SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
");background-position:center;background-size:19px 19px;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-color:var(--button-bg-color);padding:0;width:var(--form-elem-height);height:var(--form-elem-height);font-size:0;}:is(.js-newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter_bar.newsletter-wrapper) .widget__body:has(.response:not(:empty)) :is(.widget__headline, .widget__subheadline, #mc_embed_signup .mc-field-group, #mc_embed_signup input[type="submit"]){display:none;}:is(.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper) #mce-responses:has(.response:not(:empty)){grid-row:1 / -1;grid-column:1 / -1;}.newsletter-wrapper .widget__body > .snark-line:has(.response:not(:empty)){grid-column:1 / -1;}:is(.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper) :is(.newsletter-campaign:has(.response:not(:empty)), .newsletter-and-social:has(.response:not(:empty))){width:100%;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col{display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;justify-content:center;align-items:center;gap:8px 20px;margin:0 auto;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col .text-element{display:flex;color:var(--shares-color);margin:0 !important;font-weight:400 !important;font-size:16px !important;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col .whitebar_social{display:flex;gap:12px;width:auto;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col a{margin:0;background-color:#0000;padding:0;width:32px;height:32px;}.newsletter-wrapper .social_icon:after{display:none;}.newsletter-wrapper .widget article:before, .newsletter-wrapper .widget article:after{display:none;}#sFollow_Block_0_0_1_0_0_0_1{margin:0;}.donation_banner{position:relative;background:#000;}.donation_banner .posts-custom *, .donation_banner .posts-custom :after, .donation_banner .posts-custom :before{margin:0;}.donation_banner .posts-custom .widget{position:absolute;inset:0;}.donation_banner__wrapper{position:relative;z-index:2;pointer-events:none;}.donation_banner .donate_btn{position:relative;z-index:2;}#sSHARED_-_Support_Block_0_0_7_0_0_3_1_0{color:#fff;}#sSHARED_-_Support_Block_0_0_7_0_0_3_1_1{font-weight:normal;}.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper.sidebar{background:linear-gradient(91deg, #005dc7 28%, #1d63b2 65%, #0353ae 85%);}
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
"This is major loss for public health and a huge win for the tobacco industry—whose profits will be boosted at the expense of Kiwi lives," said one public health expert.
The new right-wing government of New Zealand, sworn in on Sunday, surveyed the policies left in place by the Labour Party and announced the reversal of one historic measure that was passed with the goal of preventing thousands of smoking-related deaths every year.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, head of the National Party and a former airline executive, announced that the government would scrap the generational smoking ban passed under progressive former Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern in 2021—a law that was praised by public health experts and inspired similar legislation in the United Kingdom.
The law has barred anyone born after 2009 from ever buying cigarettes, with the goal of stopping young people from becoming smokers. It also drastically reduced the legal amount of nicotine in tobacco products and cut the number of stores that are allowed to sell cigarettes from 6,000 nationwide to just 600.
Data modeling showed that the Smokefree Act would save $1.3 billion in health costs over two decades and would reduce mortality rates by 22% for women in New Zealand and by 9% for men.
Currently, about 5,000 people in New Zealand die each year from smoking-related causes.
The possibility of reducing those deaths didn't sway Luxon and his new administration to keep the law in place, with the new prime minister explaining that "coming back to those extra sources of revenue and other savings areas that will help us to fund the tax reduction" that the National Party aims to pass.
Boyd Swinburn, professor of population nutrition and global health at the University of Auckland, said the government is "effectively wanting smokers to continue smoking and more children to start so they can collect more excise tax."
Ben Uffindell, editor of the publication The Civilian, noted that Luxon's goal of increasing revenues and funding tax cuts "doesn't take into account increased cost to the health system."
Public health experts pointed out that the rollback of the law could particularly cost thousands of lives in the Indigenous Maori community.
Health CoalitionAotearoa (HCA), which uses the Maori-language name for New Zealand, said the government's move was "astounding," especially considering that new Minister of Health Dr. Shane Reti had previously stated support for anti-smoking measures.
"This is major loss for public health," said Swinburn, co-chair of the HCA, "and a huge win for the tobacco industry—whose profits will be boosted at the expense of Kiwi lives."
When New Zealand's Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern announced the country's transition away from its coronavirus elimination strategy, also known as "zero-Covid," US and British media outlets framed the decision as a recognition of the inevitable failure of an irrational goal.
The London Times (10/4/21) made its analysis clear in the headline, "New Zealand Abandons 'Absurd' Zero-Covid Strategy After Failure to Stop Delta Strain." The outlet highlighted the contrast between Ardern's approach and that of her Australian counterpart Scott Morrison: "Until today, Ardern had remained committed to the elimination strategy despite the view of her Australian counterpart, Scott Morrison, that such a goal was 'absurd.'"
The London Daily Mail (10/4/21) reported on New Zealand's transition in more triumphalist terms, stating:
New Zealand has finally acknowledged what most other countries realized long ago, that it cannot completely eradicate Covid.
Jacinda Ardern is abandoning her draconian "Zero Covid" strategy after admitting she cannot stop the spread of the Delta variant with harsh lockdown measures and aggressive contact tracing.
The Associated Press's "New Zealand Admits It Can No Longer Get Rid of Coronavirus" (10/4/21) similarly framed New Zealand's previous zero-Covid strategy as an unusual deviation that would inevitably fail, although it acknowledged that the elimination strategy worked "remarkably well":
New Zealand's government acknowledged Monday what most other countries did long ago: It can no longer completely get rid of the coronavirus.
Since early in the pandemic, New Zealand had pursued an unusual zero-tolerance approach to the virus through strict lockdowns and aggressive contact tracing.
CNBC (10/5/21) reported that New Zealand has "become the latest country to abandon a zero-Covid strategy" and has been "notoriously strict in its tackling of Covid," citing the time Ardern put the country in a strict lockdown after one coronavirus case was detected (the first caused by the Delta variant) in August.
"Notorious" is an interesting way to describe New Zealand's performance, considering how frequently it featured on numerous lists of countries credited for handling the pandemic the best compared to the rest of the world prior to the outbreak of the Delta variant (Newshub, 1/28/21; New Zealand Herald, 9/29/21; Guardian, 10/8/20).
CNBC made it seem as if New Zealand was trying to maintain zero-Covid forever, and cites experts claiming that the highly infectious Delta variant makes such approaches "futile," even though Ardern explained that New Zealand's elimination strategy was always intended to be temporary. China--with far fewer geographic and population advantages compared to New Zealand--has managed to sustain a zero-Covid approach, with less than 5,000 total deaths from the virus throughout the pandemic, in a population of 1.4 billion, with nationwide cases fading to zero in August.
However, it is erroneous to present the shift as a failure of New Zealand's pandemic response, or to falsely caricature their initial approach as being motivated by a naive belief they could sustain it indefinitely. Rather, countries only need to pursue these measures until a sufficient number of their population are fully vaccinated. Singapore transitioned out of its zero-Covid strategy in phases after targeting an 80% vaccination rate, with the vast majority of their new cases not falling seriously ill due to being vaccinated.
Ardern explained her shift by citing the increased availability of vaccines, and stated that the decision to transition away from New Zealand's zero-Covid approach was inevitable. She said that her policy had shifted due to the greater transmissibility of the Delta variant, which makes it harder to bring cases down to zero, and announced that New Zealand will be ending national lockdowns when it reaches a 90% vaccination rate (Wired, 10/8/21).
The mockery and disdain for New Zealand's pandemic response was nowhere more apparent than when it was widely reported that the country initiated a level 4 lockdown (the highest level in New Zealand) after detecting a single Delta variant case with the Delta variant on August 17 in Auckland (New Zealand's most populous city).
The London Telegraph (8/19/21) scorned New Zealand as a "once-welcoming nation" turned into a "isolated dystopia, where liberties are taken away in a heartbeat and outsiders are shunned." The paper claimed a fetishization of "zero risk" gave the state "limitless justification to interfere in our lives in the most extreme of ways." Ardern's right-wing predecessor, former Prime Minister John Key, wrote a widely shared op-ed (Stuff, 9/26/21) declaring that "the aim should no longer be to exist in a smug hermit kingdom," and not to "continue the North Korea option."
Libertarian pundit Glenn Greenwald continued this line of thought by tweeting that Australian and New Zealand officials seem "demented, oblivious to the costs of sustained isolation" because of the lockdown.
However, what critics like Greenwald omitted was that the lockdown was initially supposed to last only three days, and that New Zealanders have not been under "sustained isolation" since their zero-Covid approach quickly stamped out the virus in previous outbreaks. In fact, plenty of people living there have pointed out that it's hard for people outside the country to grasp how normal life has been there for most of the pandemic (Guardian, 10/5/21):
For 18 months, New Zealanders were living life as if there were no pandemic. We were gathering outdoors and indoors in the thousands, mask mandates were literally a foreign concept, and business and public services were operating more or less as normal. We were watching governments that let the virus rip with a good dose of horror and, if we're honest, a modest dose of smugness.
This is not a mere anecdote. When one looks at the Covid-19 Stringency Index provided by the University of Oxford, which measures how restrictive policies are for countries by tracking various metrics like school and workplace closures, as well as travel bans, it's clear that New Zealanders have enjoyed more freedoms throughout most of the pandemic than Americans or Brazilians (where Greenwald is based). Right before the latest lockdown measures in August, New Zealanders had been living normally with not a single Covid case for six months, demonstrating that powerful measures for a brief period of time actually grant citizens more freedom, and are more effective than sustained half-measures that predominate in the US and UK.
Also omitted is that the vast majority of New Zealanders were supportive of their zero-Covid policy, as numerous polls and the Labour Party's landslide 2020 reelection confirm (ABC, 10/8/21; Otago Daily Times, 9/2/21). While economic activity is not a perfect proxy for normal living, it's worth noting that New Zealand's economy grew 1.0% in 2020, while the US's dropped 3.5% and Britain's plunged 9.8%.
Yet these facts don't stop outside commentators from condemning and caricaturing New Zealand's policy as throwing away "personal freedoms" for quarantine "camps," or falsely portraying New Zealanders as if they are languishing in a "Covid prison" (Fox News, 10/28/20; London Times, 8/22/21).
As it happens, New Zealand's decision to initiate a swift lockdown after detecting a single case is similar to how other countries adopting a zero-Covid approach, like China, handle things. And that decision was later vindicated by the discovery of even more previously undetected cases, as one detected case on August 17 turned into 63 new cases by August 25, due to the more transmissible Delta variant, along with not being able to detect more cases without additional testing (Gizmodo, 8/25/21). Since officials are supposed to revise their approach upon gaining additional information in real time, it's not a surprise or a sign of incompetence that the initial three-day lockdown was repeatedly extended upon learning of more Covid cases throughout the lockdown.
This is not to say that a zero-Covid strategy is easily replicable. Many people living in countries that pursue virus elimination strategies, like New Zealand and China, have pointed out that they both depend on "social license," or trust in their government's public health response. The general public complies with public health measures because they feel like they are working together to contain the pandemic, in addition to government action having clear rationales (Time, 10/14/21). Even if the US government possessed the technical capabilities of New Zealand and China, that doesn't mean the US would be capable of replicating their success with widespread compliance, since Americans have consistently displayed low trust and satisfaction in their government compared to New Zealand and China (Pew, 5/17/21).
Nor is it to say that New Zealanders have no criticisms of their pandemic response. Critics have charged that the Labour Party's sudden transition from an elimination to a containment strategy took place too quickly, given New Zealand's slow vaccine rollout. With children and the indigenous Maori population not having the same vaccination rates as adults and white people, this risks Covid-19 "becoming a disease for brown people" (Guardian, 10/5/21; RNZ, 8/24/21). Numerous experts have argued that herd immunity and virus eradication (which differs from virus elimination by seeking to entirely wipe out Covid-19 from the planet like smallpox) may be unrealistic goals, as Covid-19 is most likely going to be endemic like influenza, in part because other countries have not pursued New Zealand's elimination strategy (Nature, 3/18/21; Vox, 10/22/21; MedPage Today, 4/11/21).
