SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
There is no truly safe way to transport Bakken crude, tar sands oil, and other petroleum products. Recommendations contained in a new report by the Center for Biological Diversity say "extreme fossil fuels should be left in the ground" for the sake of our communities, our waterway's, the nation's wildlife, and the planet's climate. (Image: Cover detail/CBD report)
The derailment and fiery explosion of an oil train in West Virginia this week was a frightening reminder of the dangers these trains pose every day along thousands of miles of track across the United States.
And it's only getting worse. Since 2008, oil-by-rail transport has grown 40-fold and we've seen a troubling spike in oil spills, derailments and environmental devastation. We've yet to see federal regulators respond to these escalating risks.
The derailment and fiery explosion of an oil train in West Virginia this week was a frightening reminder of the dangers these trains pose every day along thousands of miles of track across the United States.
And it's only getting worse. Since 2008, oil-by-rail transport has grown 40-fold and we've seen a troubling spike in oil spills, derailments and environmental devastation. We've yet to see federal regulators respond to these escalating risks.
That needs to change. What happened in West Virginia (and a similar explosive derailment of another oil train in Ontario two days earlier) will be repeated unless the Obama administration puts a moratorium on oil trains and takes step to ensure these trains can operate in a way that protects people, wildlife and the environment.
A new study by the Center for Biological Diversity, where I work, uncovers striking new details on the broad range of unchecked risks to people and the environment posed by the largely unregulated escalation in U.S. rail transport of oil.
The report-- titled "Runaway Risks: Oil Trains and the Government's Failure to Protect People, Wildlife and the Environment"(pdf)--reveals that.
The unprecedented increase in U.S. oil train traffic from fewer than 10,000 rail cars per year in 2008 to more than 400,000 in 2014 has spurred virtually no corresponding increase in safety preparedness plans, not only putting towns and cities across America in routine danger, but leaving some of the nation's most imperiled wildlife and natural areas at increased risk from a catastrophic spill.
Even as the overall number of train accidents in the country has declined in recent years, the number of dangerous oil train derailments has increased -- in part because the longer, heavier trains, often carrying more than 1 million gallons of oil, are more difficult to control and stop, according to rail safety accounts included in today's report.
Here are some of the recommendations we're making:
Some are using the West Virginia accident to argue that shipping oil through pipelines like Keystone XL would be a safer option, but the reality is that pipelines too are far from safe. Indeed, since 1986 there have been nearly 8,000 accidents involving pipelines (nearly 300 per year on average), resulting in more than 500 deaths, more than 2,300 injuries, and nearly $7 billion in damage.
The reality is that there's no way to safely transport the highly volatile crude from the Bakken oil field in North Dakota or the heavy crudes from the Alberta tar sands. Instead these extreme fossil fuels should be left in the ground for our safety and to avoid the impending climate catastrophe.
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
The derailment and fiery explosion of an oil train in West Virginia this week was a frightening reminder of the dangers these trains pose every day along thousands of miles of track across the United States.
And it's only getting worse. Since 2008, oil-by-rail transport has grown 40-fold and we've seen a troubling spike in oil spills, derailments and environmental devastation. We've yet to see federal regulators respond to these escalating risks.
That needs to change. What happened in West Virginia (and a similar explosive derailment of another oil train in Ontario two days earlier) will be repeated unless the Obama administration puts a moratorium on oil trains and takes step to ensure these trains can operate in a way that protects people, wildlife and the environment.
A new study by the Center for Biological Diversity, where I work, uncovers striking new details on the broad range of unchecked risks to people and the environment posed by the largely unregulated escalation in U.S. rail transport of oil.
The report-- titled "Runaway Risks: Oil Trains and the Government's Failure to Protect People, Wildlife and the Environment"(pdf)--reveals that.
The unprecedented increase in U.S. oil train traffic from fewer than 10,000 rail cars per year in 2008 to more than 400,000 in 2014 has spurred virtually no corresponding increase in safety preparedness plans, not only putting towns and cities across America in routine danger, but leaving some of the nation's most imperiled wildlife and natural areas at increased risk from a catastrophic spill.
Even as the overall number of train accidents in the country has declined in recent years, the number of dangerous oil train derailments has increased -- in part because the longer, heavier trains, often carrying more than 1 million gallons of oil, are more difficult to control and stop, according to rail safety accounts included in today's report.
Here are some of the recommendations we're making:
Some are using the West Virginia accident to argue that shipping oil through pipelines like Keystone XL would be a safer option, but the reality is that pipelines too are far from safe. Indeed, since 1986 there have been nearly 8,000 accidents involving pipelines (nearly 300 per year on average), resulting in more than 500 deaths, more than 2,300 injuries, and nearly $7 billion in damage.
The reality is that there's no way to safely transport the highly volatile crude from the Bakken oil field in North Dakota or the heavy crudes from the Alberta tar sands. Instead these extreme fossil fuels should be left in the ground for our safety and to avoid the impending climate catastrophe.
The derailment and fiery explosion of an oil train in West Virginia this week was a frightening reminder of the dangers these trains pose every day along thousands of miles of track across the United States.
And it's only getting worse. Since 2008, oil-by-rail transport has grown 40-fold and we've seen a troubling spike in oil spills, derailments and environmental devastation. We've yet to see federal regulators respond to these escalating risks.
That needs to change. What happened in West Virginia (and a similar explosive derailment of another oil train in Ontario two days earlier) will be repeated unless the Obama administration puts a moratorium on oil trains and takes step to ensure these trains can operate in a way that protects people, wildlife and the environment.
A new study by the Center for Biological Diversity, where I work, uncovers striking new details on the broad range of unchecked risks to people and the environment posed by the largely unregulated escalation in U.S. rail transport of oil.
The report-- titled "Runaway Risks: Oil Trains and the Government's Failure to Protect People, Wildlife and the Environment"(pdf)--reveals that.
The unprecedented increase in U.S. oil train traffic from fewer than 10,000 rail cars per year in 2008 to more than 400,000 in 2014 has spurred virtually no corresponding increase in safety preparedness plans, not only putting towns and cities across America in routine danger, but leaving some of the nation's most imperiled wildlife and natural areas at increased risk from a catastrophic spill.
Even as the overall number of train accidents in the country has declined in recent years, the number of dangerous oil train derailments has increased -- in part because the longer, heavier trains, often carrying more than 1 million gallons of oil, are more difficult to control and stop, according to rail safety accounts included in today's report.
Here are some of the recommendations we're making:
Some are using the West Virginia accident to argue that shipping oil through pipelines like Keystone XL would be a safer option, but the reality is that pipelines too are far from safe. Indeed, since 1986 there have been nearly 8,000 accidents involving pipelines (nearly 300 per year on average), resulting in more than 500 deaths, more than 2,300 injuries, and nearly $7 billion in damage.
The reality is that there's no way to safely transport the highly volatile crude from the Bakken oil field in North Dakota or the heavy crudes from the Alberta tar sands. Instead these extreme fossil fuels should be left in the ground for our safety and to avoid the impending climate catastrophe.