SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
In her 513-word piece, "US Officials Growing Increasingly Concerned Iran Could Attack Israel," CNN's Barbara Starr mindlessly repeated "concerns" by unnamed US Department of Defense and Israeli Defense Force officials that Iran might directly attack Israel and/or Israeli positions in occupied Syria--something that has never happened in recorded history. (Screenshot: CNN)
CNN's Iran Fearmongering Would Make More Sense Coming Directly From Pentagon
Barbara Starr has a long, storied career of acting—in effect if not in name—as a Department of Defense spokesperson
May 10, 2018
Why doesn't CNN Defense Department reporter Barbara Starr just leave CNN and instead work directly for the Trump DoD?
On Tuesday, hours after President Donald Trump pulled out of the Iran deal (formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action), Starr (5/8/18) rushed to publish an anonymously sourced and transparently propagandistic press release for the Trump administration and Pentagon. Wouldn't it be easier if Starr just skipped the middleman and just worked for the DoD?
In her 513-word piece, "US Officials Growing Increasingly Concerned Iran Could Attack Israel," Starr mindlessly repeated "concerns" by unnamed US Department of Defense and Israeli Defense Force officials that Iran might directly attack Israel and/or Israeli positions in occupied Syria--something that has never happened in recorded history:
There are increasing concerns Iran is on the cusp of an attack against Israel, several US military officials told CNN.
Intelligence is not clear on when an attack could come and what form it would take, they said, with one official noting that "if there is an attack, it might not be immediately clear it's Iran."
The US is watching very closely to see if Iranian-backed actions could come from inside Syria or Lebanon, or even from inside Iran itself, though that would be considered a major military escalation.
"Increasing concerns" by whom? Increased relative to what? Who are these "military officials"? If they have no clue "what form" such attacks would take or when they would be carried out, what is the public supposed to do with this information? (Don't be confused it it's not "immediately clear it's Iran"--trust us, it will be!) Moreover, why are these vague, temporally uncertain "concerns" being reported at all?
The answer is clear: The Pentagon is using CNN to stoke panic about Iran by accusing them of pre-crime without a shred of evidence, neutral analysis or third-party validation. It's a Defense Department press release in its purest form, designed solely to scare the reader and justify Trump's escalation of hostilities toward Iran.
Was Starr presented with evidence of troop movements? Keyhole satellite photos of repositioned missile systems? Statements from Iran? Leaks from Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps that would justify this being news? No. The report is 100 percent curated leaks by the US and Israeli militaries that serve no apparent purpose other than to demonize an enemy in their crosshairs.
To raise the stakes, Starr dubiously writes "at the same time, Iran has covertly shipped missiles into Syria, according to the US." But there's nothing "covert" about Iran's military support of the Syrian government, including providing the Syrian army with missiles. It's out in the open and has been for several years. The only plausible reason Starr would add the airport-thriller qualifier "covert" to a routine, years-old policy is to paint the weapons shipment as escalation on the part of Iran--as she did when reporting the "news" of said shipments in a similar DoD/IDF press release last month (CNN,4/25/18).
Barbara Starr has a long, storied career of acting--in effect if not in name--as a Department of Defense spokesperson (FAIR.org, 4/5/10, 6/27/13, 5/13/13, 8/22/14, 10/14/16). It would both streamline the process and give readers more clarity if she wrote up Defense Department spin for the US government itself, rather than doing so for Time Warner under the auspices of reporting news.
Messages to CNN can be sent to here (or via Twitter@CNN). Please remember that respectful communication is the most effective.
Messages to CNN can be sent to here (or via Twitter@CNN). Please remember that respectful communication is the most effective.
Keep reading...Show less
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
© 2023 Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)
Adam Johnson
Adam Johnson is a New York-based journalist, a contributing analyst for FAIR.org, and co-host of the Citations Needed podcast.
Why doesn't CNN Defense Department reporter Barbara Starr just leave CNN and instead work directly for the Trump DoD?
On Tuesday, hours after President Donald Trump pulled out of the Iran deal (formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action), Starr (5/8/18) rushed to publish an anonymously sourced and transparently propagandistic press release for the Trump administration and Pentagon. Wouldn't it be easier if Starr just skipped the middleman and just worked for the DoD?
