To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.

×
  • Home
  • jeff merkley
  • lead
  • troy jackson
  • michael brown
  • senate
  • center for biological diversity
  • arizona
  • election 2022
  • self-immolation
  • ukraine
  • russia
  • gaza
  • critical race theory
  • palestine
  • jan 6 insurrection
  • covid-19
  • george floyd
  • black lives matter
  • stacey abrams
  • trumpism
  • kyle rittenhouse
  • georgia
  • selma
  • john lewis
  • marjorie taylor greene
  • jared kushner
  • bernie sanders
  • sarah huckabee sanders
  • joe biden
  • kamala harris
  • jon ossoff
  • raphael warnock
  • election
  • midterm elections
  • big oil
  • fossil fuels
  • workers
  • inequality
  • minimum wage
  • poverty
  • environment
  • africa
  • food
  • hunger
  • animal rights
  • julian assange
  • amnesty international
  • united kingdom
  • wikileaks
  • biodiversity
  • new mexico
  • democracy
  • taxation
  • campaign finance
  • us supreme court
  • public health
  • oxfam
  • afghanistan
  • congressional progressive caucus
  • fight for the future
  • net neutrality
  • open internet
  • free press
  • anti-semitism
  • bend the arc
  • texas
  • cop26
  • 350.org
  • fcc
  • corporate power
  • jamie dimon
  • jpmorgan chase
  • stop the money pipeline
  • coronavirus
  • imf
  • jubilee usa
  • vaccines
  • florida
  • sustainability
  • center for responsive politics
  • amazon.com
  • drug policy alliance
  • marijuana
  • public citizen
  • environment america
  • renewable energy
  • aclu
  • war crimes
  • war on terror
  • immigration
  • refugees
  • arctic national wildlife refuge (anwr)
  • fossil fuel divestment
  • veterans
  • veterans for peace
  • oklahoma
  • racism
  • democratic party
  • people's action
  • republican party
  • us congress
  • budget
  • hyde amendment
  • reproductive rights
  • women
  • food & water watch
  • codepink
  • militarism
  • pentagon
  • us military
  • sunrise movement
  • filibuster
  • us house
  • war on drugs
  • common cause
  • indivisible
  • mitch mcconnell
  • stand up america
  • arctic
  • muslim ban
  • g7
  • patriotic millionaires
  • oregon
  • chris murphy
  • education
  • jamaal bowman
  • civil rights
  • ed markey
  • technology
  • infrastructure
  • moveon.org
  • egypt
  • journalism
  • barack obama
  • epa
  • pollution
  • war on science
  • voting rights
  • environmental working group
  • friends of the earth
  • icc
  • shell
  • methane
  • indigenous
  • line 3
  • healthcare
  • privatization
  • unemployment
  • labor
  • green new deal
  • data for progress
  • islamophobia
  • virginia
  • us department of justice
  • us senate
  • genocide
  • coal
  • iea
  • new york
  • facebook
  • police
  • big pharma
  • justice democrats
  • social security works
  • extreme weather
  • pesticides
  • bds
  • israel
  • plastics
  • fda
  • greenpeace
  • afge
  • alexandria ocasio-cortez
  • arms trade
  • benjamin netanyahu
  • cair
  • minnesota
  • super pacs
  • janet yellen
  • oil change international
  • wall street
  • factory farms
  • extremism
  • endangered species act
  • civil liberties
  • colombia
  • tony blinken
  • paris agreement
  • campaign legal center
  • fec
  • wto
  • criminal justice system
  • philadelphia
  • 9/11
  • center for food safety
  • monsanto
  • central america
  • mexico
  • children
  • mark pocan
  • rashida tlaib
  • chuck grassley
  • aipac
  • chuck schumer
  • jewish voice for peace
  • china
  • guantanamo
  • roe v. wade
  • jay inslee
  • at&t
  • corporate personhood
  • media
  • baltimore
  • naral
  • nina turner
  • center for reproductive rights
  • elon musk
  • jeff bezos
  • earthjustice
  • moveon
  • privacy
  • japan
  • rahm emanuel
  • apartheid
  • progressive international
  • coronavirus relief
  • agriculture
  • federal reserve
  • g20
  • people power
  • pennsylvania
  • wolves
  • demand progress
  • massachusetts
  • union of concerned scientists
  • human rights
  • nafta
  • asia
  • boris johnson
  • idaho
  • debt
  • sudan
  • world bank
  • keystone xl
  • syria
  • ilhan omar
  • kirsten gillibrand
  • usda
  • people for the american way
  • ron desantis
  • conservation
  • chevron
  • ecuador
  • steven donziger
  • deb haaland
  • us department of interior
    healthcare protest with sign reading "healthcare for all"

    Critics Say Trump 'Joke Healthcare Plan' Nothing But a 'Con' of the American People

    “In the longer term, we must finally pass Medicare for All, an actually great healthcare plan," said one campaigner.

    US President Donald Trump on Thursday announced a "Great Healthcare Plan" that critics panned for being "short on details," arguing that—contrary to White House claims—the scheme will lead to higher consumer costs and less care.

    Trump called on Congress to pass his proposal, which he said will "lower drug prices, lower insurance premiums, hold big insurance companies accountable, and maximize price transparency."

    However, the advocacy group Protect Our Care called the proposal a "joke healthcare plan" and a "sad attempt to continue gaslighting the American people."

    "Since taking office, President Trump and his cronies in Congress have taken a hammer to American healthcare to enrich billionaires and big corporations," the group said. "First, they slashed $1 trillion dollars from Medicaid, and then they doubled, tripled, and quadrupled health premiums for nearly 22 million Americans already struggling to get by in Trump’s unaffordable America."

    "Now that it is clear that busting working families’ budgets is bad policy and bad politics, Trump is scrambling for a lifeline," Protect Our Care added. "The solution to ending the Trump-GOP premium disaster isn’t rocket science. It is the three-year, clean extension of the Affordable Care Act tax credits that the House passed. This commonsense solution that Trump callously threatened to veto is now sitting on Senate Republican Leader John Thune’s (SD) desk."

    Trump’s new health care plan doesn’t help people facing skyrocketing ACA premiums.No fix for affordability. No solution for families struggling to stay covered.Just another empty framework while costs climb.

    [image or embed]
    — Protect Our Care (@protectourcare.org) January 15, 2026 at 12:57 PM

    The Senate—which last month voted down a similar three-year-extension to what House lawmakers passed—has yet to schedule a vote on the extension. An attempt to advance the bill through a unanimous consent agreement was blocked by Republicans on Wednesday.

    Congressman Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.), ranking member of the House Budget Committee, said in a statement Thursday that “Trump’s half-baked healthcare ‘plan’ is a con that does nothing to help Americans facing soaring costs and would raise healthcare expenses while cutting coverage."

    "That’s no surprise from a president who is taking healthcare away from 15 million Americans to pay for tax breaks for billionaires," he added. "If the White House is serious about lowering healthcare costs right now, they should support legislation to extend the enhanced Affordable Care Act (ACA) tax credits that already passed the House with bipartisan support. The American people deserve real solutions, not gimmicks.”

    The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that a three-year extension of the enhanced ACA premium tax credits would increase the number of Americans with health insurance by millions, including approximately 3 million in 2027 and 4 million in 2028.

    — (@)

    Eagan Kemp, healthcare policy advocate at the consumer watchdog group Public Citizen, said in a statement Thursday that “Trump’s Great Healthcare Plan is impressive only in the fact that it isn’t great, wouldn’t substantively improve healthcare, and isn’t even detailed enough to be considered a plan."

    “Trump and his cronies have had more than a decade to come up with something beyond ‘concepts of a plan’ but have failed time and time again," Kemp continued. "The American people are suffering under a broken healthcare system that has been made worse by Trump and his MAGA allies."

    “By passing tax cuts for billionaires and paying for them through healthcare cuts for tens of millions of people, Trump and Republicans showed their disdain for everyday Americans. In the short run, the Senate must follow the lead of the House and pass a clean three-year extension of the ACA subsidies," he said.

    “In the longer term," Kemp added, "we must finally pass Medicare for All, an actually great healthcare plan, to finally guarantee everyone in the US can get the care they need throughout their lives without financial barriers."

    Critics Say Trump 'Joke Healthcare Plan' Nothing But a 'Con' of the American People

    US President Donald Trump on Thursday announced a "Great Healthcare Plan" that critics panned for being "short on details," arguing that—contrary to White House claims—the scheme will lead to higher consumer costs and less care.

    Trump called on Congress to pass his proposal, which he said will "lower drug prices, lower insurance premiums, hold big insurance companies accountable, and maximize price transparency."

    However, the advocacy group Protect Our Care called the proposal a "joke healthcare plan" and a "sad attempt to continue gaslighting the American people."

    "Since taking office, President Trump and his cronies in Congress have taken a hammer to American healthcare to enrich billionaires and big corporations," the group said. "First, they slashed $1 trillion dollars from Medicaid, and then they doubled, tripled, and quadrupled health premiums for nearly 22 million Americans already struggling to get by in Trump’s unaffordable America."

    "Now that it is clear that busting working families’ budgets is bad policy and bad politics, Trump is scrambling for a lifeline," Protect Our Care added. "The solution to ending the Trump-GOP premium disaster isn’t rocket science. It is the three-year, clean extension of the Affordable Care Act tax credits that the House passed. This commonsense solution that Trump callously threatened to veto is now sitting on Senate Republican Leader John Thune’s (SD) desk."

    Trump’s new health care plan doesn’t help people facing skyrocketing ACA premiums.No fix for affordability. No solution for families struggling to stay covered.Just another empty framework while costs climb.

    [image or embed]
    — Protect Our Care (@protectourcare.org) January 15, 2026 at 12:57 PM

    The Senate—which last month voted down a similar three-year-extension to what House lawmakers passed—has yet to schedule a vote on the extension. An attempt to advance the bill through a unanimous consent agreement was blocked by Republicans on Wednesday.

    Congressman Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.), ranking member of the House Budget Committee, said in a statement Thursday that “Trump’s half-baked healthcare ‘plan’ is a con that does nothing to help Americans facing soaring costs and would raise healthcare expenses while cutting coverage."

    "That’s no surprise from a president who is taking healthcare away from 15 million Americans to pay for tax breaks for billionaires," he added. "If the White House is serious about lowering healthcare costs right now, they should support legislation to extend the enhanced Affordable Care Act (ACA) tax credits that already passed the House with bipartisan support. The American people deserve real solutions, not gimmicks.”

    The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that a three-year extension of the enhanced ACA premium tax credits would increase the number of Americans with health insurance by millions, including approximately 3 million in 2027 and 4 million in 2028.

    — (@)

    Eagan Kemp, healthcare policy advocate at the consumer watchdog group Public Citizen, said in a statement Thursday that “Trump’s Great Healthcare Plan is impressive only in the fact that it isn’t great, wouldn’t substantively improve healthcare, and isn’t even detailed enough to be considered a plan."

    “Trump and his cronies have had more than a decade to come up with something beyond ‘concepts of a plan’ but have failed time and time again," Kemp continued. "The American people are suffering under a broken healthcare system that has been made worse by Trump and his MAGA allies."

    “By passing tax cuts for billionaires and paying for them through healthcare cuts for tens of millions of people, Trump and Republicans showed their disdain for everyday Americans. In the short run, the Senate must follow the lead of the House and pass a clean three-year extension of the ACA subsidies," he said.

    “In the longer term," Kemp added, "we must finally pass Medicare for All, an actually great healthcare plan, to finally guarantee everyone in the US can get the care they need throughout their lives without financial barriers."

    Common Dreams. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
    Common Dreams Globe
    LATEST NEWSOPINIONCLIMATEECONOMY POLITICS RIGHTS & JUSTICEWAR & PEACE
    LATEST NEWS
    OPINION
    Common DreamsTo inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

    biofuels

    biofuel_GettyImages-

    Growing Food for Fuel Is Starving People

    Modern biofuels are touted as a boon for the climate. But, used on a large scale, they are no more sustainable than whale oil.

    George Monbiot
    Jul 03, 2022

    What can you say about governments that, in the midst of a global food crisis, choose instead to feed machines? You might say they were crazy, uncaring or cruel. But these words scarcely suffice when you seek to describe the burning of food while millions starve.

    "If biofuel production ceased worldwide, according to one estimate, the saved crops could feed 1.9 billion human beings."

    Keep ReadingShow Less
    biofuels

    New Study Warns Biofuels May Be Worse for Climate Than Gas

    When taking farmland and crop growth into account, the plant-based energy may not be all that carbon-neutral, study says

    Nadia Prupis
    Aug 26, 2016

    A new study finds that biofuels derived from plants like corn or soybeans, sometimes considered carbon-neutral, may be worse for the climate than gas.

    University of Michigan (UM) Energy Institute research professor John DeCicco analyzed all the greenhouse gas emissions created in the supply chains of various fuel types. For gas, that meant starting with extraction and transportation, among other parts of the process; for biofuels, it was farming and fertilizer use, but not tailpipe pollution, due to the presumed carbon dioxide offset, the Detroit Free Press explains.

    Keep ReadingShow Less
    american petroleum institute
    biofuels

    Oxfam Reaction to EU Biofuels Debate by Energy Ministers

    Commenting on the failure of EU Energy Ministers to reach agreement on EU biofuel policy today, Marc Olivier Herman, Oxfam's biofuels expert said:

    "Today's failure to reach a decision on EU biofuels policy must mark the end of countries complacent attitudes. All member states, especially influential countries such as Germany, France the UK, must take a firm stance against using food for fuel and stand up in favor of people and the planet."

    Newswire Editor
    Apr 28, 2015

    Commenting on the failure of EU Energy Ministers to reach agreement on EU biofuel policy today, Marc Olivier Herman, Oxfam's biofuels expert said:

    "Today's failure to reach a decision on EU biofuels policy must mark the end of countries complacent attitudes. All member states, especially influential countries such as Germany, France the UK, must take a firm stance against using food for fuel and stand up in favor of people and the planet."

    Keep ReadingShow Less
    agriculture

    Biofuels Bubble Turns to Bust

    Today, the European Parliament agreed new EU laws to limit the use of crop-based biofuels.

    EU law makers ruled that biofuels can compete with food production, contribute to climate change, and put pressure on land use - and so have set a limit on the quantity of biofuels that can be used to meet EU energy targets (at no more than 7% of transport energy).[1]

    Newswire Editor
    Apr 28, 2015

    Today, the European Parliament agreed new EU laws to limit the use of crop-based biofuels.

    EU law makers ruled that biofuels can compete with food production, contribute to climate change, and put pressure on land use - and so have set a limit on the quantity of biofuels that can be used to meet EU energy targets (at no more than 7% of transport energy).[1]

    With Europe the world's biggest user and importer of biodiesel - from crops such as palm oil, soy and rapeseed - the vote will have a major impact around the world, notably in the EU's main international supplier countries Indonesia, Malaysia and Argentina. It is likely to signal the end to the expanding use of food crops for transport fuel.

    Robbie Blake, Friends of the Earth Europe's biofuels campaigner, said:
    "Let no-one be in doubt, the biofuels bubble has burst. These fuels do more harm than good for people, the environment and the climate. The EU's long-awaited move to put the brakes on biofuels is a clear signal to the rest of the world that this is a false solution to the climate crisis. This must spark the end of burning food for fuel."

    This decision brings to an end ten years of debate in the EU [2] over the unintended detrimental effects of biofuels demand on food prices, hunger, forest destruction, land consumption, and climate change.

    Kirtana Chandrasekaran, Friends of the Earth International's food sovereignty coordinator, said:
    "While the EU has not gone far enough to stop the irresponsible use of food crops for car fuel, this new law acknowledges a reality that small scale food producers worldwide know - that biofuel crops cripple their ability to feed the world, compete for the land that provides their livelihood, and for the water that sustains us. The EU has had to backtrack on its harmful biofuels policy and this should be a lesson to other countries considering similar toxic targets for biofuels."

    Around the world, 64 countries have or are considering increasing the amount of biofuels used in transport fuel [3], including most recently Indonesia [4].

    Kurniawan Sabar, campaign manager for WALHI/Friends of the Earth Indonesia, said:
    "The people of Indonesia will be relieved to hear that the EU has taken some action to limit Europe's demand for palm oil for biofuels, which has escalated deforestation, land grabbing, and conflicts in Indonesia. The Indonesian government should take note and abandon its own plans for new subsidies to expand biofuels plantations in Indonesian forests."

    Friends of the Earth now calls on EU countries to phase out the use of food for biofuels completely.

    ***
    NOTES

    [1] What the EU has agreed:
    * A limit on biofuels from agricultural crops at 7% of EU transport energy - with an option for Member states to go lower. By comparison, the expected business as usual scenario was for biofuels of 8.6% of EU transport energy by 2020; current usage is at 4.7%, having declined in 2013 https://www.energies-renouvelables.org/observ-er/stat_baro/observ/baro222_en.pdf.
    * Indirect greenhouse emissions released by expanding biofuels production will be reported on every year by the European Commission and by fuel suppliers. This will increase the transparency of the impacts of this policy.
    * Member states should set a 0.5% non-binding target on so-called 'advanced' biofuels (most often derived from straw, household waste, forest and agricultural residues), while giving "due regard" to certain safeguards (such as waste hierarchy).

    [2] Background:
    The production and consumption of biofuels grew dramatically from 2008-2009 when two EU directives - on Renewable Energy (RED) and Fuel Quality (FQD) - were adopted that included binding targets for 10% of transport energy to be derived from renewable energy by 2020, almost all biofuels. Friends of the Earth opposed targets for biofuels at the time, and has since been campaigning to limit the use of food for fuel.

    In October 2012, the European Commission proposed to amend this legislation in reaction to evidence showing the climate impact of some biofuels could be worse for the climate than using fossil fuels, by introducing a 5% limit for food based biofuels (set at current consumption levels). This was subsequently amended by the European Parliament (setting a 6% limit) and EU member states (setting a 7% limit). The vote in the European Parliament in Strasbourg on 29 April 2015, combined with one final approval by European energy ministers, sets this reform into European law.

    The EU Commission has additionally stated it intends to scrap all future targets and support for "food based" biofuels after 2020, and future renewable energy targets for transport.

    For more information on the problems with biofuels and the background to the EU decision see [briefing].

    [3] https://ase.tufts.edu/gdae/Pubs/wp/15-01WiseMandates.pdf

    [4] The Indonesian government is planning to boost domestic use of biofuel including from palm oil, with extra subsidies and a mandatory target of 15% biofuel blended into diesel fuel https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/04/06/govt-levies-palm-oil-exports-fund-biodiesel-push.html.
    Environmentalists have criticised this decision as "a mistake"
    https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/02/16/transfer-subsidy-biofuel-accelerates-deforestation-says-walhi.html

    agriculture

    SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER

    Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

    subscribe
    below
    * indicates required
    True
    True
    Follow Us
    Most Popular

    Top DOJ Officials Resign After Being Cut Off From Renee Good Killing Probe

    Kristi Noem Goes on TV and Lies Through Her Teeth (Again) About ICE Killing of Renee Nicole Good

    Ex-Presidents, What More Do You Need to See Before Calling for Trump's Impeachment?

    Schumer, Jeffries Refuse to Join Democrats' Growing Calls to Slash ICE Spending

    'You Are Murderers!' 'Get the F*ck Out!': Fury at ICE Agents Boils in Minneapolis

    Hours After US Citizen Shot Dead by ICE, JD Vance Says ‘Door-to-Door’ Operations Are Coming

    'Goebbels Could Not Have Improved On This': DHS Spreads 'Propaganda' on ICE Killing as Violence Mounts

    After Claiming Maduro Was Its Kingpin, DOJ Now Admits in Court That 'Cartel De Los Soles' Isn't a Real Group

    'Where Were You Born?' ICE Conducting Show-Me-Your-Papers Stops in Minnesota Neighborhoods

    3 Children Hospitalized in Minneapolis After Family Van Hit With ICE Flash-Bangs

    We cover the issues the corporate media never will.
    Please support our journalism.