SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Demonstrators hold a sign in support of Planned Parenthood at a 2014 Moral Monday march in Raleigh. (Photo: Stephen Melkisethian/flickr/cc)
In Coverage of Planned Parenthood Smear, Partisan Conflict Crowds Out Reproductive Rights
"Indictment Deals Blow to GOP Over Planned Parenthood Battle" was the New York Times' choice of headline for a January 26 piece reporting that a Texas grand jury--set to investigate the women's health organization for selling fetal tissue for profit--found no wrongdoing on the part of Planned Parenthood, and instead indicted members of the anti-abortion group that made the deceptive video promoting the allegation.
Jan 30, 2016
"Indictment Deals Blow to GOP Over Planned Parenthood Battle" was the New York Times' choice of headline for a January 26 piece reporting that a Texas grand jury--set to investigate the women's health organization for selling fetal tissue for profit--found no wrongdoing on the part of Planned Parenthood, and instead indicted members of the anti-abortion group that made the deceptive video promoting the allegation.
From the story, you get that this "startling sign that a Republican campaign against the group has run into trouble" might pose problems for a Ted Cruz candidacy, and that the "war on women" narrative is part of the "Democratic playbook." You even learn, in the 22nd paragraph of the 22-paragraph piece, that Planned Parenthood doesn't sell fetal tissue for profit.
What you don't get, really, is any sense that something as vital as a woman's control over her own child-bearing is at stake.
A new report from the Women's Media Center gets at part of why that's so often the case. Looking at a year's worth of coverage in big papers and wire services, the study found that women journalists wrote just 37 percent of articles about reproductive issues; 52 percent were written by men, the rest unbylined. In quotes from individuals, quotes from men--in articles about reproductive issues--outnumbered those from women 41 to 33 percent. Male reporters tell 67 percent of presidential election stories related to abortion and contraception.
This is all connected to the fact that reproductive rights are still largely presented as political controversies or culture war pawns above all. The study found that female journalists were more likely than males to use quotes that addressed the issues primarily as matters of women's health.
As it happens, the New York Times' partisan-framed Planned Parenthood story was written by a woman: Jackie Calmes, a reporter with a history of right-leaning spin. Her piece included quotes from four male sources and one female source.
Media's partisan-conflict frame, says study author Jill Filipovic, crowds out the message of reproductive rights advocates that "abortion and contraception are normal, that abortion and contraception are moral, and women need the power to plan their families." Even in articles that include a pro forma defense of the right to choose, how often have you heard that said?
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)
Janine Jackson
Janine Jackson is Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) program director and producer/co-host of FAIR's syndicated radio show CounterSpin. She contributes frequently to FAIR's magazine, Extra! and co-edited "The FAIR Reader: An Extra! Review of Press and Politics in the '90s" (2019).
"Indictment Deals Blow to GOP Over Planned Parenthood Battle" was the New York Times' choice of headline for a January 26 piece reporting that a Texas grand jury--set to investigate the women's health organization for selling fetal tissue for profit--found no wrongdoing on the part of Planned Parenthood, and instead indicted members of the anti-abortion group that made the deceptive video promoting the allegation.
From the story, you get that this "startling sign that a Republican campaign against the group has run into trouble" might pose problems for a Ted Cruz candidacy, and that the "war on women" narrative is part of the "Democratic playbook." You even learn, in the 22nd paragraph of the 22-paragraph piece, that Planned Parenthood doesn't sell fetal tissue for profit.
What you don't get, really, is any sense that something as vital as a woman's control over her own child-bearing is at stake.
A new report from the Women's Media Center gets at part of why that's so often the case. Looking at a year's worth of coverage in big papers and wire services, the study found that women journalists wrote just 37 percent of articles about reproductive issues; 52 percent were written by men, the rest unbylined. In quotes from individuals, quotes from men--in articles about reproductive issues--outnumbered those from women 41 to 33 percent. Male reporters tell 67 percent of presidential election stories related to abortion and contraception.
This is all connected to the fact that reproductive rights are still largely presented as political controversies or culture war pawns above all. The study found that female journalists were more likely than males to use quotes that addressed the issues primarily as matters of women's health.
As it happens, the New York Times' partisan-framed Planned Parenthood story was written by a woman: Jackie Calmes, a reporter with a history of right-leaning spin. Her piece included quotes from four male sources and one female source.
Media's partisan-conflict frame, says study author Jill Filipovic, crowds out the message of reproductive rights advocates that "abortion and contraception are normal, that abortion and contraception are moral, and women need the power to plan their families." Even in articles that include a pro forma defense of the right to choose, how often have you heard that said?
Janine Jackson
Janine Jackson is Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) program director and producer/co-host of FAIR's syndicated radio show CounterSpin. She contributes frequently to FAIR's magazine, Extra! and co-edited "The FAIR Reader: An Extra! Review of Press and Politics in the '90s" (2019).
"Indictment Deals Blow to GOP Over Planned Parenthood Battle" was the New York Times' choice of headline for a January 26 piece reporting that a Texas grand jury--set to investigate the women's health organization for selling fetal tissue for profit--found no wrongdoing on the part of Planned Parenthood, and instead indicted members of the anti-abortion group that made the deceptive video promoting the allegation.
From the story, you get that this "startling sign that a Republican campaign against the group has run into trouble" might pose problems for a Ted Cruz candidacy, and that the "war on women" narrative is part of the "Democratic playbook." You even learn, in the 22nd paragraph of the 22-paragraph piece, that Planned Parenthood doesn't sell fetal tissue for profit.
What you don't get, really, is any sense that something as vital as a woman's control over her own child-bearing is at stake.
A new report from the Women's Media Center gets at part of why that's so often the case. Looking at a year's worth of coverage in big papers and wire services, the study found that women journalists wrote just 37 percent of articles about reproductive issues; 52 percent were written by men, the rest unbylined. In quotes from individuals, quotes from men--in articles about reproductive issues--outnumbered those from women 41 to 33 percent. Male reporters tell 67 percent of presidential election stories related to abortion and contraception.
This is all connected to the fact that reproductive rights are still largely presented as political controversies or culture war pawns above all. The study found that female journalists were more likely than males to use quotes that addressed the issues primarily as matters of women's health.
As it happens, the New York Times' partisan-framed Planned Parenthood story was written by a woman: Jackie Calmes, a reporter with a history of right-leaning spin. Her piece included quotes from four male sources and one female source.
Media's partisan-conflict frame, says study author Jill Filipovic, crowds out the message of reproductive rights advocates that "abortion and contraception are normal, that abortion and contraception are moral, and women need the power to plan their families." Even in articles that include a pro forma defense of the right to choose, how often have you heard that said?
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.