In her 513-word piece, "US Officials Growing Increasingly Concerned Iran Could Attack Israel," Starr mindlessly repeated "concerns" by unnamed US Department of Defense and Israeli Defense Force officials that Iran might directly attack Israel and/or Israeli positions in occupied Syria--something that has never happened in recorded history:
There are increasing concerns Iran is on the cusp of an attack against Israel, several US military officials told CNN.
Intelligence is not clear on when an attack could come and what form it would take, they said, with one official noting that "if there is an attack, it might not be immediately clear it's Iran."
The US is watching very closely to see if Iranian-backed actions could come from inside Syria or Lebanon, or even from inside Iran itself, though that would be considered a major military escalation.
"Increasing concerns" by whom? Increased relative to what? Who are these "military officials"? If they have no clue "what form" such attacks would take or when they would be carried out, what is the public supposed to do with this information? (Don't be confused it it's not "immediately clear it's Iran"--trust us, it will be!) Moreover, why are these vague, temporally uncertain "concerns" being reported at all?
The answer is clear: The Pentagon is using CNN to stoke panic about Iran by accusing them of pre-crime without a shred of evidence, neutral analysis or third-party validation. It's a Defense Department press release in its purest form, designed solely to scare the reader and justify Trump's escalation of hostilities toward Iran.
Was Starr presented with evidence of troop movements? Keyhole satellite photos of repositioned missile systems? Statements from Iran? Leaks from Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps that would justify this being news? No. The report is 100 percent curated leaks by the US and Israeli militaries that serve no apparent purpose other than to demonize an enemy in their crosshairs.
To raise the stakes, Starr dubiously writes "at the same time, Iran has covertly shipped missiles into Syria, according to the US." But there's nothing "covert" about Iran's military support of the Syrian government, including providing the Syrian army with missiles. It's out in the open and has been for several years. The only plausible reason Starr would add the airport-thriller qualifier "covert" to a routine, years-old policy is to paint the weapons shipment as escalation on the part of Iran--as she did when reporting the "news" of said shipments in a similar DoD/IDF press release last month (CNN,4/25/18).
Barbara Starr has a long, storied career of acting--in effect if not in name--as a Department of Defense spokesperson (FAIR.org, 4/5/10, 6/27/13, 5/13/13, 8/22/14, 10/14/16). It would both streamline the process and give readers more clarity if she wrote up Defense Department spin for the US government itself, rather than doing so for Time Warner under the auspices of reporting news.
Messages to CNN can be sent to here (or via Twitter@CNN). Please remember that respectful communication is the most effective.
Keep reading...Show less
Adam Johnson
Adam Johnson is a New York-based journalist, a contributing analyst for FAIR.org, and co-host of the Citations Needed podcast.
Why doesn't CNN Defense Department reporter Barbara Starr just leave CNN and instead work directly for the Trump DoD?
On Tuesday, hours after President Donald Trump pulled out of the Iran deal (formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action), Starr (5/8/18) rushed to publish an anonymously sourced and transparently propagandistic press release for the Trump administration and Pentagon. Wouldn't it be easier if Starr just skipped the middleman and just worked for the DoD?
In her 513-word piece, "US Officials Growing Increasingly Concerned Iran Could Attack Israel," Starr mindlessly repeated "concerns" by unnamed US Department of Defense and Israeli Defense Force officials that Iran might directly attack Israel and/or Israeli positions in occupied Syria--something that has never happened in recorded history:
There are increasing concerns Iran is on the cusp of an attack against Israel, several US military officials told CNN.
Intelligence is not clear on when an attack could come and what form it would take, they said, with one official noting that "if there is an attack, it might not be immediately clear it's Iran."
The US is watching very closely to see if Iranian-backed actions could come from inside Syria or Lebanon, or even from inside Iran itself, though that would be considered a major military escalation.
"Increasing concerns" by whom? Increased relative to what? Who are these "military officials"? If they have no clue "what form" such attacks would take or when they would be carried out, what is the public supposed to do with this information? (Don't be confused it it's not "immediately clear it's Iran"--trust us, it will be!) Moreover, why are these vague, temporally uncertain "concerns" being reported at all?
The answer is clear: The Pentagon is using CNN to stoke panic about Iran by accusing them of pre-crime without a shred of evidence, neutral analysis or third-party validation. It's a Defense Department press release in its purest form, designed solely to scare the reader and justify Trump's escalation of hostilities toward Iran.
