SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
");background-position:center;background-size:19px 19px;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-color:var(--button-bg-color);padding:0;width:var(--form-elem-height);height:var(--form-elem-height);font-size:0;}:is(.js-newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter_bar.newsletter-wrapper) .widget__body:has(.response:not(:empty)) :is(.widget__headline, .widget__subheadline, #mc_embed_signup .mc-field-group, #mc_embed_signup input[type="submit"]){display:none;}:is(.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper) #mce-responses:has(.response:not(:empty)){grid-row:1 / -1;grid-column:1 / -1;}.newsletter-wrapper .widget__body > .snark-line:has(.response:not(:empty)){grid-column:1 / -1;}:is(.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper) :is(.newsletter-campaign:has(.response:not(:empty)), .newsletter-and-social:has(.response:not(:empty))){width:100%;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col{display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;justify-content:center;align-items:center;gap:8px 20px;margin:0 auto;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col .text-element{display:flex;color:var(--shares-color);margin:0 !important;font-weight:400 !important;font-size:16px !important;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col .whitebar_social{display:flex;gap:12px;width:auto;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col a{margin:0;background-color:#0000;padding:0;width:32px;height:32px;}.newsletter-wrapper .social_icon:after{display:none;}.newsletter-wrapper .widget article:before, .newsletter-wrapper .widget article:after{display:none;}#sFollow_Block_0_0_1_0_0_0_1{margin:0;}.donation_banner{position:relative;background:#000;}.donation_banner .posts-custom *, .donation_banner .posts-custom :after, .donation_banner .posts-custom :before{margin:0;}.donation_banner .posts-custom .widget{position:absolute;inset:0;}.donation_banner__wrapper{position:relative;z-index:2;pointer-events:none;}.donation_banner .donate_btn{position:relative;z-index:2;}#sSHARED_-_Support_Block_0_0_7_0_0_3_1_0{color:#fff;}#sSHARED_-_Support_Block_0_0_7_0_0_3_1_1{font-weight:normal;}.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper.sidebar{background:linear-gradient(91deg, #005dc7 28%, #1d63b2 65%, #0353ae 85%);}
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The Institute of Politics at the Harvard Kennedy School revoked an invitation for United States military whistleblower Chelsea Manning to serve as a visiting fellow after intense pressure from the CIA.
According to the Harvard Crimson, the school newspaper, "high-ranking current and former CIA officials" convinced the Dean of the Kennedy School of Government to reverse course.
Mike Pompeo, the current CIA director, canceled his appearance at the school on September 14. He wrote a letter to the director of the Intelligence and Defense Projects at Harvard Kennedy that declared, "Ms. Manning betrayed her country and was found guilty of 17 serious crimes for leaking classified information to Wikileaks. Indeed, Ms. Manning stands against everything the brave men and women I serve alongside stand for."
Former CIA director Mike Morell resigned from his position as a senior fellow at the Belfer Center at the Harvard Kennedy School. His statement bore a distinct similarity to Pompeo's statement.
"Please know that I am fully aware that Belfer and the IOP are separate institutions within the Kennedy School and that, most likely, Belfer had nothing to do with the invitation of Ms. Manning to be a fellow at IOP," Morell stated. "But, as an institution, the Kennedy School's decision will assist Ms. Manning in her long-standing effort to legitimize the criminal path that she took to prominence, an attempt that may encourage others to leak classified information as well."
Morell acknowledged Manning's rights as a transgender American and contended he had nothing against her discussing the "circumstances around her crimes as well as the IOP's right to invite whomever they believe will further the education of Harvard's student body." However, Morell still found it necessary to impose his status as a former CIA director to pressure the Kennedy School to change its decision.
To the statement from Pompeo that, "Ms. Manning stands against everything the brave men and women I serve alongside stand for," there is some truth to that. She probably stands against the torture of prisoners in order to obtain "intelligence" or false confessions that can justify the global war on terrorism. She probably stands against deploying covert agents to countries to undermine their sovereignty and impose the agenda of the United States on governments. She probably does not support the cult of intelligence's regular engagement in secrecy and deception to avoid responsibility for crimes.
It is remarkable that any former CIA director would oppose someone for "long-standing efforts" to "legitimize" their "criminal path." This is exactly what former CIA director Michael Hayden, former acting CIA general counsel John Rizzo, former CIA Counterterrorism Center head Jose Rodriguez and others have done through books and speaking engagements. Rodriguez destroyed tapes showing torture, and he goes around defending his past at the CIA, even going so far as to celebrate the usefulness of torture techniques.
