SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Activists confront construction activities, which they say deliberately targeted sacred sites to 'provoke violence.' (Photo: AFP/Getty)
48 Words at 4 AM Is All Network News Has to Say About Pipeline Protests
The broadcast news networks--ABC, CBS and NBC--have aired exactly one report on the Dakota Access Pipeline protests since the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe began an encampment against the project in April, according to a search of the Nexis news database. That report, read by Anne-Marie Green, aired on the CBS Morning News at 4 a.m. on September 5. Here it is in its entirety:
Sep 08, 2016
The broadcast news networks--ABC, CBS and NBC--have aired exactly one report on the Dakota Access Pipeline protests since the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe began an encampment against the project in April, according to a search of the Nexis news database. That report, read by Anne-Marie Green, aired on the CBS Morning News at 4 a.m. on September 5. Here it is in its entirety:
National Public Radio reports violence during demonstrations against a proposed oil pipeline in North Dakota. Protestors confronted workers Saturday at a construction site. Police say four private security guards and two guard dogs were hurt. Tribal officials say the construction destroyed an Indian burial ground and cultural sites.
Those 48 words are a one-sided retelling of an NPR report ("Dakota Access Pipeline Protests in North Dakota Turn Violent," 9/4/16), which in turn gets most of its information, as well as its anti-protester spin, from an AP story, "Oil Pipeline Protest Turns Violent in North Dakota" (9/4/16).
But the report on NPR's website also contains video footage from Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! (9/4/16), who--apparently unlike any of her colleagues from network TV--thought the largest mobilization of indigenous activists against environmental degradation was worth reporting on. Goodman's footage shows the construction project's security guards wielding pepper spray and deploying attack dogs to provoke and injure demonstrators--violence on the part of the pipeline authorities that got left out of CBS's rip-and-read on the protests.
Also missing from what is so far the entirety of broadcast TV news' coverage of the Dakota Access protest is any mention of the threat the pipeline poses to water resources--the pipeline crosses the Missouri River just half a mile north of the Standing Rock Sioux reservation--or the climate destruction facilitated by pipelines designed to ship fracked oil out to consumers.
But I suppose that if you're only going to give a story 48 words of coverage, at four o'clock on a single morning, there's only so much you can say.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
© 2023 Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)
Jim Naureckas
Jim Naureckas is editor of FAIR (Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting). He is the co-author of "Way Things Aren't: Rush Limbaugh's Reign of Error." He was an investigative reporter for In These Times and managing editor of the Washington Report on the Hemisphere.
The broadcast news networks--ABC, CBS and NBC--have aired exactly one report on the Dakota Access Pipeline protests since the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe began an encampment against the project in April, according to a search of the Nexis news database. That report, read by Anne-Marie Green, aired on the CBS Morning News at 4 a.m. on September 5. Here it is in its entirety:
National Public Radio reports violence during demonstrations against a proposed oil pipeline in North Dakota. Protestors confronted workers Saturday at a construction site. Police say four private security guards and two guard dogs were hurt. Tribal officials say the construction destroyed an Indian burial ground and cultural sites.
Those 48 words are a one-sided retelling of an NPR report ("Dakota Access Pipeline Protests in North Dakota Turn Violent," 9/4/16), which in turn gets most of its information, as well as its anti-protester spin, from an AP story, "Oil Pipeline Protest Turns Violent in North Dakota" (9/4/16).
But the report on NPR's website also contains video footage from Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! (9/4/16), who--apparently unlike any of her colleagues from network TV--thought the largest mobilization of indigenous activists against environmental degradation was worth reporting on. Goodman's footage shows the construction project's security guards wielding pepper spray and deploying attack dogs to provoke and injure demonstrators--violence on the part of the pipeline authorities that got left out of CBS's rip-and-read on the protests.
Also missing from what is so far the entirety of broadcast TV news' coverage of the Dakota Access protest is any mention of the threat the pipeline poses to water resources--the pipeline crosses the Missouri River just half a mile north of the Standing Rock Sioux reservation--or the climate destruction facilitated by pipelines designed to ship fracked oil out to consumers.
But I suppose that if you're only going to give a story 48 words of coverage, at four o'clock on a single morning, there's only so much you can say.
Jim Naureckas
Jim Naureckas is editor of FAIR (Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting). He is the co-author of "Way Things Aren't: Rush Limbaugh's Reign of Error." He was an investigative reporter for In These Times and managing editor of the Washington Report on the Hemisphere.
The broadcast news networks--ABC, CBS and NBC--have aired exactly one report on the Dakota Access Pipeline protests since the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe began an encampment against the project in April, according to a search of the Nexis news database. That report, read by Anne-Marie Green, aired on the CBS Morning News at 4 a.m. on September 5. Here it is in its entirety:
National Public Radio reports violence during demonstrations against a proposed oil pipeline in North Dakota. Protestors confronted workers Saturday at a construction site. Police say four private security guards and two guard dogs were hurt. Tribal officials say the construction destroyed an Indian burial ground and cultural sites.
Those 48 words are a one-sided retelling of an NPR report ("Dakota Access Pipeline Protests in North Dakota Turn Violent," 9/4/16), which in turn gets most of its information, as well as its anti-protester spin, from an AP story, "Oil Pipeline Protest Turns Violent in North Dakota" (9/4/16).
But the report on NPR's website also contains video footage from Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! (9/4/16), who--apparently unlike any of her colleagues from network TV--thought the largest mobilization of indigenous activists against environmental degradation was worth reporting on. Goodman's footage shows the construction project's security guards wielding pepper spray and deploying attack dogs to provoke and injure demonstrators--violence on the part of the pipeline authorities that got left out of CBS's rip-and-read on the protests.
Also missing from what is so far the entirety of broadcast TV news' coverage of the Dakota Access protest is any mention of the threat the pipeline poses to water resources--the pipeline crosses the Missouri River just half a mile north of the Standing Rock Sioux reservation--or the climate destruction facilitated by pipelines designed to ship fracked oil out to consumers.
But I suppose that if you're only going to give a story 48 words of coverage, at four o'clock on a single morning, there's only so much you can say.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.