"Grocery shopping shouldn't require you to be a smartphone super-user." (Photo: Food & Water Watch)
Mar 23, 2016
Big Food companies have spent millions of dollars trying to block states from requiring GMO labeling. Thanks to pressure from hundreds of thousands of concerned people, including over 172,000 Food & Water Watch supporters, we've stopped the Senate from doing away with GMO labels... so far. But the industry's newest ploy shows why we need to keep the pressure on. Tell your Senators to protect clear, on-package GMO labeling.
Vermont's GMO labeling law will go into effect on July 1, and the corporations that make money off GMOs are getting desperate. Now, they're pushing Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) and others to introduce a so-called compromise letting QR codes and 800 numbers count as GMO labels.
You've probably seen QR codes on packaging or flyers, though you may not have known what they are. They're black-and-white squares that look like evolved bar codes, and when scanned with a smartphone they can direct people to websites, transmit contact information and more.
Let's consider this. In the industry's version of a compromise, here's how you would tell if a product contains GMOs:
- Find the QR code
- Take out you smartphone, if you have one
- Find your QR code scanning app
- Scan the QR code
- If it doesn't work at first, keep trying
- Wait for a web page to load
- Find out if the product contains GMOs
If we had clear, on-package GMO labeling, this process would look a bit different:
- Read the label and find out if the product contains GMOs
Why would Big Food companies propose such a cumbersome system? The only reason is to hide information from shoppers. If it's difficult enough to decipher a label, shoppers won't bother - grocery shopping is difficult enough without stopping to scan QR codes. If they're so determined to make GMO labels less useful, they might as well write the labels in code and give shoppers an old-fashioned decoder ring when they enter the store. Unlike QR codes, at least code-cracking will keep the kids busy as they help decipher what you're buying!
As tempting as it is to joke about this ludicrous plan, it's actually quite insidious. The QR code compromise is not only inconvenient; it's discriminatory against low-income shoppers and anyone who doesn't have a smartphone. Even the most tech-savvy smartphone users rarely use QR codes; surveys have found that only 21% of smartphone owners ever scan a QR code, and 97% of Americans don't even know what QR codes are. Yet clear labeling is clearly achievable: since last week, Kelloggs, Mars, and General Mills have all announced that they will label GMOs and follow Vermont's labeling law.
Grocery shopping shouldn't require you to be a smartphone super-user. We need to stop this phony compromise and protect GMO labeling.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
© 2021 Food & Water Watch
Big Food companies have spent millions of dollars trying to block states from requiring GMO labeling. Thanks to pressure from hundreds of thousands of concerned people, including over 172,000 Food & Water Watch supporters, we've stopped the Senate from doing away with GMO labels... so far. But the industry's newest ploy shows why we need to keep the pressure on. Tell your Senators to protect clear, on-package GMO labeling.
Vermont's GMO labeling law will go into effect on July 1, and the corporations that make money off GMOs are getting desperate. Now, they're pushing Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) and others to introduce a so-called compromise letting QR codes and 800 numbers count as GMO labels.
You've probably seen QR codes on packaging or flyers, though you may not have known what they are. They're black-and-white squares that look like evolved bar codes, and when scanned with a smartphone they can direct people to websites, transmit contact information and more.
Let's consider this. In the industry's version of a compromise, here's how you would tell if a product contains GMOs:
- Find the QR code
- Take out you smartphone, if you have one
- Find your QR code scanning app
- Scan the QR code
- If it doesn't work at first, keep trying
- Wait for a web page to load
- Find out if the product contains GMOs
If we had clear, on-package GMO labeling, this process would look a bit different:
- Read the label and find out if the product contains GMOs
Why would Big Food companies propose such a cumbersome system? The only reason is to hide information from shoppers. If it's difficult enough to decipher a label, shoppers won't bother - grocery shopping is difficult enough without stopping to scan QR codes. If they're so determined to make GMO labels less useful, they might as well write the labels in code and give shoppers an old-fashioned decoder ring when they enter the store. Unlike QR codes, at least code-cracking will keep the kids busy as they help decipher what you're buying!
As tempting as it is to joke about this ludicrous plan, it's actually quite insidious. The QR code compromise is not only inconvenient; it's discriminatory against low-income shoppers and anyone who doesn't have a smartphone. Even the most tech-savvy smartphone users rarely use QR codes; surveys have found that only 21% of smartphone owners ever scan a QR code, and 97% of Americans don't even know what QR codes are. Yet clear labeling is clearly achievable: since last week, Kelloggs, Mars, and General Mills have all announced that they will label GMOs and follow Vermont's labeling law.
Grocery shopping shouldn't require you to be a smartphone super-user. We need to stop this phony compromise and protect GMO labeling.
Big Food companies have spent millions of dollars trying to block states from requiring GMO labeling. Thanks to pressure from hundreds of thousands of concerned people, including over 172,000 Food & Water Watch supporters, we've stopped the Senate from doing away with GMO labels... so far. But the industry's newest ploy shows why we need to keep the pressure on. Tell your Senators to protect clear, on-package GMO labeling.
Vermont's GMO labeling law will go into effect on July 1, and the corporations that make money off GMOs are getting desperate. Now, they're pushing Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) and others to introduce a so-called compromise letting QR codes and 800 numbers count as GMO labels.
You've probably seen QR codes on packaging or flyers, though you may not have known what they are. They're black-and-white squares that look like evolved bar codes, and when scanned with a smartphone they can direct people to websites, transmit contact information and more.
Let's consider this. In the industry's version of a compromise, here's how you would tell if a product contains GMOs:
- Find the QR code
- Take out you smartphone, if you have one
- Find your QR code scanning app
- Scan the QR code
- If it doesn't work at first, keep trying
- Wait for a web page to load
- Find out if the product contains GMOs
If we had clear, on-package GMO labeling, this process would look a bit different:
- Read the label and find out if the product contains GMOs
Why would Big Food companies propose such a cumbersome system? The only reason is to hide information from shoppers. If it's difficult enough to decipher a label, shoppers won't bother - grocery shopping is difficult enough without stopping to scan QR codes. If they're so determined to make GMO labels less useful, they might as well write the labels in code and give shoppers an old-fashioned decoder ring when they enter the store. Unlike QR codes, at least code-cracking will keep the kids busy as they help decipher what you're buying!
As tempting as it is to joke about this ludicrous plan, it's actually quite insidious. The QR code compromise is not only inconvenient; it's discriminatory against low-income shoppers and anyone who doesn't have a smartphone. Even the most tech-savvy smartphone users rarely use QR codes; surveys have found that only 21% of smartphone owners ever scan a QR code, and 97% of Americans don't even know what QR codes are. Yet clear labeling is clearly achievable: since last week, Kelloggs, Mars, and General Mills have all announced that they will label GMOs and follow Vermont's labeling law.
Grocery shopping shouldn't require you to be a smartphone super-user. We need to stop this phony compromise and protect GMO labeling.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.