Amidst the uproar against Manning by the CIA, Harvard Kennedy is pressing ahead with having former White House press secretary Sean Spicer and Donald Trump's former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski as visiting fellows. Lewandowski grabbed Breibart News reporter Michelle Fields and was charged with battery. Prosecutors later chose not to prosecute but confirmed Fields' allegation that she was physically attacked by Lewandowski. Video also showed Lewandowski grabbing a protester.
A press release from Harvard Kennedy states, "As a TV political commentator, [Lewandowski] provides on-air analysis on political news of the day as well as an in-depth understanding of the political process and the administration of President Donald J. Trump." Part of that "analysis" included promoting birtherism--the racist notion that Obama was not a citizen when he ran for president.
On CNN, Lewandowski said, "Did he ever release his transcripts or his admission to Harvard University? You raised the issue, so just yes or no? The answer is no," and he added, "The question was did he get in as a U.S. citizen or was he brought into Harvard University as a citizen who wasn't from this country?"
It is a safe bet that the CIA will still be sending its personnel to speak to students, even as Harvard gives a platform to a birther. There won't be any letters to any deans for hiring a criminal who assaulted a reporter and got away with it.
Additionally, let's examine some of the past visiting fellows at Harvard Kennedy's Institute of Politics.
Former New Hampshire Republican Senator Kelly Ayotte was a visiting fellow in spring 2017. She was a leading hawk when it came to foreign policy, opposed to the Iran nuclear deal and against withdrawing troops from Iraq. She opposed trying Guantanamo prisoners in federal courts and spoke out against closing the military prison, despite its record of abuse and torture.
In August 2016, former Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel was a visiting fellow. Coincidentally, Hagel bears some responsibility for the frustration Manning experienced while trying to obtain hormone therapy while she was in prison at Fort Leavenworth.
Former U.S. House of Representatives Republican Majority Leader Eric Cantor was a visiting fellow in spring 2015. As late as 2014, Cantor was still speaking out against the withdrawal of troops from Iraq. He also advocated for troops to remain in Afghanistan.
Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee was a visiting fellow in the fall of 2014. Huckabee also opposed the Iran nuclear deal and wildly suggested that President Obama was marching the Israelis to "the door of the oven" with the deal. He said Guantanamo Bay was a "distraction" because people perceive there is torture and abuse but really "every consideration" is made to take care of prisoners. Plus, Huckabee is a Christian Zionist who thinks the Jewish people have a "God-given right to reclaim land" and that Palestinians should not have a state in the "Promised Land."
Michael Gerson, who served as a speechwriter and top aide to George W. Bush, was a visiting fellow in the fall of 2006. It was Gerson who proposed the metaphor of not allowing a smoking gun to become a mushroom cloud as a phrase that could help the Bush administration lie America into war in Iraq.
One thing all of the highlighted current and former visiting fellows have in common is their full support of any U.S. war or effort the country may take to expand its superpower at great cost to populations. Manning obviously does not fit because she has a record of speaking out against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Visiting fellows, as Harvard Kennedy describes, are on campus to broaden the "range and depth of opportunity for students to hear from and engage with experts, leaders, and policy-shapers."
Had Manning served as a visiting fellow, she could have spoken with students from her experience as an all-source military intelligence analyst. She could have shared with them her ideas about how to degrade and destroy the Islamic State in Iraq and how bombs and bullets only fuel the militant organization responsible for so much brutality. But that does not fit the preferred narrative of the CIA.
Harvard Kennedy had an opportunity to have a voice on campus, who would not use her presence to absolve herself of her past actions but rather would draw from her experience to help students grapple with harsh realities in the world. She is a skeptic, who students should hear from as President Donald Trump stretches the rules of engagement in war zones and hundreds upon hundreds of more civilians are killed.
Moreover, Manning served her time in prison and serving as a visiting fellow at Harvard Kennedy would have allowed her to speed her reintegration into society after seven years in a military prison. Apparently, Harvard Kennedy stands against rehabilitation and stands with the CIA, who will vengefully attack Manning for the rest of her life so long as people laud any part of the action she undertook to inform the world of the true costs of U.S. wars.