One gets the sense that corporate media outlets in countries like the US and Britain mocking or criticizing New Zealand's pandemic response are following a "misery loves company" ethos (FAIR.org, 9/17/21). But one can simply compare New Zealand's 6.9 Covid deaths per million with the US and the UK's 2,313 and 2,131 deaths per million, respectively, to see if New Zealand should listen to the US/UK media's spiteful coverage, and to assess which governments have failed their populations by putting profits before people (BMJ, 2/4/21).
New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern--hailed by progressives around the world for her government's response to the Covid-19, gun violence, and climate crises--has won a landslide re-election victory as vote counting in the country's general election came to a close on Saturday.
The New Zealand Heraldreports Ardern's center-left Labour Party surged to certain victory, winning 49.1% of the vote and crushing the center-right National Party in an "abolute drubbing." The Nats received just 26.8% of votes cast, which means Labour will enjoy a 64 to 35 seat advantage in the 120-seat parliament.
\u201c\ud83d\udd34 New Zealand sees red \ud83d\udd34\n\nThe Labour Party, under Jacinda Ardern's leadership, has surged to victory, smashing records and sealing a historic victory.\n\nBut will they govern alone? Get the full story \u25b6\ufe0f https://t.co/uWqI61uKYc\u201d— nzherald (@nzherald) 1602935272
Ardern arrived at Auckland Town Hall on Friday night to a jubilant reception as she took the stage with Labour MPs and her partner, radio and television presenter Clarke Gayford.
"Tonight New Zealand has shown the Labour Party its greatest support in at least 50 years," Ardern declared to raucous cheers.
Ardern said Labour was committed to building critical infrastructure, transitioning to 100% renewal electricity, the environment, and supporting the nation's most vulnerable people.
"Over the next three years there is much work to do," she said. "We will build back better from the Covid crisis; better stronger with the answers to the [issues] New Zealand already faces."
Labour's result is the best that any party has ever achieved since the South Pacific nation adopted mixed-member proportional representation (MMP) in 1994.
National Party candidate Judith Collins, suffering what the Herald described as "an absolute bloodbath," phoned Ardern to congratulate her on her "outstanding result."
To the left of Labour, the Green Party won approximately 8% of the vote, with Green MP Chloe Swarbrick on track to win the key Auckland Central electorate. Swarbrick will become just the second Green MP to win an electorate seat in the party's 30-year history.
\u201c#BREAKING Labour has broken records in their victory over National, but that may not be the election's biggest upset.\n\nOnce a Labour stronghold then tightly held by National, Auckland Central has gone Green as Chl\u00f6e Swarbrick looks set to claim the seat.\n\nhttps://t.co/mbWRPiJ3LG\u201d— nzherald (@nzherald) 1602932412
Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson congratulated Ardern for "an extraordinary win" and said her party hopes to be part of a "strong, truly progressive government."
Around the world, progressives hailed Ardern's victory. The 40-year-old won widespread acclaim for the manner in which her government has dealt with some of the greatest crises facing the nation of 4.9 million people.
\u201cCongratulations @jacindaardern and all our friends in the New Zealand Labour Party \ud83c\udf89. For so many reasons, an inspiration around the world and deservedly making history today \ud83c\uddf3\ud83c\uddff #NZElection2020\u201d— Lisa Nandy (@Lisa Nandy) 1602926413
Foremost among these is the Covid-19 pandemic, which as of Saturday has claimed just 25 lives in the country. In stark contrast, the U.S. state of Alabama, which has the same population as New Zealand, has lost more than 100 times as many people to Covid-19.
Ardern's government has also passed landmark climate legislation that commits the nation to reduce its carbon emissions to zero over the next 30 years, and it drew applause from U.S. gun control advocates when it responded to the March 15, 2019 Christchurch mosque massacre by banning assault weapons just six days later.
Inevitably, envious progressive observers in the U.S. drew comparisons between Ardern and President Donald Trump, who John Nichols, the national affairs correspondent at The Nation, called "polar opposites"
\u201cNew Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern is the polar opposite of Donald Trump.\n\nBoth up for re-election in 2020.\n\n#jacindaardern just won with the largest landslide NZ has seen in 74 years.\n\nSo if the equation is right, shouldn\u2019t Trump lose by the largest landslide in 74 year?\u201d— John Nichols (@John Nichols) 1602928758