SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
While certain mainstream media outlets speculate on the 'symbolic' nature of the protracted battle over the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, the tar sands industry itself is clear that pipeline access, or rather the lack of it, is the number one threat to its future.
A survey (above) carried out for the trade publication Oilsands Review sought input from tar sands producers and their suppliers on the sector's prospects for 2015. The survey was carried out in the late fall of 2014 and published in the January edition of the magazine.
Respondents were asked: "What is the top threat to future oilsands development?" At the top of the list of responses was "constraints to market access" which beat "cost escalation" and "labor availability" among other issues. See graphic.
The survey was conducted just as the current crude oil price drop was just beginning to gather steam and low oil prices does not appear to have made it onto the list of threats. However, the lack of pipeline access can only be felt even more sharply in the current low price environment as the alternative to pipelines, rail, can double transportation costs eating into already drastically diminished profit margins for the world's most costly and dirty form of crude oil production.
The survey is just another confirmation of what we have known and argued for a long time in this debate. The tar sands industry needs pipelines to survive. Without them production must be curtailed. We have repeatedly used the industry's own numbers, such as those shown in the chart below, to demonstrate that in order to achieve production growth all currently proposed pipelines must be built. It is not a matter of one or the other, but all.
We know this. The tar sands industry knows this. It is perplexing that commentators in the media and, more crucially, bureaucrats at the State Department struggle to get it.
© 2023 Oil Change International
While certain mainstream media outlets speculate on the 'symbolic' nature of the protracted battle over the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, the tar sands industry itself is clear that pipeline access, or rather the lack of it, is the number one threat to its future.
A survey (above) carried out for the trade publication Oilsands Review sought input from tar sands producers and their suppliers on the sector's prospects for 2015. The survey was carried out in the late fall of 2014 and published in the January edition of the magazine.
Respondents were asked: "What is the top threat to future oilsands development?" At the top of the list of responses was "constraints to market access" which beat "cost escalation" and "labor availability" among other issues. See graphic.
The survey was conducted just as the current crude oil price drop was just beginning to gather steam and low oil prices does not appear to have made it onto the list of threats. However, the lack of pipeline access can only be felt even more sharply in the current low price environment as the alternative to pipelines, rail, can double transportation costs eating into already drastically diminished profit margins for the world's most costly and dirty form of crude oil production.
The survey is just another confirmation of what we have known and argued for a long time in this debate. The tar sands industry needs pipelines to survive. Without them production must be curtailed. We have repeatedly used the industry's own numbers, such as those shown in the chart below, to demonstrate that in order to achieve production growth all currently proposed pipelines must be built. It is not a matter of one or the other, but all.
We know this. The tar sands industry knows this. It is perplexing that commentators in the media and, more crucially, bureaucrats at the State Department struggle to get it.
While certain mainstream media outlets speculate on the 'symbolic' nature of the protracted battle over the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, the tar sands industry itself is clear that pipeline access, or rather the lack of it, is the number one threat to its future.
A survey (above) carried out for the trade publication Oilsands Review sought input from tar sands producers and their suppliers on the sector's prospects for 2015. The survey was carried out in the late fall of 2014 and published in the January edition of the magazine.
Respondents were asked: "What is the top threat to future oilsands development?" At the top of the list of responses was "constraints to market access" which beat "cost escalation" and "labor availability" among other issues. See graphic.
The survey was conducted just as the current crude oil price drop was just beginning to gather steam and low oil prices does not appear to have made it onto the list of threats. However, the lack of pipeline access can only be felt even more sharply in the current low price environment as the alternative to pipelines, rail, can double transportation costs eating into already drastically diminished profit margins for the world's most costly and dirty form of crude oil production.
The survey is just another confirmation of what we have known and argued for a long time in this debate. The tar sands industry needs pipelines to survive. Without them production must be curtailed. We have repeatedly used the industry's own numbers, such as those shown in the chart below, to demonstrate that in order to achieve production growth all currently proposed pipelines must be built. It is not a matter of one or the other, but all.
We know this. The tar sands industry knows this. It is perplexing that commentators in the media and, more crucially, bureaucrats at the State Department struggle to get it.