SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Pramila Jayapal
House Democrats Back Sanders Senate Effort to Halt Arms Sales to Israel
"The U.S. must use its leverage to safeguard civilian lives, secure a lasting cease-fire, and advance a pathway toward peace."
Nov 20, 2024
A group of progressives in the U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday endorsed Sen. Bernie Sanders' joint resolutions of disapproval that would block sales of American weapons to Israel as its troops continue to lay waste to the Gaza Strip.
Sanders (I-Vt.) introduced the resolutions in September and plans to force a vote on Wednesday. In a statement led by Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), the House members said that "if given the opportunity to do so, we would vote in favor of S.J. Res. 111, S.J. Res. 113, and S.J. Res. 115."
Jayapal was joined by Democratic Reps. Becca Balint (Vt.), Joaquin Castro (Texas), Lloyd Doggett (Texas), Sara Jacobs (Calif.), Barbara Lee (Calif.), Jim McGovern (Mass.), Mark Pocan (Wis.), and Jan Schakowsky (Ill.).
While condemning the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attack and backing "defensive systems that are designed to meet Israel's security needs," the nine House members also argued that "the United States must use all available leverage, including the suspension of offensive weapons transfers, to de-escalate the violence and protect the lives of hostages, including Americans, Palestinian civilians, and all those impacted by the ongoing conflict."
"We are and have been deeply alarmed by the Israeli military's conduct in Gaza, where independent human rights monitors have documented the use of U.S.-provided weaponry in violations of international law," they continued. "According to the Biden administration's own report, 'it is reasonable to assess' that Israeli security forces have used U.S. weapons to violate international humanitarian law. The humanitarian aid entering Gaza has also reached historic lows. In October, an average of 28 trucks per day crossed into Gaza, compared to a pre-war daily average of 500."
The coalition also pointed to the Biden administration's mid-October letter, which threatened to cut off U.S. weapons unless the Israeli government took "urgent and sustained actions" to improve humanitarian conditions in Gaza within 30 days.
"On November 4, 2024, State Department Spokesperson Matthew Miller stated Israel had so far 'failed' to implement the recommendations in the letter, and that assessment was substantiated by several humanitarian organizations," the lawmakers noted. "Despite this clear lack of progress, no meaningful action has been taken by the Biden administration to promote Israeli compliance with stated U.S. policy goals."
Sanders
announced plans to bring his resolutions to a vote after a U.S. State Department spokesperson last week responded to a question about the Biden administration's deadline by declaring that Israel is not violating federal and international law.
Warning that U.S. President-elect Donald Trump's return to the White House in January "will only embolden" Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his far-right ministers, the House members asserted that a vote for the resolutions "is a vote to politically restrain the Netanyahu government from any forthcoming efforts to formally annex the West Bank and settle parts of Gaza."
"We urge senators to support these joint resolutions of disapproval to block specific offensive arms sales to Israel, upholding U.S. law that prohibits arms transfers to countries that engage in a consistent pattern of gross violations of internationally recognized human rights or restrict the delivery of U.S. humanitarian assistance," the coalition concluded. "The U.S. must use its leverage to safeguard civilian lives, secure a lasting cease-fire, and advance a pathway toward peace."
Some House progressives have separately endorsed Sanders' resolutions. Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.)—who lost her August primary to a Democrat backed by pro-Israel lobbyists—said that since President Joe Biden "won't stop sending bombs, it's up to Congress to uphold the law" and urged "every senator who cares about humanity and the rule of law" to vote yes.
Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), the only Palestinian American in Congress, said on social media Wednesday, "Section 620I of the Foreign Assistance Act is very clear: The U.S. cannot provide weapons to any country that 'prohibits or otherwise restricts, directly or indirectly, the transport or delivery of United States humanitarian assistance.'"
Biden "has refused to enforce U.S. law and stop sending weapons to the Israeli government as they commit genocide in Gaza and use starvation as a weapon of war," Tlaib added. "Today, every senator will have to decide if they will vote to uphold our own laws and block arms sales to Israel."
So far, only a small number of senators have signaled support for the resolutions—Democratic Sens. Tim Kaine (Va.), Jeff Merkley (Ore.), Brian Schatz (Hawaii), Chris Van Hollen (Md.), Elizabeth Warren (Mass.), and Peter Welch (Vt.). The measures would also have to get through the Republican-controlled House to hit Biden's desk, and overriding an anticipated veto would require two-thirds support in both chambers.
Although the resolutions are not expected to pass even in the Senate, "the Biden administration is aggressively pushing senators to bless continued U.S. weapons shipments for Israel ahead of a first-of-its-kind vote in Congress on the policy," HuffPostrevealed Wednesday after obtaining a copy of talking points the White House is circulating on Capitol Hill.
