SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Hate, blame, greed, bigotry and fear have always been part of our politics. If you doubt that, consider these statements from our second Presidential campaign in 1800, which pitted Adams against Jefferson for the second time.
Jefferson's camp accused President Adams of having a "hideous hermaphroditical character, which has neither the force and firmness of a man, nor the gentleness and sensibility of a woman."
In return, Adams' men called Vice President Jefferson "a mean-spirited, low-lived fellow, the son of a half-breed Indian squaw, sired by a Virginia mulatto father."
As the slurs piled on, Adams was labeled a fool, a hypocrite, a criminal, and a tyrant, while Jefferson was branded a weakling, an atheist, a libertine, and a coward. Even Martha Washington succumbed to the propaganda, telling a clergyman that Jefferson was "one of the most detestable of mankind."
Fast forward to one of our most revered Presidents, Abraham Lincoln, and you'll see essentially the same hateful, divisive speech used against him. He was referred to as an idiot, a yahoo, the original gorilla, and many northern newspapers called for his assassination (yes, northern).
Franklin Roosevelt was called a fascist and a warmonger, and Wall Street and the big banks even tried to engineer a coup against him.
So, yes, hate fear bigotry, greed and blame have always been part of our politics, and there have always been idiots and haters among us.
Why this moment in history is different
There are several things that make this moment in history different.
First and foremost, unlike in times past, this president doesn't try to stand above the fray and allow the basest of his followers to fan the flames of hate and divisiveness for him--he leads the hate parade; he ignites the fires of bigotry and blame; he scapegoats and actively and continuously appeals to the worst parts of our nature, and to the worst among us. He doesn't only seek to use hate, he mobilizes it. His is a campaign of continuous and conscious attempts to wholesale hate and the "isms" he uses to create it. Thus, he doesn't simply harness the hate of the marginalized and compromised among us, he seeks to expand the circle of hate to the mainstream.
Moreover, since Trump has no real interest in governing, he is in continuous campaign mode, whipping up fear and jingoism in tweets and on his frequent political rallies on the road. In fact, Trump has never really stopped campaigning, and for him, campaigning is nothing more than making people afraid, finding them someone to blame for their ills, and in general, distracting folks from seeing that he is not a populist and that his policies are a hodgepodge of ideas that favor moneyed interests at the expense of the poor and middle class.
There are other things that make this moment different. Our bizarre misinterpretation of the Second Amendment, combined with political fecklessness on the part of both parties, has allowed the crazies that Trump is whipping into a frothing frenzy to mechanize death.
For most of the 20th Century, the media was kept honest by laws that enabled the FCC to assure that:
But since Reagan and Clinton eviscerated these controls, information--or rather misinformation--mono-cultures like Fox "News," IHeartMedia, and Sinclair have been allowed to spring up and proliferate. And with Trump, they have functioned as a state media to serve up hate, lies, and ignorance
Meanwhile, the mainstream media has been taken over by a few corporate interests and it has embraced "balance" and false equivalency as their canon, rather than factual reporting, the pursuit of truth, and the full exploration of context and nuance, so the lies from rightwing media and politicians--and yes, the lies, distortions and dishonesty are mostly found on the right--are allowed to stand. Liberal politicians still spin, exaggerate, and resort to hyperbole sometimes, but rightwing media and politicians have untethered their lies from any connection with reality.
Social media compounds the problem of media monocultures by allowing misinformed right-wing mobs to coalesce around outlandish and counterfactual conspiracy theories.
And finally, there's no real opposition party. Rather than standing on values and representing the people's interests, Democrats have chosen tactics and empty rhetoric so they could continue to get their share of corporate and fat-cat largess to run their campaigns.
But having a President who sows hate and blame, with what amounts to a state media is what makes this period in history unique, and uniquely dangerous.
There are signs that the people are beginning to come together to lead our leaders towards a more decent, humane, and responsible political world.
But without the support of a political party built around values, laws that constrain those who would feed our most evil inclinations, and limits on using money to buy influence, it will be an uphill battle, in which the voices of hate are spread with a megaphone, and in which the advocates of decency can only respond with a million murmurs.
Let's hope it's enough.
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
Hate, blame, greed, bigotry and fear have always been part of our politics. If you doubt that, consider these statements from our second Presidential campaign in 1800, which pitted Adams against Jefferson for the second time.
Jefferson's camp accused President Adams of having a "hideous hermaphroditical character, which has neither the force and firmness of a man, nor the gentleness and sensibility of a woman."
In return, Adams' men called Vice President Jefferson "a mean-spirited, low-lived fellow, the son of a half-breed Indian squaw, sired by a Virginia mulatto father."