Was Starr presented with evidence of troop movements? Keyhole satellite photos of repositioned missile systems? Statements from Iran? Leaks from Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps that would justify this being news? No. The report is 100 percent curated leaks by the US and Israeli militaries that serve no apparent purpose other than to demonize an enemy in their crosshairs.
To raise the stakes, Starr dubiously writes "at the same time, Iran has covertly shipped missiles into Syria, according to the US." But there's nothing "covert" about Iran's military support of the Syrian government, including providing the Syrian army with missiles. It's out in the open and has been for several years. The only plausible reason Starr would add the airport-thriller qualifier "covert" to a routine, years-old policy is to paint the weapons shipment as escalation on the part of Iran--as she did when reporting the "news" of said shipments in a similar DoD/IDF press release last month (CNN,4/25/18).
Barbara Starr has a long, storied career of acting--in effect if not in name--as a Department of Defense spokesperson (FAIR.org, 4/5/10, 6/27/13, 5/13/13, 8/22/14, 10/14/16). It would both streamline the process and give readers more clarity if she wrote up Defense Department spin for the US government itself, rather than doing so for Time Warner under the auspices of reporting news.
Messages to CNN can be sent to here (or via Twitter@CNN). Please remember that respectful communication is the most effective.
Keep reading...Show less
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
LATEST NEWS
'National Disgrace': Sanders and Senate Dems Call Out Trump Attack on Education Dept
"Our nation's public schools, colleges, and universities are preparing the next generation of America's leaders—we must take steps to strengthen education in this country, not take a wrecking ball to the agency that exists to do so."
Mar 17, 2025
In a letter to U.S. Education Secretary Linda McMahon on Monday, Sen. Bernie Sanders led more than three dozen of his Democratic colleagues in dismissing the Trump administration's "false claims of financial savings" from slashing more than 1,000 jobs at the Education Department, emphasizing that the wealthy people leading federal policy "will not be harmed by these egregious attacks" on public schools.
"Wealthy families sending their children to elite, private schools will still be able to get a quality education even if every public school disappears in this country," reads the letter spearheaded by Sanders (I-Vt.), the ranking member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee. "But for working-class families, high-quality public education is an opportunity they rely on for their children to have a path to do well in life."
The decision by President Donald Trump and his unelected billionaire ally, Elon Musk of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency( DOGE), to slash the Department of Education (DOE) workforce by 50%—or 1,300 people—and take steps to illegally close the agency has already had an impact on students, noted the senators, pointing to a glitch in the Free Application for Federal Financial Aid (FAFSA) that preventing families from accessing the applications "not even 24 hours after the staff reductions were announced."
"The staff normally responsible for fixing those errors had reportedly been cut," reads the letter, which was also signed by lawmakers including Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).
"Without the Department of Education, there is no guarantee that states would uphold students' civil and educational rights."
The letter was sent as The Associated Press reported that cuts within the DOE's Office of Civil Rights have placed new barriers in front of families with children who have disabilities. Families who can't afford to take legal action against schools or districts that are not providing accommodations or services for students with disabilities have long been able to rely on on the office to open an investigation into their cases, but the AP reported that "more than 20,000 pending cases—including those related to kids with disabilities, historically the largest share of the office's work—largely sat idle for weeks after Trump took office."
"A freeze on processing the cases was lifted early this month, but advocates question whether the department can make progress on them with a smaller staff," reported the outlet.
The reduction in force has been compounded by the fact that the remaining staff has been directed to prioritize antisemitism cases, as the Trump administration places significant attention on allegations that pro-Palestinian organizers, particularly on college campuses, have endangered Jewish students by speaking out in favor of Palestinian rights and against Israel's U.S.-backed assault on Gaza and the West Bank.
An analysis of more than 550 campus protests found that 97% of the demonstrations last year remained non-violent, contrary to repeated claims by both Republican and Democratic lawmakers that they placed Jewish students in danger. Meanwhile, the Trump administration, pro-Israel advocates, and Republicans have dismissed outcry over Musk's display of a Nazi salute at an inaugural event in January.
"Special needs kids [are] now suffering because of a manufactured hysteria aimed [at] silencing dissent against genocide," said writer and political analyst Yousef Munayyer. "Utter depravity."
In their letter, Sanders and his Democratic colleagues noted that "several regional offices responsible for investigating potential violations of students' civil rights in local schools" have also been shuttered, expressing alarm that many cases will likely "go uninvestigated and that students will be left in unsafe learning environments as a result."
They noted that at a time of "massive income and wealth inequality, when 60% of people live paycheck to paycheck," the federal government's defunding of public education "would result in either higher property taxes or decreased funding for public schools, including in rural areas."
"It is a national disgrace that the Trump administration is attempting to illegally abolish the Department of Education and thus, undermine a high-quality education for our students," wrote the lawmakers. "These reductions will have devastating impacts on our nation's students and we are deeply concerned that without staff, the department will be unable to fulfill critical functions, such as ensuring students can access federal financial aid, upholding students' civil rights, and guaranteeing that federal funding reaches communities promptly and is well-spent."
Trump, they noted, has expressed a desire "to return education back to the states" despite the fact that state governments and local school boards already make education policy, with just 11% of public education funding coming from the DOE.
However, "the Department of Education has a necessary and irreplaceable responsibility to implement federal laws that ensure equal opportunity for all children in this country," they wrote. "These laws guarantee fundamental protections, such as ensuring that children with disabilities receive a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment, that students from low-income backgrounds and students of color will not be disproportionately taught by less experienced and qualified teachers, and that parents will receive information about their child's academic achievement."
"Without the Department of Education, there is no guarantee that states would uphold students' civil and educational rights," said the lawmakers. "We will not stand by as you attempt to turn back the clock on education in this country through gutting the Department of Education. Our nation's public schools, colleges, and universities are preparing the next generation of America's leaders—we must take steps to strengthen education in this country, not take a wrecking ball to the agency that exists to do so."
Keep Reading
Show Less
Democrats Demand Hearing on 'Backroom Agreement' Between DOGE and DeJoy
"Any potential deal that would give Elon Musk and his DOGE associates unilateral authority to manipulate the most critical, expansive national mail network on the planet is deeply troubling," wrote a group of House Democrats.
Mar 17, 2025
A group of House Democrats is demanding that the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform conduct a public hearing on the Trump administration and the so-called Department of Government Efficiency's plans for the U.S. Postal Service, in light of recent reporting that U.S. Postmaster General Louis DeJoy says he signed an agreement with DOGE to assist the nation's mail service "in identifying and achieving further efficiencies."
The news follows Washington Post coverage from February, when the outlet reported that U.S. President Donald Trump is considering putting the Postal Service under the control of the Commerce Department. In December, the Post also reported that Trump was eyeing privatizing the Postal Service. Elon Musk, a GOP megadonor who is playing a core role in Trump's efforts to slash federal spending and personnel, has also said the Postal Service should be privatized.
Postal workers unions are fiercely opposed to any effort to privatize the Postal Service.
"The Trump administration... is now subjecting the USPS, America's most trusted federal institution, to the chainsaw approach of Elon Musk and DOGE. This broad assault on the independence of the USPS demands congressional oversight, especially from the committee with jurisdiction over the USPS," according to the letter, which was signed by 20 House Democrats.
In a March 13 letter to congressional leaders, U.S. Postmaster General Louis DeJoy told Congress he signed an agreement with representatives from Elon Musk's DOGE and the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) so that DOGE could help the U.S. Postal Service, which has experienced billions in financial losses in recent years, work to address "big problems."
The Postal Service plans to cut 10,000 employees in the next 30 days through a voluntary early retirement program, according to DeJoy's letter.
DeJoy cited challenges facing the Postal Service, such as "mismanagement of our self-funded retirement assets," "burdensome regulatory requirements restricting normal business practice," and "unfunded mandates imposed on us by legislation."
The letter demanding a public hearing, which was addressed to House Oversight Committee Chair Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), was spearheaded by Oversight Committee Ranking Member Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.), and Rep. Kweisi Mfume (D-Md.)
"This backroom agreement between the billionaire-led DOGE and Postmaster DeJoy sets off alarm bells about this administration's plans for the Postal Service's role as a cornerstone public institution," according to the letter. "The Postal Service facilitates the delivery of more than 115 billion pieces of mail each year, a significant portion of which is delivered to rural, low-income, and hard-to-reach areas that would not otherwise receive service if not for the universal service obligation, which has received bipartisan support in Congress and is integral to the mission of Postal Service."
"We agree that there are steps Congress could take to strengthen the financial sustainability of the Postal Service, but any potential deal that would give Elon Musk and his DOGE associates unilateral authority to manipulate the most critical, expansive national mail network on the planet is deeply troubling," they continued.
The group is urging that the committee hold a hearing and wrote that they have prepared a letter to send to DeJoy asking that he furnish any signed agreements he made with the GSA and DOGE. The group is urging that Comer also sign on to that letter.
Keep Reading
Show Less
Influenced by the Architects of Project 2025, Utah Poised to Phase Out Automatic By-Mail Voting
"We already have a good voting system and it's not broken, so it doesn't need to be fixed," said the Utah advocacy director for Mormon Women for Ethical Government.
Mar 17, 2025
Utah has the unusual distinction of being a deep-red state where voters enjoy automatic by-mail voting, but that will likely change in the next few years, in part thanks to the influence of conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation.
The state is poised to codify legislation that would get rid of the practice of automatically mailing ballots to all active, registered voters. The GOP-controlled legislature recently passed a bill that will phase out the state's current automatic by-mail voting system by 2029 and also requires voters to list the last four digits of their state identification number with their return envelope beginning in 2026, according to the Utah News Dispatch. Those who opt in to voting by mail and include their state ID information will still be able to vote by mail.
The bill is a scaled back version of an earlier proposal that would have "drastically restricted voting by mail and required most Utahns to return their ballots in person at either a polling place or a drop box manned by at least two poll workers while showing their government-issued ID," per the Utah News Dispatch.
Utah Republican Gov. Spencer Cox is expected to sign the legislation, The Washington Post reported Monday.
"We already have a good voting system and it's not broken, so it doesn't need to be fixed," Melarie Wheat, the Utah advocacy director for Mormon Women for Ethical Government, told the Post. "There are going to be people who are expecting their vote-by-mail ballot and are not going to get it, who are going to say, 'Well, it's just not worth it and I don't have time to go in at this point and vote in person.'"
Chris Diaz, director of legislative tracking for the Voting Rights Lab, told the outlet that "there's never been a state that did this, in taking that step backwards after adopting universal mail voting."
In 2012, Utah began allowing counties to run elections entirely by mail if they chose to do so, according to the outlet Bolts. Eventually, by 2018, about 90% of Utah voters cast ballots by mail, and in 2020 the state changed the default voting method for registered voters to vote by mail by automatically mailing a ballot to them (while still providing in-person voting options).
Researchers at Brigham Young University found that the shift to vote by mail led to a dramatic increase in voter participation in municipal elections.
Trump has repeatedly claimed that mail-in voting leads to fraud—despite having used the system himself in Florida. Research has found that incidences of fraud with mail-in ballots are exceedingly rare—and a recent legislative audit of Utah's election system failed to find "significant fraud."
State Rep. Jefferson Burton (R-64), the lawmaker who championed the bill, conceded to Bolts that the audit had not found widespread fraud in the state and that vote-by-mail has had a positive impact on turnout.
According to the outlet, when speaking about the bill Burton cited a scorecard maintained by the Heritage Foundation, the right-wing think tank that published the far-right policy blueprint Project 2025. The Election Integrity Scorecard gives Utah a relatively poor ranking—53 out of 100. Utah gets poor marks for its "absentee ballot management" and for currently not requiring a photo ID or a unique identifier when participating in vote by mail, among other criteria.
"As [the] Utah House GOP championed a bill to effectively end vote by mail, I kept hearing one organization repeatedly cited: The Heritage Foundation," wrote Emily Anderson Stern, a reporter for The Salt Lake Tribune, wrote on Bluesky.
"While pushing for an end to Utah's universal vote-by-mail election system, state lawmakers—including House Speaker Mike Schultz—have repeatedly relied on the Heritage Foundation's policy perspectives, referencing them in public debate, interviews, promotional materials, and social media posts," according to reporting published by Anderson Stern last week.
Keep Reading
Show Less
Most Popular
We cover the issues the corporate media never will.
Please support our journalism.