To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
In this world, where everything and everyone is for sale, we must sustain independent media we can trust. If you believe independent journalism is critical to protecting democracy and the common good, please support Common Dreams this Giving Tuesday! We wouldn't exist without you.
It has been nearly seven months since a devastating earthquake killed upwards of 250,000 people
in Haiti. But judging from recent media coverage, it would appear the
country's future hinges on just one question: "Will Wyclef be the next
Haitian president?"
Yet far larger questions loom, on the eve of the August 7 deadline
for presidential hopefuls to declare their candidacy for Haiti's
November election.
Where, for instance, is the money that will be required for Haiti's
rebuilding--a task that could cost 14 billion dollars, according to an Inter-American Development Bank study.
More than three months after a UN conference in which 5.3 billion dollars were pledged for Haiti's reconstruction, only four countries (Brazil, Norway, Estonia and Australia) had paid into the UN's Haiti Reconstruction Fund.
Two weeks ago, a bold solution to this desperate financial shortfall was announced.
The July 14 announcement, broadcast on the website diplomatiegov.info,
pledged that France would reimburse Haiti for the 90 million gold
francs Haiti had been forced to pay France, its former colonizer, after
Haitian independence. The total sum to be repaid amounted to 17 billion
euros including adjustments for inflation and a minimal interest rate,
according to the announcement.
The pledge was a hoax. The next day a spokesperson for the French
embassy in Port-au-Prince was forced to concede that in fact France
would not be repaying Haitians. Cleary unamused, a French government spokesperson threatened legal action against the hoaxers.
France's humorless response to this prank is ironic in a way, since they scoffingly dismissed the idea of restitution as a "farce" when it was raised by the Haitian government back in 2002.
Yet the case for repayment is no joke. Consider the historical facts, as outlined in a 2009 paper [pdf] available on the website of the Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti.
The 90 million gold francs Haiti paid France was compensation for the
"property" French slave-owning colonists "lost" in the successful slave
revolt that led to Haiti's independence.
Prior to independence, St. Dominique--the country that is now
Haiti--was France's most profitable colony, thanks in no small part to
its particularly brutal system of slavery. In 1791, the slaves revolted,
and in 1804, after defeating Napoleon's armies, founded the world's
first black republic.
Following Haiti's independence, former French slave-owners submitted
detailed tabulations of their losses to the French government, with line
items for each of "their" slaves that had been "lost" with Haitian
independence. In 1825, King Charles X demanded that Haiti pay an
"independence debt" to compensate former colonists for the slaves who
won their freedom in the Haitian Revolution. Yet the total bill Charles X
served to Haiti was in fact fifty percent more than even the total sum
of the colonists' declared losses. With warships stationed along the
Haitian coast backing up the French demand, France insisted that Haiti
pay its former colonizer 150 million gold francs--ten times the
fledgling black nation's total annual revenues.
Under threat of a French military invasion that aimed at the
re-enslavement of the population, the Haitian government had little
choice but to agree to pay these "reparations." Haiti's government was
also forced to finance the debt through loans from a single French bank,
which capitalized on its monopoly by gauging Haiti with exorbitant
interest rates and fees.
The original sum of the indemnity was subsequently reduced, but Haiti
still disbursed 90 million gold francs to France. This second price the
French exacted for the independence Haitians had won in battle was,
even in 1825, not lawful. When the original indemnity was imposed by the
French king, the slave trade was technically illegal; such a
transaction exchanging cash for human lives valued as slave labor
represented a gross violation of both French and international laws.
And Haiti was still paying off this "independence debt" in 1947--140
years after the abolition of the slave trade and 85 years after the
emancipation proclamation.
The Haitian government's legal case for restitution was aborted
prematurely in 2004, with the French-backed overthrow of the government
that had the temerity to point out that France "extorted this money from
Haiti by force and . . . should give it back to us so that we can build
primary schools, primary healthcare, water systems and roads."
But the question remains, as Dr. Paul Farmer put it so eloquently in his testimony in the 2003 hearings
in France on the question of restitution, "Will the happy winners of
the world's history settle in their distressing routine or will they
finally break off from cruel, corrupted and racist politics? Will they
finally give back to Haiti the price of its blood?"
I'll bet that won't be something the media will ask Wyclef. But it would appear that the Haitian-born hip-hop
star might well have something to say on the matter, if his twitter feed
is any indication.
Wyclef recently retweeted Noam Chomsky's view on this matter: "the US and France should be paying massive reparations" to Haiti.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
It has been nearly seven months since a devastating earthquake killed upwards of 250,000 people
in Haiti. But judging from recent media coverage, it would appear the
country's future hinges on just one question: "Will Wyclef be the next
Haitian president?"
Yet far larger questions loom, on the eve of the August 7 deadline
for presidential hopefuls to declare their candidacy for Haiti's
November election.
Where, for instance, is the money that will be required for Haiti's
rebuilding--a task that could cost 14 billion dollars, according to an Inter-American Development Bank study.
More than three months after a UN conference in which 5.3 billion dollars were pledged for Haiti's reconstruction, only four countries (Brazil, Norway, Estonia and Australia) had paid into the UN's Haiti Reconstruction Fund.
Two weeks ago, a bold solution to this desperate financial shortfall was announced.
The July 14 announcement, broadcast on the website diplomatiegov.info,
pledged that France would reimburse Haiti for the 90 million gold
francs Haiti had been forced to pay France, its former colonizer, after
Haitian independence. The total sum to be repaid amounted to 17 billion
euros including adjustments for inflation and a minimal interest rate,
according to the announcement.
The pledge was a hoax. The next day a spokesperson for the French
embassy in Port-au-Prince was forced to concede that in fact France
would not be repaying Haitians. Cleary unamused, a French government spokesperson threatened legal action against the hoaxers.
France's humorless response to this prank is ironic in a way, since they scoffingly dismissed the idea of restitution as a "farce" when it was raised by the Haitian government back in 2002.
Yet the case for repayment is no joke. Consider the historical facts, as outlined in a 2009 paper [pdf] available on the website of the Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti.
The 90 million gold francs Haiti paid France was compensation for the
"property" French slave-owning colonists "lost" in the successful slave
revolt that led to Haiti's independence.
Prior to independence, St. Dominique--the country that is now
Haiti--was France's most profitable colony, thanks in no small part to
its particularly brutal system of slavery. In 1791, the slaves revolted,
and in 1804, after defeating Napoleon's armies, founded the world's
first black republic.
Following Haiti's independence, former French slave-owners submitted
detailed tabulations of their losses to the French government, with line
items for each of "their" slaves that had been "lost" with Haitian
independence. In 1825, King Charles X demanded that Haiti pay an
"independence debt" to compensate former colonists for the slaves who
won their freedom in the Haitian Revolution. Yet the total bill Charles X
served to Haiti was in fact fifty percent more than even the total sum
of the colonists' declared losses. With warships stationed along the
Haitian coast backing up the French demand, France insisted that Haiti
pay its former colonizer 150 million gold francs--ten times the
fledgling black nation's total annual revenues.
Under threat of a French military invasion that aimed at the
re-enslavement of the population, the Haitian government had little
choice but to agree to pay these "reparations." Haiti's government was
also forced to finance the debt through loans from a single French bank,
which capitalized on its monopoly by gauging Haiti with exorbitant
interest rates and fees.
The original sum of the indemnity was subsequently reduced, but Haiti
still disbursed 90 million gold francs to France. This second price the
French exacted for the independence Haitians had won in battle was,
even in 1825, not lawful. When the original indemnity was imposed by the
French king, the slave trade was technically illegal; such a
transaction exchanging cash for human lives valued as slave labor
represented a gross violation of both French and international laws.
And Haiti was still paying off this "independence debt" in 1947--140
years after the abolition of the slave trade and 85 years after the
emancipation proclamation.
The Haitian government's legal case for restitution was aborted
prematurely in 2004, with the French-backed overthrow of the government
that had the temerity to point out that France "extorted this money from
Haiti by force and . . . should give it back to us so that we can build
primary schools, primary healthcare, water systems and roads."
But the question remains, as Dr. Paul Farmer put it so eloquently in his testimony in the 2003 hearings
in France on the question of restitution, "Will the happy winners of
the world's history settle in their distressing routine or will they
finally break off from cruel, corrupted and racist politics? Will they
finally give back to Haiti the price of its blood?"
I'll bet that won't be something the media will ask Wyclef. But it would appear that the Haitian-born hip-hop
star might well have something to say on the matter, if his twitter feed
is any indication.
Wyclef recently retweeted Noam Chomsky's view on this matter: "the US and France should be paying massive reparations" to Haiti.
It has been nearly seven months since a devastating earthquake killed upwards of 250,000 people
in Haiti. But judging from recent media coverage, it would appear the
country's future hinges on just one question: "Will Wyclef be the next
Haitian president?"
Yet far larger questions loom, on the eve of the August 7 deadline
for presidential hopefuls to declare their candidacy for Haiti's
November election.
Where, for instance, is the money that will be required for Haiti's
rebuilding--a task that could cost 14 billion dollars, according to an Inter-American Development Bank study.
More than three months after a UN conference in which 5.3 billion dollars were pledged for Haiti's reconstruction, only four countries (Brazil, Norway, Estonia and Australia) had paid into the UN's Haiti Reconstruction Fund.
Two weeks ago, a bold solution to this desperate financial shortfall was announced.
The July 14 announcement, broadcast on the website diplomatiegov.info,
pledged that France would reimburse Haiti for the 90 million gold
francs Haiti had been forced to pay France, its former colonizer, after
Haitian independence. The total sum to be repaid amounted to 17 billion
euros including adjustments for inflation and a minimal interest rate,
according to the announcement.
The pledge was a hoax. The next day a spokesperson for the French
embassy in Port-au-Prince was forced to concede that in fact France
would not be repaying Haitians. Cleary unamused, a French government spokesperson threatened legal action against the hoaxers.
France's humorless response to this prank is ironic in a way, since they scoffingly dismissed the idea of restitution as a "farce" when it was raised by the Haitian government back in 2002.
Yet the case for repayment is no joke. Consider the historical facts, as outlined in a 2009 paper [pdf] available on the website of the Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti.
The 90 million gold francs Haiti paid France was compensation for the
"property" French slave-owning colonists "lost" in the successful slave
revolt that led to Haiti's independence.
Prior to independence, St. Dominique--the country that is now
Haiti--was France's most profitable colony, thanks in no small part to
its particularly brutal system of slavery. In 1791, the slaves revolted,
and in 1804, after defeating Napoleon's armies, founded the world's
first black republic.
Following Haiti's independence, former French slave-owners submitted
detailed tabulations of their losses to the French government, with line
items for each of "their" slaves that had been "lost" with Haitian
independence. In 1825, King Charles X demanded that Haiti pay an
"independence debt" to compensate former colonists for the slaves who
won their freedom in the Haitian Revolution. Yet the total bill Charles X
served to Haiti was in fact fifty percent more than even the total sum
of the colonists' declared losses. With warships stationed along the
Haitian coast backing up the French demand, France insisted that Haiti
pay its former colonizer 150 million gold francs--ten times the
fledgling black nation's total annual revenues.
Under threat of a French military invasion that aimed at the
re-enslavement of the population, the Haitian government had little
choice but to agree to pay these "reparations." Haiti's government was
also forced to finance the debt through loans from a single French bank,
which capitalized on its monopoly by gauging Haiti with exorbitant
interest rates and fees.
The original sum of the indemnity was subsequently reduced, but Haiti
still disbursed 90 million gold francs to France. This second price the
French exacted for the independence Haitians had won in battle was,
even in 1825, not lawful. When the original indemnity was imposed by the
French king, the slave trade was technically illegal; such a
transaction exchanging cash for human lives valued as slave labor
represented a gross violation of both French and international laws.
And Haiti was still paying off this "independence debt" in 1947--140
years after the abolition of the slave trade and 85 years after the
emancipation proclamation.
The Haitian government's legal case for restitution was aborted
prematurely in 2004, with the French-backed overthrow of the government
that had the temerity to point out that France "extorted this money from
Haiti by force and . . . should give it back to us so that we can build
primary schools, primary healthcare, water systems and roads."
But the question remains, as Dr. Paul Farmer put it so eloquently in his testimony in the 2003 hearings
in France on the question of restitution, "Will the happy winners of
the world's history settle in their distressing routine or will they
finally break off from cruel, corrupted and racist politics? Will they
finally give back to Haiti the price of its blood?"
I'll bet that won't be something the media will ask Wyclef. But it would appear that the Haitian-born hip-hop
star might well have something to say on the matter, if his twitter feed
is any indication.
Wyclef recently retweeted Noam Chomsky's view on this matter: "the US and France should be paying massive reparations" to Haiti.