SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Last week, the Congressional Progressive Caucus held its second of six scheduled forums
on Afghanistan. It was the first non-classified public forum on Capitol
Hill to address the Obama Administration's newly released
Afghanistan/Pakistan strategy. Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson (Ret.) -- a
Vietnam Veteran and former chief of staff for Secretary Colin Powell --
offered some powerful words of caution.
"My soldier's soul screams at me to get out," Wilkerson said. "Part
of that is some 38,000 names on a Wall that I do not fail to visit
twice a year every year for the last 25 years....Counterinsurgency is not a very optimal experience.
It rarely is won, it rarely results in what we might call a viable
civility, prosperity and dignity. Look at Iraq right now... We never
solved the problems in the Gulf."
He spoke out against the use of bombs and predator drone strikes. He
said that killing "a few" Al Qaeda or Taliban targets "coupled with 20
to 25 civilian deaths" was only helping the enemy's recruiting efforts.
"Research is now showing that the leaders that they replace them with are more radical than the leaders we hit," he said.
Although Wilkerson doesn't argue for withdrawal -- he said we need
"to get this better" -- he nevertheless makes a pretty powerful case
against escalation. "One thing I would not do is over-militarize our
foreign policy," he said. "... We need to demilitarize as much as
possible... Keep our sword sheathed, and only pull it out when it's
absolutely necessary."
The next day a House Foreign Affairs subcommittee held a hearing on "Achieving Peace and Stability in the Graveyard of Empires".
Dr. Seth Jones, a political scientist with the RAND Corporation,
also pointed to the seemingly impossible task of General Petraeus'
counterinsurgency strategy. He said the ratio requirement "needed to
win a counterinsurgency is 20 security forces per 1000 inhabitants...
[Given] the population estimates in provinces where most of the
insurgency is taking place, [this] translates into a force requirement
of approximately 271,652 forces." (Other estimates are as high as 400,000 troops
needed to execute the Petraeus Playbook.) So it really comes as no
surprise that Petraeus already signaled he will ask for another 10,000 troops even before the dust had settled on Obama's announcement of an additional 21,000 troops.
Jones also warned that escalation by the US "may be interpreted by the
population as an occupation, eliciting nationalist reactions...."
The soldier's soul had it right. This strategy won't work. We need to Get Out.
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. Our Year-End campaign is our most important fundraiser of the year. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
Last week, the Congressional Progressive Caucus held its second of six scheduled forums
on Afghanistan. It was the first non-classified public forum on Capitol
Hill to address the Obama Administration's newly released
Afghanistan/Pakistan strategy. Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson (Ret.) -- a
Vietnam Veteran and former chief of staff for Secretary Colin Powell --
offered some powerful words of caution.
"My soldier's soul screams at me to get out," Wilkerson said. "Part
of that is some 38,000 names on a Wall that I do not fail to visit
twice a year every year for the last 25 years....Counterinsurgency is not a very optimal experience.
It rarely is won, it rarely results in what we might call a viable
civility, prosperity and dignity. Look at Iraq right now... We never
solved the problems in the Gulf."
He spoke out against the use of bombs and predator drone strikes. He
said that killing "a few" Al Qaeda or Taliban targets "coupled with 20
to 25 civilian deaths" was only helping the enemy's recruiting efforts.
"Research is now showing that the leaders that they replace them with are more radical than the leaders we hit," he said.
Although Wilkerson doesn't argue for withdrawal -- he said we need
"to get this better" -- he nevertheless makes a pretty powerful case
against escalation. "One thing I would not do is over-militarize our
foreign policy," he said. "... We need to demilitarize as much as
possible... Keep our sword sheathed, and only pull it out when it's
absolutely necessary."
The next day a House Foreign Affairs subcommittee held a hearing on "Achieving Peace and Stability in the Graveyard of Empires".
Dr. Seth Jones, a political scientist with the RAND Corporation,
also pointed to the seemingly impossible task of General Petraeus'
counterinsurgency strategy. He said the ratio requirement "needed to
win a counterinsurgency is 20 security forces per 1000 inhabitants...
[Given] the population estimates in provinces where most of the
insurgency is taking place, [this] translates into a force requirement
of approximately 271,652 forces." (Other estimates are as high as 400,000 troops
needed to execute the Petraeus Playbook.) So it really comes as no
surprise that Petraeus already signaled he will ask for another 10,000 troops even before the dust had settled on Obama's announcement of an additional 21,000 troops.
Jones also warned that escalation by the US "may be interpreted by the
population as an occupation, eliciting nationalist reactions...."
The soldier's soul had it right. This strategy won't work. We need to Get Out.
Last week, the Congressional Progressive Caucus held its second of six scheduled forums
on Afghanistan. It was the first non-classified public forum on Capitol
Hill to address the Obama Administration's newly released
Afghanistan/Pakistan strategy. Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson (Ret.) -- a
Vietnam Veteran and former chief of staff for Secretary Colin Powell --
offered some powerful words of caution.
"My soldier's soul screams at me to get out," Wilkerson said. "Part
of that is some 38,000 names on a Wall that I do not fail to visit
twice a year every year for the last 25 years....Counterinsurgency is not a very optimal experience.
It rarely is won, it rarely results in what we might call a viable
civility, prosperity and dignity. Look at Iraq right now... We never
solved the problems in the Gulf."
He spoke out against the use of bombs and predator drone strikes. He
said that killing "a few" Al Qaeda or Taliban targets "coupled with 20
to 25 civilian deaths" was only helping the enemy's recruiting efforts.
"Research is now showing that the leaders that they replace them with are more radical than the leaders we hit," he said.
Although Wilkerson doesn't argue for withdrawal -- he said we need
"to get this better" -- he nevertheless makes a pretty powerful case
against escalation. "One thing I would not do is over-militarize our
foreign policy," he said. "... We need to demilitarize as much as
possible... Keep our sword sheathed, and only pull it out when it's
absolutely necessary."
The next day a House Foreign Affairs subcommittee held a hearing on "Achieving Peace and Stability in the Graveyard of Empires".
Dr. Seth Jones, a political scientist with the RAND Corporation,
also pointed to the seemingly impossible task of General Petraeus'
counterinsurgency strategy. He said the ratio requirement "needed to
win a counterinsurgency is 20 security forces per 1000 inhabitants...
[Given] the population estimates in provinces where most of the
insurgency is taking place, [this] translates into a force requirement
of approximately 271,652 forces." (Other estimates are as high as 400,000 troops
needed to execute the Petraeus Playbook.) So it really comes as no
surprise that Petraeus already signaled he will ask for another 10,000 troops even before the dust had settled on Obama's announcement of an additional 21,000 troops.
Jones also warned that escalation by the US "may be interpreted by the
population as an occupation, eliciting nationalist reactions...."
The soldier's soul had it right. This strategy won't work. We need to Get Out.