

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
"I'm voting yes to get Volkswagen to come back to the table," said one employee at the plant. "The majority of the people I know don't want VW's 'final offer.'"
Volkswagen workers in Chattanooga, Tennessee, who unionized with the United Auto Workers last year, announced Thursday that they will vote next week to authorize a strike after over 13 months of fruitless contract negotiations with the auto giant.
The strike authorization vote planned for October 28-29 "comes after months of unfair labor practices committed by the company, including bad faith negotiations, unlawful intimidation, and the unilateral cutting of jobs at Volkswagen’s only US assembly plant," UAW said in a statement. The union also highlighted Volkswagen's $20.6 billion in profits last year.
Company spokesperson Michael Lowder said Monday that "Volkswagen made it clear to the union that our last, best, and final offer is indeed final. We cannot in good faith prolong negotiations by continuing to bargain when we have already put our best offer on the table. It is time for the UAW to give VW employees a voice and let them decide for themselves by voting on our final offer."
However, multiple employees said Thursday that they are not happy with the company's latest offer and plan to vote for a strike.
"I'm voting yes because this is the time to show Volkswagen we are serious about receiving industry-standard treatment. Job security's essential. They could pay us $100 an hour, but it means nothing if they close the plant two weeks into the agreement," said James Robinson. "I'm hoping this process shows the company we are serious about getting a fair contract. We will show them their offer wasn't enough, show them we're willing to stand up to get what we deserve."
"I'm hoping this process shows the company we are serious about getting a fair contract."
Employee Taylor Fugate said that "I'm voting yes to get Volkswagen to come back to the table. The majority of the people I know don't want VW's 'final offer.' They want to keep negotiating, and we are willing to do what it takes to make that happen."
"We need affordable healthcare and a strong job security statement that leaves no gray area," Fugate added. "We also deserve equal standards—Southern autoworkers shouldn't be treated differently!"
One elected Republican held a press conference on Wednesday in a bid to bully the union into holding a vote on the company's latest offer. Local 3 News reported that Hamilton County Commissioner Jeff Eversole said: "Volkswagen put forward a final union contract offer over a month ago that offers significant gains for Chattanooga workers, including a 20% wage increase, a cost-of-living allowance, a $4,000 ratification bonus, lower healthcare costs, and much more. Many employees have been reaching out to the UAW to vote, and the UAW has refused."
Payday Report's Mike Elk pointed out Thursday that "the tactics used by the GOP in Chattanooga are similar to the tactics that they have used for more than a decade to sometimes successfully dissuade union votes by implying that the plant may close if the union gets 'too greedy' (their words, not my mine, as the son of a Volkswagen auto assembly line worker)."
Local 3 News noted that "during the press conference, dozens of members from both the UAW and the Chattanooga Area Central Labor Council, or CLC, began picketing outside of the VW plant."
The outlet also spoke with some employees. One of them, Dakotah Bailey, explained that "originally, it was going to be a 25% increase in wages. They didn't want to take that, and now they dropped it down to 20%. I wanted to try and get my money now. Especially right before the holidays. It would be great to have an extra $5,500 sitting in my bank account."
According to a "Volkswagen Stories" video series published by the UAW on YouTube, wages are a primary concern for workers. Other top priorities include health and safety conditions at the plant, healthcare, paid time off, and retirement benefits.
"I don't want to strike, but if it comes to it, I will," Volkswagen worker Mitchell Harris said Thursday. "Because I feel that all my brothers and sisters of UAW Local 42 deserve respect, to provide a better life for their families, and have job security for us and generations to come."
Ushering in a vigorous celebration of the real history of the US working class in the lead up to May 1 couldn’t be more necessary to buttress workers’ class consciousness and solidarity under Trump.
Just two months ago, my union—the United Automobile Workers—did a remarkable thing. It made public its pledge to fight for the rights of autoworkers—not its own dues-paying members, but workers overseas—based on the slogan, “An injury to one is an injury to all.”
That slogan has its origins in the radical US labor formation from the last century, the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), also known as the “Wobblies.” The Wobblies were famous for advocating “One Big Union,” uniting workers without distinction, and directly targeting the capitalist system. Its founders 120 years ago included anarchists, socialists, and Marxists.
The UAW pledged to support injured workers in Colombia who assembled cars and trucks under antiquated, onerous working conditions for one of the largest transnational corporations in the world, General Motors. They were all men, mostly in their 20s, 30s, and 40s when they were fired by GM due to their job-related injuries. When they hired in, they had to sign a pledge they wouldn’t join a union.
This was GM’s routine practice, and they got away with it for a long time, making their factory on the outskirts of the capital city, Bogotá, the most profitable GM plant in Latin America. That is, until dozens of the injured and fired workers formed their own association, ASOTRECOL, and collectively fought back. GM didn’t see that coming, and they’ve tried to be blind to it ever since.

A lot of autoworkers in the US and around the world, and the solidarity network that grew to support ASOTRECOL, became familiar with these courageous workers when a group of them waged three successive hunger strikes, with their lips sewn shut. The tent they occupied at the foot of the massive fortress housing the US Embassy, now going on for over 14 years, has become iconic. All this took place in the country with the worst reputation in the world for the assassination of trade unionists—3,000 organizers during 1990-2010—by paramilitaries and Colombian military forces. There’s no record of GM complaining about these murders.
It was only after one full year of the encampment, and a weeks-long hunger strike, that the UAW and AFL-CIO took notice and lent support to the workers’ struggle. When the workers didn’t bend the knee to GM and declined a settlement “final offer,” everything changed—US Labor’s support disappeared, including the UAW’s. My union was gripped in a corruption scandal which ultimately led to changes in the UAW Constitution enabling the membership, for the first time, to directly elect the top leadership.
The reform caucus, Unite All Workers for Democracy (UAWD), which I helped birth, can take credit for this turn of events. A new slate of leaders (UAW Members United) was elected to the International Executive Board in 2022-23, including President Shawn Fain and the UAW’s GM Department Director, Mike Booth.
The current effort on behalf of ASOTRECOL presents a different face of global solidarity, one not predicated on reciprocity or “what’s in it for us?”
Beginning in 2024, Fain and Booth put GM on notice—calling on GM to “deliver justice for the remaining 12 Colombian workers illegally fired after suffering debilitating injuries at GM’s Bogotá plant.” In August, on the 14th anniversary of the tent occupation the UAW posted on Facebook about the struggle, including a YouTube video, with a call to share and post on GM social media.
The UAW is currently building international support, directly engaging with GM, and garnering support from unions around the globe which represent GM workers.
With this campaign, Fain and Booth are redefining the meaning and practice of the UAW’s “international solidarity.” Former (and convicted) UAW President Dennis Williams and Secretary-Treasurer Gary Casteel elaborated on their view in We Don’t Quit: Stories of UAW Global Solidarity published in 2015. They wrote that “global solidarity is a two-way street—one that shows that those we support regularly use their power on behalf of the UAW when we need their help.” One example: the German IG Metal union’s support for the UAW’s organizing campaign at VW in Chattanooga, Tennessee.
The current effort on behalf of ASOTRECOL presents a different face of global solidarity, one not predicated on reciprocity or “what’s in it for us?” ASOTRECOL is not a union. It does not have the organized power to directly support the UAW. Yet the UAW is investing time, energy, staff, and political capital to see this through, with victory not guaranteed. Standing with 12 South American disabled GM autoworkers who were kicked under the bus literally embraces the IWW tenet that, “An Injury to One is an Injury to All.” That’s a cultural norm that UAW members embrace on the shop floor, more often than not. Fain and Booth have made it international.
One of the most interesting outcomes of the “Stand Up Strikes” at the “Big 3” in 2023 was the agreement on the contract expiration dates. The strategy behind choosing April 30, 2028 is an envisioned “general strike” on May Day, International Workers Solidarity Day. The UAW’s aim is to win US unions to align their contracts to expire at the same time under the mantra, “We have more power if we strike together.”
The headline of an editorial by President Fain published in In These Times (May, 2024) read, “May Day 2028 Could Transform the Labor Movement—and the World.” In it he doubles down, explaining the date was chosen “…in hopes the labor movement can collectively aspire to building the power needed to change the world.” Much of the UAW’s focus is on the goals of the proposed coordinated strikes: healthcare as a human right, pensions, improved standard of living, work-life balance. Fain argues: If working people are going to accomplish these objectives, “unions have to start thinking bigger.”
The vision for how May Day 2028 would work out, and what exactly it would look like, deserves a lot of study, discussion, and debate. In the meantime, there have been a lot of rumblings among unionists and progressives asking, “Can we wait that long?” Fain’s pronouncements were made before President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance were elected, and before the vile, anti-working class Project 2025 became the US government’s agenda. With the growing military occupation of our Democratic Party-leaning cities, there’s no assurance of fair elections in 2026. Will we be experiencing a full-fledged dictatorship by 2028? We need to reevaluate our thinking.
There’s no better way to begin to demonstrate this truth than with a global one-day shut down on May Day 2026.
May Day 2025 commemorations in the US were historic. An estimated quarter million workers and allies turned out at over 1,100 rallies and marches, nationwide—the most ever! Local organizing committees and coalitions, supported by a national network, May Day Strong, organized for May Day like never before, tearing off the stigma that the billionaire class has used historically to ‘kettle” workers to the more “acceptable” Labor Day parades and barbecues. No more!
However, the UAW—except for a scattering of rank-and-file members and retirees—was absent in the Detroit May Day Rally and March, missing the opportunity to educate and mobilize its members. UAW Region 1 Rep Paul Torrente, who spoke at the rally on the importance of May Day, was the exception. UAW Solidarity House cannot afford to be absent next year, the 140th anniversary of the most hallowed celebration of the global working class.
In Fain’s words, “...To reshape the economy into one that works for the benefit of everyone—not just the wealthy—we need to reclaim our country’s history of militant trade unions that united workers across race, gender, and nationality.”
That history must be reclaimed now and marshalled to build a united working class—not in 2-plus years, but now! We must begin now to recalibrate the culture of our working class movement, by explaining—as Fain does in the In These Times article, “The cause of those Haymarket Martyrs became the cause of the working class around the world, and May 1 became an international holiday commemorating the fight of workers everywhere to reclaim their time and the value of their labor.”
How many UAW members or retirees know about the “Haymarket Martyrs?” Aligning contracts is one thing, but it can’t be done in isolation of building the class consciousness that the struggle of “workers over billionaires” requires. That education cannot begin a moment too soon.
The reality is that the US working class and especially UAW members are torn between nationalism and internationalism—hence the fractures within its ranks over the UAW’s position supporting Trump’s tariff agenda. It’s no surprise because the dominant elites within the organized sector of labor—the AFL-CIO—have been steeped and saturated for over a century in American exceptionalism and make “American Great.”
Next year, with Trump at the helm of US celebrations of its 250th anniversary, the working class will be inundated with appeals to patriotism, jingoism, militarism, patriarchy, white supremacy, flag waving, etc. Ushering in a vigorous celebration of the real history of the US working class in the lead up to May 1 couldn’t be more necessary, to buttress workers’ class consciousness and solidarity. Fain is clear:
May Day is celebrated as an official holiday in countries from Argentina to South Africa to Sweden to Hong Kong, just about everywhere—except its country of origin. When unions organize together across industries and countries, our power is exponentially amplified. The fact is: Without workers, the world stops running.
There’s no better way to begin to demonstrate this truth than with a global one-day shut down on May Day 2026. It falls on a Friday. The UAW and the broader labor movement can call for a day of “no work,” for a three-day weekend, and begin to test its capacity to organize a broad “general strike” in the true meaning of the term. Back to Fain:
A united working class is the only effective wall against the billionaire class’ race to the bottom. For the US labor movement, that means grappling with some hard truths. Like the undeniable fact that it is impossible to protect American jobs while ignoring the plight of everyone else.
Stepping up, as the Fain leadership has done, in defense of the Colombian GM ex-workers is a real-life implementation of what otherwise can easily pass as rhetoric. “As working people, we must come together,” concludes President Fain, “We can no longer allow corporations, politicians, and borders to divide us. It’s time we reclaim May Day for the working class.”
One union official described the Democratic candidate as "a voice for the people of Maine fed up with the corrupting influence of the oligarchy and money in our politics."
On the heels of Maine Gov. Janet Mills entering the Democratic primary race to face Republican Sen. Susan Collins next year, the United Auto Workers on Wednesday endorsed Graham Platner, the oyster farmer and working-class champion who's been railing against the oligarchy since he launched his campaign in August.
" Inequality is out of control in our country. Today, the top 1% have more wealth than the bottom 95% of humanity combined," said UAW president Shawn Fain in a statement. "Graham understands this, and at a time when too many politicians take their cues from billionaires and corporate lobbyists, he has chosen to stand with the working class."
In Platner's first campaign ad, the military veteran pointed to his four infantry tours and declared: "I'm not afraid to name an enemy, and the enemy is the oligarchy. It's the billionaires who pay for it and the politicians who sell us out—and yeah, that means politicians like Susan Collins."
Fain said Wednesday that Platner is "focused on the real problems facing workers across this country—not the distractions the billionaire class uses to divide us. His campaign is rooted in the same core issues our union fights for every day: a living wage, affordable healthcare, retirement security, and time outside of work to actually live our lives. The UAW is proud to endorse candidates like Platner taking on the broken status quo."
Trent Vellela, president of the UAW's Maine Community Action Program Council from Bath Marine Draftsmen's Association, said that "I think he's the real deal," a sentiment shared by Platner's supporters across the country.
"Graham directly addresses the hard issues in a straightforward and relatable way," Vellela noted. "He is clear about his principles and his plan to achieve positive outcomes for the working people of Maine."
The UAW represents nearly 2,000 workers across the state, from marine draftsmen at Bath Iron Works to employees at the Portland Museum of Art and the University of Maine System. Maine is part of the union's Region 9A, directed by Brandon Mancilla.
"Graham Platner has emerged as a voice for the people of Maine fed up with the corrupting influence of the oligarchy and money in our politics," Mancilla said. "More importantly, he is building a mass movement that will not only power his campaign but will be ready to take on the challenges facing working families in Maine and across the country once in office."
"Our members are ready to hit the ground running with Graham's campaign and take back the power for Maine's working class," he said.
While the UAW and working-class Mainers rally behind Platner, Mills is already getting a boost from the Democratic Party establishment. On Tuesday, just hours after her announcement to enter the race, news broke that the Mills campaign and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) formed a joint fundraising committee.
Platner's first TV ad—set to "air statewide on MSNBC starting Wednesday," according to Axios—takes aim at his primary opponent. It begins with a woman saying: "Janet Mills again? She was a good governor, but I think it's time for change."