As the slurs piled on, Adams was labeled a fool, a hypocrite, a criminal, and a tyrant, while Jefferson was branded a weakling, an atheist, a libertine, and a coward. Even Martha Washington succumbed to the propaganda, telling a clergyman that Jefferson was "one of the most detestable of mankind."
Fast forward to one of our most revered Presidents, Abraham Lincoln, and you'll see essentially the same hateful, divisive speech used against him. He was referred to as an idiot, a yahoo, the original gorilla, and many northern newspapers called for his assassination (yes, northern).
Franklin Roosevelt was called a fascist and a warmonger, and Wall Street and the big banks even tried to engineer a coup against him.
So, yes, hate fear bigotry, greed and blame have always been part of our politics, and there have always been idiots and haters among us.
Why this moment in history is different
There are several things that make this moment in history different.
First and foremost, unlike in times past, this president doesn't try to stand above the fray and allow the basest of his followers to fan the flames of hate and divisiveness for him--he leads the hate parade; he ignites the fires of bigotry and blame; he scapegoats and actively and continuously appeals to the worst parts of our nature, and to the worst among us. He doesn't only seek to use hate, he mobilizes it. His is a campaign of continuous and conscious attempts to wholesale hate and the "isms" he uses to create it. Thus, he doesn't simply harness the hate of the marginalized and compromised among us, he seeks to expand the circle of hate to the mainstream.
Moreover, since Trump has no real interest in governing, he is in continuous campaign mode, whipping up fear and jingoism in tweets and on his frequent political rallies on the road. In fact, Trump has never really stopped campaigning, and for him, campaigning is nothing more than making people afraid, finding them someone to blame for their ills, and in general, distracting folks from seeing that he is not a populist and that his policies are a hodgepodge of ideas that favor moneyed interests at the expense of the poor and middle class.
There are other things that make this moment different. Our bizarre misinterpretation of the Second Amendment, combined with political fecklessness on the part of both parties, has allowed the crazies that Trump is whipping into a frothing frenzy to mechanize death.
For most of the 20th Century, the media was kept honest by laws that enabled the FCC to assure that:
But since Reagan and Clinton eviscerated these controls, information--or rather misinformation--mono-cultures like Fox "News," IHeartMedia, and Sinclair have been allowed to spring up and proliferate. And with Trump, they have functioned as a state media to serve up hate, lies, and ignorance
Meanwhile, the mainstream media has been taken over by a few corporate interests and it has embraced "balance" and false equivalency as their canon, rather than factual reporting, the pursuit of truth, and the full exploration of context and nuance, so the lies from rightwing media and politicians--and yes, the lies, distortions and dishonesty are mostly found on the right--are allowed to stand. Liberal politicians still spin, exaggerate, and resort to hyperbole sometimes, but rightwing media and politicians have untethered their lies from any connection with reality.
Social media compounds the problem of media monocultures by allowing misinformed right-wing mobs to coalesce around outlandish and counterfactual conspiracy theories.
And finally, there's no real opposition party. Rather than standing on values and representing the people's interests, Democrats have chosen tactics and empty rhetoric so they could continue to get their share of corporate and fat-cat largess to run their campaigns.
But having a President who sows hate and blame, with what amounts to a state media is what makes this period in history unique, and uniquely dangerous.
There are signs that the people are beginning to come together to lead our leaders towards a more decent, humane, and responsible political world.
But without the support of a political party built around values, laws that constrain those who would feed our most evil inclinations, and limits on using money to buy influence, it will be an uphill battle, in which the voices of hate are spread with a megaphone, and in which the advocates of decency can only respond with a million murmurs.
Let's hope it's enough.
Hate, blame, greed, bigotry and fear have always been part of our politics. If you doubt that, consider these statements from our second Presidential campaign in 1800, which pitted Adams against Jefferson for the second time.
Jefferson's camp accused President Adams of having a "hideous hermaphroditical character, which has neither the force and firmness of a man, nor the gentleness and sensibility of a woman."
In return, Adams' men called Vice President Jefferson "a mean-spirited, low-lived fellow, the son of a half-breed Indian squaw, sired by a Virginia mulatto father."
As the slurs piled on, Adams was labeled a fool, a hypocrite, a criminal, and a tyrant, while Jefferson was branded a weakling, an atheist, a libertine, and a coward. Even Martha Washington succumbed to the propaganda, telling a clergyman that Jefferson was "one of the most detestable of mankind."
