SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The Department of Housing and Urban Develoment (HUD) webstie explains the agency is closed during the shutdown. (Photo: HUD/screenshot)
Longest Shutdown Ever: This Is Bad Governance
This shutdown is a brazen power grab by the president, and so far, too many members of Congress have been willing to cede this power
https://www.nationalpriorities.org/blog/2019/01/12/longest-shutdown-ever/
Jan 12, 2019
Editor's Note: This piece was originally published on Sat. Jan. 12, 2018 by National Priorities Project, a project of the Institute for Policy Studies.
It's day 22, and this government shutdown is officially the longest in American history.
Congress has the power to make things right, but it would take a bipartisan stand against the president.
This is bad governance. Our constitution makes clear that Congress, not the president, has the "power of the purse." This shutdown is a brazen power grab by the president, and so far, too many members of Congress have been willing to cede this power to the president when they could end it today with enough votes. So, the shutdown continues.
Most Americans favor immigration, and oppose a wall, as I wrote this week in Fortune. According to a poll from business insider, most Americans would rather see our shared resources put toward infrastructure, healthcare, or education than a wall at the border.
Where will it end? In recent days reports have focused on the possibility of the president declaring a national emergency. According to news reports, he would use the declaration to repurpose funding from either militaryfunds or disaster fundsfor Puerto Rico, Texas and California. If he takes from the military, he's admitting he thinks the military doesn't need the funds. If he takes from disaster funds, he's just plain heartless.
This is unconscionable, and it's dangerous for our democracy. The president's powers have been limited from the outset of our democracy to guard against authoritarianism, and a declaration of national emergency will almost certainly be met by lawsuits and congressional investigation.
This is no way to run a budget, and no way to run a government. Congress has the power to make things right, but it would take a bipartisan stand against the president.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
© 2023 Institute for Policy Studies
Lindsay Koshgarian
Lindsay Koshgarian directs the National Priorities Project at the Institute for Policy Studies.
Editor's Note: This piece was originally published on Sat. Jan. 12, 2018 by National Priorities Project, a project of the Institute for Policy Studies.
It's day 22, and this government shutdown is officially the longest in American history.
Congress has the power to make things right, but it would take a bipartisan stand against the president.
This is bad governance. Our constitution makes clear that Congress, not the president, has the "power of the purse." This shutdown is a brazen power grab by the president, and so far, too many members of Congress have been willing to cede this power to the president when they could end it today with enough votes. So, the shutdown continues.
Most Americans favor immigration, and oppose a wall, as I wrote this week in Fortune. According to a poll from business insider, most Americans would rather see our shared resources put toward infrastructure, healthcare, or education than a wall at the border.
Where will it end? In recent days reports have focused on the possibility of the president declaring a national emergency. According to news reports, he would use the declaration to repurpose funding from either militaryfunds or disaster fundsfor Puerto Rico, Texas and California. If he takes from the military, he's admitting he thinks the military doesn't need the funds. If he takes from disaster funds, he's just plain heartless.
This is unconscionable, and it's dangerous for our democracy. The president's powers have been limited from the outset of our democracy to guard against authoritarianism, and a declaration of national emergency will almost certainly be met by lawsuits and congressional investigation.
This is no way to run a budget, and no way to run a government. Congress has the power to make things right, but it would take a bipartisan stand against the president.
Lindsay Koshgarian
Lindsay Koshgarian directs the National Priorities Project at the Institute for Policy Studies.
Editor's Note: This piece was originally published on Sat. Jan. 12, 2018 by National Priorities Project, a project of the Institute for Policy Studies.
It's day 22, and this government shutdown is officially the longest in American history.
Congress has the power to make things right, but it would take a bipartisan stand against the president.
This is bad governance. Our constitution makes clear that Congress, not the president, has the "power of the purse." This shutdown is a brazen power grab by the president, and so far, too many members of Congress have been willing to cede this power to the president when they could end it today with enough votes. So, the shutdown continues.
Most Americans favor immigration, and oppose a wall, as I wrote this week in Fortune. According to a poll from business insider, most Americans would rather see our shared resources put toward infrastructure, healthcare, or education than a wall at the border.
Where will it end? In recent days reports have focused on the possibility of the president declaring a national emergency. According to news reports, he would use the declaration to repurpose funding from either militaryfunds or disaster fundsfor Puerto Rico, Texas and California. If he takes from the military, he's admitting he thinks the military doesn't need the funds. If he takes from disaster funds, he's just plain heartless.
This is unconscionable, and it's dangerous for our democracy. The president's powers have been limited from the outset of our democracy to guard against authoritarianism, and a declaration of national emergency will almost certainly be met by lawsuits and congressional investigation.
This is no way to run a budget, and no way to run a government. Congress has the power to make things right, but it would take a bipartisan stand against the president.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.