SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
");background-position:center;background-size:19px 19px;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-color:var(--button-bg-color);padding:0;width:var(--form-elem-height);height:var(--form-elem-height);font-size:0;}:is(.js-newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter_bar.newsletter-wrapper) .widget__body:has(.response:not(:empty)) :is(.widget__headline, .widget__subheadline, #mc_embed_signup .mc-field-group, #mc_embed_signup input[type="submit"]){display:none;}:is(.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper) #mce-responses:has(.response:not(:empty)){grid-row:1 / -1;grid-column:1 / -1;}.newsletter-wrapper .widget__body > .snark-line:has(.response:not(:empty)){grid-column:1 / -1;}:is(.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper) :is(.newsletter-campaign:has(.response:not(:empty)), .newsletter-and-social:has(.response:not(:empty))){width:100%;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col{display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;justify-content:center;align-items:center;gap:8px 20px;margin:0 auto;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col .text-element{display:flex;color:var(--shares-color);margin:0 !important;font-weight:400 !important;font-size:16px !important;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col .whitebar_social{display:flex;gap:12px;width:auto;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col a{margin:0;background-color:#0000;padding:0;width:32px;height:32px;}.newsletter-wrapper .social_icon:after{display:none;}.newsletter-wrapper .widget article:before, .newsletter-wrapper .widget article:after{display:none;}#sFollow_Block_0_0_1_0_0_0_1{margin:0;}.donation_banner{position:relative;background:#000;}.donation_banner .posts-custom *, .donation_banner .posts-custom :after, .donation_banner .posts-custom :before{margin:0;}.donation_banner .posts-custom .widget{position:absolute;inset:0;}.donation_banner__wrapper{position:relative;z-index:2;pointer-events:none;}.donation_banner .donate_btn{position:relative;z-index:2;}#sSHARED_-_Support_Block_0_0_7_0_0_3_1_0{color:#fff;}#sSHARED_-_Support_Block_0_0_7_0_0_3_1_1{font-weight:normal;}.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper.sidebar{background:linear-gradient(91deg, #005dc7 28%, #1d63b2 65%, #0353ae 85%);}
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
"Members of Congress should not be allowed to trade stock," said one former congressional candidate. "It's corruption."
A financial watchdog group on Tuesday released its annual report on congressional stock trading, which shows that "Congress blew the market out of the water" in 2023, fueling fresh calls for a ban targeting U.S. lawmakers and their immediate family members.
"Members of Congress shouldn't be allowed to trade stocks of the companies they regulate for the same reasons referees aren't allowed to bet on the games they officiate," Melanie D'Arrigo, a former Democratic congressional candidate who is now executive director of the Campaign for New York Health, said in response to the Unusual Whales report.
Nina Turner, who also previously ran for Congress and is now a senior fellow at the Institute on Race, Power, and Political Economy, agreed. As Turner put it: "Members of Congress should not be allowed to trade stock. It's corruption."
While the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act of 2012 was intended to ban insider trading by members of Congress, lawmakers are still permitted to buy and sell stocks, even those of companies impacted by their work on Capitol Hill.
Revelations about lawmakers' stock market gains over the past few years, including previous reports from Unusual Whales, have bolstered efforts to pass legislation barring members of Congress, their spouses, and their dependent children from trading individual stocks—such as the Bipartisan Restoring Faith in Government Act introduced in May.
U.S. Congressman Ken Buck (R-Colo.) responded to the latest Unusual Whales report by promoting the Bipartisan Ban on Congressional Stock Ownership Act, which he introduced last year with Reps. Matt Rosendale (R-Mont.) and Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
"Members of both parties have misused their influence to buy and trade stocks. This is an issue which hurts all Americans," Buck said Tuesday. "The Bipartisan Ban on Congressional Stock Ownership Act will ensure that Congress is voting to represent their constituents instead of their wallets."
Unusual Whales' new report includes a graph comparing lawmakers' estimated returns for 2023—based on the current stocks in their portfolios—with the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY), an exchange-traded fund that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index.
Thirty-two members of Congress—evenly split among Democrats and Republicans—fared better than SPY, which was up 24.81%. Overall, Democratic lawmakers were up 31.18% last year while their GOP colleagues were up 17.99%. At the top was U.S. Rep. Brian Higgins (D-N.Y.) at 238.9%.
Joining him in the top 10 were: Rep. Mark Green (R-Tenn.), 122.2%; Rep. Garret Graves (R-La.), 107.6%; David Rouzer (R-N.C.), 105.6%; Seth Moulton (D-Mass.), 80%; Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), 78.5%; Rep. John Rutherford (R-Fla.), 69.1%; Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), 68.1%; former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), 65.5%; and Pete Sessions (R-Texas), 63.3%.
"Numerous members in Congress traded war stocks before the Israel-Gaza-Palestine conflict," Unusual Whales noted.
