SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
rashida tlaib
'Free Mahmoud Khalil': Progressives Demand Release of 'Disappeared' Columbia Grad
"If the feds can snatch up an American green card holder for speech they don't like and get away with it, they won't stop here. They'll be able to erase the right to speech they don't agree with and kidnap anyone who dares resist."
Mar 10, 2025
Condemning the Trump administration and immigration officials for detaining and imprisoning Mahmoud Khalil over his involvement in pro-Palestinian demonstrations at Columbia University last year, U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez issued a warning for those who believe the arrest is an isolated incident rather than an indication of the president's approach to dissenters.
"If the federal government can disappear a legal U.S. permanent resident without reason or warrant, then they can disappear U.S. citizens too," said the New York Democrat. "Anyone—left, right, or center—who has highlighted the importance of constitutional rights and free speech should be sounding the alarm now."
Khalil, a graduate of Columbia who was a student at the school until December, was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on Saturday evening as he was returning home to his university-owned apartment with his wife, who is eight months pregnant. He is reportedly being held in Central Louisiana ICE Processing Center, over a thousand miles away from home, while the Trump administration works to revoke his green card under the State Department's "catch and revoke" initiative launched last week with the goal of deporting students who are deemed to be "pro-Hamas."
Khalil, who is an Algerian citizen of Palestinian descent, was an organizer of the solidarity encampment that was erected on Columbia's New York City campus last spring to demand the school divest from companies that have supported Israel's bombardment of Gaza.
Jewish-led rights groups including Jewish Voice for Peace and IfNotNow were among those demanding his release on Monday, and a group of Columbia faculty members were preparing to give a press conference alongside Jewish leaders and immigrant rights defenders to speak out against "the unprecedented and unconstitutional arrest of a permanent resident and Columbia graduate student in retaliation for his political activity."
IfNotNow said that ICE had "abducted and disappeared" Khalil and that the attack on his constitutional rights "enables [President Donald] Trump's authoritarian consolidation of power against his political opponents.
The group condemned the Trump administration for "carrying out this authoritarian lurch under the guise of fighting for Jewish safety."
In New York, hundreds of people gathered Monday afternoon in front of the city's ICE office to demand Khalil's release.
Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), the only Palestinian-American member of Congress, said the arrest and efforts to deport Khalil are "an assault on our First Amendment and freedom of speech."
The Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee also spoke out against Khalil's arrest, noting that after he was taken away, his pregnant wife had "no idea where" he was. She attempted to visit him at a facility in Elizabeth, New Jersey, where she was told he was being held, but he was not there.
"This should terrify everyone," said the Democratic lawmakers. "So pro-'freedom of speech' that Republicans will DETAIN you if you disagree with them."
While Columbia University officials released statements in recent days about "reports of ICE around campus" and said the Ivy League school "has and will continue to follow the law," administrators have not spoken out about Khalil's detention or demanded his release.
Columbia administrators faced condemnation last year for their crackdown on student protests against the United States' support for Israel's assault on Gaza, which had killed tens of thousands of Palestinians when the demonstrations started, with ample evidence that Israel was targeting civilian infrastructure and not just Hamas targets.
Zeteoreported that Khalil reached out to the administration the day before his arrest, asking officials to "provide the necessary protections" and expressing fear over the Trump administration's threats.
Khalil told officials he had been "subjected to a vicious, coordinated, and dehumanizing doxxing campaign led by Columbia affiliates Shai Davidai and David Lederer who, among others, have labeled me a security threat and called for my deportation."
"I haven't been able to sleep, fearing that ICE or a dangerous individual might come to my home. I urgently need legal support, and I urge you to intervene and provide the necessary protections to prevent further harm," Khalil wrote.
New York City Council member Chi Ossé said that "every Democratic politician and American with a conscience" should speak out against Khalil's detention.