Perhaps former CIA acting director Michael Morell's shamefully provocative rhetoric toward Russia and Iran will prove too unhinged even for Hillary Clinton. It appears equally likely that it will succeed in earning him a senior job in a possible Clinton administration, so it behooves us to have a closer look at Morell's record.
My initial reaction of disbelief and anger was the same as that of my VIPS colleague, Larry Johnson, and the points Larry made about Morell's behavior in the Benghazi caper, Iran, Syria, needlessly baiting nuclear-armed Russia, and how to put a "scare" into Bashar al-Assad give ample support to Larry's characterization of Morell's comments as "reckless and vapid." What follows is an attempt to round out the picture on the ambitious 57-year-old Morell.
I suppose we need to start with Morell telling PBS/CBS interviewer Charlie Rose on Aug. 8 that he (Morell) wanted to "make the Iranians pay a price in Syria. ... make the Russians pay a price in Syria."
Rose: "We make them pay the price by killing Russians?"
Morell: "Yeah."
Rose: "And killing Iranians?"
Morell: "Yes ... You don't tell the world about it. ... But you make sure they know it in Moscow and Tehran."
You might ask what excellent adventure earned Morell his latest appearance with Charlie Rose? It was a highly unusual Aug. 5 New York Timesop-ed titled "I ran the C.I.A. Now I'm Endorsing Hillary Clinton."
Peabody award winner Rose -- having made no secret of how much he admires the glib, smooth-talking Morell -- performed true to form. Indeed, he has interviewed him every other month, on average, over the past two years, while Morell has been a national security analyst for CBS.
This interview, though, is a must for those interested in gauging the caliber of bureaucrats who have bubbled to the top of the CIA since the disastrous tenure of George Tenet (sorry, the interview goes on and on for 46 minutes).
A Heavy Duty
Such interviews are a burden for unreconstructed, fact-based analysts of the old school. In a word, they are required to watch them, just as they must plow through the turgid prose of "tell-it-all" memoirs. But due diligence can sometimes harvest an occasional grain of wheat among the chaff.
For example, George W. Bush's memoir, Decision Points, included a passage the former president seems to have written himself. Was Bush relieved to learn, just 15 months before he left office, the "high-confidence," unanimous judgment of the U.S. intelligence community that Iran had stopped working on a nuclear weapon in 2003 and had not resumed work on such weapons? No way!
In his memoir, he complains bitterly that this judgment in that key 2007 National Intelligence Estimate "tied my hands on the military side. ... After the NIE, how could I possibly explain using the military to destroy the nuclear facilities of a country the intelligence community said had no active nuclear weapons program?" No, I am not making this up. He wrote that.
In another sometimes inadvertently revealing memoir, At the Center of the Storm: My Years at the CIA, CIA Director George Tenet described Michael Morell, whom he picked to be CIA's briefer of President George W. Bush, in these terms: "Wiry, youthful looking, and extremely bright, Mike speaks in staccato-like bursts that get to the bottom line very quickly. He and George Bush hit it off almost immediately. Mike was the perfect guy for us to have by the commander-in-chief's side."
Wonder what Morell was telling Bush about those "weapons of mass destruction in Iraq" and the alleged ties between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda. Was Morell winking at Bush the same way Tenet winked at the head of British intelligence on July 20, 2002, telling him that "the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy" of invading Iraq?
High on Morell
Not surprisingly, Tenet speaks well of his protege and former executive assistant Morell. But he also reveals that Morell "coordinated the CIA review" of Secretary of State Colin Powell's infamous Feb. 5, 2003 speech to the United Nations - a dubious distinction if there ever was one.
So Morell reviewed the "intelligence" that went into Powell's thoroughly deceptive account of the Iraqi threat! Powell later called that dramatic speech, which wowed Washington's media and foreign policy elites and was used to browbeat the few remaining dissenters into silence, a "blot" on his record.
In Morell's own memoir, The Great War of Our Time, Morell apologized to former Secretary of State Powell for the bogus CIA intelligence that found its way into Powell's address. Morell told CBS: "I thought it important to do so because ... he went out there and made this case, and we were wrong."
It is sad to have to remind folks almost 14 years later that the "intelligence" was not "mistaken;" it was fraudulent from the get-go. Announcing on June 5, 2008, the bipartisan conclusions from a five-year study by the Senate Intelligence Committee, Sen. Jay Rockefeller described the intelligence conjured up to "justify" war on Iraq as "uncorroborated, contradicted, or even non-existent."