As Common Dreams has reported, after Israel declared war in response to a Hamas-led attack on October 7, the stock of defense companies soared and weapons giants have continued to cash in on the conflict.
Unusual Whales also highlighted that "the banking crisis saw numerous mergers and unusually timed transactions, both by banking executives and politicians."
The person behind Unusual Whales grantedABC News an anonymous interview about such trades back in November:
"One thing people always say is that members are very good at picking stocks, that's often assumed… but to be quite frank, members were also quite good at avoiding losses," he told ABC News in his first television interview.
He pointed ABC News to the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and the regional banking crisis. He tracked trades showing several members of Congress, who sit on the House and Senate committees that regulate the financial industry, who sold SVB and other bank stocks before they experienced their sharpest decline.
"I can't know the intent, if that was what they were aiming to do," he told ABC News. "But many of the members who were trading banking stocks during that time performed very, very well."
In the Tuesday report, Unusual Whales also flagged unusual trades by Pelosi, whose husband is a trader, and Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), "one of the most active traders in Congress."
"We hope this will be our final report, and this report (with the history of our previous research) will be good enough to end the argument about Congress and trading," concluded Unusual Whales, which has also launched a tool so members of the public can track the portfolios of individual lawmakers.
Fox News host Jesse Watters on Tuesday asked U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) about the report, which shows that she was up 18.6% last year. She responded, "I actually asked my team about that today—why my name was on the list—because I don't even own any stocks and I haven't all of 2023."
"As a matter of fact, we have to report everything, including children who are dependents of ours. And I think what was reported was actually related to my son's account that his father and I had set up for him years ago," added Greene, who shares three children with her ex-husband.
Newsweekreported that a clip of the interview "sparked questions and mockery from social media users, some of whom accused Greene of using her son as an excuse to cover up her own trading."
"Speaking up to save lives—no matter faith, no matter ethnicity—should not be controversial in this chamber. The cries of the Palestinian and Israeli children sound no different to me."
Update:
U.S. House lawmakers voted Tuesday night to censure Tlaib. The vote was 234-188, with 22 Democrats joining almost all Republicans in approving the resolution. Four GOP lawmakers voted against the measure.
Earlier:
As the Republican-led U.S. House of Representatives on Tuesday advanced a resolution to censure Rep. Rashida Tlaib for affirming Palestinian human rights and opposing Israel's war on Gaza, the Michigan Democrat defended herself—and the people of her ancestral home—during an impassioned House floor speech.
"I'm the only Palestinian American serving in Congress... and my perspective is needed here now more than ever," Tlaib asserted. "I will not be silenced and I will not let you distort my words."
"Folks forget I'm from Detroit, the most beautiful, blackest city in the country where I learned how to speak truth to power even if my voice shakes," she added. "Trying to bully or censor me won't work because this movement for a cease-fire is much bigger than one person. It's growing every single day."
A motion to table Rep. Rich McCormick's (R-Ga.) resolution to censure Tlaib "For promoting false narratives regarding the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel and for calling for the destruction of the state of Israel" failed, with one Democrat—Rep. Brad Scheider of Illinois—joining 212 Republicans in voting down the measure.
Tlaib has never called for the destruction of Israel.
Six Republicans—Reps. Ken Buck (Colo.), John Duarte (Calif.), Mike Garcia (Calif.), Thomas Massie (Ky.), Thomas McClintock (Calif.), and Ryan Zinke (Mont.)—voted to table the motion.
"It's not our job to censure somebody because we don't agree with them," argued Buck.
Many Republicans and Democrats have accused Tlaib of antisemitism, especially for calling Israel's war on Gaza a "genocide"—an assessment with which many experts concur—and for using the phrase, "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free."
Tlaib has explained that, to her, the phrase—which is also a
core component of the original platform of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's right-wing Likud party—"is an aspirational call for freedom, human rights, and peaceful coexistence, not death, destruction, or hate."
But to little avail, as House Republicans answered with censure resolutions, including a failed effort by far-right Georgia Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene. House lawmakers are set to hold a final vote on McCormick's resolution on Wednesday.
"While I will continue to defend First Amendment liberties for those I disagree with, I will not support the right to call for a violent genocide," Rep. Tim Walberg (R-Mich.) said.
There is no evidence that Tlaib has ever called for any genocide.
However, statements by some
congressional Republicans—and many Israeli officials including Netanyahu—have been condemned by human rights defenders as advocating genocidal violence against Palestinians.
Speaking on the House floor Tuesday, Tlaib said:
There are millions of people across our country who oppose Netanyahu's extremism and are done watching our country support collective punishment and the use of white phosphorus bombs that melt flesh to the bone. They are done watching our government... supporting cutting off food, water, electricity, and medical care to millions of people with nowhere to go. Like me... they don't believe the answer to war crimes is more war crimes.
"The refusal of Congress and the [Biden] administration to acknowledge Palestinian lives is chipping away at my soul," Tlaib said. "Over 10,000 Palestinians have been killed."
