SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Dr. Cornel West speaks to the Platform Committee in Orlando last weekend. (Photo: Joe Roulette/flickr/cc)
Welcome to the New Democratic Party
Clinton Platform members got up to tell the Committee, guests, and the audience watching at home on CSPAN that they oppose the TPP. But they would not add these words to the platform: “We oppose the TPP.”
Jul 14, 2016
This weekend in Orlando, Florida members of the Platform Committee met to help create the Democratic party's positions on a number of key issues. I was honored to attend as a Committee member on behalf of Senator Bernie Sanders.
The Platform adopted by the Committee contains victories on social, racial and economic justice issues that have been championed by Senator Sanders and his supporters: it calls for a $15 federal minimum wage, paid family leave, the Department of Justice to investigate all shootings involving police officers, and the removal of marijuana as a Class One controlled substance (which squeaked to victory, 81-80.)
The Platform passed with overwhelming support from members appointed by Secretary Hillary Clinton, the Democratic National Committee (DNC), and Senator Sanders. However, the platform falls short on several key issues, specifically the Trans-Pacific Partnership (also known as TPP or "manure," as Sanders Committee member Jim Hightower dubbed it) and Medicare-for-All.
There were amendments offered on TPP by both the Sanders and Clinton camps. Clinton Committee member Lee Saunders, president of AFSCME, took to the mic to support his amendment on TPP, joined by AFT president and Clinton Committee member Randi Weingarten.
"We have been against TPP," Weingarten told the audience. "And we are glad that both of our candidates are against TPP."
"We have open opposition from both of our candidates," echoed Saunders in his remarks. "For once all Democratic candidates and Labor are of one view: No on TPP."
The amendment, which totaled 452 words, states, in part:
"[Trade agreements] must not undermine democratic decision making through special privileges and private courts for corporations, and trade negotiations must be transparent and inclusive... [W]e will oppose trade agreements that do not support good American jobs, raise wages, and improve our national security... Any trade agreement must protect workers and the environment and not undermine access to critically-needed prescription drugs...These are standards all Democrats believe should be applied to all trade agreements, including the Trans-Pacific Partnership."
But what was missing from this amendment of 452 words? Four words that made the position of the Democratic party on TPP explicit: "We oppose the TPP."
Former NAACP president Ben Jealous, representing Sanders, offered those words in an amendment to Saunders' amendment, imploring Committee members to be leaders, not bureaucrats.
But the Clinton and DNC members of the Platform Committee voted down the Jealous amendment in a vote of 74 to 106.
Let me recap for you: Clinton Platform members got up to tell the Committee, guests, and the audience watching at home on CSPAN that they oppose the TPP. But they would not add these words to the platform: "We oppose the TPP."
A subsequent amendment was offered by Sanders Committee member Jim Hightower which stated the TPP must not get a vote in Congress. It too was voted down by the Clinton and DNC platform members (77 to 104), despite one of the most stirring and captivating speeches of the weekend, delivered by Dr. Cornel West.
On healthcare, the platform language as adopted states that "healthcare is a right, not a privilege" and that "Democrats will never falter in our generations long fight to guarantee health coverage as a fundamental right for every American." This fight is far from over as millions are without insurance, many are underinsured, and some with insurance still struggle to afford their healthcare expenses. Our system of healthcare is still largely market-based, not rights based.
But the DNC and Clinton Committee members refused to support an amendment, presented by Sanders Committee member Michael Lighty of National Nurses United, which stated: "The best way to achieve this goal is through a Medicare-for-All health care system that builds upon the ACA [the Affordable Care Act] and gives everyone in this country the freedom to get the medical care they need when they need it."
"If this [single payer] is controversial in this room, it is the only room of Democrats in which it is controversial," Lighty told the Democratic Platform Committee this weekend. Single payer is supported by 58% of US residents and 81% of Democrats.
This vote to refuse to endorse Medicare-for-All -- in a 66 to 92 vote -- was, as Dr. West said at the drafting committee meeting, an embrace of the abstract over the specific.
While my heart is heavy knowing I will vote for Secretary Clinton in November -- and, yes, I hope you will do the same -- we must cherish and celebrate the victories we have achieved. But we must also examine our defeats, for they are telling for what they say about the current Democratic establishment and Senator Sanders' campaign and the millions of people it mobilized. It is a defining difference - it is the difference between the platitude and the action, between the promise and the execution, between, to borrow Dr. West's phrase, the abstract and the specific.
