academics from voicing their dissent, both in person and online.Antisemitism has been cited to justify a physical crackdown on dissent in the West.
Israel and its allied Western governments and corporate media intensified their efforts to thrust center-stage the faux equivalence between anti-Zionism and antisemitism.
To do this, the U.S. and many European countries, including the U.K., France, and Germany, have utilized both judicial and extra-judicial tools developed since the release of the heavily criticized IHRA working definition of antisemitism in 2016, which has been weaponized and “intentionally used to create a chilling effect” on academic freedom as stated by its lead author Kenneth Stern.
This marks a further attempt to silence the growing critical voices of Israel, especially among university students and faculty.
This equivalency turns things upside down. Not only does it interdict dissent, freedom of speech and assembly, and academic freedom, but it also misleadingly presents the struggle and protest against settler-colonial oppression, apartheid, and genocide conducted by the Israeli state, government officials, and army as expressions of racism and hate speech against all Jews.
Such an equivalency is both anachronistic and inconsistent, particularly in its wholesale association of all Jews with Israel and Zionism, which in itself is an antisemitic generalisation. In reality, many Jews have never been or want to be associated with Israel or Zionism, and some are explicitly anti-Zionist.
It is worth recalling that in 1917, Edwin Montagu, the only Jewish member of the then British government, forcefully opposed Zionism on theological and political grounds.
These structures lay the foundations and background knowledge that can inform the development of similar practices to shut down protests of other subjugated groups and social movements.
This makes Palestine more than a provincial struggle for justice and freedom.
Palestine is entwined with the broader struggle against colonial structures, ethics, and knowledge that has for decades licensed and abetted exploitation and eliminatory violence against colonized nations, both in the Global South and Global North.
Israel’s settler-colonization of Palestine is part and parcel of these colonial structures. Israel not only applies western technology and weapons to kill en masse, but also uses the same knowledge, reason, and ethics to justify it.
The Palestinian quest for freedom and a non-colonial future powerfully vivifies the double consciousness, to use WEB Du Bois’s concept, of the oppressed across the globe.
On the one hand, Palestine evokes memories of exploitation, dispossession, humiliation, stolen children, slavery, Jim Crow laws, apartheid, white supremacy, and genocide inflicted by the Euro-American colonial powers. These colonial crimes were also justified and rationalized as moral practices and just wars.
For the Global South and Indigenous nations of the Global North, including Indigenous nations of the most liberal democratic states such as Sweden and Norway, such supremacist and colonial discourse and practices serve as reminders of their past and present experiences of Liberal oppression and colonialism, as perceptively captured by Naledi Pandor, the minister of international relations and cooperation in South Africa.
Western support to buy Israel extra time to carry out further extermination and destruction in Gaza did not, and will not, stop the struggle for transforming Palestine from the damned place of the Earth to a place of non-colonial humanity, where freedom and justice prevail for all from the river to the sea.
Through the lens of Gaza, Namibia’s President Nangolo Mbumba saw Germany’s atrocities in Africa, particularly the genocide of the Herero and Nama peoples between 1904 and 1908, to which it has “yet to fully atone,” as he put it.
On the other hand, the Palestinian struggle has reinvigorated our focus on Indigenous metaphysics, cultures, traditions, histories, knowledge, languages, and spirituality, elements that colonial Europe either suppressed, locked, or destroyed.
This development creates new pathways for decolonial thinking and emancipation beyond the shackles of colonial models.
The awakening of consciousness is unfolding at a crucial global juncture, as Western dominance in the realms of power, economy, and knowledge is receding.
In addition to brute force, Euro-American dominance relied on normative or soft power, particularly assertions of universal truth, objectivity, civilization, and recently the so-called rules-based international order. Colonial normative power has served as a bulwark that has alienated colonized nations and blocked their confidence.
The rise of the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) has marked the end of Western global dominance.
Meanwhile, the Euro-American complicity in the genocide in Gaza has irreversibly shattered its normative power. Such complicity goes beyond official state power and institutions associated with bodies that underpin this power, such as corporate media, university administrations, society elite, senior philosophers, corporations, and many others.
For centuries, Euro-American powers have amassed immense privileges at the expense of colonized, oppressed, and racialized people all around the world.
Losing privileges leads to disorientation and mental breakdown. Therefore, the application of physical force to quash dissent is likely to escalate in liberal Western democracies, especially when normative masks have fallen off.
What we are witnessing, the repression and restriction, might be just the beginning.
The Palestinian sumud (steadfast resistance) in the face of the genocidal war during the last eight months has repositioned the Palestinian moral and just cause at the center of the ethical struggle, shifting away from fixed ideologies as the younger generations on university campuses have demonstrated.
Western support to buy Israel extra time to carry out further extermination and destruction in Gaza did not, and will not, stop the struggle for transforming Palestine from the damned place of the Earth to a place of non-colonial humanity, where freedom and justice prevail for all from the river to the sea.
In the long struggle for freedom and equality, colonial oppression will ultimately be defeated.