SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
");background-position:center;background-size:19px 19px;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-color:var(--button-bg-color);padding:0;width:var(--form-elem-height);height:var(--form-elem-height);font-size:0;}:is(.js-newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter_bar.newsletter-wrapper) .widget__body:has(.response:not(:empty)) :is(.widget__headline, .widget__subheadline, #mc_embed_signup .mc-field-group, #mc_embed_signup input[type="submit"]){display:none;}:is(.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper) #mce-responses:has(.response:not(:empty)){grid-row:1 / -1;grid-column:1 / -1;}.newsletter-wrapper .widget__body > .snark-line:has(.response:not(:empty)){grid-column:1 / -1;}:is(.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper) :is(.newsletter-campaign:has(.response:not(:empty)), .newsletter-and-social:has(.response:not(:empty))){width:100%;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col{display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;justify-content:center;align-items:center;gap:8px 20px;margin:0 auto;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col .text-element{display:flex;color:var(--shares-color);margin:0 !important;font-weight:400 !important;font-size:16px !important;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col .whitebar_social{display:flex;gap:12px;width:auto;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col a{margin:0;background-color:#0000;padding:0;width:32px;height:32px;}.newsletter-wrapper .social_icon:after{display:none;}.newsletter-wrapper .widget article:before, .newsletter-wrapper .widget article:after{display:none;}#sFollow_Block_0_0_1_0_0_0_1{margin:0;}.donation_banner{position:relative;background:#000;}.donation_banner .posts-custom *, .donation_banner .posts-custom :after, .donation_banner .posts-custom :before{margin:0;}.donation_banner .posts-custom .widget{position:absolute;inset:0;}.donation_banner__wrapper{position:relative;z-index:2;pointer-events:none;}.donation_banner .donate_btn{position:relative;z-index:2;}#sSHARED_-_Support_Block_0_0_7_0_0_3_1_0{color:#fff;}#sSHARED_-_Support_Block_0_0_7_0_0_3_1_1{font-weight:normal;}.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper.sidebar{background:linear-gradient(91deg, #005dc7 28%, #1d63b2 65%, #0353ae 85%);}
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
My next portrait for the Americans Who Tell the Truth project will be Daniel Hale, the former Air Force analyst and drone whistleblower who released classified documents showing that nearly 90% of the casualties of U.S. drone assassination missions are civilians--children, women, workers, farmers, and other people who show up as shadows on drone pilot computer screens and are subsequently rendered permanent shadows. Hale will be sentenced on July 27 in Alexandria, Virginia for the crime of truth telling. In all likelihood he will receive 10 years in prison--surely sufficient time to reflect on the error of his ways, which is, primarily, having an overactive conscience, believing that killing innocent civilians, no matter what the national security excuse, is murder.
Daniel Hale, who is now 33 years old, the same age, interestingly enough, as a well known religious figure was when he was crucified for defying the state, joins a special club of courageous whistleblowers--including Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning, and Daniel Ellsberg--all of whom naively believed the notion that the government of a democratic society derives its just power from the consent of the governed, and that for the people to grant that consent, they need to know what is being done in their name, and with their money. By keeping secret the most important issues of life and death, such a government teaches how it derives unjust power.
"Our government is not ours at all if we have no control over its immoral actions, its duplicitous wars, its pandering to weapons dealers, its perverse willingness to torture, its propensity to murder civilians to justify its militarism, its silencing of truth tellers."
We live in an age when the central ethical lesson of the United States is not democratic self-determination as in our own heralded origin story. No, our most crucial moral lesson is collateral damage--that whatever we do to advance our security, no matter how many innocents are necessarily blown to smithereens, is OK--and because we do it and we are exceptional people, it is ethical. Collaterals are those nameless, storyless individuals who become martyrs, not for their beliefs, but ours. And, strangely, when our diplomats conflate collateral damage with the export of democracy, not everyone understands. Sometimes even those firing the drones fail to understand. Like Daniel Hale.
Some people in defense of Hale have said that this is a free speech issue. That doesn't seem right to me. When Hale got his high security clearance, he knew he was supposed to keep mum about government secrets. He knew that no matter what ethically odious policy or activity he became privy to or part of, he was to tell no one. That is, he was supposed to be responsible for making his conscience his own collateral damage. And then he realized he had a higher obligation. He's been charged under the Espionage Act as though he were a spy. The enemy he has informed is the American public. So, let me ask you, John and Jane Q. Public: Do you feel betrayed by Daniel Hale or by your government? This is actually a serious question. Does the United States have any interest in the lives of black and brown civilians who happen to be proximate to a Hellfire drone missile? A disturbingly large number of people may say no.
The Department of Justice has accused Daniel Hale of the theft of government property, classified documents, not his to disseminate. It seems to me that the real theft is of the right of the people to know and be responsible for what their government is doing. What is being stolen is the moral agency of the people. What is being stolen is the opportunity of the people to decide if they want to allow their government to continue with this kind of "just" power when it is committing unjust and immoral acts. What is being stolen is the essence of democracy--unless you happen to believe the essence of democracy is secrecy and security, not justice.
The government's intense determination to prosecute Daniel Hale is precisely because his principled moral courage asks the profound questions our government, our NSA, our DOJ, our DOD and CIA do not want asked. As our ideals are stolen and we are splashed with the blood of civilians, how can we best show our support for such a government? Do any of you need reminding that every war that this country has been engaged in in the past 65 years has been promoted by lies. Why would we trust them with any secrets? We can show our support by demanding and telling the truth. Our government is not ours at all if we have no control over its immoral actions, its duplicitous wars, its pandering to weapons dealers, its perverse willingness to torture, its propensity to murder civilians to justify its militarism, its silencing of truth tellers.
It's an astounding thing to see the full force of the state come down on the one person with moral clarity. What qualities in a democratic society can we count on to be hedges against moral chaos? Surely the correct answer to that question is neither secrecy nor official prevarication. But when we have a government that embraces secrecy and punishes truth tellers, the only hedge is more truth tellers.
In the past few years some sections of this country have haltingly engaged in an examination of its systemic racism--an indication that moral maturity is possible. However, about its systemic dishonesty around militarism and foreign policy, no such mainstream discussion exists. In the name of blind patriotism we are encouraged to deny the humanity of our victims, even--especially!--our innocent victims. By doing so we deny our own values and humanity. When President Barack Obama announced that he would not prosecute the war crimes of the George W. Bush administration because he wanted us to look forward, not back, what he was asking honest, moral people to do was to deny their moral accountability, deny the rule of law, deny their identity, and embrace a deadly lie. We were being asked to let go of any guilt we felt about starting the atrocious preemptive war on Iraq. We were being asked to move comfortably into a future free from responsibility, free from our values and our humanity. What then is left of us? What kind of people are we? Are we a people who shoot missiles into people's homes and cars and schools and wedding parties on the off chance there may be a bad guy on the premises when even the accusations against the bad guy are unsubstantiated?
Daniel Hale offers us an opportunity to answer those questions. Let's support this courageous man before the state disappears him.
As a kid growing up in Ohio in the 1950s and '60's I was taught to admire and respect--frankly, be intimidated by--white men in suits. They were the priests of the High Holy Church of How the World Works, constantly chanting the liturgy of economic expansion, war, consumption, entitlement, white supremacy, American superiority, extraction of profit from nature. This teaching wasn't direct, as in, See that man in the charcoal gray Brooks Brothers suit with the red and blue striped tie -- listen to, obey him! But everywhere I looked voices of authority and power emanated from these white men in suits. Kids assumed they were our wise elders, our role models. Some were politicians, some teachers, some generals, some TV broadcasters, businessmen and bankers.
The suits weren't pretending. They believed their authority was authentic. They believed in the sanctity of their superior whiteness. They believed America was both good and great and white--it seemed the melting pot's most important ingredient was bleach. They believed capitalism was the only right and righteous economic system. They believed they embodied the pinnacle of the great chain of being. They believed nature's bounty was endless and endlessly forgiving. They believed God was rewarding them for their beliefs. They still saluted the flag of Manifest Destiny. They believed the US was right to dominate the people and resources of other countries; imperialism rhymed with duty rhymed with White Man's Burden rhymed with profit. They observed men of their tribe in all the positions of power, and they knew the tribe's costume (the expensive suit) advertised and accentuated their authority. Initiation into this tribe was the fitting of the first suit on the teenage (white male) acolyte. Often the men in suits were corrupt and yet they went on believing anyway; such is the nature of smug entitlement. Corruptness was at one end of the necessity scale. The exception proved the rule.
White supremacy intends that marginalized people, people who are objects of racism, will internalize the relentless propaganda of their inferiority, believe that their lack of material and social success is a product of their race or ethnicity or gender or failure to work hard enough, think it's racial and personal rather than systemic and engineered. So, the white elders in suits internalized the opposite. That same propaganda justified their belief in superiority, that the systems they constructed to deliver them wealth and power were deserved.
We are fortunate to live in a time when white supremacy, power and wealth are finally being challenged by a broad and insistent coalition of ages, races and genders. As is often the case, the spark igniting the resistance was an event of both brutal realism and profound metaphor: the white knee on the black neck. A particular white cop on racist autopilot supplied the knee; centuries of white men in suits the weight. The former is the tool, the latter the business plan. The former the puppet, the latter the master. The former just another day-in-the-life, the latter the men who narrate history.
Original Sin
When I was a kid, I was also learning about the doctrine of original sin in Sunday school. I resented the hell out of that idea. The notion that every newborn, innocent child was de facto burdened with an immense, irrevocable sin he or she could hardly have committed was offensive. Should Adam & Eve's refusal to follow orders condemn us all in perpetuity? Seemed an abuse of power to me. And as a young boy as yet unaware of his own flaws, the idea that to be human is to be sinful soured me on Sunday school altogether: if God was good and all-powerful, why would he create men and women to be irrevocably sinful? Not fair! Why should I suffer my entire life paying for Adam's screw-ups?
However, the popular attribution today of both indigenous genocide and chattel slavery as this country's original sins is as sound philosophically as it is historically undeniable. White people living in this culture who espouse its values of equality, rights and freedom are morally compromised by the legacy of those facts. One of the primary responsibilities of citizenship, then, is atoning for those dual sins, realizing how wealth and value, dignity and equality have been apportioned by race and power. Being born here doesn't condemn one to the burden of those sins. You can move to another place and assume another society's collective guilt. But good citizens must swing whatever sledgehammer they can heft to smash the foundation of white supremacy.
I think, though, there is another sin which precedes and informs genocide and slavery. That sin knocks down the living pillars holding up the temple of this Earth. Ironically this sin was codified as the Doctrine of Christian Discovery by Catholic Pope Nicholas 5th in 1455. It would be hard to imagine a more ruthless, racist, and arrogant assertion of greater consequence than this one which posits humans and their activities as somehow separate from and superior to the laws of nature. It also determined that non-Christians had no rights--not to property, or land or life. That is, it gave the church's blessing to brutal imperialism. Columbus and the Conquistadores (the transnational corporate emissaries of their day) came to these continents infused with this doctrine which justified robbery, slavery, murder and rape. Conveniently, thanks to their Pope's Doctrine of Discovery, they were fulfilling God's will. Such thinking is spectacularly criminal, self-serving, and ultimately suicidal.
Even then scientists knew that the earth and all its species existed in a closed ecological system, a miraculous web of life, tuned to a frequency requiring the balanced hum of every living thing. They knew that the balanced hum was generated by the vibrating laws of nature. They also knew that this living miracle took place on a tiny planet spinning through a vast cosmos. As far as they knew there was not another planet like it--certainly not within hailing distance. Instead of accepting the laws of the one place they could survive in the universe, these wise elders decided to flout those laws and write their own.
Many people attribute the arrogance of the attitude that human will and desire can disregard nature's laws to 'human nature.' As though it's human nature for all humans to be so relentlessly acquisitive and self-centered that they are hardwired to refuse the reality and limits imposed by nature, and to refuse the grace of living in harmony with them. That's absurd. Indigenous peoples all over the world have lived and live within the grace of nature's laws. They have human nature. They never took a course at a great university nor understood the politics and economy of a city-state, but they identified reality, thanked it for its beneficence. The wise white men branded indigenous peoples as uneducated, superstitious, pagan, savage and dispensable as they clearcut their forests, mined their resources, and polluted their water. These men had power, but all their learning reinforced and mechanized their ignorance. They asked their one God to grant them dominion over nature. If they had accepted the reality of the earth, they could not have generated their wealth.
Sure there is greed in human nature, and lust for power, but there is also good sense and a desire to honor the reality of the place we are in. As conquerors write history, so the powerful write the schools' curriculum. Sure there is the propensity to make new, convenient rules for a game that already has intransigent rules, but there is also the wisdom to play by the rules of the game that sustain life. Billions of people are now playing by unsustainable rules which are leading to planetary suicide. When you insist on playing by the wrong rules, no matter how many degrees you have from MIT and Harvard, you become the superstitious, uneducated, dispensable ones. Your arrogance creates a flat world with an edge tipping into oblivion and the stupidity to sail over that edge.
Refusal to want to live in harmony with nature's laws alienates us all from this earth, alienates us from ourselves as creatures in nature's web, alienates us from our biological and spiritual connection to the past and the future. That is, it alienates us from time. This refusal insists on a temporal, temporary, commodity-driven relationship to the earth, bribes us to resemble the throwaway products we use--the same respect for a human life, a tree swallow as a plastic bottle. One and done. This refusal insists that we weave ourselves into a web of unreality and glory in the power and brief profit of that unreality.
Rumplestiltskin
We are the felicitous function of vast amounts of time, of sunlight, of evolution, of water, of gravity, of recycled lives and elements, of creativity--of a life force we can neither understand nor duplicate. Just for fun, let's play a variation on Rumpelstiltskin. You remember the fable? A miller boasted to a king that his daughter could spin hay into gold. The king locked her in a roomful of hay and told her that if she didn't do it overnight, he'd kill her. Marry her if she could. A magical little imp appeared to the terrified girl and volunteered to do the spinning for her but she would have to give him her firstborn child if she couldn't guess his name. A year later, pregnant and married to the king, she's terrified that she will have to give up her child. She happens upon the imp dancing around his fire in the forest while he is chanting his name, Rumplestiltskin. Saved again.
So, you be the miller's daughter. You're CEO of The Miller's Daughter, Inc., a Fortune 500 company. I know you, a good capitalist, can weave straw into gold, that is, you know how to turn a profit on any resource properly marketed. But now I'm giving you a room full of carbon, oxygen, nitrogen and hydrogen. I'll give you, not one night, but a million years. I don't want you to spin those elements into gold. Instead, make me a passenger pigeon. Make me a golden toad. Make me a white rhinoceros. A Giant Auk. Make me ten million Monarch butterflies. Heck, just make me one acorn. Combine the elements using the economic rules of capitalism. What? you say, that's not fair! Of course it is; didn't you tell me free markets solve all problems? You used those rules to cut them out of the web. Use them to weave them back in. OK, stop whining. Start small, make a flea.
If you think the time frame is too tight and the buzzer might sound before you get all the legs on the flea and its tiny little heart beating, well, then, maybe you will realize capitalism is a better destroyer than savior, more likely to create violent oligarchy than either miraculous creatures or peaceful democracy. Maybe you will have a clue about how alienated we all are from the sanctity of life and our responsibility to its web of creatures and laws. Forget your mea culpas, though. Nature's not interested. Built into her laws is infinite forgiveness disguised as irrepressible, exuberant creation and change. Nature's marching band never stops strutting her stuff. Live in harmony with her and she'll begin to heal, if not you, then a creature evolved without arrogance. But be prepared for a bumpy transition of tough weather and ark building.
When I try to describe how it feels to be alienated--from a country, a group, a partner, an idea, the past, a culture, an identity--lots of emotions surface. Alienation generates anger and sorrow, confusion and loneliness. Yearning and weariness. Despair. Often that which one feels alienated from and the feelings generated are multiple. If my experience and beliefs estrange me from the unrealized values of my country, I feel alienated from the abstract notion of the country, its facade, its citizens, friends who disagree with me, and from the self who felt morally grounded being identified with those values. Each estrangement, like a planet, accumulates a cluster of painful emotions in orbit around it.
What surprises me is how long alienation may persist without resolution. Two people may remain in a marriage for decades while both are alienated from the love, respect, and companionship which brought them together. Or, far more dramatically, think of the many generations of indigenous people and people of color who persist in the United States in spite of brutal personal and systemic racism, genocide. It's one thing to be loyal to a country which seems to support you, far different to be loyal to one that is actively hostile to you, generation after generation, callously exploiting and diminishing, making you the target of white supremacy.
"If we jettison the past, we betray the past... Only by examining that history together, can we move into the future together. The true story is humbling, but it's the only one that unites us." Of course, it can be hard to cut one's ties--family, habit, home, job and the hope of unrealized dreams hold one in place. Of these, perhaps the most interesting and complex is hope. Frequently, alienated people, because they are excluded, believe more deeply in the values of the country than the majority who take those values for granted, accept the window dressing, and easily ignore that the practice of the rhetoric is not equitably distributed. The hope of the marginalized that those values will one day be theirs may be a more compelling anchor than actually having them. Eyes on the prize.
For people of color--as well as for those white people who are acutely aware and ashamed of America's alienation from its purported values--2020 presents an opportunity to fully integrate this country's values with its behavior--to come in from our own cold, to match talk with walk. If we can say that a country in some sense possesses, or can possess a soul, we can now ask our alienated soul to inhabit our prodigal history. The curious combination of pandemic, recession, racist police violence, and the perseverance of the Black Lives Matter demonstrators is performing the role of neuro- and cardiac surgeons, cutting open the memory and heart of the body politic, bypassing the clotted ideas and myths, false narratives and prejudices, with arteries of truth. What a relief! Will we have the perseverance and courage to complete the operation? Will the patient survive? If this operation is not performed successfully, stroke and heart attack are imminent.
Somewhere in the midst of the protests, an alchemy has taken place. As the protests matured, they were no longer protests; they transformed from lead to gold. At the beginning they shouted, accurately, I'm angry! I demand to be treated with dignity! I'm here to call out the systemic violence and hypocrisy of your racism! This country's long and despicable history has got to change! If the protests had been a one time expression of outrage, that would have been the sum of the message. But because they persisted, because they are inclusive, because they had time to expand and grow into a deeper understanding of their own message--because they were right!--they shapeshifted into affirmations of the people we want to be, from rage into vision, a people who acknowledge together the bloody journey of this country's true history, who share the identity of its crucible, and who together want to embark on a new journey, want to tell a new story, a story of justice, compassion, peace and love. The story we claimed in 1776, but have betrayed again and again ever since.
"The truth is a heavy, awkward, irritating burden in a society which doesn't acknowledge it."Too often when the streets fill with righteous protest of people alienated and outraged by this culture's violence--which is to say, alienated by its materialism, greed, racism, sexism, domination, and the implicit militarism of capitalism--too often the only message communicated by the media is spectacle and anger of a mob. The protesters, who march to rescue this culture from its habitual injustices, end by being further alienated by a status quo media which describes them en masse as marginal. Nothing pleases power more. American power is inhospitable and antagonistic to people who insist on reminding it of its hypocrisy, its real motives, and its many crimes.
However, if the protests that go on day after day are composed of a genuine cross section of people, the protesters are much harder to brand and dismiss. They are us. We begin to ask, first, What are they saying? And then: What are we saying? What values are we affirming?
That's not lead but gold running in the streets.
Something deeper is going on, though, and in that deeper nature of alienation is a painful realization. In order for this country and people in this country to perform reprehensible acts, it has to deny its own professed values and laws while pretending to uphold them. It calls on its citizens to also deny those values, turn them inside out, deny basic humanity so majorities can participate willingly in atrocity and call it necessary and good. The inside-out values say police killing unarmed black people enhances security for whites; drones killing civilians protects us from terrorists; mass incarceration is a good use of law; unequal distribution of wealth, health care, quality education, jobs and housing is a fair economy; stealing voting rights from minorities is democracy. If we allow our silence to condone such practices, we alienate ourselves from human decency, from respect for other people's lives, from any hope of participatory democracy. We characterize others as enemies and judge them unfit to live or have the opportunities that make full life possible. We murder our own dream.
Our identities can sometimes be fabricated more easily out of lies than from truths. The mainstream culture prefers to move on, choosing to forget rather than examine, live in myth rather than compassion. The alienated people feel responsible to hold on to the truth. The truth is a heavy, awkward, irritating burden in a society which doesn't acknowledge it. Sometimes it seems that carrying the truth of history is like pulling a very long freight train as it struggles for miles and miles on an uphill grade. The engine labors, overheats. The engineer is tempted to uncouple 400 years of overloaded boxcars. Who cares? Certainly not the perpetrators of the injustices. They say, Just let it go; dragging all that history is slowing progress. They mean profit.
That's why these ongoing affirmations are so important. If we jettison the past, we betray the past. All those boxcars shunted off to oblivion tell us who we are. Not who we think we'd like to be, but who we really are. Only by examining that history together, can we move into the future together. The true story is humbling, but it's the only one that unites us.
Stay in the streets.