SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
");background-position:center;background-size:19px 19px;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-color:var(--button-bg-color);padding:0;width:var(--form-elem-height);height:var(--form-elem-height);font-size:0;}:is(.js-newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter_bar.newsletter-wrapper) .widget__body:has(.response:not(:empty)) :is(.widget__headline, .widget__subheadline, #mc_embed_signup .mc-field-group, #mc_embed_signup input[type="submit"]){display:none;}:is(.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper) #mce-responses:has(.response:not(:empty)){grid-row:1 / -1;grid-column:1 / -1;}.newsletter-wrapper .widget__body > .snark-line:has(.response:not(:empty)){grid-column:1 / -1;}:is(.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper) :is(.newsletter-campaign:has(.response:not(:empty)), .newsletter-and-social:has(.response:not(:empty))){width:100%;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col{display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;justify-content:center;align-items:center;gap:8px 20px;margin:0 auto;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col .text-element{display:flex;color:var(--shares-color);margin:0 !important;font-weight:400 !important;font-size:16px !important;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col .whitebar_social{display:flex;gap:12px;width:auto;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col a{margin:0;background-color:#0000;padding:0;width:32px;height:32px;}.newsletter-wrapper .social_icon:after{display:none;}.newsletter-wrapper .widget article:before, .newsletter-wrapper .widget article:after{display:none;}#sFollow_Block_0_0_1_0_0_0_1{margin:0;}.donation_banner{position:relative;background:#000;}.donation_banner .posts-custom *, .donation_banner .posts-custom :after, .donation_banner .posts-custom :before{margin:0;}.donation_banner .posts-custom .widget{position:absolute;inset:0;}.donation_banner__wrapper{position:relative;z-index:2;pointer-events:none;}.donation_banner .donate_btn{position:relative;z-index:2;}#sSHARED_-_Support_Block_0_0_7_0_0_3_1_0{color:#fff;}#sSHARED_-_Support_Block_0_0_7_0_0_3_1_1{font-weight:normal;}.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper.sidebar{background:linear-gradient(91deg, #005dc7 28%, #1d63b2 65%, #0353ae 85%);}
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
With an incoming Trump administration ready to bend to the will of the fossil fuel industry, the Biden administration cannot afford to miss this opportunity to secure its climate legacy.
The Biden administration is running out of time to fulfill its promises to stop using U.S. taxpayer dollars to finance fossil fuel projects overseas. And, as Donald Trump is about to assume the presidency, this is one of the final chances for President Joe Biden to cement his climate legacy.
On November 18, member countries of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) will meet to consider a proposal to end support from export credit agencies (ECAs) for fossil fuels. This proposal not only has the ability to change the course of the climate crisis by shifting $41 billion USD per year globally out of oil and gas, but is the final opportunity for the outgoing Biden administration to fulfill its pledges made through the Clean Energy Transition Partnership, the International Climate Finance Plan, Executive Order on the Climate Crisis, and via G7 statements in 2022 and 2024.
Since May of 2023, the U.S. Export-Import Bank (EXIM)—our country’s ECA—has approved $2.2 billion in new oil-, gas-, and coal-related projects overseas, including a $500 million loan for an oil and gas drilling project in Bahrain. Additionally, EXIM is considering financing dangerous projects like Mozambique LNG and Papua LNG. With a recent report finding that EXIM was considering financing international fossil fuel projects with lifetime emissions equivalent to roughly 80% of the annual fossil fuel carbon dioxide-equivalent output of the entire United States (or 1,300 coal-fired power plants), this proposal is a critical action President Biden can still take to reduce harmful emissions, stop EXIM from financing dangerous fossil fuel projects abroad, and follow through on his commitments.
President Biden’s reputation as our country’s most pro-climate president is on the line.
The climate crisis has reached a critical point, and it’s unconscionable to keep funneling taxpayer dollars into reckless fossil fuel projects overseas. We are already paying the price for this ongoing investment in fossil fuels—facing record-breaking floods, devastating storms, and deadly extreme weather. The escalating severity of these climate disasters must be a wake-up call our leaders can no longer ignore: Taxpayer financing for overseas fossil fuel projects must end now. And, the support for this climate action is strong: Over 250 civil society organizations have called on OECD member states to end public oil and gas funding.
OECD member states as a whole send $41 billion annually to fossil fuel projects despite the blatant need for a swift transition to clean energy, and the Biden administration’s failure to put forward a position—despite pledging to do this numerous times—has led to deadlock and inaction. The billions of dollars per year that EXIM provides for fossil fuels could be shifted away from fossil fuels to renewable energy projects and be presented as part of a climate finance package at COP29. With the clock ticking for his administration, President Biden must agree to end public financing of foreign fossil fuels via EXIM, follow through on past commitments, and show global climate leadership at COP29 and beyond.
As one of the world’s largest emitters, the United States must use this opportunity to reach our global clean energy agreements and hold ourselves and the rest of the international community accountable for keeping goals such as 1.5°C alive. This meeting is a chance for redemption, to set a global example, and to allow the Biden administration to keep its promise from Glasgow. Taking advantage of this moment will ensure that the progress made over the past four years cannot be undone, will help reduce global emissions, and will help at home by safeguarding tax dollars and fortifying the Biden administration’s record of protecting communities from the climate crisis.
President Biden’s reputation as our country’s most pro-climate president is on the line. With an incoming Trump administration ready to bend to the will of the fossil fuel industry, the Biden administration cannot afford to miss this opportunity to commit the United States to ending taxpayer funding for fossil fuel projects abroad. This decision should not be a difficult one—and we hope that the Biden administration agrees to put communities both here and abroad and the climate over fossil fuel industry interests.
President Biden’s approach to the climate crisis is nothing short of hypocritical. While the president’s rhetoric aligns with global climate promises, his administration has approved massive fossil fuel projects.
Ahead of its Climate Ambition Summit in September, the United Nations is calling on global leaders to phase out fossil fuels. U.S. President Joe Biden is painfully falling behind on this agenda and must urgently get back on track to maintain any credibility in these climate discussions.
As we suffer through extreme heat in the U.S. and across the globe, President Biden has been protecting fossil fuel profits instead of people. From the Willow Project in Alaska to Gulf LNG exports, Biden props up dangerous oil and gas projects and the corporations that value their bottom line over our future. It has to stop.
The latest reports from the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) show that maintaining a 50% chance of limiting global warming to 1.5°C (2.7°F) requires an immediate end to investments in new coal, oil, and gas production and hazardous liquified fossil gas (LNG) infrastructure.
Of all countries in the world, the United States is the world’s top oil and gas producer and exporter, and is planning the largest expansion in oil and gas production over the next decade.
These findings remain unchanged in the context of the war in Ukraine and its impact on global energy markets, and as last year’s World Energy Outlook said: “No one should imagine that Russia’s invasion can justify a wave of new oil and gas infrastructure in a world that wants to reach net zero emissions by 2050.”
President Biden’s approach to the climate crisis is nothing short of hypocritical. While the president’s rhetoric aligns with global climate promises, his administration has approved massive fossil fuel projects.
Of all countries in the world, the United States is the world’s top oil and gas producer and exporter, and is planning the largest expansion in oil and gas production over the next decade. This year alone, Biden approved the Willow oil project in Alaska and multiple LNG export facilities, and his administration put its support behind the Mountain Valley fracked gas pipeline, skipping important permitting processes meant to protect people and the environment, betraying communities and his voters.
President Biden has even backed policies that gut bedrock environmental laws that protect communities from fossil fuel pollution.
At the United Nations COP26 climate summit in Glasgow, President Biden joined 38 other countries and financial institutions in promising to end international public finance for fossil fuels by the end of 2022 and to instead prioritize public finance for clean energy. At the G7 leader’s summit in 2021, a near-identical commitment was adopted, bringing Japan, one of the world’s largest fossil financiers, onboard, and this year the G7 committed to report on progress by the end of 2023. If the United States followed through on its promise, they could shift $3.7 billion annually out of fossil fuels on average, increasing their international renewable energy public finance by five times.
But instead of keeping its commitment, the Biden administration continues to approve new public funding for fossil fuel expansion abroad. While Canada, the United Kingdom, and France have published policies keeping their promises to stop international funding for fossil fuels, the United States has refused to publish a policy.
In May, the Biden administration approved almost $100 million in export finance for expanding an Indonesian oil refinery, neglecting the agreed end of 2022 deadline for ending such support. Just a month ago, the U.S. development finance corporation (DFC) pledged half a billion dollars to support LNG imports in Poland and gas infrastructure in South Africa. Most recently in July, the Export-Import Bank of the United States (EXIM)—the official export credit agency of the U.S.—insured $400 million in revolving credit facilities for global commodities trader Trafigura, allowing them to purchase LNG from U.S. exporters to sell primarily to European buyers. And more is on the docket—the United States is currently considering export finance for a controversial LNG project in Papua New Guinea.
Voters will not ignore Biden’s disastrous climate track record unless he starts keeping his climate promises and paves the way for a cleaner, safer, and more equitable future with cheaper energy bills and good jobs.
The U.S. breaking its promise is particularly unhelpful now that a huge diplomatic opportunity is opening up to advance oil and gas export finance restrictions at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
More than half of OECD countries, including the United States, signed onto the COP26 commitment to end international public finance for fossil fuels, creating strong foundations for a progressive member to table a proposal for oil and gas restrictions and kick off negotiations on the topic. This is an urgent matter. OECD members still provide $41 billion annually in export support to fossil fuel projects, five times their clean energy support.
Ironically, the United States was the country championing efforts to secure OECD coal finance restrictions back in 2015. Now it risks being an obstacle rather than a leader at the OECD.
At a time when we must rapidly and equitably phase out fossil fuels, it is alarming to see Biden consistently breaking their climate commitments and pushing for the global expansion of LNG and oil, as well as holding back progress at the UNSG Climate Ambition Summit and the OECD. Every new fossil fuel project is incompatible with a liveable future.
As the world’s biggest historic polluter, the United States has a responsibility to lead a global just transition away from fossil fuels. Biden can make the choice to lead this moment and succeed. Voters will not ignore Biden’s disastrous climate track record unless he starts keeping his climate promises and paves the way for a cleaner, safer, and more equitable future with cheaper energy bills and good jobs.
We call on President Biden to fulfill his duty to the American people, the international community, and communities whose lives and well-being are impacted by the dirty fossil fuel projects he has been backing. On Sunday, September 17 people will be marching through New York City with these demands at the UNSG Climate Ambition Summit. It’s time for Biden to listen to our voices and end the era of fossil fuels.
Worker pay, already failing to keep pace with cost-of-living increases, is at risk of being further suppressed as artificial intelligence and other technologies threaten to automate 27% of existing jobs in wealthy countries.
As corporate profits soar, the real income of workers in 38 wealthy countries has fallen by an average of nearly 4% over the past year, and the situation could deteriorate further as artificial intelligence and other forms of technology threaten to automate 27% of existing jobs in the same nations.
That's according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's (OECD) latest annual employment outlook, published Tuesday, which stresses the "urgent need to act."
"OECD countries may be on the brink of an AI revolution."
One of the report's key findings is that in most high-income countries, labor markets have "stabilized" since the Covid-19 pandemic unleashed economic chaos more than three years ago. The OECD unemployment rate was 4.8% in May 2023, compared with 5.3% in December 2019. However, joblessness varies widely among the club's members, from 12.7% in Spain to 3.6% in the United States and 2.4% in the Czech Republic.
Tight labor markets typically improve workers' bargaining power, yielding wage gains. But despite historically low unemployment rates in many OECD countries, the report finds that real wages across the bloc declined 3.8% between the first quarter of 2022 and the first quarter of 2023.
Nominal wages increased 5.6% from Q1 2022 to Q1 2023, but that wasn't enough to offset the ongoing cost-of-living crisis, the report indicates. As a result of high and persistent inflation—a phenomenon that many experts say is inseparable from corporate profiteering—real income decreased by as much as 15.6% in Hungary, 10.4% in the Czech Republic, and 0.7% in the United States.
Several earlier analyses have shown that since the Covid-19 pandemic and Russia's invasion of Ukraine disrupted international supply chains—rendered fragile by decades of neoliberal globalization—highly consolidated corporations have capitalized on myriad crises to justify price hikes that far outpace the rising costs of doing business, padding their bottom lines at the expense of working-class consumers.
The OECD's new report also acknowledges that "profits have often risen more than labor compensation."
"Going forward," the report notes, "evidence suggests there is some room for profits to absorb further wage adjustments to recover some of the losses in purchasing power gradually without generating significant price pressures or resulting in a fall in labor demand."
Workers' incomes could take additional hits due to technology-induced automation.
"While firms' adoption of AI is still relatively low, rapid progress including with generative AI (e.g. ChatGPT), falling costs, and the increasing availability of workers with AI skills suggest that OECD countries may be on the brink of an AI revolution," the report states. "It is vital to gather new and better data on AI uptake and use in the workplace, including which jobs will change, be created or disappear, and how skills needs are shifting."
"The potential for substitution remains significant, raising fears of decreasing wages and job losses."
The report estimates that 27% of existing jobs in OECD countries are at high risk of automation, from AI and other technologies. If even a fraction of those jobs are automated, it could lead to a surge in unemployment—weakening workers' bargaining power in relation to employers and setting the stage for further wage repression.
"High-skill occupations, despite being more exposed to recent progress in AI, are still at least risk of automation," says the OECD. "Low- and middle-skilled jobs are most at risk, including in construction, farming, fishing, and forestry, and to a lesser extent production and transportation."
According to the report, 63% of finance workers and 57% of manufacturing workers are worried about job loss due to AI in the next 10 years.
The OECD makes three key recommendations to policymakers:
Stefano Scarpetta, OECD director for Employment, Labor, and Social Affairs, wrote Tuesday that "despite the renewed worries about a jobless future, the impact of AI on job levels has been limited so far."
"However," he added, "it is also clear that the potential for substitution remains significant, raising fears of decreasing wages and job losses."