SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Last Thursday, in the early hours of the morning, a Palestinian community leader's home was raided by Israeli security forces.
In front of his family, the wanted man was hauled off to detention
without access to a lawyer, while his home and offices were ransacked
and property confiscated.
While this sounds like an all-too
typical occurrence in West Bank villages such as Bil'in and Beit Omar,
in fact, the target in question this time was Ameer Makhoul, a
Palestinian citizen of Israel and head of internationally renowned NGO network Ittijah.
After
being snatched last week, Makhoul's detention was subject to a
court-enforced gagging order, preventing the Israeli media from even
reporting that it had happened. This ban was finally lifted yesterday,
as Israeli newspapers were being forced to report on angry protests by
Palestinians in Israel without explaining the specific provocation.
It turned out that another Palestinian citizen of Israel, Balad party activist Omar Said, had also been arrested, and interrogated by the Shin Bet since the end of April. Now, both Makhoul and Said are to be charged with espionage and "contact with a foreign agent" - namely, Hezbollah. On Monday night, hundreds of demonstrators rallied in Haifa to protest against what they call "an escalating campaign to crack down on Israel's Palestinian citizens".
The gagging order recalls the Anat Kam case,
where for several months it was forbidden to report that the former
soldier was under house arrest and being investigated by the Shin Bet
for "leaking classified military information". The facts about Kam were first circulated by bloggers and campaigners, something repeated in Makhoul's case (including this Facebook group).
The
night raids, interrogations, and charges are not isolated incidents -
indeed, Makhoul had been prevented from leaving the country in April, according to an order (PDF) by the interior minister. Days later, a West Bank Palestinian non-violent resistance organiser, Iyad Burnat, was also banned from travelling at the Jordan crossing, en route to, among other things, a conference on the Geneva conventions.
Several
examples now point to an uncomfortable reality for the self-proclaimed
"only democracy in the Middle East": practices that have long been
routine in the military occupation of the West Bank and Gaza are being
used in Israel to suppress dissent and limit civil liberties. The green
line is increasingly blurry.
There are the Sheikh Jarrah protests, where marches and rallies against the eviction of Palestinians from their homes have been targeted by the police,
including the arrest of an organiser at his home - only for him to be
released without charge and no evidence presented. Then there is the
trend towards repressive legislation, with the so-called nakba law making its way through the Knesset, the Israeli parliament, that will ban state funding for any group that marks the expulsions of Palestinians in 1948.
Two weeks ago, a new bill was proposed by more than a dozen cross-party members of Knesset (MK), which would outlaw
any organisation "if there is a reasonable basis to conclude that the
organisation is providing information to foreign bodies or is involved
in lawsuits abroad against senior officials in the government in Israel
and/or officers in the Israeli army regarding war crimes". Adalah, one
of the groups specifically targeted, stated: "Only a state that commits
prohibited acts would be interested in such legislation."
Arab members of the Knesset are also increasingly under attack.
MKs Mohammad Barakeh and Said Naffaa have had their parliamentary
immunity stripped so that they can face criminal proceedings, with the
chair of the committee which deals with immunity issues reported to have suggested
that "a serious decision" would have to be made as to "whether or not
these parties can continue to sit in the Israeli parliament, even while
they operate against the country".
More recently, a trip by Arab MKs to Libya
has been greeted by attempts to "strip the members of their immunity",
with MK Michael Ben-Ari declaring "an historic opportunity to abolish
once and for all the immunity and rights of Knesset members who hate
Israel and denigrate the state".
At the heart of this and other cases against Palestinian citizens is contact with the wider Arab world. According to Adalah,
the "charge of meeting a foreign agent" is so broad that it
criminalises "almost any Arab who establishes legitimate relations with
political and social activists in the Arab world".
So why is this
happening now? First, it is the latest manifestation of a deteriorating
atmosphere in Israel, with political dissent and human rights groups under attack. Depressingly, there is considerable support among Jewish Israelis for this kind of crackdown: one poll
found that 57.6% of respondents "agreed that human rights organisations
that expose immoral conduct by Israel should not be allowed to operate
freely".
Second, there is also a specific focus on Israel's Palestinian minority. Three years ago, it was revealed
that the Shin Bet intended to "thwart the activity of any group or
individual seeking to harm the Jewish and democratic character of the
state of Israel, even if such activity is sanctioned by the law". This
is no doubt in part a response to the kind of developments Makhoul
talked about in January when I met him in Haifa:
how "this generation" of Palestinian citizens "has grown up with
October 2000. The green line disappeared - in terms of thinking,
behaviour, and consciousness."
Hussein Abu Hussein, the lawyer
for both Makhoul and Said, stressed the role of someone like Makhoul in
being a prominent advocate internationally for "the need for
accountability" - in other words, "the state has enough reasons to stop
this voice". Mohammad Zeidan, of the Arab Association for Human Rights
(HRA), says that the arrests are "clearly political". He believes that
for some in Israel, the work being done by NGOs and Arab parties on the
international level is "crossing a red line" - "they want to remind us
that this is not a democracy".
