SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
United States senators are taking turns reading the FBI's updated background investigation into Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. But the report is unaccountably incomplete. The FBI interviewed only one of Kavanaugh's three accusers. And investigators failed to interview key witnesses who could have helped corroborate allegations of sexual misconduct by Kavanaugh, or exposed lies he appears to have told the Senate while under oath. Most striking, the FBI did not interview Kavanaugh, himself.
Nor did the FBI interview Kavanaugh's first accuser, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, nor any of the people Ford confided in about her alleged assault, including her husband and nearly half a dozen friends. Investigators also did not speak to the former FBI agent who conducted the polygraph test that Ford passed. In a scathing letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray, Ford's lawyers write: "The 'investigation' conducted over the past five days is a stain on the process, on the FBI, and on our American ideal of justice."
The FBI did interview Deborah Ramirez, the Yale classmate who accuses Kavanaugh of drunkenly exposing himself to her. But investigators did not interview Yale contemporaries who could corroborate Ramirez's recollection, or call into question other under-oath testimony by Kavanaugh.
Kavanaugh has repeatedly testified that his alleged indecent exposure to Ramirez could not have happened because it would have been "the talk of campus." The New Yorker quotes Yale classmate Kenneth Appold, now a professor at Princeton's theological seminary, saying it was indeed talked about. Appold told reporters Jane Mayer and Ronan Farrow that he heard about the incident within days, saying he's "100 percent certain" he was told Kavanaugh exposed himself to Ramirez: "I can corroborate Debbie's account," Appold said. "I believe her because it matches the same story I heard thirty-five years ago, although the two of us have never talked." Appold reportedly offered to speak to the FBI but never heard back.
Kavanaugh's honesty under oath has been called into question by another former Yale classmate, the nominee's old roommate James Roche, whom the FBI did not interview. Writing at Slate, Roche insists Kavanaugh lied to the senate about his drinking habits and about his use of the terms "Devil's Triangle" and "boof," both of which appear on Kavanaugh's high school yearbook page.
"I do not know if Brett attacked Christine Blasey Ford in high school or if he sexually humiliated Debbie in front of a group of people she thought were her friends," Roche writes. "But I can say that he lied under oath. He claimed that he occasionally drank too much but never enough to forget details of the night before, never enough to 'black out.' He did, regularly. He said that 'boofing' was farting and the 'Devil's Triangle' was a drinking game. 'Boofing' and 'Devil's Triangle' are sexual references. I know this because I heard Brett and his friends using these terms on multiple occasions."
A high school classmate of Kavanaugh also approached the FBI with evidence that Kavanaugh lied under oath. He was not interviewed, but submitted an affidavit that he provided anonymously to the New Yorker. Kavanaugh testified that he called himself a "Renate Alumnius" [sic] in his yearbook as a sign of camaraderie and affection for a girl in his social circle, not as a mark of real or imagined sexual conquest.
Kavanaugh's former Georgetown Prep classmate attests that this is a lie: "One name that routinely was a subject of conversation when the football players were bragging about sexual conquests was a person named Renate, pronounced, REE NATE," the classmate wrote in his affidavit. "In particular, I recall that Brett Kavanaugh had made up a rhyme using the REE NATE pronunciation of Renate's name. I specifically recall one day walking down a hall with Brett Kavanaugh on a way to class, and hearing Brett Kavanaugh sing this rhyme. While I cannot recall the exact words he sang, the general theme was that Renate could be used for sex as a last resort. What I recall from the rhyme that I heard Brett Kavanaugh sing is: 'REE NATE, REE NATE, if you want a date, can't get one until late, and you wanna get laid, you can make it with REE NATE.'"
This recollection is consistent with a snippet of verse that made it into the 1983 Georgetown Prep yearbook:
The FBI also did not interview Julie Swetnick, who alleges Kavanaugh participated in horrific sexual misbehavior. (Kavanaugh has vigorously denied the allegations of Swetnick, Ramirez and Ford.) Swetnick is represented by lawyer Michael Avenatti, who tweeted out a sworn statement from another contemporary who claims to have witnessed Kavanaugh spiking punch at house parties. Avenatti calls the FBI investigation a "scam."
