"While they do little to advance high-quality education, the bills are a valuable step forward in overhauling the testing and accountability regime that has undermined public education," Neill writes. (Photo: Tom Gill/flickr/cc)
Testing resistance and reform activists can help determine the result of the House-Senate conference committee that will write a compromise bill to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA, now named No Child Left Behind).
Both houses of Congress took important steps to end federally mandated accountability, but failed to reduce the amount of required testing. While they do little to advance high-quality education, the bills are a valuable step forward in overhauling the testing and accountability regime that has undermined public education. The new shared version written by the conference committee this fall will go back to each chamber for final votes and then, if approved, on to President Obama for his signature. If a bill does not become law in this Congress, NCLB and the waivers will continue until at least 2017.
FairTest has analyzed the bills (see here) and will work toward these goals in conference:
1) Block NCLB-style accountability provisions.This is the most contentious accountability issue. The Senate rejected a Democratic amendment that would have significantly restored NCLB-style accountability, including a variation of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and mandated school interventions. Democrats from both houses, backed by the Obama-Duncan administration, will try to use the conference process to insert what they could not win in either chamber. They have threatened to block final passage if they do not get their way. However, all but three Senate Democrats voted for the bill, signaling most members do not want to keep NCLB. Now activists must win over Democrats to counter the threat to reestablish "test-and-punish." Fortunately, no one is pushing to restore the mandate for escalating sanctions. Both bills leave interventions up to the states and end the federal mandate to use student scores to judge teachers.
2) Retain state power to limit the weight given to test scores in accountability provisions. Both bills leave it up to the states to determine their accountability indices, provided that statewide assessment is part of the mix. Some Democrats will push to give test scores the majority of the weight.
3) Retain as strong an opt-out provision as possible. The House bill allows parents to opt their children out of federally mandated exams. The Senate allows states or districts to decide. Where allowed, opt outs would not count against schools. FairTest will press the conference committee to adopt the House version while recognizing that the Senate version would still be a step forward.
4) Retain the Senate section authorizing states to develop "innovative" assessment programs and the House section authorizing local assessments.The Senate bill allows up to seven states to develop innovative systems that can be built on a variety of local, performance and other assessments. More states would be allowed to participate after three years. The conference bill should allow as many states to participate as meet the criteria. The House bill allows districts to design their own assessment systems, continuing an NCLB provision. (State efforts to use it were blocked by the U.S. Department of Education until recent approval of a New Hampshire pilot.) In both cases, scores have to be comparable on a statewide basis. FairTest recommends combining the two: the House for its greater flexibility and availability to all states, the Senate for its explicit support of spending federal funds to build new assessment systems pushing the Department to allow innovation.
5) Retain limits to the power of the U.S. Department of Education to manipulate state policies on standards, assessments and accountability, as well as bar the Department from granting waivers that require state actions not already mandated by federal law. Again, some Democrats aim to weaken the prohibitions to allow the Department to intervene on state tests and accountability.
What can people do?
- Contact all your Senators and Representatives to express your views and ask them to share them with the House and Senate education committee leadership. Here is a letter you can use: https://www.fairtest.org/tell-congress-keep-federal-accountability-mandates.
- Push organizations you work with to intervene.
- Congress is on recess until after Labor Day, so try to meet with members to educate them while they're in their home districts. You can find House contact information at https://www.house.gov/representatives/ and Senate contact information at https://www.senate.gov/senators/contact/.
- As always, share the information and call on people you know to act now.
© 2023 Living In Dialogue
Testing resistance and reform activists can help determine the result of the House-Senate conference committee that will write a compromise bill to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA, now named No Child Left Behind).
Both houses of Congress took important steps to end federally mandated accountability, but failed to reduce the amount of required testing. While they do little to advance high-quality education, the bills are a valuable step forward in overhauling the testing and accountability regime that has undermined public education. The new shared version written by the conference committee this fall will go back to each chamber for final votes and then, if approved, on to President Obama for his signature. If a bill does not become law in this Congress, NCLB and the waivers will continue until at least 2017.
FairTest has analyzed the bills (see here) and will work toward these goals in conference:
1) Block NCLB-style accountability provisions.This is the most contentious accountability issue. The Senate rejected a Democratic amendment that would have significantly restored NCLB-style accountability, including a variation of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and mandated school interventions. Democrats from both houses, backed by the Obama-Duncan administration, will try to use the conference process to insert what they could not win in either chamber. They have threatened to block final passage if they do not get their way. However, all but three Senate Democrats voted for the bill, signaling most members do not want to keep NCLB. Now activists must win over Democrats to counter the threat to reestablish "test-and-punish." Fortunately, no one is pushing to restore the mandate for escalating sanctions. Both bills leave interventions up to the states and end the federal mandate to use student scores to judge teachers.
2) Retain state power to limit the weight given to test scores in accountability provisions. Both bills leave it up to the states to determine their accountability indices, provided that statewide assessment is part of the mix. Some Democrats will push to give test scores the majority of the weight.
3) Retain as strong an opt-out provision as possible. The House bill allows parents to opt their children out of federally mandated exams. The Senate allows states or districts to decide. Where allowed, opt outs would not count against schools. FairTest will press the conference committee to adopt the House version while recognizing that the Senate version would still be a step forward.
4) Retain the Senate section authorizing states to develop "innovative" assessment programs and the House section authorizing local assessments.The Senate bill allows up to seven states to develop innovative systems that can be built on a variety of local, performance and other assessments. More states would be allowed to participate after three years. The conference bill should allow as many states to participate as meet the criteria. The House bill allows districts to design their own assessment systems, continuing an NCLB provision. (State efforts to use it were blocked by the U.S. Department of Education until recent approval of a New Hampshire pilot.) In both cases, scores have to be comparable on a statewide basis. FairTest recommends combining the two: the House for its greater flexibility and availability to all states, the Senate for its explicit support of spending federal funds to build new assessment systems pushing the Department to allow innovation.
5) Retain limits to the power of the U.S. Department of Education to manipulate state policies on standards, assessments and accountability, as well as bar the Department from granting waivers that require state actions not already mandated by federal law. Again, some Democrats aim to weaken the prohibitions to allow the Department to intervene on state tests and accountability.
What can people do?
- Contact all your Senators and Representatives to express your views and ask them to share them with the House and Senate education committee leadership. Here is a letter you can use: https://www.fairtest.org/tell-congress-keep-federal-accountability-mandates.
- Push organizations you work with to intervene.
- Congress is on recess until after Labor Day, so try to meet with members to educate them while they're in their home districts. You can find House contact information at https://www.house.gov/representatives/ and Senate contact information at https://www.senate.gov/senators/contact/.
- As always, share the information and call on people you know to act now.
Testing resistance and reform activists can help determine the result of the House-Senate conference committee that will write a compromise bill to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA, now named No Child Left Behind).
Both houses of Congress took important steps to end federally mandated accountability, but failed to reduce the amount of required testing. While they do little to advance high-quality education, the bills are a valuable step forward in overhauling the testing and accountability regime that has undermined public education. The new shared version written by the conference committee this fall will go back to each chamber for final votes and then, if approved, on to President Obama for his signature. If a bill does not become law in this Congress, NCLB and the waivers will continue until at least 2017.
FairTest has analyzed the bills (see here) and will work toward these goals in conference:
1) Block NCLB-style accountability provisions.This is the most contentious accountability issue. The Senate rejected a Democratic amendment that would have significantly restored NCLB-style accountability, including a variation of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and mandated school interventions. Democrats from both houses, backed by the Obama-Duncan administration, will try to use the conference process to insert what they could not win in either chamber. They have threatened to block final passage if they do not get their way. However, all but three Senate Democrats voted for the bill, signaling most members do not want to keep NCLB. Now activists must win over Democrats to counter the threat to reestablish "test-and-punish." Fortunately, no one is pushing to restore the mandate for escalating sanctions. Both bills leave interventions up to the states and end the federal mandate to use student scores to judge teachers.
2) Retain state power to limit the weight given to test scores in accountability provisions. Both bills leave it up to the states to determine their accountability indices, provided that statewide assessment is part of the mix. Some Democrats will push to give test scores the majority of the weight.
3) Retain as strong an opt-out provision as possible. The House bill allows parents to opt their children out of federally mandated exams. The Senate allows states or districts to decide. Where allowed, opt outs would not count against schools. FairTest will press the conference committee to adopt the House version while recognizing that the Senate version would still be a step forward.
4) Retain the Senate section authorizing states to develop "innovative" assessment programs and the House section authorizing local assessments.The Senate bill allows up to seven states to develop innovative systems that can be built on a variety of local, performance and other assessments. More states would be allowed to participate after three years. The conference bill should allow as many states to participate as meet the criteria. The House bill allows districts to design their own assessment systems, continuing an NCLB provision. (State efforts to use it were blocked by the U.S. Department of Education until recent approval of a New Hampshire pilot.) In both cases, scores have to be comparable on a statewide basis. FairTest recommends combining the two: the House for its greater flexibility and availability to all states, the Senate for its explicit support of spending federal funds to build new assessment systems pushing the Department to allow innovation.
5) Retain limits to the power of the U.S. Department of Education to manipulate state policies on standards, assessments and accountability, as well as bar the Department from granting waivers that require state actions not already mandated by federal law. Again, some Democrats aim to weaken the prohibitions to allow the Department to intervene on state tests and accountability.
What can people do?
- Contact all your Senators and Representatives to express your views and ask them to share them with the House and Senate education committee leadership. Here is a letter you can use: https://www.fairtest.org/tell-congress-keep-federal-accountability-mandates.
- Push organizations you work with to intervene.
- Congress is on recess until after Labor Day, so try to meet with members to educate them while they're in their home districts. You can find House contact information at https://www.house.gov/representatives/ and Senate contact information at https://www.senate.gov/senators/contact/.
- As always, share the information and call on people you know to act now.