Mar 25, 2010
In President Obama's first week in office, he pledged to close down
Guantanamo within a year.
The year's been up for two months now, and Guantanamo still remains
open.
Making matters worse, it looks like the Obama Administration may
simply move Guantanamo to Afghanistan.
The Los Angeles Times is reporting that the "White
House is considering whether to detain international terrorism suspects
at [Bagram Air Base] in Afghanistan, an option that would lead to
another prison with the same purpose as Guantanamo Bay."
And that purpose is to hold suspects indefinitely, without ever
granting them any due process rights.
The Supreme Court has ruled that suspects held at Guantanamo have due
process rights because Guantanamo is effectively U.S. property. But the
Obama Administration, like the Bush Administration before it, says that
this court decision does not apply to Bagram Air Base.
Last September, Obama's Justice Department told a lower court that
"when it comes to military facilities, unlike Guantanamo, that are truly
abroad-particularly those halfway across the globe in an active war
zone-courts in the United States exceed their role by second-guessing
the political branches about the reach of habeas jurisdiction."
Until the Court resolves that question, Obama can ship detainees from
Guantanamo - or anywhere else in the world - to Bagram Air Base and
hold them there for years at a time.
It's against international law, but that hasn't stopped a President
before.
So it looks like make Guantanamo may soon be Spanish for Bagram, and
both will translate into human rights violations.
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
© 2023 The Progressive
Matt Rothschild
Matt Rothschild is the executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. Prior to joining the Democracy Campaign at the start of 2015, Matt worked at The Progressive Magazine for 32 years. For most of those, he was the editor and publisher of The Progressive.
In President Obama's first week in office, he pledged to close down
Guantanamo within a year.
The year's been up for two months now, and Guantanamo still remains
open.
Making matters worse, it looks like the Obama Administration may
simply move Guantanamo to Afghanistan.
The Los Angeles Times is reporting that the "White
House is considering whether to detain international terrorism suspects
at [Bagram Air Base] in Afghanistan, an option that would lead to
another prison with the same purpose as Guantanamo Bay."
And that purpose is to hold suspects indefinitely, without ever
granting them any due process rights.
The Supreme Court has ruled that suspects held at Guantanamo have due
process rights because Guantanamo is effectively U.S. property. But the
Obama Administration, like the Bush Administration before it, says that
this court decision does not apply to Bagram Air Base.
Last September, Obama's Justice Department told a lower court that
"when it comes to military facilities, unlike Guantanamo, that are truly
abroad-particularly those halfway across the globe in an active war
zone-courts in the United States exceed their role by second-guessing
the political branches about the reach of habeas jurisdiction."
Until the Court resolves that question, Obama can ship detainees from
Guantanamo - or anywhere else in the world - to Bagram Air Base and
hold them there for years at a time.
It's against international law, but that hasn't stopped a President
before.
So it looks like make Guantanamo may soon be Spanish for Bagram, and
both will translate into human rights violations.
Matt Rothschild
Matt Rothschild is the executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. Prior to joining the Democracy Campaign at the start of 2015, Matt worked at The Progressive Magazine for 32 years. For most of those, he was the editor and publisher of The Progressive.
In President Obama's first week in office, he pledged to close down
Guantanamo within a year.
The year's been up for two months now, and Guantanamo still remains
open.
Making matters worse, it looks like the Obama Administration may
simply move Guantanamo to Afghanistan.
The Los Angeles Times is reporting that the "White
House is considering whether to detain international terrorism suspects
at [Bagram Air Base] in Afghanistan, an option that would lead to
another prison with the same purpose as Guantanamo Bay."
And that purpose is to hold suspects indefinitely, without ever
granting them any due process rights.
The Supreme Court has ruled that suspects held at Guantanamo have due
process rights because Guantanamo is effectively U.S. property. But the
Obama Administration, like the Bush Administration before it, says that
this court decision does not apply to Bagram Air Base.
Last September, Obama's Justice Department told a lower court that
"when it comes to military facilities, unlike Guantanamo, that are truly
abroad-particularly those halfway across the globe in an active war
zone-courts in the United States exceed their role by second-guessing
the political branches about the reach of habeas jurisdiction."
Until the Court resolves that question, Obama can ship detainees from
Guantanamo - or anywhere else in the world - to Bagram Air Base and
hold them there for years at a time.
It's against international law, but that hasn't stopped a President
before.
So it looks like make Guantanamo may soon be Spanish for Bagram, and
both will translate into human rights violations.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.