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Last Thursday, in the early hours of the morning, a Palestinian community leader's home was raided by Israeli security forces.
In front of his family, the wanted man was hauled off to detention
without access to a lawyer, while his home and offices were ransacked
and property confiscated.
While this sounds like an all-too
typical occurrence in West Bank villages such as Bil'in and Beit Omar,
in fact, the target in question this time was Ameer Makhoul, a
Palestinian citizen of Israel and head of internationally renowned NGO network Ittijah.
After
being snatched last week, Makhoul's detention was subject to a
court-enforced gagging order, preventing the Israeli media from even
reporting that it had happened. This ban was finally lifted yesterday,
as Israeli newspapers were being forced to report on angry protests by
Palestinians in Israel without explaining the specific provocation.
It turned out that another Palestinian citizen of Israel, Balad party activist Omar Said, had also been arrested, and interrogated by the Shin Bet since the end of April. Now, both Makhoul and Said are to be charged with espionage and "contact with a foreign agent" - namely, Hezbollah. On Monday night, hundreds of demonstrators rallied in Haifa to protest against what they call "an escalating campaign to crack down on Israel's Palestinian citizens".
The gagging order recalls the Anat Kam case,
where for several months it was forbidden to report that the former
soldier was under house arrest and being investigated by the Shin Bet
for "leaking classified military information". The facts about Kam were first circulated by bloggers and campaigners, something repeated in Makhoul's case (including this Facebook group).
The
night raids, interrogations, and charges are not isolated incidents -
indeed, Makhoul had been prevented from leaving the country in April, according to an order (PDF) by the interior minister. Days later, a West Bank Palestinian non-violent resistance organiser, Iyad Burnat, was also banned from travelling at the Jordan crossing, en route to, among other things, a conference on the Geneva conventions.
Several
examples now point to an uncomfortable reality for the self-proclaimed
"only democracy in the Middle East": practices that have long been
routine in the military occupation of the West Bank and Gaza are being
used in Israel to suppress dissent and limit civil liberties. The green
line is increasingly blurry.
There are the Sheikh Jarrah protests, where marches and rallies against the eviction of Palestinians from their homes have been targeted by the police,
including the arrest of an organiser at his home - only for him to be
released without charge and no evidence presented. Then there is the
trend towards repressive legislation, with the so-called nakba law making its way through the Knesset, the Israeli parliament, that will ban state funding for any group that marks the expulsions of Palestinians in 1948.
Two weeks ago, a new bill was proposed by more than a dozen cross-party members of Knesset (MK), which would outlaw
any organisation "if there is a reasonable basis to conclude that the
organisation is providing information to foreign bodies or is involved
in lawsuits abroad against senior officials in the government in Israel
and/or officers in the Israeli army regarding war crimes". Adalah, one
of the groups specifically targeted, stated: "Only a state that commits
prohibited acts would be interested in such legislation."
Arab members of the Knesset are also increasingly under attack.
MKs Mohammad Barakeh and Said Naffaa have had their parliamentary
immunity stripped so that they can face criminal proceedings, with the
chair of the committee which deals with immunity issues reported to have suggested
that "a serious decision" would have to be made as to "whether or not
these parties can continue to sit in the Israeli parliament, even while
they operate against the country".
More recently, a trip by Arab MKs to Libya
has been greeted by attempts to "strip the members of their immunity",
with MK Michael Ben-Ari declaring "an historic opportunity to abolish
once and for all the immunity and rights of Knesset members who hate
Israel and denigrate the state".
At the heart of this and other cases against Palestinian citizens is contact with the wider Arab world. According to Adalah,
the "charge of meeting a foreign agent" is so broad that it
criminalises "almost any Arab who establishes legitimate relations with
political and social activists in the Arab world".
So why is this
happening now? First, it is the latest manifestation of a deteriorating
atmosphere in Israel, with political dissent and human rights groups under attack. Depressingly, there is considerable support among Jewish Israelis for this kind of crackdown: one poll
found that 57.6% of respondents "agreed that human rights organisations
that expose immoral conduct by Israel should not be allowed to operate
freely".
Second, there is also a specific focus on Israel's Palestinian minority. Three years ago, it was revealed
that the Shin Bet intended to "thwart the activity of any group or
individual seeking to harm the Jewish and democratic character of the
state of Israel, even if such activity is sanctioned by the law". This
is no doubt in part a response to the kind of developments Makhoul
talked about in January when I met him in Haifa:
how "this generation" of Palestinian citizens "has grown up with
October 2000. The green line disappeared - in terms of thinking,
behaviour, and consciousness."
Hussein Abu Hussein, the lawyer
for both Makhoul and Said, stressed the role of someone like Makhoul in
being a prominent advocate internationally for "the need for
accountability" - in other words, "the state has enough reasons to stop
this voice". Mohammad Zeidan, of the Arab Association for Human Rights
(HRA), says that the arrests are "clearly political". He believes that
for some in Israel, the work being done by NGOs and Arab parties on the
international level is "crossing a red line" - "they want to remind us
that this is not a democracy".
Last Thursday, in the early hours of the morning, a Palestinian community leader's home was raided by Israeli security forces.
In front of his family, the wanted man was hauled off to detention
without access to a lawyer, while his home and offices were ransacked
and property confiscated.
While this sounds like an all-too
typical occurrence in West Bank villages such as Bil'in and Beit Omar,
in fact, the target in question this time was Ameer Makhoul, a
Palestinian citizen of Israel and head of internationally renowned NGO network Ittijah.
After
being snatched last week, Makhoul's detention was subject to a
court-enforced gagging order, preventing the Israeli media from even
reporting that it had happened. This ban was finally lifted yesterday,
as Israeli newspapers were being forced to report on angry protests by
Palestinians in Israel without explaining the specific provocation.
It turned out that another Palestinian citizen of Israel, Balad party activist Omar Said, had also been arrested, and interrogated by the Shin Bet since the end of April. Now, both Makhoul and Said are to be charged with espionage and "contact with a foreign agent" - namely, Hezbollah. On Monday night, hundreds of demonstrators rallied in Haifa to protest against what they call "an escalating campaign to crack down on Israel's Palestinian citizens".
The gagging order recalls the Anat Kam case,
where for several months it was forbidden to report that the former
soldier was under house arrest and being investigated by the Shin Bet
for "leaking classified military information". The facts about Kam were first circulated by bloggers and campaigners, something repeated in Makhoul's case (including this Facebook group).
The
night raids, interrogations, and charges are not isolated incidents -
indeed, Makhoul had been prevented from leaving the country in April, according to an order (PDF) by the interior minister. Days later, a West Bank Palestinian non-violent resistance organiser, Iyad Burnat, was also banned from travelling at the Jordan crossing, en route to, among other things, a conference on the Geneva conventions.
Several
examples now point to an uncomfortable reality for the self-proclaimed
"only democracy in the Middle East": practices that have long been
routine in the military occupation of the West Bank and Gaza are being
used in Israel to suppress dissent and limit civil liberties. The green
line is increasingly blurry.
There are the Sheikh Jarrah protests, where marches and rallies against the eviction of Palestinians from their homes have been targeted by the police,
including the arrest of an organiser at his home - only for him to be
released without charge and no evidence presented. Then there is the
trend towards repressive legislation, with the so-called nakba law making its way through the Knesset, the Israeli parliament, that will ban state funding for any group that marks the expulsions of Palestinians in 1948.
Two weeks ago, a new bill was proposed by more than a dozen cross-party members of Knesset (MK), which would outlaw
any organisation "if there is a reasonable basis to conclude that the
organisation is providing information to foreign bodies or is involved
in lawsuits abroad against senior officials in the government in Israel
and/or officers in the Israeli army regarding war crimes". Adalah, one
of the groups specifically targeted, stated: "Only a state that commits
prohibited acts would be interested in such legislation."
Arab members of the Knesset are also increasingly under attack.
MKs Mohammad Barakeh and Said Naffaa have had their parliamentary
immunity stripped so that they can face criminal proceedings, with the
chair of the committee which deals with immunity issues reported to have suggested
that "a serious decision" would have to be made as to "whether or not
these parties can continue to sit in the Israeli parliament, even while
they operate against the country".
More recently, a trip by Arab MKs to Libya
has been greeted by attempts to "strip the members of their immunity",
with MK Michael Ben-Ari declaring "an historic opportunity to abolish
once and for all the immunity and rights of Knesset members who hate
Israel and denigrate the state".
At the heart of this and other cases against Palestinian citizens is contact with the wider Arab world. According to Adalah,
the "charge of meeting a foreign agent" is so broad that it
criminalises "almost any Arab who establishes legitimate relations with
political and social activists in the Arab world".
So why is this
happening now? First, it is the latest manifestation of a deteriorating
atmosphere in Israel, with political dissent and human rights groups under attack. Depressingly, there is considerable support among Jewish Israelis for this kind of crackdown: one poll
found that 57.6% of respondents "agreed that human rights organisations
that expose immoral conduct by Israel should not be allowed to operate
freely".
Second, there is also a specific focus on Israel's Palestinian minority. Three years ago, it was revealed
that the Shin Bet intended to "thwart the activity of any group or
individual seeking to harm the Jewish and democratic character of the
state of Israel, even if such activity is sanctioned by the law". This
is no doubt in part a response to the kind of developments Makhoul
talked about in January when I met him in Haifa:
how "this generation" of Palestinian citizens "has grown up with
October 2000. The green line disappeared - in terms of thinking,
behaviour, and consciousness."
Hussein Abu Hussein, the lawyer
for both Makhoul and Said, stressed the role of someone like Makhoul in
being a prominent advocate internationally for "the need for
accountability" - in other words, "the state has enough reasons to stop
this voice". Mohammad Zeidan, of the Arab Association for Human Rights
(HRA), says that the arrests are "clearly political". He believes that
for some in Israel, the work being done by NGOs and Arab parties on the
international level is "crossing a red line" - "they want to remind us
that this is not a democracy".