Fast forward to one of our most revered Presidents, Abraham Lincoln, and you'll see essentially the same hateful, divisive speech used against him. He was referred to as an idiot, a yahoo, the original gorilla, and many northern newspapers called for his assassination (yes, northern).
Franklin Roosevelt was called a fascist and a warmonger, and Wall Street and the big banks even tried to engineer a coup against him.
So, yes, hate fear bigotry, greed and blame have always been part of our politics, and there have always been idiots and haters among us.
Why this moment in history is different
There are several things that make this moment in history different.
First and foremost, unlike in times past, this president doesn't try to stand above the fray and allow the basest of his followers to fan the flames of hate and divisiveness for him--he leads the hate parade; he ignites the fires of bigotry and blame; he scapegoats and actively and continuously appeals to the worst parts of our nature, and to the worst among us. He doesn't only seek to use hate, he mobilizes it. His is a campaign of continuous and conscious attempts to wholesale hate and the "isms" he uses to create it. Thus, he doesn't simply harness the hate of the marginalized and compromised among us, he seeks to expand the circle of hate to the mainstream.
Moreover, since Trump has no real interest in governing, he is in continuous campaign mode, whipping up fear and jingoism in tweets and on his frequent political rallies on the road. In fact, Trump has never really stopped campaigning, and for him, campaigning is nothing more than making people afraid, finding them someone to blame for their ills, and in general, distracting folks from seeing that he is not a populist and that his policies are a hodgepodge of ideas that favor moneyed interests at the expense of the poor and middle class.
There are other things that make this moment different. Our bizarre misinterpretation of the Second Amendment, combined with political fecklessness on the part of both parties, has allowed the crazies that Trump is whipping into a frothing frenzy to mechanize death.
For most of the 20th Century, the media was kept honest by laws that enabled the FCC to assure that:
But since Reagan and Clinton eviscerated these controls, information--or rather misinformation--mono-cultures like Fox "News," IHeartMedia, and Sinclair have been allowed to spring up and proliferate. And with Trump, they have functioned as a state media to serve up hate, lies, and ignorance
Meanwhile, the mainstream media has been taken over by a few corporate interests and it has embraced "balance" and false equivalency as their canon, rather than factual reporting, the pursuit of truth, and the full exploration of context and nuance, so the lies from rightwing media and politicians--and yes, the lies, distortions and dishonesty are mostly found on the right--are allowed to stand. Liberal politicians still spin, exaggerate, and resort to hyperbole sometimes, but rightwing media and politicians have untethered their lies from any connection with reality.
Social media compounds the problem of media monocultures by allowing misinformed right-wing mobs to coalesce around outlandish and counterfactual conspiracy theories.
And finally, there's no real opposition party. Rather than standing on values and representing the people's interests, Democrats have chosen tactics and empty rhetoric so they could continue to get their share of corporate and fat-cat largess to run their campaigns.
But having a President who sows hate and blame, with what amounts to a state media is what makes this period in history unique, and uniquely dangerous.
There are signs that the people are beginning to come together to lead our leaders towards a more decent, humane, and responsible political world.
But without the support of a political party built around values, laws that constrain those who would feed our most evil inclinations, and limits on using money to buy influence, it will be an uphill battle, in which the voices of hate are spread with a megaphone, and in which the advocates of decency can only respond with a million murmurs.
Let's hope it's enough.
The study was published as President Donald Trump was blasted for an executive order that one critic said shows he wants to turn the Alaskan Arctic into the "the world's largest gas station."
For thousands of years, the land areas of the Arctic have served as a "carbon sink," storing potential carbon emissions in the permafrost. But according to a study published in the journal Nature Climate Change Tuesday, more than 34% of the Arctic is now a source of carbon to the atmosphere, as permafrost melts and the Arctic becomes greener.
"When emissions from fire were added, the percentage grew to 40%," according to the Woodwell Climate Research Center, which led the international team that conducted the research.
The study, which was first reported on by The Guardian, was released the day after President Donald Trump issued multiple presidential actions influencing the United States' ability to confront the climate crisis, which is primarily caused by fossil fuel emissions, including one directly impacting resource extraction in Alaska, a section of which is within the Arctic Circle.
Sue Natali, one of the researchers who worked on the study published in Nature Climate Change, told NPR in December (in reference to similar research) that the Arctic's warming "is not an issue of what party you support."
"This is something that impacts everyone," she said.
As the permafrost—ground that remains frozen for two or more years—holds less carbon, it releases CO2 into the atmosphere that could "considerably exacerbate climate change," according to the study.
"There is a load of carbon in the Arctic soils. It's close to half of the Earth's soil carbon pool. That's much more than there is in the atmosphere. There's a huge potential reservoir that should ideally stay in the ground," said Anna Virkkala, the lead author of the study, in an interview with The Guardian.