"They're not doing this despite his rights," said Ossé. "They're doing this because of his rights—they're violating the Constitution on purpose, testing the fragile system to see what they can get away with... If the feds can snatch up an American green card holder for speech they don't like and get away with it, they won't stop here. They'll be able to erase the right to speech they don't agree with and kidnap anyone who dares resist."
Ossé called on all those who support civil and constitutional rights to "flood the phones" of members of Congress and demand they push for Khalil's release.
Khalil, a graduate of Columbia who was a student at the school until December, was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on Saturday evening as he was returning home to his university-owned apartment with his wife, who is eight months pregnant. He is reportedly being held in Central Louisiana ICE Processing Center, over a thousand miles away from home, while the Trump administration works to revoke his green card under the State Department's "catch and revoke" initiative launched last week with the goal of deporting students who are deemed to be "pro-Hamas."
Khalil, who is an Algerian citizen of Palestinian descent, was an organizer of the solidarity encampment that was erected on Columbia's New York City campus last spring to demand the school divest from companies that have supported Israel's bombardment of Gaza.
Jewish-led rights groups including Jewish Voice for Peace and IfNotNow were among those demanding his release on Monday, and a group of Columbia faculty members were preparing to give a press conference alongside Jewish leaders and immigrant rights defenders to speak out against "the unprecedented and unconstitutional arrest of a permanent resident and Columbia graduate student in retaliation for his political activity."
IfNotNow said that ICE had "abducted and disappeared" Khalil and that the attack on his constitutional rights "enables [President Donald] Trump's authoritarian consolidation of power against his political opponents.
The group condemned the Trump administration for "carrying out this authoritarian lurch under the guise of fighting for Jewish safety."
In New York, hundreds of people gathered Monday afternoon in front of the city's ICE office to demand Khalil's release.
Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), the only Palestinian-American member of Congress, said the arrest and efforts to deport Khalil are "an assault on our First Amendment and freedom of speech."
The Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee also spoke out against Khalil's arrest, noting that after he was taken away, his pregnant wife had "no idea where" he was. She attempted to visit him at a facility in Elizabeth, New Jersey, where she was told he was being held, but he was not there.
"This should terrify everyone," said the Democratic lawmakers. "So pro-'freedom of speech' that Republicans will DETAIN you if you disagree with them."
While Columbia University officials released statements in recent days about "reports of ICE around campus" and said the Ivy League school "has and will continue to follow the law," administrators have not spoken out about Khalil's detention or demanded his release.
Columbia administrators faced condemnation last year for their crackdown on student protests against the United States' support for Israel's assault on Gaza, which had killed tens of thousands of Palestinians when the demonstrations started, with ample evidence that Israel was targeting civilian infrastructure and not just Hamas targets.
Zeteoreported that Khalil reached out to the administration the day before his arrest, asking officials to "provide the necessary protections" and expressing fear over the Trump administration's threats.
Khalil told officials he had been "subjected to a vicious, coordinated, and dehumanizing doxxing campaign led by Columbia affiliates Shai Davidai and David Lederer who, among others, have labeled me a security threat and called for my deportation."
"I haven't been able to sleep, fearing that ICE or a dangerous individual might come to my home. I urgently need legal support, and I urge you to intervene and provide the necessary protections to prevent further harm," Khalil wrote.
New York City Council member Chi Ossé said that "every Democratic politician and American with a conscience" should speak out against Khalil's detention.
"They're not doing this despite his rights," said Ossé. "They're doing this because of his rights—they're violating the Constitution on purpose, testing the fragile system to see what they can get away with... If the feds can snatch up an American green card holder for speech they don't like and get away with it, they won't stop here. They'll be able to erase the right to speech they don't agree with and kidnap anyone who dares resist."
Ossé called on all those who support civil and constitutional rights to "flood the phones" of members of Congress and demand they push for Khalil's release.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Taking Axe to 'Human Needs Budget', Trump and Musk Nowhere to Be Found at 'Slash the Pentagon' Event
"While the so-called Department of Government Efficiency has been on a rampage to root out 'waste, fraud, and abuse,' they've been ignoring the biggest money pit in the entire federal government," said Rep. Summer Lee.
Feb 12, 2025
As billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency makes its way through federal agencies with the aim of cutting spending that goes toward protecting workers' rights, providing disaster assistance and healthcare in the Global South, and defending Americans from corporate greed, Democratic lawmakers are demanding to know why Republicans are pushing to increase the already bloated Pentagon budget.
"While American families struggle with skyrocketing healthcare costs and grocery bills, Republicans are gearing up to fork over another $150 billion to the military-industrial complex," said Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) at a press conference titled "Slash the Pentagon" with government watchdog Public Citizen on Tuesday.
The event was held as the Senate Budget Committee prepared to begin a markup Wednesday of Senate Republicans' budget blueprint that was recently released, which could add $150 billion to the Department of Defense (DOD) budget.
The spending would be focused on improving "military readiness," expanding the U.S. Navy, building an air and missile defense system the Trump administration has called the "Iron Dome for America," and investing in nuclear defenses.
The senator said adding to the Pentagon's budget—which already stands at nearly $900 billion—won't make Americans safer, because "the doomsday that Americans fear in the 21st century isn't being vaporized by a nuclear bomb."
"It's the doomsday diagnosis of cancer, it's medical debt, it's housing payments or loan payments, it's grocery bills and heating bills," said Markey. "Let's finally put the people before the Pentagon."
As progressive organizers have noted in recent weeks, despite the fact that President Donald Trump campaigned as a populist—and won the support of a majority of working-class voters while high earners swung toward former Vice President Kamala Harris in the November election—the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has spent the early days of Trump's second term seizing data and pushing for the shutdown of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Department of Education, attempting to take control of a major payment systemat the Department of the Treasury, and looking to cut spending at the Department of Labor.
Meanwhile, the Pentagon—which has failed seven consecutive audits, unable to account for its spending even as it swallows up 14% of the federal budget—has barely registered as a target of DOGE.
"While the so-called Department of Government Efficiency has been on a rampage to root out 'waste, fraud, and abuse,' they've been ignoring the biggest money pit in the entire federal government: the Department of Defense," said Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.). "The people want a more efficient government, quality healthcare, housing costs that don't skyrocket, and affordable eggs and groceries—not a bloated military budget that doesn't make us any safer. Maybe DOGE should take a look at that."
Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) added that DOGE's actions so far will leave students with disabilities without resources and threaten senior citizens who rely on Social Security.
"We don't have clean drinking water in our country, but we always have the money for war," said Tlaib. "I'm sick of it. If our government has endless money to bomb people, they have money for clean air and water, guaranteeing healthcare as a human right, and making sure no child goes hungry. Our elected officials are choosing to spend money on endless war instead of the American people."
Trump and Musk have begun answering some questions from the press about whether DOGE will address DOD spending, with the president saying Sunday that DOGE will likely find "hundreds of billions of dollars of fraud and abuse."
Musk has criticized the Pentagon's $12 billion F-35 program as "obsolete," and some lawmakers have drawn attention to exorbitant spending at the department on luxury meals, toilet seats, and soap dispensers.
But Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Tuesday expressed hope that spending cuts would focus on climate programs, saying the Pentagon "is not in the business of climate change, solving the global thermostat. We're in the business of deterring and winning wars."
The DOD is the "single largest institutional producer of greenhouse gases in the world," as the Costs of War project at Brown University said in a 2019 report, and Trump's former defense secretary, Jim Mattis, acknowledged that the DOD must "pay attention to potential adverse impacts" of the climate crisis, related to national security.
On Tuesday, Musk was also questioned about DOGE's priorities at the Pentagon, with a reporter asking whether he has a conflict of interest in examining the DOD's spending, given his role of CEO at SpaceX, an aerospace company that receives about $22 billion in defense contracts from the department.
Musk shrugged off the concern, telling the reporter that he isn't personally "the one filing the contract, it's the people at SpaceX," and adding that defense contracts received by his company are "by far the best value for money for the taxpayer."