"Administration officials are suggesting lawmakers who vote against the arms are empowering American and Israeli foes from Iran to the militant groups Hamas and Hezbollah, which the U.S. treats as terror organizations," HuffPost reported. "Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) is also privately pressing senators to endorse the ongoing flow of military equipment to Israel, according to one of the aides."
Responding to the report on social media, Sanders ally and Arab American Institute president James Zogby—who is considering a run for Democratic National Committee chair—said that "this White House effort is disgraceful."
"Senators trying to block offensive weapons to Israel aren't aiding Hamas, they're trying to stop genocide, starvation, and massive violations of U.S. laws," Zogby added. "They're saving Palestinian lives and the last shred of U.S. honor."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Post-Dobbs Infant Mortality Spike Shows 'We Must Restore Abortion Rights'
Rep. Pramila Jayapal called the findings "a direct result of Trump's right-wing Supreme Court and extreme MAGA abortion bans."
Oct 22, 2024
In yet another example of what's at stake in the November 5 elections, now just two weeks away, researchers revealed Monday that since the U.S. Supreme Court reversedRoe v. Wade in June 2022, babies have died at a higher rate across the country.
Responding to the findings on Tuesday, Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)—who has publicly shared her own abortion care story—took aim at Republican nominee Donald Trump, who as president appointed three of the justices behind the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization ruling that unleashed a GOP attack on reproductive freedom nationwide.
"The U.S. has a higher infant mortality rate than before the Dobbs decision—a direct result of Trump’s right-wing Supreme Court and extreme MAGA abortion bans," Jayapal said on social media. "Another proof point that this was never about protecting life. We must restore abortion rights."
Research published in JAMA Pediatrics in June showed "increased infant mortality in Texas following passage of Senate Bill 8, banning abortion in early pregnancy," notes the new paper, published in the same journal. "The increase appeared pronounced among infants with congenital anomalies, potentially owing to frail fetuses more often being carried to term following the implementation of abortion restrictions."
"In the seven to 14 months after Roe v. Wade was overturned, we saw a 7% increase in infant mortality, and a 10% increase in those babies born with congenital anomalies."
Parvati Singh and Maria Gallo of Ohio State University decided to examine "whether national monthly trends in infant mortality exhibit similar patterns" following Dobbs. They found that "infant mortality was higher than expected, overall and among those with congenital anomalies, for several months after the Dobbs decision in the U.S."
Specifically, "in the seven to 14 months after Roe v. Wade was overturned, we saw a 7% increase in infant mortality, and a 10% increase in those babies born with congenital anomalies," said Singh, an assistant professor of epidemiology, in a statement.
More than 20 states currently have total abortion bans or limit care at various points during the first 18 weeks of pregnancy. Over the past two years, stories of pregnant people who have been denied emergency care or even died due to state restrictions have mounted.
Though some experts warned of such consequences back in 2022, Gallo said that "I'm not sure that people expected infant mortality rates to increase following Dobbs. It's not necessarily what people were thinking about. But when you restrict access to healthcare it can cause a broader impact on public health than can be foreseen."
"Will this continue past this time period? That's an open question," the epidemiology professor added. "It could be that, yes, it will because access is shut down in some states. But it also could be that eventually more state policymakers are seeing that this isn't what people in the state want and more will pass constitutional amendments to protect access."
Both the researchers behind this paper and the lead author of the Texas study, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health demographer and perinatal epidemiologist Alison Gemmill, pointed out that the infant mortality rates might have been even higher if the latest analysis focused on states where policies changed versus national trends.
"Prior to these abortion bans, people had the option to terminate if the fetus was found to have a severe congenital anomaly—we're talking about organs being outside of the body and other things that are very severe and not compatible with life," Gemmill told the Los Angeles Times. If patients in these positions are forced continue their pregnancies, she added, "those babies would die shortly after birth."
The Democratic nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris, and her allies warn that a Trump victory in November could result in a federal ban on abortion as well as restrictions on birth control and fertility treatments.
Although the Republican has tried to deflect criticism by claiming he supports leaving such decisions to states, that approach threatens the lives and rights of people living in GOP-controlled states. Given that Trump is also a well-documented liar, critics say his public promises to leave it up to the states doesn't mean he wouldn't sign a federal abortion ban if a Republican-held Congress put one on his desk.
Trump recently said he will vote against a Florida ballot measure that would strike down the state's six-week ban and prevent similar pre-viability prohibitions.
"Because of Donald Trump, millions of women across our nation are living under Trump abortion bans and lack access to critical reproductive healthcare," Harris said last week.
"Because of Donald Trump, doctors, and nurses face potential jail time for taking care of their patients," she continued. "And because of Donald Trump, women are facing horrific consequences to their health and lives—even death. Donald Trump is the architect of this healthcare crisis. He is 'proud' of overturning Roe v. Wade and if given the chance, he will make the crisis even worse in all 50 states. We will not let that happen."
In addition to choosing the next president, U.S. voters—some of whom are already casting ballots—will pick which party controls each chamber of Congress. Last month, Harris, a former senator, endorsed eliminating the Senate filibuster to codify Roe.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Democrats Renew Effort to End Private Equity Looting
"Union-busting, pollution, and bankruptcy aren't side effects of the private equity model: They are the model," said one campaigner backing the bill. "It's a smash-and-grab, plain and simple."
Oct 10, 2024
Less than a month away from the U.S. general election, over a dozen congressional Democrats on Thursday renewed their fight to "fundamentally reform the private equity industry" with a bill that Rep. Mark Pocan said "will finally hold these predatory firms accountable and protect workers from being plundered by corporate greed."
"It's long past time for billionaires and big corporations to stop gambling with hardworking Americans' and their communities' assets in service of corporate greed," declared Pocan (D-Wis.), who is leading the Stop Wall Street Looting Act with Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).
"In Wisconsin, we've seen what happens when private equity firms like Sun Capital raid companies for their wealth and leave workers and communities to pick up the pieces," he noted. "When Sun Capital took over Shopko—a Wisconsin-based retail chain that had stood strong for more than 50 years—they drained it dry, buried it in debt, pushed it into bankruptcy, and abandoned roughly 14,000 workers."
"Private equity takeovers are legal looting that make a handful of Wall Street executives very rich while costing thousands of people their jobs, putting valuable companies out of business, and in the case of healthcare, is literally a matter of life and death."
Warren's state is also dealing with fallout from the industry. As The Boston Globereported Thursday, the legislation is "designed to rein in the growing power of private equity firms and limit the sort of leveraged buyout deals that led to the crisis at Steward Health Care, whose bankruptcy continues to roil communities in Massachusetts and seven other states."
The bill "was reintroduced in part as a response to the unfolding crisis at Steward, which before its bankruptcy was the nation's largest private for-profit hospital system," the newspaper noted. It follows the Senate's unanimous approval of a resolution to hold CEO Dr. Ralph de la Torre in criminal contempt of Congress for his refusal to comply with a subpoena to testify before a committee. Shortly after the vote—the first of its kind since 1971—he resigned.
"Private equity takeovers are legal looting that make a handful of Wall Street executives very rich while costing thousands of people their jobs, putting valuable companies out of business, and in the case of healthcare, is literally a matter of life and death," Warren, a former bankruptcy law professor, said Thursday. "Our bill is designed to close loopholes and end incentives for private equity pillaging—and it will make sure what happened at Steward never happens again."
As a fact sheet from the sponsors details, the bill would make private equity firms responsible for liabilities including debt, legal judgments, and pension-related obligations; limit how much money they can extract from companies; close a loophole they have used to conceal assets from bankruptcy courts; implement various protections for workers and customers; increase transparency; impose guardrails for receiving public funds; and drive real estate investment trusts out of healthcare.
"From healthcare to housing, millions of Americans are seeing private equity take over companies with the promise of improving services, only to strip them for parts and hurt both workers and working families," said Jayapal. "It's time for Congress to take action to protect Americans from the dangers of private equity and corporate greed, and that's exactly what our Stop Wall Street Looting Act will do."
The legislation is backed by Reps. Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.), Rick Larsen (D-Wash.), Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.), Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), and Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.), along with Sens. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Tina Smith (D-Minn.), and Ed Markey (D-Mass.).
The bill is also endorsed by dozens of groups including the American Federation of Teachers, Americans for Financial Reform, Economic Policy Institute, Indivisible, National Employment Law Project, National Nurses United, Public Citizen, Service Employees International Union, Student Borrower Protection Center, Take on Wall Street, United for Respect, and Working Families Party.
"Union-busting, pollution, and bankruptcy aren't side effects of the private equity model: They are the model," said Porter McConnell of Take on Wall Street. "It's a smash-and-grab, plain and simple. That's why we are so pleased to see comprehensive legislation like the Stop Wall Street Looting Act introduced in Congress today. We created the loopholes in the law that allowed the private equity industry to thrive, and we can end them."
United for Respect co-executive directors Bianca Agustin and Terrysa Guerra stressed that "Wall Street private equity firms have proven themselves to be a parasite on workers, our economy, and American retailers by gutting companies for profit and driving mass layoffs. Holding billionaire profiteers accountable for the damage they do to our working families and communities is imperative to addressing growing economic inequality."
"The Stop Wall Street Looting Act will help close loopholes in our laws that for too long have allowed private equity to pillage companies and amass huge profits while workers lose their jobs and are left with nothing," they added. "United for Respect is proud to support this bill—and we need all legislators to join us in protecting workers and putting Wall Street on the hook for the havoc they reap."
While the bill is unlikely to go anywhere in the currently divided Congress, it's a clear statement from the sponsors where they stand, as early voting gets underway to determine the future of the Senate and House of Representatives as well as the next occupant of the White House—Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris or former Republican President Donald Trump.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular