SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Breakthrough on Nuke Reduction?
Feb 08, 2009
The Obama administration is considering a major reduction in nuclear
weapons to as little as 1,000 warheads each for Russia and the U.S.,
according to a recent article in The Times of London.
Surprisingly, this story has received almost no attention in the U.S.
media, although it may represent the most important progress in
non-proliferation in many years.
The Obama team will reconsider
the Bush administration's plan for a missile defense deployment in
Eastern Europe -- a deployment the Russians have strongly opposed,
according to the article. Obama pledged during his campaign to open
talks with Moscow on the Start treaty, which expires at the end of the
year. That agreement calls for both countries to reduce their
stockpiles from about 10,000 to about 5,000.
But going to 1,000 would mark a major additional reduction. According to David Krieger, head of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, "This news is not just noteworthy, it could be a game-changer."
The Times quoted an unnamed administration official as saying: "Nobody would be surprised if the number reduced to the 1,000 mark for the post-Start treaty."
"Imagine
what a message these talks would send to other nuclear countries,"
Krieger said in an email to supporters. "Suddenly, U.S. leadership
would be unequivocal, and there would be pressure on all nuclear
nations to join in the process."
The world's nuclear stockpile
stands at about 25,000 nuclear weapons, the vast majority of which are
held by Russia and the United States.
This news falls in line with President Obama's promise during the campaign to seek a nuclear-free world:
"I
will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons. To seek that goal,
I will not develop new nuclear weapons; I will seek a global ban on the
production of fissile material; and I will negotiate with Russia to
take our ICBMs off hair-trigger alert, and to achieve deep cuts in our
nuclear arsenals."
There's at least some support for a nuclear-free future from the other side of the aisle. George Shultz, secretary of state in the Reagan administration, told me in a YES!
interview that he believes the world can be safe from the global hazard
of nuclear warfare, terrorism, or accident only by eliminating nuclear
weapons.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This article was written for YES! Magazine, a national, nonprofit media organization that fuses powerful ideas and practical actions. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Sarah Van Gelder
Sarah van Gelder writes "How We Rise" on Substack (howwerise.substack.com) and recently completed a zine, “Community As Strategy,” available free at https://open.substack.com/pub/howwerise/p/community-as-strategy-10-ways-to. She is founding editor of YES! Magazine.
The Obama administration is considering a major reduction in nuclear
weapons to as little as 1,000 warheads each for Russia and the U.S.,
according to a recent article in The Times of London.
Surprisingly, this story has received almost no attention in the U.S.
media, although it may represent the most important progress in
non-proliferation in many years.
The Obama team will reconsider
the Bush administration's plan for a missile defense deployment in
Eastern Europe -- a deployment the Russians have strongly opposed,
according to the article. Obama pledged during his campaign to open
talks with Moscow on the Start treaty, which expires at the end of the
year. That agreement calls for both countries to reduce their
stockpiles from about 10,000 to about 5,000.
But going to 1,000 would mark a major additional reduction. According to David Krieger, head of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, "This news is not just noteworthy, it could be a game-changer."
The Times quoted an unnamed administration official as saying: "Nobody would be surprised if the number reduced to the 1,000 mark for the post-Start treaty."
"Imagine
what a message these talks would send to other nuclear countries,"
Krieger said in an email to supporters. "Suddenly, U.S. leadership
would be unequivocal, and there would be pressure on all nuclear
nations to join in the process."
The world's nuclear stockpile
stands at about 25,000 nuclear weapons, the vast majority of which are
held by Russia and the United States.
This news falls in line with President Obama's promise during the campaign to seek a nuclear-free world:
"I
will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons. To seek that goal,
I will not develop new nuclear weapons; I will seek a global ban on the
production of fissile material; and I will negotiate with Russia to
take our ICBMs off hair-trigger alert, and to achieve deep cuts in our
nuclear arsenals."
There's at least some support for a nuclear-free future from the other side of the aisle. George Shultz, secretary of state in the Reagan administration, told me in a YES!
interview that he believes the world can be safe from the global hazard
of nuclear warfare, terrorism, or accident only by eliminating nuclear
weapons.
Sarah Van Gelder
Sarah van Gelder writes "How We Rise" on Substack (howwerise.substack.com) and recently completed a zine, “Community As Strategy,” available free at https://open.substack.com/pub/howwerise/p/community-as-strategy-10-ways-to. She is founding editor of YES! Magazine.
The Obama administration is considering a major reduction in nuclear
weapons to as little as 1,000 warheads each for Russia and the U.S.,
according to a recent article in The Times of London.
Surprisingly, this story has received almost no attention in the U.S.
media, although it may represent the most important progress in
non-proliferation in many years.
The Obama team will reconsider
the Bush administration's plan for a missile defense deployment in
Eastern Europe -- a deployment the Russians have strongly opposed,
according to the article. Obama pledged during his campaign to open
talks with Moscow on the Start treaty, which expires at the end of the
year. That agreement calls for both countries to reduce their
stockpiles from about 10,000 to about 5,000.
But going to 1,000 would mark a major additional reduction. According to David Krieger, head of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, "This news is not just noteworthy, it could be a game-changer."
The Times quoted an unnamed administration official as saying: "Nobody would be surprised if the number reduced to the 1,000 mark for the post-Start treaty."
"Imagine
what a message these talks would send to other nuclear countries,"
Krieger said in an email to supporters. "Suddenly, U.S. leadership
would be unequivocal, and there would be pressure on all nuclear
nations to join in the process."
The world's nuclear stockpile
stands at about 25,000 nuclear weapons, the vast majority of which are
held by Russia and the United States.
This news falls in line with President Obama's promise during the campaign to seek a nuclear-free world:
"I
will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons. To seek that goal,
I will not develop new nuclear weapons; I will seek a global ban on the
production of fissile material; and I will negotiate with Russia to
take our ICBMs off hair-trigger alert, and to achieve deep cuts in our
nuclear arsenals."
There's at least some support for a nuclear-free future from the other side of the aisle. George Shultz, secretary of state in the Reagan administration, told me in a YES!
interview that he believes the world can be safe from the global hazard
of nuclear warfare, terrorism, or accident only by eliminating nuclear
weapons.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy