SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
corporate media
Evidence of Epstein Ties to Mossad Grow, But Corporate Media Doesn't Seem to Care
There has been wall-to-wall US corporate media coverage of the Department of Justice’s Epstein files and the battle over its release. So why has new reporting about hacked materials largely been ignored by US corporate media?
Nov 15, 2025
For years, there have been whispers that convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who had ties to key officials in the US and foreign governments, was involved with Israel’s intelligence agency, Mossad.
However, the Epstein/Mossad ties were often labeled by US corporate media as “unfounded” (New York Times, 8/24/25), dismissed as a “conspiracy theory” (New York Times, 7/16/25), or said to have been “largely manufactured by paranoiacs and attention seekers and credulous believers” (New York Times, 9/9/25). Former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett has claimed that “Epstein’s conduct, both the criminal and the merely despicable, had nothing whatsoever to do with the Mossad or the State of Israel.”
It’s true that far-right antisemites like Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson have promoted a conspiratorial version of the Epstein/Israel connection as part of their bigoted, attention-seeking narratives. But recent investigations by Drop Site News—the nonprofit investigative outlet founded in July 2024—into a major hack targeting Israel revealed that Epstein did play a significant role in brokering multiple deals for Israeli intelligence. Despite the hack’s significant revelations, US corporate media coverage remains scant.
‘Knack for steering the superpowers’
Since 2024, a hacking group called “Handala” with reported ties to the Iranian government (Committee to Protect Journalists, 7/9/25) has carried out a series of cyberattacks targeting Israeli government officials and facilities (Press TV, 12/1/24; CyberDaily, 6/16/25).Aspects of the Handala hack were published on the website of nonprofit whistleblower Distributed Denial of Secrets (DDoS), including hundreds of thousands of emails from former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, one of Epstein’s closest connections.
Since the hacked information was released, numerous independent media outlets—including Reason (8/27/25), All-Source Intelligence (9/17/25, 9/29/25, 10/13/25), Grayzone (10/6/25, 10/9/25, 10/13/25), the (b)(7)(D) (10/16/25, 10/21/25) and DeClassified UK (9/1/25, 11/3/25)—have published investigations on its contents. Among the independent media outlets, Drop Site’s coverage stands out for its in-depth research and broad scope.
Drop Site’s investigations into the Handala hack have included six major stories since late September, four of which have centered around “Epstein’s work on behalf of Israeli military interests, particularly as it relates to his role in the development of Israel’s cyber warfare industry.”
Drop Site reporters Murtaza Hussain and Ryan Grim (9/28/25) detailed how Epstein wielded his influence to expand Israel’s cyber warfare industry into Mongolia. Drop Site wrote:
Jeffrey Epstein…exploited his network of political and financial elites to help Barak, and ultimately the Israeli government itself, to increase the penetration of Israel’s spy-tech firms into foreign countries.
In their next piece, Drop Site revealed (10/30/25) that Epstein created an Israel/Russia backchannel to attempt to oust Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Hussain and Grim reported that Epstein also worked with Barak and Russian elites to pressure the Obama administration into approving strikes on Iran, demonstrating his “knack for steering the superpowers toward Israel’s interests by leveraging a social network that intersected the Israeli, American and Russian intelligence communities.”
In the same piece, Hussain and Grim quoted Epstein asking Barak to “wait until they could speak privately before Barak notified intelligence leaders of a deal” with Russian-Israeli oligarch Viktor Vekselberg, and to “not go to number 1 too quickly.” Number 1 has long been a nickname for the head of the Mossad, DropSite noted.
Another article (11/7/25) recounted that Epstein sold surveillance technology to Côte d’Ivoire: “Epstein helped Barak deliver a proposal for mass surveillance of Ivorian phone and internet communications, crafted by former Israeli intelligence officials.”
Most recently, Grim and Hussain (11/11/25) reported that an Israeli spy regularly stayed at Epstein’s Manhattan apartment. The spy, Yoni Koren, “made his intelligence career working in covert operations alongside the Mossad.”