It strains credulity beyond the breaking point to think that Michael Morell was unaware of the fraudulent nature of the WMD propaganda campaign. Yet, like all too many others, he kept quiet and got promoted.
Out of Harm's Way
For services rendered, Tenet rescued Morell from the center of the storm, so to speak, sending him to a plum posting in London, leaving the hapless Stu Cohen holding the bag. Cohen had been acting director of the National Intelligence Council and nominal manager of the infamous Oct. 1, 2002 National Intelligence Estimate warning about Iraq's [non-existent] WMD.
Cohen made a valiant attempt to defend the indefensible in late November 2003, and was still holding out some hope that WMD would be found. He noted, however, "If we eventually are proved wrong -- that is, that there were no weapons of mass destruction and the WMD programs were dormant or abandoned - the American people will be told the truth ..." And then Stu disappeared into the woodwork.
In October 2003, the 1,200-member "Iraq Survey Group" commissioned by Tenet to find those elusive WMD in Iraq had already reported that six months of intensive work had turned up no chemical, biological or nuclear weapons. By then, the U.S.-sponsored search for WMD had already cost $300 million, with the final bill expected to top $1 billion.
In Morell's The Great War of Our Time, he writes, "In the summer of 2003 I became CIA's senior focal point for liaison with the analytic community in the United Kingdom." He notes that one of the "dominant" issues, until he left the U.K. in early 2006, was "Iraq, namely our failure to find weapons of mass destruction." (It was a PR problem; Prime Minister Tony Blair and Morell's opposite numbers in British intelligence were fully complicit in the "dodgy-dossier" type of intelligence.)
When the storm subsided, Morell came back from London to bigger and better things. He was appointed the CIA's first associate deputy director from 2006 to 2008, and then director for intelligence until moving up to become CIA's deputy director (and twice acting director) from 2010 until 2013.
Reading his book and watching him respond to those softball pitches from Charlie Rose on Monday, it is hard to avoid the conclusion that glibness, vacuousness and ambition can get you to the very top of U.S. intelligence in the Twenty-first Century - and can also make you a devoted fan of whoever is likely to be the next President.
'Wisdom' on China
For those who did not make it to the very end in watching the most recent Michael-and-Charlie show, here is an example of what Morell and Rose both seem to consider trenchant analysis. Addressing the issue of U.S. relations with China, Morell described the following as a main "negative:"
"We both have large militaries in the same place on the planet, the Pacific. What does that mean? It means you have to plan for war against each other, and we both do; it means you have to equip yourself with weapons systems for war against each other, which both of us do; and it means you have to exercise those forces for war against each other, and both of us do. And both sides see all of three of those things. That leads to a natural tension and pulls you apart. ..."
Those who got to the end of Morell's book had already been able to assimilate that wisdom on page 325:
"The negative side [regarding relations with China] includes the fact that ... each country needs to prepare for war against each other (because our militaries are in close proximity to each other). Each plans for such a war, each trains for it, and each must equip its forces with the modern weaponry to fight it [leading] to tension in the relationship. ..."
Well, Morell is at least consistent. More telling, this gibberish is music to the ears of those whom Pope Francis, speaking to Congress last September, referred to as the "blood-drenched" arms traders. Morell seems to be counting on his deep insights being music to the ears of Hillary Clinton, as well.
As for Morell's claim that Russian President Vladimir Putin is somehow controlling Donald Trump, well, even Charlie Rose had stomach problems with that and with Morell's "explanation." In the Times op-ed, Morell wrote: "In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation."
Let the bizarre-ness of that claim sink in, since it is professionally impossible to recruit an agent who is unwitting of being an agent, since an agent is someone who follows instructions from a control officer.
However, since Morell apparently has no evidence that Trump was "recruited," which would make the Republican presidential nominee essentially a traitor, he throws in the caveat "unwitting." Such an ugly charge is on par with Trump's recent hyperbolic claim that President Obama was the "founder" of ISIS.
Looking back at Morell's record, it was not hard to see all this coming, as Morell rose higher and higher in a system that rewards deserving sycophants. I addressed this five years ago in an article titled "Rise of Another CIA Yes Man." That piece elicited many interesting comments from senior intelligence officers who knew Morell personally; some of those comments are tucked into the end of the article.