(Photo: Takver/cc/flickr)
Dec 29, 2015
Call it the grand convergence: Coverage of environmental issues, especially climate change, has jumped traditional boundaries to include broader—and slightly ominous—geopolitical and health angles.
At the successful Paris climate talks in December, President Obama and other world leaders tied terrorism to human-induced bouts of erratic and severe weather. Drought and water crises, they said, exacerbated civil distress in Syria and the Middle East.
In July, Pope Francis issued a forceful encyclical, or church teaching, calling humanity to rethink economics and lifestyles better to foster care and concern for our "common home."
Secretary of State John Kerry, speaking at Old Dominion University in November, highlighted the serious "social and political consequences that stem from crop failures, water shortages, famine, and outbreaks of epidemic disease."
In some ways, reporters have responded: The encyclical was widely covered - a search of Environmental Health News' aggregated archives for "Pope Francis encyclical" shows 440 news reports, editorials, and opinion pieces published this year. Republicans and pundits latched on to Obama's climate/terrorism connection: almost 180 pieces in our archives mention both "climate" and "terrorism."
EHN.org's archives are not meant to be an exhaustive survey of reporting but rather a selective sampling of the day's news and opinion. Our search methodology has changed over the years; nevertheless, we picked up more than 30,000 environmentally themed news stories, editorials, and opinions.
Scientists, too, are connecting more dots among different environmental topics. In July and November, Stanford University professor Paul Ehrlich and University of California, Berkeley Professor John Harte published two pieces on food security and the intertwined nature of ecological and social systems.
"An enormous number of conditions have to be met if humankind is to thrive sustainably," Ehrlich and Harte wrote in the International Journal of Environmental Studies this summer.
They added: "The basic dilemma facing humanity is how to solve enough of these problems, many if not most acting synergistically, to avoid a disastrous decline in general health, cognitive ability, and social order."
That thinking isn't new, of course--Harte published a paper in 1996 on synergies in environmental degradation. But the trend for years was for media and popular culture- even science- to distill issues down to one simplified meme or theme: Gun control, economics, education, health. The environment has been no different.
"I felt for a decade or more that I was just talking to the wind," Harte said. "When we talk about economics, education, health, there tends to be an absence of what I would call 'systemic thinking' ... the tendency is for each person to have one hobby horse--one pet, favored thing. They don't look at the system."
Harte suggested that even the most recent assessment from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, published in late 2013 and early 2014, fell short. He said the many synergies associated with climate change didn't get much detail.
That's changing.
Obama has made climate change a signature issue of his last years in office, bringing up the issue in myriad settings. Secretary of State Kerry took a tour of the strategic Naval Station Norfolk this fall, which supports the U.S. Atlantic fleet--75 ships, 134 aircraft, and the largest concentration of U.S. Navy forces in the world. Military brass, Rolling Stone reported earlier this year, say the base might be rendered unusable in 25 to 50 years due to rising seas.
Talking later in the day at Old Dominion, Kerry connected some dots.
"The bottom line is that the impacts of climate change can exacerbate resource competition, threaten livelihoods, and increase the risk of instability and conflict, especially in places already undergoing economic, political, and social stress," Kerry said. "And because the world is so extraordinarily interconnected today - economically, technologically, militarily, in every way imaginable - instability anywhere can threaten stability everywhere."
Such arguments, Harte said, are becoming "more and more acceptable" even though scientists have known about the issue for decades.
"Bill Clinton was a very smart guy," Harte added. "But he wasn't saying stuff like that."
More broadly, environmental coverage in 2015 jumped from past years, especially on climate change.
Since 2000, media analysts at the University of Colorado, Boulder, have tracked climate coverage in news reports published by five national newspapers--The Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times and USA Today.
This year's coverage climbed to levels not seen since December 2009, when world leaders last tried to hammer out a climate accord in Copenhagen.
On January 20th, it begins...
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. Our Year-End campaign is our most important fundraiser of the year. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Douglas Fischer
Douglas Fischer has spent 20 years covering subjects ranging from climate science to environmental health to energy development. Since 2015, he has served as director of Environmental Health Sciences, publisher of EHN.org and DailyClimate.org.
2015climate changecrop failuresenvironmentfood securityjohn kerrymediapope francisrepublicansscientistsclimate emergency
Call it the grand convergence: Coverage of environmental issues, especially climate change, has jumped traditional boundaries to include broader—and slightly ominous—geopolitical and health angles.
At the successful Paris climate talks in December, President Obama and other world leaders tied terrorism to human-induced bouts of erratic and severe weather. Drought and water crises, they said, exacerbated civil distress in Syria and the Middle East.
In July, Pope Francis issued a forceful encyclical, or church teaching, calling humanity to rethink economics and lifestyles better to foster care and concern for our "common home."
Secretary of State John Kerry, speaking at Old Dominion University in November, highlighted the serious "social and political consequences that stem from crop failures, water shortages, famine, and outbreaks of epidemic disease."
In some ways, reporters have responded: The encyclical was widely covered - a search of Environmental Health News' aggregated archives for "Pope Francis encyclical" shows 440 news reports, editorials, and opinion pieces published this year. Republicans and pundits latched on to Obama's climate/terrorism connection: almost 180 pieces in our archives mention both "climate" and "terrorism."
EHN.org's archives are not meant to be an exhaustive survey of reporting but rather a selective sampling of the day's news and opinion. Our search methodology has changed over the years; nevertheless, we picked up more than 30,000 environmentally themed news stories, editorials, and opinions.
Scientists, too, are connecting more dots among different environmental topics. In July and November, Stanford University professor Paul Ehrlich and University of California, Berkeley Professor John Harte published two pieces on food security and the intertwined nature of ecological and social systems.
"An enormous number of conditions have to be met if humankind is to thrive sustainably," Ehrlich and Harte wrote in the International Journal of Environmental Studies this summer.
They added: "The basic dilemma facing humanity is how to solve enough of these problems, many if not most acting synergistically, to avoid a disastrous decline in general health, cognitive ability, and social order."
That thinking isn't new, of course--Harte published a paper in 1996 on synergies in environmental degradation. But the trend for years was for media and popular culture- even science- to distill issues down to one simplified meme or theme: Gun control, economics, education, health. The environment has been no different.
"I felt for a decade or more that I was just talking to the wind," Harte said. "When we talk about economics, education, health, there tends to be an absence of what I would call 'systemic thinking' ... the tendency is for each person to have one hobby horse--one pet, favored thing. They don't look at the system."
Harte suggested that even the most recent assessment from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, published in late 2013 and early 2014, fell short. He said the many synergies associated with climate change didn't get much detail.
That's changing.
Obama has made climate change a signature issue of his last years in office, bringing up the issue in myriad settings. Secretary of State Kerry took a tour of the strategic Naval Station Norfolk this fall, which supports the U.S. Atlantic fleet--75 ships, 134 aircraft, and the largest concentration of U.S. Navy forces in the world. Military brass, Rolling Stone reported earlier this year, say the base might be rendered unusable in 25 to 50 years due to rising seas.
Talking later in the day at Old Dominion, Kerry connected some dots.
"The bottom line is that the impacts of climate change can exacerbate resource competition, threaten livelihoods, and increase the risk of instability and conflict, especially in places already undergoing economic, political, and social stress," Kerry said. "And because the world is so extraordinarily interconnected today - economically, technologically, militarily, in every way imaginable - instability anywhere can threaten stability everywhere."
Such arguments, Harte said, are becoming "more and more acceptable" even though scientists have known about the issue for decades.
"Bill Clinton was a very smart guy," Harte added. "But he wasn't saying stuff like that."
More broadly, environmental coverage in 2015 jumped from past years, especially on climate change.
Since 2000, media analysts at the University of Colorado, Boulder, have tracked climate coverage in news reports published by five national newspapers--The Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times and USA Today.
This year's coverage climbed to levels not seen since December 2009, when world leaders last tried to hammer out a climate accord in Copenhagen.
Douglas Fischer
Douglas Fischer has spent 20 years covering subjects ranging from climate science to environmental health to energy development. Since 2015, he has served as director of Environmental Health Sciences, publisher of EHN.org and DailyClimate.org.
Call it the grand convergence: Coverage of environmental issues, especially climate change, has jumped traditional boundaries to include broader—and slightly ominous—geopolitical and health angles.
At the successful Paris climate talks in December, President Obama and other world leaders tied terrorism to human-induced bouts of erratic and severe weather. Drought and water crises, they said, exacerbated civil distress in Syria and the Middle East.
In July, Pope Francis issued a forceful encyclical, or church teaching, calling humanity to rethink economics and lifestyles better to foster care and concern for our "common home."
Secretary of State John Kerry, speaking at Old Dominion University in November, highlighted the serious "social and political consequences that stem from crop failures, water shortages, famine, and outbreaks of epidemic disease."
In some ways, reporters have responded: The encyclical was widely covered - a search of Environmental Health News' aggregated archives for "Pope Francis encyclical" shows 440 news reports, editorials, and opinion pieces published this year. Republicans and pundits latched on to Obama's climate/terrorism connection: almost 180 pieces in our archives mention both "climate" and "terrorism."
EHN.org's archives are not meant to be an exhaustive survey of reporting but rather a selective sampling of the day's news and opinion. Our search methodology has changed over the years; nevertheless, we picked up more than 30,000 environmentally themed news stories, editorials, and opinions.
Scientists, too, are connecting more dots among different environmental topics. In July and November, Stanford University professor Paul Ehrlich and University of California, Berkeley Professor John Harte published two pieces on food security and the intertwined nature of ecological and social systems.
"An enormous number of conditions have to be met if humankind is to thrive sustainably," Ehrlich and Harte wrote in the International Journal of Environmental Studies this summer.
They added: "The basic dilemma facing humanity is how to solve enough of these problems, many if not most acting synergistically, to avoid a disastrous decline in general health, cognitive ability, and social order."
That thinking isn't new, of course--Harte published a paper in 1996 on synergies in environmental degradation. But the trend for years was for media and popular culture- even science- to distill issues down to one simplified meme or theme: Gun control, economics, education, health. The environment has been no different.
"I felt for a decade or more that I was just talking to the wind," Harte said. "When we talk about economics, education, health, there tends to be an absence of what I would call 'systemic thinking' ... the tendency is for each person to have one hobby horse--one pet, favored thing. They don't look at the system."
Harte suggested that even the most recent assessment from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, published in late 2013 and early 2014, fell short. He said the many synergies associated with climate change didn't get much detail.
That's changing.
Obama has made climate change a signature issue of his last years in office, bringing up the issue in myriad settings. Secretary of State Kerry took a tour of the strategic Naval Station Norfolk this fall, which supports the U.S. Atlantic fleet--75 ships, 134 aircraft, and the largest concentration of U.S. Navy forces in the world. Military brass, Rolling Stone reported earlier this year, say the base might be rendered unusable in 25 to 50 years due to rising seas.
Talking later in the day at Old Dominion, Kerry connected some dots.
"The bottom line is that the impacts of climate change can exacerbate resource competition, threaten livelihoods, and increase the risk of instability and conflict, especially in places already undergoing economic, political, and social stress," Kerry said. "And because the world is so extraordinarily interconnected today - economically, technologically, militarily, in every way imaginable - instability anywhere can threaten stability everywhere."
Such arguments, Harte said, are becoming "more and more acceptable" even though scientists have known about the issue for decades.
"Bill Clinton was a very smart guy," Harte added. "But he wasn't saying stuff like that."
More broadly, environmental coverage in 2015 jumped from past years, especially on climate change.
Since 2000, media analysts at the University of Colorado, Boulder, have tracked climate coverage in news reports published by five national newspapers--The Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times and USA Today.
This year's coverage climbed to levels not seen since December 2009, when world leaders last tried to hammer out a climate accord in Copenhagen.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.