Failing to cover the Handala hack
Hacked information must be handled ethically by journalists—including by verifying the files, considering public interest, concealing identities when necessary, and noting its origins. This is what Drop Site has done. And its reporting has significant public interest, revealing the ways in which Epstein served Israel’s interests.
Yet in a search of ProQuest’s US Newsstream collection for “Handala,” as well as a supplementary Google search, the only US corporate media outlet found to have covered the Handala hack is the New York Post (8/31/25). Its single 700-word story, drawing from Reason (8/27/25) and the Times of London (8/30/25), focused on how Prince Andrew stayed in contact with Epstein for five years longer than previously stated—sidestepping the revelations from Drop Site about Epstein’s ties to Mossad.
Hussain, who had not seen the New York Post story, said US corporate media is “deliberately ignoring” the story:
It’s such a goldmine of stories. They’re not going through it, they don’t want to talk about it. I think it’s very difficult for them to conceive what these emails refer to because they’ve spent so much time talking about it as a conspiracy theory. And now contravening evidence is emerging, or well-substantiated evidence, showing that it’s really not a conspiracy theory.
Indeed, recent mentions of Epstein’s ties to Israeli government officials have continued to dismiss them as conspiracy theories, ignoring the hack and Drop Site‘s work. For instance, an LA Times op-ed (10/10/25) on antisemitism in the GOP listed Tucker Carlson’s suggestion that “Epstein was a Mossad agent” (and accusing Israel of “genocide” in Gaza) as evidence of “appalling behavior,” alongside things like “entertaining Hitler/Nazi apologia” and suggesting that “Jews had something to do with [Charlie] Kirk’s death.”
The New Yorker’s Jay Caspian Kang (10/10/25) asserted in his weekly column:
On Planet Epstein, everything that happens—the assassination of Charlie Kirk, the war in Gaza, the suppression of speech by the Trump Administration—proves the country is run by blackmail, pedophilia and fealty to Israel.
While it is of course absurd to blame “everything” on Epstein or Israel—and right-wing conspiracy theories that incorporate antisemitism are very real and dangerous—is it really unreasonable to blame “the war in Gaza” on too much “fealty to Israel”? After all, from October 7, 2023 to September 2025, the US sent $21.7 billion in military aid to Israel, according to Brown University’s Costs of War project—more than a quarter of Israel’s total post–October 7 military expenditures. Epstein’s evident connections to Mossad do raise the question of whether there is more to that “fealty” than the $100 million the pro-Israel lobbying group AIPAC spent on both parties during the 2024 election cycle (Common Dreams, 8/28/24).
By using the “conspiracy theory” frame, Kang not only overlooked the recently revealed files from Drop Site, but also failed to convey the full scope of Epstein’s influence, leaving the actions of associates and key government officials unscrutinized.
Other Handala revelations
Other aspects of the Handala hack have also been well-covered by independent media, including reports of billionaires funding an Israeli cyber campaign against anti-apartheid activists (All-Source Intelligence, 9/17/25). Other stories describe Iran striking a secret Israeli military site near a Tel Aviv tower (All-Source Intelligence, 10/13/25; Grayzone, 10/13/25), and Larry Ellison’s son, David Ellison, meeting with a top Israeli general to plan spying on Americans (Grayzone, 10/6/25). The Grayzone (10/9/25) also reported that a former US ambassador secretly worked with a top Israeli diplomat to help Israel access several prestigious UN committees.
In Israeli media, Haaretz (3/9/25) reported that thousands of Israeli gun owners were exposed in an Iranian hack-and-leak operation. The paper (7/9/25) also revealed the leak of a database containing thousands of résumés belonging to Israelis who served in classified and sensitive positions within the Israel Defense Forces and other military and security agencies.
These details, like those about Epstein, have also been met with silence in US corporate media.
There has been wall-to-wall US corporate media coverage of the Department of Justice’s Epstein files and the battle over its release. So why has the hack largely been ignored by US corporate media? One possible reason is the hack’s likely origin. It has been reportedly attributed to Banished Kitten, a cyber unit within Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence (Committee to Protect Journalists, 7/9/25). Hacks purportedly emanating from Iran are rarely covered in US corporate media—and when they are, the origin of the hack, not its content, becomes the focus.
Look no further than media coverage of the 271-page official dossier of then–Republican vice presidential candidate JD Vance, which revealed that the Trump campaign believed Vance “embraced noninterventionism,” among other purported vulnerabilities (Ken Klippenstein, 9/26/24). The US government alleged the Vance dossier was leaked through Iranian hacking (FAIR.org, 9/30/24). While the New York Times, Washington Post and Politico possessed the Vance dossier for weeks, they declined to publish it (Popular Information, 9/9/24).
The contents of the Vance dossier were eventually revealed by independent reporter Ken Klippenstein, as well-documented by FAIR contributor Ari Paul (9/30/24). Paul noted that while Klippenstein’s reporting pushed the story into the legacy media, “most of the reporting about this dossier has been on the intrigue revolving around Iranian hacking rather than the content itself” (Daily Beast, 8/10/24; Politico, 8/10/24; Forbes, 8/11/24).
Today, despite Drop Site‘s thorough and revealing reporting, the Handala hack has been almost completely ignored by US corporate media. Said Drop Site‘s Hussain:
A lot of these [media] organizations, it’s kind of not a secret, they have sympathies or ties to Israel, so it’s not a story which is appealing to them, it’s not politically convenient for these organizations, for the most part.
I think when something’s in the public interest, you report on it, and you’re transparent about where it came from. But in this case, [US corporate] media chose not to.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Bezos-Owned Washington Post Caught Omitting Amazon Conflicts of Interest in Editorials
"The Post’s opinion section, which owners traditionally consider their very own plaything, is a lost cause," said one critic.
Oct 28, 2025
Veteran reporters, journalism professors, and former Washington Post staffers are among those raising alarm over the respected newspaper's increasingly common publication of editorials that directly support the business interests of its owner, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, without disclosing potential conflicts of interest.
NPR reported on Tuesday that at least three editorials published by the paper over the last two weeks have weighed in "on matters in which Bezos has a financial or corporate interest without noting his stake," and in which "the Post's official editorial line landed in sync with its owner's financial interests."
The most recent example came when the Post published an editorial defending President Donald Trump's widely criticized ballroom construction project, which involved the demolition of the East Wing of the White House and which apparently didn't go through any regulatory approval process.
The editorial initially failed to mention that Amazon was one of several corporate donors that funded the demolition of the East Wing.
What's more, the paper only added an acknowledgement of the Amazon donation after its absence was flagged by Columbia Journalism School professor Bill Grueskin, who noted in a Bluesky post that the Post slipped in the acknowledgment with "no clarification or correction appended to the piece."
The editorial about the East Wing's destruction was also the subject of a scathing analysis by former New York Times public editor Margaret Sullivan, who similarly called out Amazon's donation to the ballroom project and described the paper's editorial on the demolition "both sad and shameful."
Although Sullivan still had praise for the paper's news reporting team, she concluded that "the Post’s opinion section, which owners traditionally consider their very own plaything, is a lost cause, at least for now."
In addition to the editorial about the East Wing demolition, NPR singled out a recent Post editorial praising the US military's push to develop smaller nuclear reactors, and an editorial that pushed for Washington, DC to speed up the approval of self-driving cars.
Amazon purchased a stake in the company X-energy to develop small nuclear reactors to power data centers in 2024, and the company's self-driving car subsidiary, Zoox, announced it would begin operating in DC just three weeks before the Post ran its editorial.
Ruth Marcus, a former deputy editorial page editor at the Washington Post, told NPR that she had always insisted on disclosing potential conflicts of interest during her tenure at the paper.
"It strikes me that the failure to do this [disclosure] is concerning—whether out of negligence or worse," she said. "I think telling your readers that there might be a conflict in whatever they're reading is always important. It's a lot more important when it involves whoever the owner is."
The Post over the last year has seen a mass exodus of talent from its editorial pages, as multiple longtime columnists and contributors have taken jobs with other publications or have become their own independent publishers. The Post's former opinion editor, David Shipley, resigned this past February just as Bezos decreed that the paper would should the focus of its editorials to "personal liberties and free markets."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Wildly Corrupt': Trump Favors Rich Pal to Buy One of World's Largest Media Companies
If the Trump administration gets its way, "one giant company could control almost everything you watch on TV," warned Sen. Elizabeth Warren.
Oct 24, 2025
The Trump administration reportedly wants a rich friend of the president, Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison, to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, the parent company of CNN, HBO, and other major media organizations.
David Ellison is the son of Oracle cofounder Larry Ellison, one of the richest men in the world and a Republican megadonor. Under the younger Ellison's leadership, Skydance recently scored a regulatory green light from the Trump administration to merge with Paramount. Federal approval of the deal was widely seen as a corrupt reward for Paramount's decision to pay $16 million to settle a lawsuit that President Donald Trump filed last year against the CBS parent company.
"They're friends of mine. They're big supporters of mine. And they'll do the right thing," Trump said of the Ellisons earlier this month, declaring that CBS has "great potential" under new leadership. CBS has already taken several steps to appease the president.
Now, the Trump administration reportedly favors the newly formed media behemoth, Paramount Skydance, to buy Warner Bros. Discovery, which publicly announced earlier this week that it is seeking bids.
The New York Post reported Thursday that Paramount Skydance is "clearly in the catbird seat." Citing an unnamed government official with direct knowledge of the matter, the Post reported that "a number of rival bidders are likely to face stiff hurdles from US regulators in the blockbuster auction."
Paramount Skydance has so far made several offers to Warner Bros. Discovery, all of which were rejected as insufficient.
But Ellison appears confident that his firm will ultimately acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, given his personal relationship with Trump. According to CNN, "Ellison's allies are privately arguing that he is the only buyer who would pass muster with Trump administration regulators."
"Privately, Ellison is exuding the kind of confidence that comes from having tens of billions in cash," CNN reported. "His ambitions are bolstered by his father, Larry Ellison, Oracle's executive chairman, who currently ranks as the second-richest man in the world. Together they are 'building an unprecedented media empire,' as The Washington Post put it earlier this month."
Watchdogs and Democratic lawmakers have voiced alarm over Ellison's efforts. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) warned earlier this week that if Paramount Skydance ultimately purchases Warner Bros. Discovery, "one giant company could control almost everything you watch on TV."
Matt Stoller, director of research at the American Economic Liberties Project, called the Trump administration's reported position on Ellison's bid for Warner Bros. Discovery "wildly corrupt."
The New York Times notes that the potential merger "would combine two of the largest Hollywood studios, Warner Bros. and Paramount, granting huge clout at the box office and putting CNN and CBS News under the same corporate umbrella, which would give the new company enormous sway over the news industry."
"It would combine Paramount+ and HBO Max, two of the biggest streaming services, bringing the company's movies and shows into hundreds of millions of living rooms," the Times added.
The Writers Guild of America, a labor union that represents TV and news writers, spoke out forcefully against the possibility of a Paramount Skydance-Warner Bros. merger on Thursday, saying in a statement that "merger after merger in the media industry has harmed workers, diminished competition and free speech, and wasted hundreds of billions of dollars better invested in organic growth."
“At a time when the country demands, and needs, the broadest possible set of views and stories and voices," the union said, "we have handed over the keys to the media kingdom to giants whose sole motivation is to maximize their short-term investment return, not to inform or enlighten or entertain."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular