SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
"When science is denied by our decision makers, this cannot stand." (Photo: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center/flickr/cc)
On Thursday the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology tweeted some good ole fashioned climate denial--you know, the old tired long discredited nonsensical claim that cold weather negates the global consensus of scientists that climate change is happening
On Thursday the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology tweeted some good ole fashioned climate denial--you know, the old tired long discredited nonsensical claim that cold weather negates the global consensus of scientists that climate change is happening (It doesn't.). The scientific community and the news media did not let this go unnoticed and that's a good thing for our continuing to hold decision makers accountable for respecting science under a Trump administration.
Here was the tweet:
\u201c.@BreitbartNews: Global Temperatures Plunge. Icy Silence from Climate Alarmists https://t.co/uLUPW4o93V\u201d— Sci, Space, & Tech GOP (@Sci, Space, & Tech GOP) 1480619566
It was quickly followed by a multitude of responses from other decision makers, scientists, and others. Think Progress has a nice summary of responses. I especially liked this one from House Science Committee member Representative Don Beyer:
\u201cThis isn't factual, it's embarrassing, and Breitbart is not a credible news source. We need to bring *science* back to the Science Committee https://t.co/oZ6GfFAlUI\u201d— Rep. Don Beyer (@Rep. Don Beyer) 1480623365
I saw the House Science tweet and didn't think much of it. Perhaps I'm cynical. Perhaps I've been following science in Washington DC for too long. But it didn't seem notable to me. This is because the House Science Committee, and particularly its Chairman Lamar Smith, now have a broad and consistent record of denying climate science, bullying scientists across disciplines, and otherwise disparaging the scientific enterprise it's supposed to be supporting.
Not that I'm keeping a running list (I am actually), but here are some highlights:
And yesterday's climate-denying tweet was not even its first science-attacking tweet of the week. The day prior, the Committee's handle had trolled Yale Climate Connections.
\u201cAnother group \u2018dealing\u2019 w/ climate change in a non-scientific way, along w/ the other green groups who value politics & emotion over facts https://t.co/PF5lrWyXBu\u201d— Sci, Space, & Tech GOP (@Sci, Space, & Tech GOP) 1480542687
Despite this pervasive record of science-slamming, the House Science Committee was still taken to task for the recent climate-denying tweet and this is a good thing. We cannot normalize science denial. It is entirely inappropriate for members of Congress to be peddling misinformation on climate science--especially when they are in charge of the House Science Committee. The world noticed this and called them on it.
We need to do more of this. When science is denied by our decision makers, this cannot stand. We must persist in calling out such misinformation when we see it, whether it will come from the House Science Committee, the Trump administration, or other decision makers in the future. Americans deserve leaders who respect science and scientists. I promise to be a little less cynical moving forward and I hope you will too.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
On Thursday the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology tweeted some good ole fashioned climate denial--you know, the old tired long discredited nonsensical claim that cold weather negates the global consensus of scientists that climate change is happening (It doesn't.). The scientific community and the news media did not let this go unnoticed and that's a good thing for our continuing to hold decision makers accountable for respecting science under a Trump administration.
Here was the tweet:
\u201c.@BreitbartNews: Global Temperatures Plunge. Icy Silence from Climate Alarmists https://t.co/uLUPW4o93V\u201d— Sci, Space, & Tech GOP (@Sci, Space, & Tech GOP) 1480619566
It was quickly followed by a multitude of responses from other decision makers, scientists, and others. Think Progress has a nice summary of responses. I especially liked this one from House Science Committee member Representative Don Beyer:
\u201cThis isn't factual, it's embarrassing, and Breitbart is not a credible news source. We need to bring *science* back to the Science Committee https://t.co/oZ6GfFAlUI\u201d— Rep. Don Beyer (@Rep. Don Beyer) 1480623365
I saw the House Science tweet and didn't think much of it. Perhaps I'm cynical. Perhaps I've been following science in Washington DC for too long. But it didn't seem notable to me. This is because the House Science Committee, and particularly its Chairman Lamar Smith, now have a broad and consistent record of denying climate science, bullying scientists across disciplines, and otherwise disparaging the scientific enterprise it's supposed to be supporting.
Not that I'm keeping a running list (I am actually), but here are some highlights:
And yesterday's climate-denying tweet was not even its first science-attacking tweet of the week. The day prior, the Committee's handle had trolled Yale Climate Connections.
\u201cAnother group \u2018dealing\u2019 w/ climate change in a non-scientific way, along w/ the other green groups who value politics & emotion over facts https://t.co/PF5lrWyXBu\u201d— Sci, Space, & Tech GOP (@Sci, Space, & Tech GOP) 1480542687
Despite this pervasive record of science-slamming, the House Science Committee was still taken to task for the recent climate-denying tweet and this is a good thing. We cannot normalize science denial. It is entirely inappropriate for members of Congress to be peddling misinformation on climate science--especially when they are in charge of the House Science Committee. The world noticed this and called them on it.
We need to do more of this. When science is denied by our decision makers, this cannot stand. We must persist in calling out such misinformation when we see it, whether it will come from the House Science Committee, the Trump administration, or other decision makers in the future. Americans deserve leaders who respect science and scientists. I promise to be a little less cynical moving forward and I hope you will too.
On Thursday the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology tweeted some good ole fashioned climate denial--you know, the old tired long discredited nonsensical claim that cold weather negates the global consensus of scientists that climate change is happening (It doesn't.). The scientific community and the news media did not let this go unnoticed and that's a good thing for our continuing to hold decision makers accountable for respecting science under a Trump administration.
Here was the tweet:
\u201c.@BreitbartNews: Global Temperatures Plunge. Icy Silence from Climate Alarmists https://t.co/uLUPW4o93V\u201d— Sci, Space, & Tech GOP (@Sci, Space, & Tech GOP) 1480619566
It was quickly followed by a multitude of responses from other decision makers, scientists, and others. Think Progress has a nice summary of responses. I especially liked this one from House Science Committee member Representative Don Beyer:
\u201cThis isn't factual, it's embarrassing, and Breitbart is not a credible news source. We need to bring *science* back to the Science Committee https://t.co/oZ6GfFAlUI\u201d— Rep. Don Beyer (@Rep. Don Beyer) 1480623365
I saw the House Science tweet and didn't think much of it. Perhaps I'm cynical. Perhaps I've been following science in Washington DC for too long. But it didn't seem notable to me. This is because the House Science Committee, and particularly its Chairman Lamar Smith, now have a broad and consistent record of denying climate science, bullying scientists across disciplines, and otherwise disparaging the scientific enterprise it's supposed to be supporting.
Not that I'm keeping a running list (I am actually), but here are some highlights:
And yesterday's climate-denying tweet was not even its first science-attacking tweet of the week. The day prior, the Committee's handle had trolled Yale Climate Connections.
\u201cAnother group \u2018dealing\u2019 w/ climate change in a non-scientific way, along w/ the other green groups who value politics & emotion over facts https://t.co/PF5lrWyXBu\u201d— Sci, Space, & Tech GOP (@Sci, Space, & Tech GOP) 1480542687
Despite this pervasive record of science-slamming, the House Science Committee was still taken to task for the recent climate-denying tweet and this is a good thing. We cannot normalize science denial. It is entirely inappropriate for members of Congress to be peddling misinformation on climate science--especially when they are in charge of the House Science Committee. The world noticed this and called them on it.
We need to do more of this. When science is denied by our decision makers, this cannot stand. We must persist in calling out such misinformation when we see it, whether it will come from the House Science Committee, the Trump administration, or other decision makers in the future. Americans deserve leaders who respect science and scientists. I promise to be a little less cynical moving forward and I hope you will too.