\u201cWe still have yet to hear anything from the FBI despite a new witness coming forward & submitting a declaration last night. We now have multiple witnesses that support the allegations and they are all prepared to be interviewed by the FBI. Trump\u2019s \u201cinvestigation\u201d is a scam.\u201d— Michael Avenatti (@Michael Avenatti) 1538565599
The incompleteness of the investigation does not appear to trouble key Republican senators. Susan Collins of Maine told reporters: "It appears to be a very thorough investigation." But the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), strongly disagrees: "The most notable part of this report is what's not in it," she told reporters on Thursday. "The FBI did not interview Brett Kavanaugh nor did the FBI interview Blasey Ford. It looks to be the product of an incomplete investigation." While senate Democrats agreed that the investigation should be limited in scope, Feinstein said, "We did not agree that [the Trump White House] should tie the FBI's hands."
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
United States senators are taking turns reading the FBI's updated background investigation into Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. But the report is unaccountably incomplete. The FBI interviewed only one of Kavanaugh's three accusers. And investigators failed to interview key witnesses who could have helped corroborate allegations of sexual misconduct by Kavanaugh, or exposed lies he appears to have told the Senate while under oath. Most striking, the FBI did not interview Kavanaugh, himself.
Nor did the FBI interview Kavanaugh's first accuser, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, nor any of the people Ford confided in about her alleged assault, including her husband and nearly half a dozen friends. Investigators also did not speak to the former FBI agent who conducted the polygraph test that Ford passed. In a scathing letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray, Ford's lawyers write: "The 'investigation' conducted over the past five days is a stain on the process, on the FBI, and on our American ideal of justice."
The FBI did interview Deborah Ramirez, the Yale classmate who accuses Kavanaugh of drunkenly exposing himself to her. But investigators did not interview Yale contemporaries who could corroborate Ramirez's recollection, or call into question other under-oath testimony by Kavanaugh.
Kavanaugh has repeatedly testified that his alleged indecent exposure to Ramirez could not have happened because it would have been "the talk of campus." The New Yorker quotes Yale classmate Kenneth Appold, now a professor at Princeton's theological seminary, saying it was indeed talked about. Appold told reporters Jane Mayer and Ronan Farrow that he heard about the incident within days, saying he's "100 percent certain" he was told Kavanaugh exposed himself to Ramirez: "I can corroborate Debbie's account," Appold said. "I believe her because it matches the same story I heard thirty-five years ago, although the two of us have never talked." Appold reportedly offered to speak to the FBI but never heard back.
Kavanaugh's honesty under oath has been called into question by another former Yale classmate, the nominee's old roommate James Roche, whom the FBI did not interview. Writing at Slate, Roche insists Kavanaugh lied to the senate about his drinking habits and about his use of the terms "Devil's Triangle" and "boof," both of which appear on Kavanaugh's high school yearbook page.
"I do not know if Brett attacked Christine Blasey Ford in high school or if he sexually humiliated Debbie in front of a group of people she thought were her friends," Roche writes. "But I can say that he lied under oath. He claimed that he occasionally drank too much but never enough to forget details of the night before, never enough to 'black out.' He did, regularly. He said that 'boofing' was farting and the 'Devil's Triangle' was a drinking game. 'Boofing' and 'Devil's Triangle' are sexual references. I know this because I heard Brett and his friends using these terms on multiple occasions."
A high school classmate of Kavanaugh also approached the FBI with evidence that Kavanaugh lied under oath. He was not interviewed, but submitted an affidavit that he provided anonymously to the New Yorker. Kavanaugh testified that he called himself a "Renate Alumnius" [sic] in his yearbook as a sign of camaraderie and affection for a girl in his social circle, not as a mark of real or imagined sexual conquest.
