SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
groundwork collaborative
Musk Admission Exposes 'DOGE's Deeply Unpopular and Unrealistic Agenda'
"Americans see right through Musk's scheme to pay for his own tax breaks by defunding Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare," said one critic.
Jan 09, 2025
Mega-billionaire Elon Musk conceded Wednesday that he's not likely to achieve his fantastical goal of slashing $2 trillion from the federal budget, an admission that one critic said underscores the folly of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency.
"President-elect [Donald] Trump hasn't even taken office and Elon Musk is already admitting failure on DOGE's deeply unpopular and unrealistic agenda," Lindsay Owens, executive director of the Groundwork Collaborative, said in a statement. "Americans see right through Musk's scheme to pay for his own tax breaks by defunding Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare."
Musk, the world's richest man and a close ally of Trump, said in an interview Wednesday that cutting $2 trillion in federal spending would be an "epic outcome" but described it as a "best-case" scenario. Economists have dismissed Musk's $2 trillion target as absurd, given that the entire annual discretionary budget was $1.6 trillion for Fiscal Year 2024.
Bobby Kogan, senior director of federal budget policy at the Center for American Progress, said Thursday that Musk's lower target of $1 trillion in cuts is also "too large," noting that "if you protect Social Security, Medicare, vets, and defense, it would mean cutting every other program by 45% on average." Republican lawmakers have floated similarly outlandish cuts.
Opponents of the Department of Government Efficiency—an advisory commission set to be led by Musk and fellow billionaire Vivek Ramaswamy—have warned it is a thinly veiled effort to target Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and other nondiscretionary programs, a concern amplified by recent comments from GOP supporters of the panel.
"I am a strong advocate of discussing this and reevaluating them, and I do believe, at the end of the day, there will be some cut," Rep. Greg Lopez (R-Colo.) said of Medicare and Social Security outside of the first meeting of the House DOGE Caucus.
Musk said ahead of the 2024 elections—on which he spent heavily to influence—that spending cuts he envisions would "necessarily" bring "some temporary hardship," but he hasn't specifically detailed which programs he would target.
"If the incoming president follows through on even a fraction of the $2 trillion in cuts that Musk and his allies have promised, the pain will be felt well beyond struggling small-town America," journalist Conor Lynch wrote for Truthdig earlier this week. "Veterans, especially, who voted overwhelmingly for the president-elect, could be in for a rude awakening."
"Shortly after being tapped to be Musk's co-chair at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, Vivek Ramaswamy posted on X that the first order of business should be to eliminate all spending on programs with expired authorizations from Congress, which amounts to over half a trillion dollars," Lynch noted. "Users were quick to point out that if Trump followed Ramaswamy's advice, he would instantly defund healthcare for veterans, which is by far the largest spending program on that list."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Democratic Leaders Accused of Bowing to GOP Attack on IRS Funds
"For the second straight year, President Biden and the Democrats are poised to sacrifice a significant chunk of one of their biggest accomplishments," one critic lamented.
Dec 18, 2024
Economic justice advocates are urging House Democrats to do more to defend Internal Revenue Service funding after leaders of the minority party agreed to Republican draft legislation that would continue a freeze on more than $20 billion in IRS modernization and enforcement funds in order to avert a government shutdown.
The $20.2 billion freeze is part of a continuing resolution that would guarantee funding for the federal government through March 14. Although the Inflation Reduction Act signed into law by President Joe Biden in August 2022 allocated $80 billion in supplemental funding to the IRS, Congress subsequently rescinded $21.6 billion of that and added a rider for the $20.2 billion freeze in an earlier continuing resolution.
The freeze means that the funds are neither permanently rescinded nor available for use. According to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, the effective $20.2 billion funding reduction would increase the federal deficit by $46 billion "due to a drop in the agency's capacity to enforce taxes on wealthy individuals owed under existing federal law."
As Dylan Gyauch-Lewis wrote Wednesday for The American Prospect, "For the second straight year, President Biden and the Democrats are poised to sacrifice a significant chunk of one of their biggest accomplishments: funding for the IRS to go after wealthy tax cheats."
"With the latest maneuver, more than 90% of the money invested to scale up IRS auditing and oversight could be gone before it can even be used," Gyauch-Lewis added. "Yet again, Democrats seem to have been outplayed by Republican leadership."
Conversely, the infusion of IRA funding has boosted IRS recovery of unpaid taxes.
"The IRS has collected $4.7 billion in back taxes from wealthy tax cheats thanks to funding from the Inflation Reduction Act," Groundwork Collaborative executive director Lindsay Owens said in a statement Wednesday. "But since its passage, Republicans have clawed back nearly half of the enforcement budget to make it easier for the ultra-wealthy to get away with not paying their share."
Democrats helped this happen. In order to secure a 2023 debt ceiling deal with then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), Biden agreed to multi-year spending caps in the so-called Fiscal Responsibility Act, as well as the $21.6 billion IRS funding recision. Now it is uncertain whether the outgoing Biden administration or congressional Democrats will fight to defend IRS funding or once again acquiesce to GOP cuts in order to keep the government running.
House & Senate Dems told us they were fighting to add a provision in the CR to fix the frozen funding, but it didn't make the cut. Republicans have made no secret of targeting the expanded IRS funding from the IRA - an effort very likely to continue in 2025 under a GOP trifecta.
[image or embed]
— Cady Stanton (@cadystanton.bsky.social) December 18, 2024 at 5:10 AM
IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel warned during a recent media call that Republicans' proposed cuts to the agency's funding would "be critically damaging to our capacity to do the work we need to do to make sure that large corporations and complex partnerships are paying what they owe."
Owens said "it's clear congressional Republicans are paving the way for the Trump administration to make it open season for tax cheats."
Such fears mounted this month after Republican President-elect Donald Trump tapped former Rep. Billy Long (R-Mo.) to head the IRS. Long sponsored multiple bills to dismantle the IRS and legislation to repeal all estate taxes, which are overwhelmingly paid by the wealthiest Americans. He has also promoted a dubious pandemic-era tax credit that the IRS has called a magnet for fraud.
"Even before the new administration takes office, we are seeing Republicans take steps to hamstring the IRS to ensure the ultra-wealthy can continue to evade their taxes," Anna Aurilio, senior director of campaigns at Economic Security Project Action, said in a statement Wednesday.
"A well-funded IRS is vital to administering a fair tax code. Slashing funding for the agency, which recently collected nearly $5 billion from wealthy tax evaders and crime rings, only hurts the efficiency and efficacy of the government," Aurilio added. "By starving the agency that helps deliver vital tax credits to the American people, Congress will make it more difficult for people to file their taxes and get the credits they qualify for—all while making it easier for the wealthiest individuals and big businesses to avoid paying their fair share."
Keep ReadingShow Less
New Report Sheds Light on the Pitfalls of AI-Powered 'Gig Nursing'
"These apps are a symptom of broken healthcare infrastructure that is now victim to corporate takeovers. Failing to act on both fronts poses risks to our healthcare system and the workers who power it," wrote one of the researchers.
Dec 17, 2024
While gig work is fairly common in a number of sectors in the American economy, a brief released Tuesday by the progressive-leaning think tank the Roosevelt Institute details how the gig model now has its tentacles in the healthcare industry, and argues it is creating new hazards for workers and patients.
The brief, authored by Groundwork Collaborative fellow Katie Wells and King's College London lecturer Funda Ustek Spilda, sounds the alarm over "on-demand nursing firms" such as CareRev, Clipboard Health, ShiftKey, ShiftMed, and others which have gained traction by promising hospitals more control and nurses and nursing assistants more flexibility.
Practically speaking, these "new Uber-style apps use algorithmic scheduling, staffing, and management technologies—software often touted by companies as cutting-edge 'AI,' or artificial intelligence—to connect understaffed medical facilities with nearby nurses and nursing assistants looking for work," according to the brief.
The authors, whose research was largely based on interviews with 29 gig nurses, argued that these apps "encourage nurses to work for less pay," do not offer nurses clarity when it comes to scheduling and amount or type of work, are not sufficiently concerned with worker safety, and "can threaten patient well-being by placing nurses in unfamiliar clinical environments with no onboarding or facility training."
These platforms are also using the same tactics asthe ride-hailing serviceUber when it comes to lobbying state legislatures in order to shield themselves from labor regulations, according to the authors, who noted that larger hospital systems in the country have included gig nurses in their operations since 2016.
The researchers argued that while the rates on a platform like ShiftKey can be higher for nurses and nurses assistants, nursing on-demand platforms can create a race to the bottom for wages: "The nurses and nursing assistants who use these apps must pay fees to bid on shifts, and they win those bids by offering to work for lower hourly rates than their fellow workers."
When the nursing on-demand firms classify the workers as self-employed, nurses and nursing assistants are also exposed to higher risk because they are "excluded from the protections of local, state, and federal law on minimum wage, overtime pay, workers' compensation, retirement benefits, employment-based health insurance, and paid sick days."
Workers are also rated based on facility feedback and determinations made by the algorithm, and can be penalized if they cancel a shift because they are sick or have a conflict, per the report.
"In at least one case, a nursing assistant went into work at a hospital while sick with Covid-19 because she could not figure out how to cancel a shift without lowering her rating," according to the authors.
By way of background, the authors of the brief also argue that the often-invoked "nursing shortage" is actually misleading term. In fact, there is no shortage of available nurses and nursing assistants, but rather a "growing number of nurses and nursing assistants who refuse to accept chronically understaffed, underpaid, unsafe, and high-stress workplaces," according to the brief, which cites outside research.
In fact, many of the workers interviewed said they would continue working for nursing on demand services because broadly speaking they like the work. According to the brief, interviewees said "over and over again how important flexible schedules are to their lives, especially their own caregiving, be it for children, spouses, or elders"—though the authors of the study wrote that this does not mean the concerns expressed by the workers are not worth paying attention to.
The rise of gig nursing is taking place on the backdrop of increasing corporate ownership over the healthcare industry writ large, including the rise of private equity ownership of medical facilities and medical staffing agencies.
"Policymakers need to be proactive and step in to regulate these platforms and provide proper labor protections for all nurses, gig and non-gig alike," said Wells in a Tuesday statement. "But these apps are a symptom of broken healthcare infrastructure that is now victim to corporate takeovers. Failing to act on both fronts poses risks to our healthcare system and the workers who power it."
Wells also toldThe Guardian that the gig companies don't release data and the industry is unregulated, meaning the true extent to which the U.S. healthcare system is leaning on gig nurses is unknown—but she said it is clearly a growing trend.
These on-demand nursing apps can also have a negative impact on patients, according to sources the authors spoke with. One nurse recounted that "there have been times when I've been unable to access patient records or find supply closets."
"Other workers report that the lack of management and resources can result in major safety lapses for patients, such as gig nurses not being able to get updated information on patient medications or instructions about whether patients need help with feeding," the authors wrote.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular