SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The US Supreme Court has ruled against NYT investigative journalist James Risen. (Photo: Alex Menendez/UCB Graduate School of Journalism/)
James Risen's Fate Now Unclear
The Supreme Court just refused to hear an appeal by James Risen, The New York Times reporter who has asserted his reporter's privilege not to testify about a source. As a result, he could be cited for contempt of court and then jailed.
"I will continue to fight," Risen said in a statement.
But it's unclear what his options are, just as it's unclear what the Obama Administration will do.
Jun 03, 2014
The Supreme Court just refused to hear an appeal by James Risen, The New York Times reporter who has asserted his reporter's privilege not to testify about a source. As a result, he could be cited for contempt of court and then jailed.
"I will continue to fight," Risen said in a statement.
But it's unclear what his options are, just as it's unclear what the Obama Administration will do.
In Risen's 2006 book, "State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration," he wrote about a botched CIA plan to give bogus nuclear weapons blueprints to the Iranians.
The U.S. government alleges that the source was Jeffrey Sterling, a former CIA employee, whom the Justice Department is prosecuting under the 1917 Espionage Act.
Risen refuses to release information about his source.
Ironically, the Bush Administration eventually stopped trying to pry it out of him, but the Obama Administration refused to relent.
A lower court ruled in Risen's favor, but an appellate court ruled against him. So now, with the Supreme Court's refusal to hear the case, the appellate court ruling stands.
This puts Risen is in a box, and it's up to the Justice Department whether it will allow him to get out it.
"The ball is now in the government's court," Joel Kurtzberg, an attorney for Risen, told the AP. "It can elect to proceed in the Sterling trial without Jim's testimony if it wants to. If they insist on his testimony and Jim refuses to testify, the court will need to have a hearing to determine if Jim is in contempt and, if so, what the consequence of that will be."
Last week, Attorney General Eric Holder hinted that he wouldn't demand jail time for Risen. He told a group of journalists: "As long as I'm attorney general, no reporter who is doing his job is going to go to jail."
While that was reassuring for Risen's supporters, Holder could say that Risen wasn't "doing his job." Or Holder could ask the court to slap a fine on Risen for every day that he refuses to talk.
In any event, the precedent set in this case will apply long after Holder is attorney general
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
© 2023 The Progressive
Matt Rothschild
Matt Rothschild is the executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. Prior to joining the Democracy Campaign at the start of 2015, Matt worked at The Progressive Magazine for 32 years. For most of those, he was the editor and publisher of The Progressive.
The Supreme Court just refused to hear an appeal by James Risen, The New York Times reporter who has asserted his reporter's privilege not to testify about a source. As a result, he could be cited for contempt of court and then jailed.
"I will continue to fight," Risen said in a statement.
But it's unclear what his options are, just as it's unclear what the Obama Administration will do.
In Risen's 2006 book, "State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration," he wrote about a botched CIA plan to give bogus nuclear weapons blueprints to the Iranians.
The U.S. government alleges that the source was Jeffrey Sterling, a former CIA employee, whom the Justice Department is prosecuting under the 1917 Espionage Act.
Risen refuses to release information about his source.
Ironically, the Bush Administration eventually stopped trying to pry it out of him, but the Obama Administration refused to relent.
A lower court ruled in Risen's favor, but an appellate court ruled against him. So now, with the Supreme Court's refusal to hear the case, the appellate court ruling stands.
This puts Risen is in a box, and it's up to the Justice Department whether it will allow him to get out it.
"The ball is now in the government's court," Joel Kurtzberg, an attorney for Risen, told the AP. "It can elect to proceed in the Sterling trial without Jim's testimony if it wants to. If they insist on his testimony and Jim refuses to testify, the court will need to have a hearing to determine if Jim is in contempt and, if so, what the consequence of that will be."
Last week, Attorney General Eric Holder hinted that he wouldn't demand jail time for Risen. He told a group of journalists: "As long as I'm attorney general, no reporter who is doing his job is going to go to jail."
While that was reassuring for Risen's supporters, Holder could say that Risen wasn't "doing his job." Or Holder could ask the court to slap a fine on Risen for every day that he refuses to talk.
In any event, the precedent set in this case will apply long after Holder is attorney general
Matt Rothschild
Matt Rothschild is the executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. Prior to joining the Democracy Campaign at the start of 2015, Matt worked at The Progressive Magazine for 32 years. For most of those, he was the editor and publisher of The Progressive.
The Supreme Court just refused to hear an appeal by James Risen, The New York Times reporter who has asserted his reporter's privilege not to testify about a source. As a result, he could be cited for contempt of court and then jailed.
"I will continue to fight," Risen said in a statement.
But it's unclear what his options are, just as it's unclear what the Obama Administration will do.
In Risen's 2006 book, "State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration," he wrote about a botched CIA plan to give bogus nuclear weapons blueprints to the Iranians.
The U.S. government alleges that the source was Jeffrey Sterling, a former CIA employee, whom the Justice Department is prosecuting under the 1917 Espionage Act.
Risen refuses to release information about his source.
Ironically, the Bush Administration eventually stopped trying to pry it out of him, but the Obama Administration refused to relent.
A lower court ruled in Risen's favor, but an appellate court ruled against him. So now, with the Supreme Court's refusal to hear the case, the appellate court ruling stands.
This puts Risen is in a box, and it's up to the Justice Department whether it will allow him to get out it.
"The ball is now in the government's court," Joel Kurtzberg, an attorney for Risen, told the AP. "It can elect to proceed in the Sterling trial without Jim's testimony if it wants to. If they insist on his testimony and Jim refuses to testify, the court will need to have a hearing to determine if Jim is in contempt and, if so, what the consequence of that will be."
Last week, Attorney General Eric Holder hinted that he wouldn't demand jail time for Risen. He told a group of journalists: "As long as I'm attorney general, no reporter who is doing his job is going to go to jail."
While that was reassuring for Risen's supporters, Holder could say that Risen wasn't "doing his job." Or Holder could ask the court to slap a fine on Risen for every day that he refuses to talk.
In any event, the precedent set in this case will apply long after Holder is attorney general
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.