SpaceX was handed a new $38.85 million contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) on Monday.
Meanwhile, said Public Citizen co-president Robert Weissman, as Republicans head toward the budget reconciliation process, "money for the Pentagon will come directly cutting spending on human needs. The money that will go to Lockheed Martin or Palantir will come directly from Medicaid and food stamps and other programs for the poor and vulnerable."
"But with the plundering of the human needs budget made plain," he said, "the American people are not going to stand for—and will defeat—the Republicans' Pentagon boondoggle proposal."
Keep ReadingShow Less
The Moral Shame of US Foreign Policy
Neither major party candidate represented a challenge to U.S. complicity in Israel’s horrific war on the people and land of Gaza.
Dec 17, 2024
“A new study has found that almost half of children in Gaza wish to die, as a result of the trauma they have been forced to endure. Every single supplier of arms to Israel has blood on its hands—and the world will never forgive them.”
—Jeremy Corbyn, MP (Dec. 12, 2024)
The election of former President Donald Trump to another term as U.S. president has been cause for profound despair among millions of Democratic voters. Certainly anyone who cares about human and democratic rights can only feel dismay about the return of this notorious megalomaniac to the White House.
But worse than the election results is another deflating reality. Neither major party candidate represented a challenge to U.S. complicity in Israel’s horrific war on the people and land of Gaza. The presidential election proved to be a choice between two electable candidates, manifestly different on the surface, yet neither of whom was capable of taking a principled stand against the worst crime imaginable—genocide.
Consider that reality for a moment. While the Democratic candidate Kamala Harris campaigned as the defender of democracy, our only hope against the fascist predations of Republican Trump, the current vice president refused to consider even the slightest change in course from the Biden administration’s staunch support for Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza. In fact, for more than a year the supply of U.S. weapons has enabled Israel to carry out one of the most concentrated and deadly military assaults on a population in modern times.
As for Trump and the GOP, this is a party of unabashed cheerleaders for genocide, who embrace Israel’s depraved war without any moral reservations.
Is what the Israeli military (IDF) doing in Gaza under the auspices of the Biden administration somehow less of a fascist horror show than the threat of Trump’s dystopian vision for the United States? What kind of democracy was it exactly that the Harris campaign stood for, if it excluded the most basic right of the Palestinian people not to be annihilated?
Ultimately, the Harris campaign was nothing more than a glossy marketing machine, a high-paid commercial for more of the same old war and Wall Street politics. Months of nationwide campus and street protests for a permanent Gaza cease-fire, and the growing unpopularity of the U.S. role as Israel’s chief arms supplier, resonated little in the end with the Harris campaign’s supposedly savvy advisors. Better instead to highlight the support of anti-Trump Republicans like Liz Cheney than allow a Palestinian-American campaign supporter even five minutes at the Democratic National Convention to speak about the plight of Gaza. Better to demonstrate loyalty to President Joe Biden, a leader whose legacy is now forever stained with the blood of the Palestinian people.
As for Trump and the GOP, this is a party of unabashed cheerleaders for genocide, who embrace Israel’s depraved war without any moral reservations. With near unanimity this past July, GOP members repeatedly stood and cheered Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s bellicose address to a joint session of Congress. It was an indelible display of shameless idolatry for a mass murderer, as Netanyahu denounced American cease-fire protestors as “useful idiots” and otherwise sought to justify his war crimes.
Notably, the decision to welcome Netanyahu to Congress was a bipartisan one, an invitation whose political optics were so bad several dozen congressional Democrats chose to boycott the address. One who did not was Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), who with quiet dignity sat through Netanyahu’s remarks displaying a sign with the words “war criminal” and “guilty of genocide” written on either side. “It is utterly disgraceful that leaders from both parties have invited him to address Congress,” said Tlaib. “He should be arrested and sent to the International Criminal Court [ICC]."
How Many People Have to Die?
Since Tlaib’s protest the ICC has issued formal arrest warrants for the Israeli prime minister and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, along with Hamas leader Ibrahim Al-Masri. Doggedly loyal to the Zionist state, Biden called the ICC decision to seek the Israeli leaders arrests “outrageous.”
What is wrong with Biden? How many people have to be bombed, shot, slaughtered, and starved, their homes, schools, hospitals, and shelters destroyed, before he says enough? Biden’s outrage at the ICC decision is driven by his claim that there is no equivalence between Israel and Hamas. Actually, in terms of sheer killing power, he is right. According to Al Jazeera’slive tracker of war data, the death toll in the Israel-Gaza war (October 7, 2023 to December 15, 2024) stands at 44,976 Palestinians and 1,139 Israelis killed.
Unbearably, the IDF has also killed 17,492 children in Gaza. Another 106,759 people have been injured and more than 11,000 are missing. In the Occupied West Bank, at least 812 people, including 169 children, have been killed and another 6,250 injured over the past year by Israeli police, military, and settlers.
In modern politics, murdering thousands of children and other innocents in an obliterating campaign of state-sponsored terrorism is just business as usual, one more geopolitical “controversy” for our esteemed leaders to do nothing about.
Further, the IDF has killed 3,823 people in Lebanon (October 8, 2023 to November 27, 2024), according to Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor. Another 15,859 residents of Lebanon are reported injured as a result of Israeli military action. The IDF has also partially or completely destroyed over 100,000 housing units across Lebanon.
No matter. For Netanyahu’s supporters in the U.S. political establishment, no lessons are ever learned nor red lines crossed, even as Israel’s war rage continues unabated. Instead, the Senate majority recently voted to approve another $61 million in high explosive mortar rounds to Israel. Only 19 senators (all Democrats except for Vermont independent Bernie sanders) voted no.
In late November, the United States also vetoed a new U.N. Security Council resolution calling for an immediate, permanent cease-fire in Gaza and release of remaining Israeli hostages. This was the fourth time the U.S. has vetoed a Gaza cease-fire resolution! The U.S. ambassador claimed the resolution didn’t adequately link a cease-fire to the necessity of releasing hostages, a concern rejected by every other member nation of the Security Council. What was it again Harris said during her campaign about the White House working tirelessly for a Gaza cease-fire?
Why is the United States still Israel’s key ally? In January 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), in response to the case brought by South Africa, issued a preliminary determination that the genocide case was plausibly brought and ordered Israel to “take all measures within its power” to uphold its obligations under Article II of the Genocide Convention. In a newly released report. Amnesty International has also concluded that Israel has and is continuing to commit genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. “Israel has unleashed hell and destruction on Palestinians in Gaza brazenly, continuously, and with total impunity,” states the Amnesty report.
But nothing has changed since the ICJ warning to Israel. In modern politics, murdering thousands of children and other innocents in an obliterating campaign of state-sponsored terrorism is just business as usual, one more geopolitical “controversy” for our esteemed leaders to do nothing about.
Gaza and Trump’s Victory
The Biden administration’s complicity in Israel’s war differs from the incoming Trump administration only in the latter’s unabashed embrace of Israel’s war crimes. Consider only Trump’s selection for the next U.S. ambassador to Israel: former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, a man who believes there is no such person as a Palestinian.
Trump himself now says there will be “hell to pay” if the Israeli hostages still in Gaza are not released prior to his January inauguration. You have to wonder what hell he is referring to that has not already occurred. With his usual fidelity to reality, Trump further ignores Netanyahu’s repeated obstruction of efforts to negotiate the release of hostages held in Gaza, to the upset of other Israeli leaders and public.
The guiding lights of the Democratic Party were apparently confident enough voters wouldn’t care that the Harris campaign remained full on with the politics of “Genocide Joe.” It was a poor gamble.
All this does not bode well for a peaceful and just future in the region. When the October 7 Hamas raids into southern Israel occurred, leading to hundreds of deaths and 254 people taken hostage, President Biden and others described the assault as “unprovoked.” It was a revealing response, a reflection of just how little Western leaders care about the modern history of Israel’s oppression of the indigenous Palestinian population. News flash to Biden: History did not begin on October 7.
Of course, to defend the basic human rights of the Palestinian people, including just the right to survive, does not constitute a political endorsement of Hamas, or any particular leadership or group. If any individual or group has committed atrocities against innocent civilians, those responsible should be held legally accountable. But isn’t it necessary to try to understand the deeper historic roots of the violence, to see beyond the layers of Western and Zionist propaganda designed to obscure Israel’s long occupation and oppression of the Palestinian people and their lands? All this began long before Hamas even existed.
It’s obvious Israel’s far-right leaders do not view the Palestinian people as human beings who deserve justice, as a people with whom they should live in peace. In fact, Israel’s destruction of Gaza over the past 14 months represents less an aberration than an acceleration of the Zionist state’s historic relationship since 1948 with the Palestinian people, which is one of oppressor and oppressed.
The Failure of the Democrats
The guiding lights of the Democratic Party were apparently confident enough voters wouldn’t care that the Harris campaign remained full on with the politics of “Genocide Joe.” It was a poor gamble. The dramatic fall in voter turnout for the Democratic candidate proved decisive to Trump’s victory, which he won over Harris by only 1.6% of the popular vote. The unwillingness of Harris to campaign as an anti-war candidate, to even appear to separate herself from Biden’s demoralizing fealty to Israel, did nothing to get out the vote. Many people understandably draw a moral line at supporting genocide.
The White House was not unaware of how unpopular its support for Israel had become. In June a CBS News poll showed 61% of Americans opposed to sending U.S. weapons to Israel. Among Democrats and people under 30 years of age, 77% were in opposition to continued arms deliveries to Israel. Prior to the Democratic Party convention, one poll showed approximately one-third of U.S. voters in Arizona, Georgia, and Pennsylvania more likely to vote for Harris if she agreed to stop arming Israel, or if an Israel-Hamas cease-fire was achieved before election day. Yet the Harris-Walz campaign remained opposed to an arms embargo, which ultimately rendered all their cease-fire rhetoric empty theatrics.
Trump also won just because he was not in office. A vote for Trump was likely perceived by many as somehow just shaking up the system.
The latter was no doubt what was involved in the Biden administration’s 30-day ultimatum to Israel three weeks before the election to improve Gaza’s access to humanitarian aid or risk delivery of future arms supplies. Not surprisingly, post-election the U.S. State Department announced, much to the disbelief of some members of Congress and several international aid groups, that Israel had made “limited progress” toward improving delivery of humanitarian aid, and thus was not in violation of U.S. law.
There’s a pattern here. In May, the Biden administration had even acknowledged Israel’s use of U.S. arms likely violated international humanitarian law, but claimed it lacked confirmatory evidence. It was at this time that the administration paused delivery of a shipment of 500-pound and 2,000-pound bombs, as the Israeli military threatened to assault densely populated Rafah in southern Gaza. A military offensive there was supposedly a “red line” for the Biden administration. But it was one Netanyahu ignored as the IDF soon swept through central Rafah and air strikes hit people sheltering in tents.
For the White House all this constituted only an “uptick” in military action, not the “full-scale” assault on Rafah their floating red line was intended to oppose. Tellingly, the United States decided in July to resume shipments of 500-pound bombs to Israel. Apparently, U.S. officials were no longer concerned about the threat to the population from the 65-foot blast radius of 500-pound bombs, compared to the 115-foot radius of 2,000-pound bombs.
That’s par for the course for the Biden State Department, with the exception of the several department staff who resigned their positions in protest of the administration’s complicity in Israeli war crimes. Otherwise neither Biden, Harris, nor Trump have wanted to end, reduce, or put any meaningful conditions whatsoever on arms deliveries to Israel.
Time for New Mass Movement Politics
Certainly there are multiple factors at play in Trump’s election victory. The pressures of the inflationary state of the economy, combined with historic wage stagnation and growing wealth inequality, are obviously factors. But it’s more than that. Trump also cynically manipulated base appeals to racism. His demonizing rhetoric about migrant floods “poisoning the blood of America” was classic divide-and-conquer politics, a tactic long used by capitalist elites to redirect working-class discontent away from their rule and power. These racist appeals were persuasive to many of the Trump faithful.
But perhaps Trump also won just because he was not in office. A vote for Trump was likely perceived by many as somehow just shaking up the system. The operative word here is somehow. In Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Bronx congressional district, for example, Trump won 33% of the vote, an 11-point improvement from 2020. Yet the left progressive Ocasio-Cortez also won a decisive victory, returning to Congress for a fourth term with 68.9% of the vote. A minority of others also cast protest votes for Green Party candidate Jill Stein or independent Cornel West, both of whom campaigned on anti-war platforms in solidarity with Palestine.
Tellingly, the CEO of BlackRock, Larry Fink, who oversees the investment firm’s management of $11.5 trillion in assets, downplayed the election’s significance for Wall Street investors. “I’m tired of hearing this is the biggest election in your lifetime,” Fink remarked in October at a securities industry event. “The reality is over time it doesn’t matter.” In other words, as long as capital accumulation proceeds unimpeded, as long as the billionaires and corporate elites continue to profit and prosper, any Democratic or Republican administration is fine.
The pretense of civilized, democratic Israel has now fallen away to reveal the ignominy of an oppressor state in all its furious depravity.
The prospect of another four years with Trump in the White House is bleak. But Trump and his entourage of power-hungry hustlers, grifters, far-right ideologues, and other low-flying opportunists are hardly invincible. They can be defeated.
Of course, those who oppose the warmongers and right-wing authoritarians will surely face many challenges in the new year. But perhaps we should despair less and organize more.
From Democratic Socialists of America to Jewish Voice for Peace, the activism of the United Auto Workers and other labor ranks, to the organizers for women’s reproductive rights and the human rights of migrants, the voices who continue to speak up for humanity are many. We need to continue to mobilize these voices for the cause of peace with new resonance and power. We need political action not beholden to the Washington status quo or enfeebled Democratic electoral politics, but movement politics that embraces the larger anti-capitalist vision of what Dr. King once described as the “radical reconstruction of society itself.”
People are tired of endless wars. However justified Ukrainian resistance to Russia’s military aggression, the Russia-Ukraine war also just grinds on, costing tens of billions in U.S. military aid with no prospects for a fair negotiated settlement. For the Biden administration, the war appears to be more about strategically weakening Russia and providing a bonanza for arms manufacturers than defending democratic Ukrainian sovereignty.
In October 2023, the Deputy Speaker of the Knesset in Israel, Nissim Vaturi, said: “Now we all have one common goal—erasing the Gaza Strip from the face of the Earth.” Other Israeli leaders have expressed similar genocidal aspirations. To the shame of the world, this nightmare story has continued unabated for more than a year.
A new study conducted by the Community Training Center for Crisis Management (CTCCM) with support from the War Child Alliance finds deep psychological trauma now prevalent among the children of Gaza. Surrounded by death, destruction, and displacement, their homes, schools, and communities destroyed by IDF air strikes and military assaults, 96% of the most vulnerable children in Gaza live with the feeling of imminent death. With loved ones often dead or wounded, nearly half of the children also describe just wishing to die.
Why is U.S. foreign policy committed to support a rogue Israeli state led by unrepentant war criminals? We should recognize the essential justice of the vision of a democratic, secular Palestine, based on respect for the human rights of all people, not an exclusionary and violent Zionist settler-colonial project armed to excess by Western imperialism. The pretense of civilized, democratic Israel has now fallen away to reveal the ignominy of an oppressor state in all its furious depravity. Tragically, this failed state is leading Gaza to obliteration and ruin.
The whole world needs to rise up against this terrible imperial violence and the social system that creates it.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular