SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Tim Geithner's at it again, doing somersaults, with hundreds of
billions of federal money flying out of his pockets in the process, all
to distract us from the more sensible course of action, which is to
nationalize the insolvent banks.
Instead, he wants to scrub their assets clean by having the government and some private speculators buy up their bad bets.
Geithner calls it the Public Private Partnership Investment Program, and if he were playing scrabble, he'd be all out of Ps.
Tim Geithner's at it again, doing somersaults, with hundreds of
billions of federal money flying out of his pockets in the process, all
to distract us from the more sensible course of action, which is to
nationalize the insolvent banks.
Instead, he wants to scrub their assets clean by having the government and some private speculators buy up their bad bets.
Geithner calls it the Public Private Partnership Investment Program, and if he were playing scrabble, he'd be all out of Ps.
But don't be confused. The public is taking the biggest risk,
whereas the private speculators, for a tiny investment, can gain quite
a lot.
Here's the deal. Say a bank has a bad mortgage loan that it is holding for $100,000.
The government will set up an auction to determine what the mortgage really is worth.
Say the highest private bid for the mortgage is $84,000.
The government will provide $72,000 in a loan guarantee, and then
the private investor would put up only $6,000, which the government
would match with its own $6,000 stake.
So the government, you and I, are on the hook for $78,000 whereas the private investor has only $6,000 of skin in the game.
But get this: The private speculator gets to control the management
of the asset, and not the government, even though we're on the hook for
about 93% of the risk.
"The Treasury intends to provide 50 percent of the equity capital," Geithner's fact sheet says, "but private managers will retain control of asset management subject to rigorous oversight from the FDIC."
Geithner infamously said, just a few days after he became Treasury
Secretary, that "we have a financial system that is run by private
shareholders, managed by private institutions, and we'd like to do our
best to preserve that system."
And he is doing his best at that, which is all the worse for us.
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. Our Year-End campaign is our most important fundraiser of the year. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
Tim Geithner's at it again, doing somersaults, with hundreds of
billions of federal money flying out of his pockets in the process, all
to distract us from the more sensible course of action, which is to
nationalize the insolvent banks.
Instead, he wants to scrub their assets clean by having the government and some private speculators buy up their bad bets.
Geithner calls it the Public Private Partnership Investment Program, and if he were playing scrabble, he'd be all out of Ps.
But don't be confused. The public is taking the biggest risk,
whereas the private speculators, for a tiny investment, can gain quite
a lot.
Here's the deal. Say a bank has a bad mortgage loan that it is holding for $100,000.
The government will set up an auction to determine what the mortgage really is worth.
Say the highest private bid for the mortgage is $84,000.
The government will provide $72,000 in a loan guarantee, and then
the private investor would put up only $6,000, which the government
would match with its own $6,000 stake.
So the government, you and I, are on the hook for $78,000 whereas the private investor has only $6,000 of skin in the game.
But get this: The private speculator gets to control the management
of the asset, and not the government, even though we're on the hook for
about 93% of the risk.
"The Treasury intends to provide 50 percent of the equity capital," Geithner's fact sheet says, "but private managers will retain control of asset management subject to rigorous oversight from the FDIC."
Geithner infamously said, just a few days after he became Treasury
Secretary, that "we have a financial system that is run by private
shareholders, managed by private institutions, and we'd like to do our
best to preserve that system."
And he is doing his best at that, which is all the worse for us.
Tim Geithner's at it again, doing somersaults, with hundreds of
billions of federal money flying out of his pockets in the process, all
to distract us from the more sensible course of action, which is to
nationalize the insolvent banks.
Instead, he wants to scrub their assets clean by having the government and some private speculators buy up their bad bets.
Geithner calls it the Public Private Partnership Investment Program, and if he were playing scrabble, he'd be all out of Ps.
But don't be confused. The public is taking the biggest risk,
whereas the private speculators, for a tiny investment, can gain quite
a lot.
Here's the deal. Say a bank has a bad mortgage loan that it is holding for $100,000.
The government will set up an auction to determine what the mortgage really is worth.
Say the highest private bid for the mortgage is $84,000.
The government will provide $72,000 in a loan guarantee, and then
the private investor would put up only $6,000, which the government
would match with its own $6,000 stake.
So the government, you and I, are on the hook for $78,000 whereas the private investor has only $6,000 of skin in the game.
But get this: The private speculator gets to control the management
of the asset, and not the government, even though we're on the hook for
about 93% of the risk.
"The Treasury intends to provide 50 percent of the equity capital," Geithner's fact sheet says, "but private managers will retain control of asset management subject to rigorous oversight from the FDIC."
Geithner infamously said, just a few days after he became Treasury
Secretary, that "we have a financial system that is run by private
shareholders, managed by private institutions, and we'd like to do our
best to preserve that system."
And he is doing his best at that, which is all the worse for us.