Kavanaugh's former Georgetown Prep classmate attests that this is a lie: "One name that routinely was a subject of conversation when the football players were bragging about sexual conquests was a person named Renate, pronounced, REE NATE," the classmate wrote in his affidavit. "In particular, I recall that Brett Kavanaugh had made up a rhyme using the REE NATE pronunciation of Renate's name. I specifically recall one day walking down a hall with Brett Kavanaugh on a way to class, and hearing Brett Kavanaugh sing this rhyme. While I cannot recall the exact words he sang, the general theme was that Renate could be used for sex as a last resort. What I recall from the rhyme that I heard Brett Kavanaugh sing is: 'REE NATE, REE NATE, if you want a date, can't get one until late, and you wanna get laid, you can make it with REE NATE.'"
This recollection is consistent with a snippet of verse that made it into the 1983 Georgetown Prep yearbook:
The FBI also did not interview Julie Swetnick, who alleges Kavanaugh participated in horrific sexual misbehavior. (Kavanaugh has vigorously denied the allegations of Swetnick, Ramirez and Ford.) Swetnick is represented by lawyer Michael Avenatti, who tweeted out a sworn statement from another contemporary who claims to have witnessed Kavanaugh spiking punch at house parties. Avenatti calls the FBI investigation a "scam."
\u201cWe still have yet to hear anything from the FBI despite a new witness coming forward & submitting a declaration last night. We now have multiple witnesses that support the allegations and they are all prepared to be interviewed by the FBI. Trump\u2019s \u201cinvestigation\u201d is a scam.\u201d— Michael Avenatti (@Michael Avenatti) 1538565599
The incompleteness of the investigation does not appear to trouble key Republican senators. Susan Collins of Maine told reporters: "It appears to be a very thorough investigation." But the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), strongly disagrees: "The most notable part of this report is what's not in it," she told reporters on Thursday. "The FBI did not interview Brett Kavanaugh nor did the FBI interview Blasey Ford. It looks to be the product of an incomplete investigation." While senate Democrats agreed that the investigation should be limited in scope, Feinstein said, "We did not agree that [the Trump White House] should tie the FBI's hands."
United States senators are taking turns reading the FBI's updated background investigation into Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. But the report is unaccountably incomplete. The FBI interviewed only one of Kavanaugh's three accusers. And investigators failed to interview key witnesses who could have helped corroborate allegations of sexual misconduct by Kavanaugh, or exposed lies he appears to have told the Senate while under oath. Most striking, the FBI did not interview Kavanaugh, himself.
Nor did the FBI interview Kavanaugh's first accuser, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, nor any of the people Ford confided in about her alleged assault, including her husband and nearly half a dozen friends. Investigators also did not speak to the former FBI agent who conducted the polygraph test that Ford passed. In a scathing letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray, Ford's lawyers write: "The 'investigation' conducted over the past five days is a stain on the process, on the FBI, and on our American ideal of justice."
The FBI did interview Deborah Ramirez, the Yale classmate who accuses Kavanaugh of drunkenly exposing himself to her. But investigators did not interview Yale contemporaries who could corroborate Ramirez's recollection, or call into question other under-oath testimony by Kavanaugh.
Kavanaugh has repeatedly testified that his alleged indecent exposure to Ramirez could not have happened because it would have been "the talk of campus." The New Yorker quotes Yale classmate Kenneth Appold, now a professor at Princeton's theological seminary, saying it was indeed talked about. Appold told reporters Jane Mayer and Ronan Farrow that he heard about the incident within days, saying he's "100 percent certain" he was told Kavanaugh exposed himself to Ramirez: "I can corroborate Debbie's account," Appold said. "I believe her because it matches the same story I heard thirty-five years ago, although the two of us have never talked." Appold reportedly offered to speak to the FBI but never heard back.
Kavanaugh's honesty under oath has been called into question by another former Yale classmate, the nominee's old roommate James Roche, whom the FBI did not interview. Writing at Slate, Roche insists Kavanaugh lied to the senate about his drinking habits and about his use of the terms "Devil's Triangle" and "boof," both of which appear on Kavanaugh's high school yearbook page.
"I do not know if Brett attacked Christine Blasey Ford in high school or if he sexually humiliated Debbie in front of a group of people she thought were her friends," Roche writes. "But I can say that he lied under oath. He claimed that he occasionally drank too much but never enough to forget details of the night before, never enough to 'black out.' He did, regularly. He said that 'boofing' was farting and the 'Devil's Triangle' was a drinking game. 'Boofing' and 'Devil's Triangle' are sexual references. I know this because I heard Brett and his friends using these terms on multiple occasions."
A high school classmate of Kavanaugh also approached the FBI with evidence that Kavanaugh lied under oath. He was not interviewed, but submitted an affidavit that he provided anonymously to the New Yorker. Kavanaugh testified that he called himself a "Renate Alumnius" [sic] in his yearbook as a sign of camaraderie and affection for a girl in his social circle, not as a mark of real or imagined sexual conquest.
Kavanaugh's former Georgetown Prep classmate attests that this is a lie: "One name that routinely was a subject of conversation when the football players were bragging about sexual conquests was a person named Renate, pronounced, REE NATE," the classmate wrote in his affidavit. "In particular, I recall that Brett Kavanaugh had made up a rhyme using the REE NATE pronunciation of Renate's name. I specifically recall one day walking down a hall with Brett Kavanaugh on a way to class, and hearing Brett Kavanaugh sing this rhyme. While I cannot recall the exact words he sang, the general theme was that Renate could be used for sex as a last resort. What I recall from the rhyme that I heard Brett Kavanaugh sing is: 'REE NATE, REE NATE, if you want a date, can't get one until late, and you wanna get laid, you can make it with REE NATE.'"
This recollection is consistent with a snippet of verse that made it into the 1983 Georgetown Prep yearbook:
The FBI also did not interview Julie Swetnick, who alleges Kavanaugh participated in horrific sexual misbehavior. (Kavanaugh has vigorously denied the allegations of Swetnick, Ramirez and Ford.) Swetnick is represented by lawyer Michael Avenatti, who tweeted out a sworn statement from another contemporary who claims to have witnessed Kavanaugh spiking punch at house parties. Avenatti calls the FBI investigation a "scam."
\u201cWe still have yet to hear anything from the FBI despite a new witness coming forward & submitting a declaration last night. We now have multiple witnesses that support the allegations and they are all prepared to be interviewed by the FBI. Trump\u2019s \u201cinvestigation\u201d is a scam.\u201d— Michael Avenatti (@Michael Avenatti) 1538565599
The incompleteness of the investigation does not appear to trouble key Republican senators. Susan Collins of Maine told reporters: "It appears to be a very thorough investigation." But the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), strongly disagrees: "The most notable part of this report is what's not in it," she told reporters on Thursday. "The FBI did not interview Brett Kavanaugh nor did the FBI interview Blasey Ford. It looks to be the product of an incomplete investigation." While senate Democrats agreed that the investigation should be limited in scope, Feinstein said, "We did not agree that [the Trump White House] should tie the FBI's hands."
"Thank you to the hundreds of thousands of Americans across the country who are standing up and speaking out for our voting rights, fundamental freedoms, and essential services like Social Security and Medicare."
In communities large and small across the United States on Saturday, hundreds of thousands of people collectively took to the streets to make their opposition to President Donald Trump heard.
The people who took part in the organized protests ranged from very young children to the elderly and their message was scrawled on signs of all sizes and colors—many of them angry, some of them funny, but all in line with the "Hands Off" message that brought them together.
"Thank you to the hundreds of thousands of Americans across the country who are standing up and speaking out for our voting rights, fundamental freedoms, and essential services like Social Security and Medicare," said the group Stand Up America as word of the turnout poured in from across the country.
A relatively small, but representative sample of photographs from various demonstrations that took place follows.
Demonstrators gather on Boston Common, cheering and chanting slogans, during the nationwide "Hands Off!" protest against US President Donald Trump and his advisor, Tesla CEO Elon Musk, in Boston, Massachusetts on April 5, 2025. (Photo by Joseph Prezioso / AFP)
"Everyone involved in this crime against humanity, and everyone who covered it up, would face prosecution in a world that had any shred of dignity left."
A video presented to officials at the United Nations on Friday and first made public Saturday by the New York Times provides more evidence that the recent massacre of Palestinian medics in Gaza did not happen the way Israeli government claimed—the latest in a long line of deception when it comes to violence against civilians that have led to repeated accusations of war crimes.
The video, according to the Palestine Red Crescent Society (PRCS), was found on the phone of a paramedic found in a mass grave with a bullet in his head after being killed, along with seven other medics, by Israeli forces on March 23. The eight medics, buried in the shallow grave with the bodies riddled with bullets, were: Mustafa Khafaja, Ezz El-Din Shaat, Saleh Muammar, Refaat Radwan, Muhammad Bahloul, Ashraf Abu Libda, Muhammad Al-Hila, and Raed Al-Sharif. The video reportedly belonged to Radwan. A ninth medic, identified as Asaad Al-Nasasra, who was at the scene of the massacre, which took place near the southern city of Rafah, is still missing.
The PRCS said it presented the video—which refutes the explanation of the killings offered by Israeli officials—to members of the UN Security Council on Friday.
"They were killed in their uniforms. Driving their clearly marked vehicles. Wearing their gloves. On their way to save lives," Jonathan Whittall, head of the UN's humanitarian affairs office in Palestine, said last week after the bodies were discovered. Some of the victims, according to Gaza officials, were found with handcuffs still on them and appeared to have been shot in the head, execution-style.
The Israeli military initially said its soldiers "did not randomly attack" any ambulances, but rather claimed they fired on "terrorists" who approached them in "suspicious vehicles." Lt. Col. Nadav Shoshani, an IDF spokesperson, said the vehicles that the soldiers opened fire on were driving with their lights off and did not have clearance to be in the area. The video evidence directly contradicts the IDF's version of events.
As the Times reports:
The Times obtained the video from a senior diplomat at the United Nations who asked not to be identified to be able to share sensitive information.
The Times verified the location and timing of the video, which was taken in the southern city of Rafah early on March 23. Filmed from what appears to be the front interior of a moving vehicle, it shows a convoy of ambulances and a fire truck, clearly marked, with headlights and flashing lights turned on, driving south on a road to the north of Rafah in the early morning. The first rays of sun can be seen, and birds are chirping.
In an interview with Drop Site News published Friday, the only known paramedic to survive the attack, Munther Abed, explained that he and his colleagues "were directly and deliberately shot at" by the IDF. "The car is clearly marked with 'Palestinian Red Crescent Society 101.' The car's number was clear and the crews' uniform was clear, so why were we directly shot at? That is the question."
The video's release sparked fresh outrage and demands for accountability on Saturday.
"The IDF denied access to the site for days; they sent in diggers to cover up the massacre and intentionally lied about it," said podcast producer Hamza M. Syed in reaction to the new revelations. "The entire leadership of the Israeli army is implicated in this unconscionable war crime. And they must be prosecuted."
"Everyone involved in this crime against humanity, and everyone who covered it up, would face prosecution in a world that had any shred of dignity left," said journalist Ryan Grim of DropSite News.
"They're dismantling our country. They're looting our government. And they think we'll just watch."
In communities across the United States and also overseas, coordinated "Hands Off" protests are taking place far and wide Saturday in the largest public rebuke yet to President Donald Trump and top henchman Elon Musk's assault on the workings of the federal government and their program of economic sabotage that is sacrificing the needs of working families to authoritarianism and the greed of right-wing oligarchs.
Indivisible, one of the key organizing groups behind the day's protests, said millions participated in more than 1,300 individual rallies as they demanded "an end to Trump's authoritarian power grab" and condemning all those aiding and abetting it.
"We expected hundreds of thousands. But at virtually every single event, the crowds eclipsed our estimates," the group said in a statement Saturday evening.
"Hands off our healthcare, hands off our civil rights, hands off our schools, our freedoms, and our democracy."
"This is the largest day of protest since Trump retook office," the group added. "And in many small towns and cities, activists are reporting the biggest protests their communities have ever seen as everyday people send a clear, unmistakable message to Trump and Musk: Hands off our healthcare, hands off our civil rights, hands off our schools, our freedoms, and our democracy."
According to the organizers' call to action:
They're dismantling our country. They’re looting our government. And they think we'll just watch.
On Saturday, April 5th, we rise up with one demand: Hands Off!
This is a nationwide mobilization to stop the most brazen power grab in modern history. Trump, Musk, and their billionaire cronies are orchestrating an all-out assault on our government, our economy, and our basic rights—enabled by Congress every step of the way. They want to strip America for parts—shuttering Social Security offices, firing essential workers, eliminating consumer protections, and gutting Medicaid—all to bankroll their billionaire tax scam.
They're handing over our tax dollars, our public services, and our democracy to the ultra-rich. If we don't fight now, there won’t be anything left to save.
The more than 1,300 "Hands Off!" demonstrations—organized by a large coalition of unions, progressive advocacy groups, and pro-democracy watchdogs—first kicked off Saturday in Europe, followed by East Coast communities in the U.S., and continued throughout the day at various times, depending on location. See here for a list of scheduled "Hands Off" events.
"The United States has a president, not a king," said the progressive advocacy group People's Action, one of the group's involved in the actions, in an email to supporters Saturday morning just as protest events kicked off in hundreds of cities and communities. "Donald Trump has, by every measure, been working to make himself a king. He has become unanswerable to the courts, Congress, and the American people."
In its Saturday evening statement, Indivisible said the actions far exceeded their expectations and should be seen as a turning point in the battle to stop Trump and his minions:
The Trump administration has spent its first 75 days in office trying to overwhelm us, to make us feel powerless, so that we will fall in line, accept the ransacking of our government, the raiding of our social safety net, and the dismantling of our democracy.
And too often, the response from our leaders and those in positions to resist has been abject cowardice. Compliance. Obeying in advance.
But not today. Today we've demonstrated a different path forward. We've modeled the courage and action that we want to see from our leaders, and showed all those who've been standing on the sidelines who share our values that they are not alone.
Citing the Republican president's thirst for "power and greed," People's Action earlier explained why organized pressure must be built and sustained against the administration, especially at the conclusion of a week in which the global economy was spun into disarray by Trump's tariff announcement, his attack on the rule of law continued, and the twice-elected president admitted he was "not joking" about the possibility of seeking a third term, which is barred by the constitution.
"He is destroying the economy with tariffs in order to pay for the tax cuts he wants to push through to enrich himself and his billionaire buddies," warned People's Action. "He has ordered the government to round up innocent people off of the streets and put them in detention centers without due process because they dared to speak out using their First Amendment rights. And he is not close to being done—by his own admission, he is planning to run for a third term, which the Constitution does not allow."
Live stream of Hands Off rally in Washington, D.C.:
Below are photo or video dispatches from demonstrations around the world on Saturday. Check back for updates...
United Kingdom
France
Germany
Belgium:
Massachusetts:
Maine:
Washington, D.C.:
New York:
Minnesota:
Michigan:
Ohio:
Colorado:
Pennsylvania:
North Carolina:
The protest organizers warn that what Trump and Musk are up to "is not just corruption" and "not just mismanagement," but something far more sinister.
"This is a hostile takeover," they said, but vowed to fight back. "This is the moment where we say NO. No more looting, no more stealing, no more billionaires raiding our government while working people struggle to survive."