"Let me be clear: My criticism has always been of the Israeli government and Netanyahu's actions. It's important to separate people and governments—no government is beyond criticism," she stressed. "The idea that criticizing the government of Israel is antisemitic sets a very dangerous precedent and it's being used to silence diverse voices speaking up for human rights across our nation."
"Do you realize what it's like, Mr. Chair, for the people outside our chamber right now listening in agony to their own government dehumanizing them?" Tlaib asked. "To hear the president of the United States who we helped elect
dispute death tolls as we see video after video of dead children and parents under rubble? Mr. Chair, do you know what it's like to fear rising hate crimes... and worry that your own child might suffer the same horrors that 6-year-old Wadea [Al Fayoume] did in Illinois?"
"I can't believe I have to say this but Palestinian people are not disposable," she said. After a long pause in which she choked back tears, she added, "We are human beings just like anyone else."
"The idea that criticizing the government of Israel is antisemitic sets a very dangerous precedent and it's being used to silence diverse voices speaking up for human rights across our nation."
Holding up a photo of her grandmother who lives in the illegally occupied West Bank and flanked by her friend and colleague Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Tlaib said her "Sity," like all Palestinians, "just wants to live her life with the freedom and human dignity we all deserve."
Tlaib said she is "inspired by the courageous survivors in Israel, who have lost loved ones, yet are calling for a cease-fire," and "grateful for the people in the streets in the peace movement, with countless Jewish Americans across the country standing up and lovingly saying, 'Not in our name.'"
"Speaking up to save lives—no matter faith, no matter ethnicity—should not be controversial in this chamber," she argued. "The cries of the Palestinian and Israeli children sound no different to me. What I don't understand is why the cries of Palestinians sound different to you all. We cannot lose our shared humanity."
"As we live in an increasingly digital age, we need to ensure that humans hold the power alone to command, control, and launch nuclear weapons—not robots," said co-sponsor Sen. Ed Markey.
In the name of "protecting future generations from potentially devastating consequences," a bipartisan group of U.S. lawmakers on Wednesday introduced legislation meant to prevent artificial intelligence from launching nuclear weapons without meaningful human control.
The Block Nuclear Launch by Autonomous Artificial Intelligence Act—introduced by Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Reps. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), Don Beyer (D-Va.), and Ken Buck (R-Colo.)—asserts that "any decision to launch a nuclear weapon should not be made" by AI.
The proposed legislation acknowledges that the Pentagon's 2022 Nuclear Posture Review states that current U.S. policy is to "maintain a human 'in the loop' for all actions critical to informing and executing decisions by the president to initiate and terminate nuclear weapon employment."
The bill would codify that policy so that no federal funds could be used "to launch a nuclear weapon [or] select or engage targets for the purposes of launching" nukes.
"As we live in an increasingly digital age, we need to ensure that humans hold the power alone to command, control, and launch nuclear weapons—not robots," Markey asserted in a statement. "We need to keep humans in the loop on making life-or-death decisions to use deadly force, especially for our most dangerous weapons."
\u201cAI is amazing and has made our lives better. It can also kill us. No matter how smart AI becomes, it can never have control over nuclear weapons.\n\nI introduced bipartisan legislation with @RepKenBuck @RepDonBeyer and Sen @EdMarkey to require a human to launch any nuclear weapon.\u201d— Ted Lieu (@Ted Lieu) 1682544333
Buck argued that "while U.S. military use of AI can be appropriate for enhancing national security purposes, use of AI for deploying nuclear weapons without a human chain of command and control is reckless, dangerous, and should be prohibited."
According to the 2023 AI Index Report—an annual assessment published earlier this month by the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence—36% of surveyed AI experts worry about the possibility that automated systems "could cause nuclear-level catastrophe."
"Use of AI for deploying nuclear weapons without a human chain of command and control is reckless, dangerous, and should be prohibited."
The report followed a February assessment by the Arms Control Association, an advocacy group, that AI and other emerging technologies including lethal autonomous weapons systems and hypersonic missiles pose a potentially existential threat that underscores the need for measures to slow the pace of weaponization.
"While we all try to grapple with the pace at which AI is accelerating, the future of AI and its role in society remains unclear," Lieu said in a statement introducing the new bill.
"It is our job as members of Congress to have responsible foresight when it comes to protecting future generations from potentially devastating consequences," he continued. "That's why I'm pleased to introduce the bipartisan, bicameral Block Nuclear Launch by Autonomous AI Act, which will ensure that no matter what happens in the future, a human being has control over the employment of a nuclear weapon—not a robot."
"AI can never be a substitute for human judgment when it comes to launching nuclear weapons," Lieu added.
While dozens of countries support the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, none of the world's nine nuclear powers, including the United States, have signed on, and Russia's invasion of Ukraine has reawakened fears of nuclear conflict that were largely dormant since the Cold War.