The dire warning was released on the heels of Trump's executive order titled "Unleashing the Alaska's Extraordinary Resource Potential" that calls for expedited "permitting and leasing of energy and natural resource projects in Alaska," as well as for the prioritization of "development of Alaska's liquefied natural gas (LNG) potential, including the sale and transportation of Alaskan LNG to other regions of the United States and allied nations within the Pacific region."
The order also rolls back a number of Biden-era restrictions on drilling and extraction in Alaska, which included protecting areas within the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge from oil and gas leasing.
"Alaska is warming four times faster than the rest of the planet, a trend that is wreaking havoc on communities, ecosystems, fish, wildlife, and ways of life that depend on healthy lands and waters," said Carole Holley, managing attorney for the Alaska Office of the environmental group Earthjustice, in a statement Monday.
"Earthjustice and its clients will not stand idly by while Trump once again forces a harmful industry-driven agenda on our state for political gain and the benefit of a wealthy few," she added.
Trump wants to turn the Alaskan Arctic into the "the world's largest gas station," said Athan Manuel, director of Sierra Club's Lands Protection Program, in a statement Monday. "Make no mistake, Trump's rushed and sloppy actions today are an existential threat to these lands and waters, and the communities and wildlife that depend on them."
The U.N. ambassador nominee also shrugged off the Nazi salutes made by Elon Musk on Inauguration Day.
As U.S. Rep. Elise Stefanik faced questioning by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Tuesday regarding her nomination for a top diplomatic position, the rights group Jewish Voice for Peace Action called on lawmakers to consider her "record of antisemitic, anti-Palestinian, anti-immigrant, and anti-democracy rhetoric and policy" and block her confirmation.
Stefanik's (R-N.Y.) record was reinforced at the hearing as she was asked about her views on Palestine, expressions of antisemitism in the United States, and far-right Israeli leaders' political agenda, with Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) recalling a meeting he had with the congresswoman after President Donald Trump nominated her to be the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.
At the meeting, Van Hollen said, Stefanik had expressed support for the idea that Israel has a Biblical right to control the entire West Bank—a position that is held by Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and former National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, but runs counter to the two-state solution that the U.S. government has long supported.
"Is that your view today?" asked Van Hollen, to which Stefanik replied, "Yes."
Van Hollen noted that Stefanik's viewpoint also flies in the face of numerous U.N. Security Council resolutions and international consensus about the Middle East conflict.
"If the president is going to succeed at bringing peace and stability to the Middle East, we're going to have to look at the U.N. Security Council resolutions," said the senator. "And it's going to be very difficult to achieve that if you continue to hold the view that you just expressed, which is a view that was not held by the founders of the state of Israel."
Stefanik also refused to answer a direct question from Van Hollen regarding whether Palestinian people have the right to self-determination, saying only that she supports "human rights for all" and pivoting to a call for Israeli hostages to be released by Hamas.
Jenin Younes, litigation counsel with the New Civil Liberties Alliance, said Stefanik expressed "religious fanaticism, pure and simple" at the confirmation hearing—which was held as Israeli settlers and soldiers ramped up attacks on Palestinians in the West Bank.
"That [Stefanik] will now play a major role with respect to our foreign policy in the region is terrifying," said Younes.
Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) Action noted that in addition to supporting "the Israeli government's brutal genocide of Palestinians," Stefanik has also "amplified the antisemitic Great Replacement theory"—which claims the influence and power of white Christian Americans is being deliberately diminished by Jewish Americans and immigration policy.
Despite her support for the debunked conspiracy theory, Stefanik made headlines last year for her accusations against college students, faculty, and administrators over the pro-Palestinian demonstrations that exploded across campuses as Americans spoke out against Israel's U.S.-backed assault on Gaza. The congresswoman said the protests were expressions of antisemitism and pushed for the resignation of university leaders who declined to discipline students who spoke out against Israel.
The hearings where Stefanik lambasted college leaders "were part of a broader campaign to silence anti-war activism and dissent on college campuses while forwarding the MAGA culture war campaign against [diversity, equity, and inclusion], critical race theory, and LGBTQ+ rights," said JVP Action.
An exchange between Stefanik and Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) on Tuesday also raised questions over Stefanik's views on antisemitism. Murphy asked the nominee about the Nazi salute twice displayed by billionaire Trump backer Elon Musk—whom the president has named to lead his proposed Department of Government Efficiency—at an event Monday night.
" Elon Musk did not do those salutes," Stefanik asserted.
Murphy countered by reading several comments from right-wing commentators who applauded Musk's "Heil Hitler" salute.
"Over and over again last night, white supremacist groups and neo-Nazi groups in this country rallied around that visual," said Murphy.
JVP Action said Stefanik has "deeply embraced Trump's anti-democratic agenda."
"Her nomination must be blocked," said the group.
"As long as Citizens United remains the law of the land, our democracy will remain broken," said one campaigner.
As President Donald Trump triumphantly returned to the White House thanks in part to a tsunami of campaign cash from oligarchs and corporate interests, democracy defenders on Tuesday marked the 15th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that unleashed such spending by urging action to overturn the decision.
In a nation where corporations and moneyed interests already wielded disproportionate power and influence over elections, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission reversed campaign finance restrictions dating back to the era of Gilded Age robber barons. The ruling affirmed that political spending by corporations, nonprofit organizations, labor unions, and other groups is a form of free speech protected by the 1st Amendment that government cannot restrict. The decision ushered in the era of super PACs—which can raise unlimited amounts of money to spend on campaigns—and secret spending on elections with so-called "dark money."
In his Citizens United dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens asserted that "in a functioning democracy the public must have faith that its representatives owe their positions to the people, not to the corporations with the deepest pockets," and warned that the ruling "will undoubtedly cripple the ability of ordinary citizens, Congress, and the states to adopt even limited measures to protect against corporate domination of the electoral process."
"Over the last 15 years, the American people have watched with disgust as both parties welcomed the unfettered sale of our democracy and elections to the highest bidders."
Since then, nearly $20 billion has been spent on U.S. presidential elections and more than $53 billion on congressional races, according to data compiled by OpenSecrets. Spending on 2024 congressional races was double 2010 levels, while presidential campaign contributions were more than 50% higher in 2024 than in 2008, the last election before Citizens United.
Ultrawealthy megadonors played a critical role in Trump's 2024 victory. Some of them have been rewarded with Cabinet nominations and key appointments in "an administration dominated by billionaires and corporate interests," as Americans for Tax Fairness executive director David Kass described it.
"Fifteen years ago today, the Supreme Court gave billionaires and special interests unprecedented power to rig our democracy with its disastrous Citizens United decision. Yesterday, Donald Trump was sworn in, ushering in the wealthiest administration in American history," Tiffany Muller, president of the advocacy group End Citizens United, said on social media Tuesday. "Citizens United paved the way for Trump II."
Alexandra Rojas, executive director of the progressive political action committee Justice Democrats, said in a statement that "over the last 15 years, the American people have watched with disgust as both parties welcomed the unfettered sale of our democracy and elections to the highest bidders."
"Citizens United legalized economic inequality as a political tool for the wealthy to exploit," Rojas added. "A decade-and-a-half later, working-class people cannot afford to run for office and everyday voters' voices are drowned out by billionaire-funded super PACs. As long as Citizens United remains the law of the land, our democracy will remain broken."
Justice Democrats noted: "Yesterday, Donald Trump was inaugurated as president in what was maybe one of the most openly corporate-sponsored inaugurations in American history. In just one row seated in front of Trump's Cabinet members, four men had the combined wealth of just under $1 trillion."
"Billionaires and corporations are paying their way to gain influence in the Trump administration and they can expect a massive return on their investment, at the expense of everyday people," the group added.
It's no surprise, say critics, that corporate profits and plutocrat wealth have soared to new heights during the Citizens United era.
"Citizens United allowed corporations to buy candidates and elections. Citizens United legalized political bribery. Citizens United let wealth dominate our elections," the consumer watchdog Public Citizen said Tuesday. "Overturn Citizens United."
Positing that "Citizens United turned our democracy into an auction," Congressman Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) wrote on social media Tuesday that "our government is supposed to be of the people, by the people, and for the people—not corporations and billionaire elites. We must #EndCitizensUnited and put the American people back in charge."
Democratic lawmakers have introduced numerous bills, including proposed constitutional amendments, to reverse Citizens United. While Congress has not been able or willing to address the issue, 22 states and the District of Columbia, as well as more than 800 local governments across the country, have passed measures calling for a constitutional amendment to overturn the ruling, according to Public Citizen.
"This is a moment to
usher in a new era in the Democratic Party that rejects the growing oligarchy in this country by rejecting the unprecedented level of billionaire and corporate spending that has a stranglehold over both parties," Justice Democrats said on Tuesday. "Now is the moment to tirelessly center working people and expose the big money corruption that Citizens United has brought onto both parties. By rejecting their influence, working-class people may finally have the promise of a party that actually serves them."