As evidenced from the votes this weekend, we have much more work to do -- in our school boards and in our city councils, in Washington, DC and in our state capitols, in the Democratic party and in the streets. And it is up to us, my fellow Berniecrats and my allies in the DNC and Clinton camps, to transform this party. As Senator Nina Turner told those at the platform meeting: "Welcome to the new Democratic Party."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Elizabeth Weill-Greenberg
Elizabeth Weill-Greenberg is a Part-Time Lecturer at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey where she teaches a course on wrongful convictions. She is a proud union member of the Part-Time Lecturer chapter of AFT at Rutgers.
ben jealousbernie sanderscornel westdemocracydemocratic partyelection 2016hillary clintonjim hightowermedicaremedicare for allmichael lightynational nurses unitednina turnersingle-payertpptrade
This weekend in Orlando, Florida members of the Platform Committee met to help create the Democratic party's positions on a number of key issues. I was honored to attend as a Committee member on behalf of Senator Bernie Sanders.
The Platform adopted by the Committee contains victories on social, racial and economic justice issues that have been championed by Senator Sanders and his supporters: it calls for a $15 federal minimum wage, paid family leave, the Department of Justice to investigate all shootings involving police officers, and the removal of marijuana as a Class One controlled substance (which squeaked to victory, 81-80.)
The Platform passed with overwhelming support from members appointed by Secretary Hillary Clinton, the Democratic National Committee (DNC), and Senator Sanders. However, the platform falls short on several key issues, specifically the Trans-Pacific Partnership (also known as TPP or "manure," as Sanders Committee member Jim Hightower dubbed it) and Medicare-for-All.
There were amendments offered on TPP by both the Sanders and Clinton camps. Clinton Committee member Lee Saunders, president of AFSCME, took to the mic to support his amendment on TPP, joined by AFT president and Clinton Committee member Randi Weingarten.
"We have been against TPP," Weingarten told the audience. "And we are glad that both of our candidates are against TPP."
"We have open opposition from both of our candidates," echoed Saunders in his remarks. "For once all Democratic candidates and Labor are of one view: No on TPP."
The amendment, which totaled 452 words, states, in part:
"[Trade agreements] must not undermine democratic decision making through special privileges and private courts for corporations, and trade negotiations must be transparent and inclusive... [W]e will oppose trade agreements that do not support good American jobs, raise wages, and improve our national security... Any trade agreement must protect workers and the environment and not undermine access to critically-needed prescription drugs...These are standards all Democrats believe should be applied to all trade agreements, including the Trans-Pacific Partnership."
But what was missing from this amendment of 452 words? Four words that made the position of the Democratic party on TPP explicit: "We oppose the TPP."
Former NAACP president Ben Jealous, representing Sanders, offered those words in an amendment to Saunders' amendment, imploring Committee members to be leaders, not bureaucrats.
But the Clinton and DNC members of the Platform Committee voted down the Jealous amendment in a vote of 74 to 106.
Let me recap for you: Clinton Platform members got up to tell the Committee, guests, and the audience watching at home on CSPAN that they oppose the TPP. But they would not add these words to the platform: "We oppose the TPP."
A subsequent amendment was offered by Sanders Committee member Jim Hightower which stated the TPP must not get a vote in Congress. It too was voted down by the Clinton and DNC platform members (77 to 104), despite one of the most stirring and captivating speeches of the weekend, delivered by Dr. Cornel West.
On healthcare, the platform language as adopted states that "healthcare is a right, not a privilege" and that "Democrats will never falter in our generations long fight to guarantee health coverage as a fundamental right for every American." This fight is far from over as millions are without insurance, many are underinsured, and some with insurance still struggle to afford their healthcare expenses. Our system of healthcare is still largely market-based, not rights based.
But the DNC and Clinton Committee members refused to support an amendment, presented by Sanders Committee member Michael Lighty of National Nurses United, which stated: "The best way to achieve this goal is through a Medicare-for-All health care system that builds upon the ACA [the Affordable Care Act] and gives everyone in this country the freedom to get the medical care they need when they need it."
"If this [single payer] is controversial in this room, it is the only room of Democrats in which it is controversial," Lighty told the Democratic Platform Committee this weekend. Single payer is supported by 58% of US residents and 81% of Democrats.
This vote to refuse to endorse Medicare-for-All -- in a 66 to 92 vote -- was, as Dr. West said at the drafting committee meeting, an embrace of the abstract over the specific.
While my heart is heavy knowing I will vote for Secretary Clinton in November -- and, yes, I hope you will do the same -- we must cherish and celebrate the victories we have achieved. But we must also examine our defeats, for they are telling for what they say about the current Democratic establishment and Senator Sanders' campaign and the millions of people it mobilized. It is a defining difference - it is the difference between the platitude and the action, between the promise and the execution, between, to borrow Dr. West's phrase, the abstract and the specific.
As evidenced from the votes this weekend, we have much more work to do -- in our school boards and in our city councils, in Washington, DC and in our state capitols, in the Democratic party and in the streets. And it is up to us, my fellow Berniecrats and my allies in the DNC and Clinton camps, to transform this party. As Senator Nina Turner told those at the platform meeting: "Welcome to the new Democratic Party."
Elizabeth Weill-Greenberg
Elizabeth Weill-Greenberg is a Part-Time Lecturer at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey where she teaches a course on wrongful convictions. She is a proud union member of the Part-Time Lecturer chapter of AFT at Rutgers.
This weekend in Orlando, Florida members of the Platform Committee met to help create the Democratic party's positions on a number of key issues. I was honored to attend as a Committee member on behalf of Senator Bernie Sanders.
The Platform adopted by the Committee contains victories on social, racial and economic justice issues that have been championed by Senator Sanders and his supporters: it calls for a $15 federal minimum wage, paid family leave, the Department of Justice to investigate all shootings involving police officers, and the removal of marijuana as a Class One controlled substance (which squeaked to victory, 81-80.)
The Platform passed with overwhelming support from members appointed by Secretary Hillary Clinton, the Democratic National Committee (DNC), and Senator Sanders. However, the platform falls short on several key issues, specifically the Trans-Pacific Partnership (also known as TPP or "manure," as Sanders Committee member Jim Hightower dubbed it) and Medicare-for-All.
There were amendments offered on TPP by both the Sanders and Clinton camps. Clinton Committee member Lee Saunders, president of AFSCME, took to the mic to support his amendment on TPP, joined by AFT president and Clinton Committee member Randi Weingarten.
"We have been against TPP," Weingarten told the audience. "And we are glad that both of our candidates are against TPP."
"We have open opposition from both of our candidates," echoed Saunders in his remarks. "For once all Democratic candidates and Labor are of one view: No on TPP."
The amendment, which totaled 452 words, states, in part:
"[Trade agreements] must not undermine democratic decision making through special privileges and private courts for corporations, and trade negotiations must be transparent and inclusive... [W]e will oppose trade agreements that do not support good American jobs, raise wages, and improve our national security... Any trade agreement must protect workers and the environment and not undermine access to critically-needed prescription drugs...These are standards all Democrats believe should be applied to all trade agreements, including the Trans-Pacific Partnership."
But what was missing from this amendment of 452 words? Four words that made the position of the Democratic party on TPP explicit: "We oppose the TPP."
Former NAACP president Ben Jealous, representing Sanders, offered those words in an amendment to Saunders' amendment, imploring Committee members to be leaders, not bureaucrats.
But the Clinton and DNC members of the Platform Committee voted down the Jealous amendment in a vote of 74 to 106.
Let me recap for you: Clinton Platform members got up to tell the Committee, guests, and the audience watching at home on CSPAN that they oppose the TPP. But they would not add these words to the platform: "We oppose the TPP."
A subsequent amendment was offered by Sanders Committee member Jim Hightower which stated the TPP must not get a vote in Congress. It too was voted down by the Clinton and DNC platform members (77 to 104), despite one of the most stirring and captivating speeches of the weekend, delivered by Dr. Cornel West.
On healthcare, the platform language as adopted states that "healthcare is a right, not a privilege" and that "Democrats will never falter in our generations long fight to guarantee health coverage as a fundamental right for every American." This fight is far from over as millions are without insurance, many are underinsured, and some with insurance still struggle to afford their healthcare expenses. Our system of healthcare is still largely market-based, not rights based.
But the DNC and Clinton Committee members refused to support an amendment, presented by Sanders Committee member Michael Lighty of National Nurses United, which stated: "The best way to achieve this goal is through a Medicare-for-All health care system that builds upon the ACA [the Affordable Care Act] and gives everyone in this country the freedom to get the medical care they need when they need it."
"If this [single payer] is controversial in this room, it is the only room of Democrats in which it is controversial," Lighty told the Democratic Platform Committee this weekend. Single payer is supported by 58% of US residents and 81% of Democrats.
This vote to refuse to endorse Medicare-for-All -- in a 66 to 92 vote -- was, as Dr. West said at the drafting committee meeting, an embrace of the abstract over the specific.
While my heart is heavy knowing I will vote for Secretary Clinton in November -- and, yes, I hope you will do the same -- we must cherish and celebrate the victories we have achieved. But we must also examine our defeats, for they are telling for what they say about the current Democratic establishment and Senator Sanders' campaign and the millions of people it mobilized. It is a defining difference - it is the difference between the platitude and the action, between the promise and the execution, between, to borrow Dr. West's phrase, the abstract and the specific.
As evidenced from the votes this weekend, we have much more work to do -- in our school boards and in our city councils, in Washington, DC and in our state capitols, in the Democratic party and in the streets. And it is up to us, my fellow Berniecrats and my allies in the DNC and Clinton camps, to transform this party. As Senator Nina Turner told those at the platform meeting: "Welcome to the new Democratic Party."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.