SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
seniors
Seniors Like Me Need a Strong Safety Net; We Must Protect It From Trump’s GOP
The federal budget cuts the incoming Republican majority in Congress has put forward would slash healthcare, food, and housing by trillions over the next 10 years, resulting in at least a 50% reduction in these services.
Dec 14, 2024
I worked hard my whole career and retired feeling secure. Then I lost every last dime in a scam. I was left with $1,300 a month in Social Security benefits to live on in an area where monthly expenses run about $3,700.
I’m a smart woman, but scams against older Americans are increasing in number and sophistication. Whether through scams, strained savings, or costs of living going up, half of older Americans—that’s 27 million households—can’t afford their basic needs.
And suddenly I became one of them. The experience has taught me a lot about the value of a strong social safety net—and why we’ll need to protect it from the coming administration.
We have the tax dollars—the question is whether we have the political will to invest in seniors, workers, and families, or only for tax cuts for the very rich.
I was ashamed and frightened after what happened, but I scraped myself up off the floor and tried to make the best of it.
I’d worked with aging people earlier in my career, so I was familiar with at least some of the groups who could help. I reached out to a local nonprofit and they came through with flying colors, connecting me to life-saving federal assistance programs.
I was assigned a caseworker, who guided me through applying for public programs like the Medical Savings Plan (MSP), the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), subsidized housing, Medicare Part D, and Medicaid.
It’s hard to describe my relief at getting this help.
Before receiving the MSP, I’d been paying for medications and health insurance—which cost about $200—out of my monthly Social Security check. With MSP, that cost is covered. I also found an apartment I liked through subsidized housing, and I have more money for groceries through SNAP. Now it’s easier to afford other necessities, like hearing-aid batteries and my asthma inhaler.
But I’m worried about the incoming administration’s plans to cut programs like these, which have helped me so much. They’re proposing slashing funding and imposing overly burdensome work and reporting requirements. Studies show that requirements like these can cause millions of otherwise eligible people to lose critical assistance.
President-elect Donald Trump has also indicated that he favors increased privatization of Medicare, which would result in higher costs and less care. And his tax promises are projected to move up the insolvency date of Social Security.
All told, the federal budget cuts the incoming Republican majority in Congress has put forward would slash healthcare, food, and housing by trillions over the next 10 years, resulting in at least a 50% reduction in these services. And they plan to divert those investments in us into more tax cuts for the nation’s very wealthiest.
I want lawmakers of each party to know how important these social investments are for seniors and families. Older Americans—who’ve worked hard all our lives—shouldn’t be pushed out onto the streets, forced to go without sufficient food or healthcare due to unfortunate circumstances.
We have the tax dollars—the question is whether we have the political will to invest in seniors, workers, and families, or only for tax cuts for the very rich. If we do the latter, that’s the real scam.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Harris’ Historic Gains With Seniors Show They Are the Secret Weapon Progressives Need
The organizing I’ve been a part of has shown not only are seniors engaged, but they are ready to take on fights progressives care about, like protecting public healthcare and fighting back against privatization.
Nov 09, 2024
U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris lost the election, but when all the votes are tallied, she may have won the senior vote. If so, she would be the first Democrat to do so since Al Gore did in 2000.
As of September 29, CNN reported that the average poll had Kamala Harris up with seniors by three points. Harris’ strong ratings continued to hold in a poll of likely voters by ABC/Ipsos, released a week later, showed Harris up 51-46%. CNN Exit polling has the two candidates tied with voters over 65, a group Trump won by 7%, and 5%, in 2016 and 2020 respectively.
Senior citizens took a beating over the last year, as the primary conversation about older people was centered on the two older men running for president, especially President Joe Biden. I get it, and was glad Biden stepped aside, but by the time he did there’d been plenty of collateral damage. Mainstream news media and popular culture took potshot after potshot at Biden, and sometimes Trump, with jokes about dementia. One Stephen Colbert bit featured Trump being inaugurated with a stack of Depends instead of a book of scripture.
One group that I think few would think we should more aggressively court, fold in, and organize with are seniors, but that is a self-defeating path if we want to realize significant change down the road.
I learned of Biden stepping down while among a hundred people, almost all seniors, filing into a meeting of a County Board of Supervisors in rural Wisconsin. They were there to protest a plan to privatize their beloved county-owned nursing home that in one form or another had been part of the county for more than a century. So many people showed up that the county had to create an overflow room to accommodate everyone. Then, one by one, older Democrats, Independents, and Republicans took to the podium and expressed their ire at the idea of selling off a venerable community institution that they had all paid into for years or a lifetime. It was a fight for publicly funded and run healthcare, and against privatization, and had cross-partisan appeal.
They were not alone in this fight, as small-town seniors in a handful of counties were doing the same, flooding into county board meetings, marching (or driving their tractors) in local parades, and giving pro-privatization county board members hell every step of the way.
In these meetings and marches, I experienced people, 75, 80, and older, having a third, even fourth, act, building relationships across partisanship, doing things for the first time, and some fighting for what was right with their very last breath. None of these fights to protect public healthcare would be possible if not for the leadership of people over 65. They have time, wisdom, and experience to contribute, and we need every bit of it.
In community organizing circles, there is a dearth of organizing of older working class people. The push has been to get younger. I get it, and over the years have trained hundreds of young organizers to organize younger people. But I would encourage us to think about the role of older people in building movements and a “larger we" that can get us to the other side of this tumultuous period in American history.
For those of us who crave significant change, whether as sweeping as doing away with the Electoral College, or an expansion of Medicare, or a reinstatement of some basic voting rights, It will require more than razor thin majorities coming to an agreement. It will require super majorities of people being in agreement on many things and across many states. If we want big change, we need a lot more people.
In many states older people are the fastest growing age demographic, becoming a higher percentage of the electorate, and will have a lot to say about who wins elections. Between 2010 and 2022, the 65-and-over population grew by 48%.
As swing states have been a hot topic of conversation, here’s how the aging of America is playing out in a few of those. The number of Wisconsinites aged 75 and older is projected to grow by 75% over the next two decades. Michiganders over 85 are the state’s fastest growing age group, and Pennsylvania’s over 65 population is already at more than 2.2 million. That’s a lot of people.
Seniors consistently turn out at the highest rate of any age group. According to the U.S. Census, voter registration numbers for those over 65 to 74 hover at 78%, higher than any other age group.
The organizing I’ve been a part of in Wisconsin has shown not only are seniors engaged, but they are ready to take on fights progressives care about, like protecting public healthcare and fighting back against privatization.
Seniors have united across partisanship to save their public nursing homes. In the spring elections, they took that energy to the ballot box and a number of county board members who led the charge to privatize, including the chairs of two counties, were voted out and replaced by candidates who supported keeping their nursing homes publicly owned. People in the community expanded who was in the fight, and they won.
There’s been a tendency among some progressives to look to narrow who is in, to slice us into smaller groups, and to not work in coalition with people unless we agree on all the things. One group that I think few would think we should more aggressively court, fold in, and organize with are seniors, but that is a self-defeating path if we want to realize significant change down the road.
If we want big things, we need more people. Let’s look to expand, not narrow, who is in, and, considering the fact that older people are becoming a larger percentage of the population, it would seem a major mistake to not place more focus here.
Keep ReadingShow Less
A Winning Issue for The Closing Case: 'Medicare at Home'
For seniors needing quality care in their final years and the families who love them, this is good policy by Kamala Harris—and good politics too.
Nov 04, 2024
Tight elections often come down to who has the strongest close. Kamala Harris has certainly had a strong one. One of the strongest elements has been her support for Medicare at Home, which would expand Medicare to include in-home care. There is plenty of evidence that this issue moves voters, and for swing voters looking for one more data point in that decision, this could be the tipping point.
Harris spoke about Medicare at Home when appearing on the Howard Stern Show earlier this month. This part of the conversation with Stern scored in the 95th percentile in determining a voter's opinion of Harris as a candidate, far outpacing all other messages.
This aligns with what we’ve found in Wisconsin. Senior Voters for Care, of which I am affiliated, teamed up with Hart Research Associates to conduct a poll of 800 likely voters over 55 in Wisconsin on views on long-term care.
The poll found that 71% of swing voters and 64% of independent voters said that if a candidate had a plan to provide more funding for long-term care, they would view that candidate more favorably. Kamala Harris has that plan.
The issue of long-term care has been a hot one in the state as a number of conservative county boards have pushed to privatize county-owned nursing homes despite their being five-star facilities and, in most cases, on solid financial footing. The issue has stirred up a hornet’s nest with seniors across partisanship, flooding into county board meetings, marching (and driving their tractors) in local parades, and organizing to stop the sale every step of the way.
The number of Wisconsinites 75 and older is projected to grow by 75% over the next two decades. If the state’s senior population continues to grow as projected, it will need 10,000 more registered nurses, CNAs, and home health care aids by 2030.
The most popular solution among those polled to the state’s looming care crisis was raising caregivers' wages to help attract and retain workers. Ninety-three percent of the people polled supported this measure, including 87 percent of Republicans and 93 percent of independents.
Nearly as popular was expanding Medicaid to increase access to necessary long-term care, with 87% overall backing this initiative, including 93% of Independents.
This is a big deal because Medicare at Home is essentially these two solutions put together, though even better, in that it would expand one of the most popular social programs in the country–Medicare. Chances are that support for this proposal would have outpaced the question we asked because, through Medicare, this long-term care benefit would be available to all of us, while Medicaid is only for those of us with low incomes and very little wealth. Because Medicare does not cover long-term, many families spend down their savings to qualify for Medicaid.
My family is spending my mom’s life savings and the money made from selling her house to pay for her assisted living care at $6,000 a month. It’s a common experience for many voters.
The poll found that 71% of swing voters and 64% of independent voters said that if a candidate had a plan to provide more funding for long-term care, they would view that candidate more favorably. Kamala Harris has that plan.
The Vice President’s plan to win the Presidency banks on some rapidly aging states. Wisconsin's 85-and-over population is expected to double between now and 2040. Michiganders over 85 are the state’s fastest-growing age group, and Pennsylvania’s over-65 population is already more than 2.2 million.
Medicare at Home is the right policy at the right time and appears to be good politics. If enough people heard about it in the campaign's closing weeks, it could be one of the parts of her strong finish that helps put her over the top.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular