SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
On several occasions, now, progressive candidates have endorsed the idea that we should tax the rich more, in contrast to the Republicans who have been on a decades long mission to reduce taxes on the rich and corporations. Usually, pundits have reacted as if the progressives had lost their mind to advocate such a "radical" if not "communistic" idea.
And the Democratic mainstream typically shares the pundits' incredulity. In fact, when the Republicans started calling the progressives bad names, the Democratic Party went into a collective cringe, and tried to reign in the offending progressives.
They should have learned from Bernie Sanders--the most popular politician in America--confronting the corporatists and conservatives was a better strategy than cringing from their name-calling.
They should have learned from Bernie Sanders--the most popular politician in America--confronting the corporatists and conservatives was a better strategy than cringing from their name-calling.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is the latest progressive to speak out in favor of taxing the wealthy, and predictably, the punditocracy pounced on her as if she was some naive political ingenue, and just as predictably, many of the mainstream Democrats joined them.
As with Sanders, however, AOC didn't go into a swoon when she was challenged on the idea that a 70 percent marginal rate could raise revenue needed to support a Green New Deal. In her 60 Minutes interview, when Anderson Cooper characterized her as "radical," she said "... then call me radical." When Scott Walker completely mischaracterized how marginal rates work in an attempt to discredit her, AOC took him on and destroyed him, rather than going into hiding.
Her courage and conviction has proven to be a political asset, not a liability, as the corporate wing of the Democratic Party would have it.
But here's the thing: after the 60 Minutes interview and AOC's rebuttal of the assault by the forces of the status quo, mainstream Democrats and the punditocracy seem surprised and shocked to learn that nearly 60 percent of Americans support a top marginal rate of 70 percent on the ultra-rich.
Their surprise tells us why Democrats have been losing political ground, why Republicans dominate all three branches of government and most states, and why Americans are overwhelmingly cynical about politicians, government and the political process.
Bottom line: the progressive majority has been there all along, but no one was willing to represent them, or champion progressive ideas.
Bottom line: the progressive majority has been there all along, but no one was willing to represent them, or champion progressive ideas.
A relatively recent article in The American Prospect cites polling by mainstream organizations like Pew and Gallup on a wide range of issues to show how overwhelmingly liberal Americans are when it comes to policy. A few nuggets include:
This level of support can be found for gun control, more humane immigration policies, increased minimum wages, tuition free college ... on and on it goes.
So why is Trump president, and why do Republicans control much of the federal government and most of the states?
The short answer is because Democrats have ceded the debate to conservative corporatists, mostly because they're as beholden to moneyed interests as the Republicans are. And it's not just politicians and the press. The civil institutions we used to rely on to be watchdogs and counterweights to political, economic, and corporate power have been taken over by the elite establishment. As I point out in my latest book, over the last several decades, many unions, environmental groups, think tanks, foundations and not-for-profit public interest groups were headed by the establishment elites who often had little in common with the rank and file they purportedly represented. In many cases they were run by the establishment elite and party mainstreamers and funded by the rich and corporations.
With no one offering a counter narrative, three groups emerged in the electorate. The less informed accepted lies, distortions and deceptions such as trickle-down, supply- side, government-as-the-problem, not the solution, and embraced conservativism.
With no one offering a counter narrative, three groups emerged in the electorate. The less informed accepted lies, distortions and deceptions such as trickle-down, supply- side, government-as-the-problem, not the solution, and embraced conservativism. Others, witnessing the increasing disparity in power and wealth between them and the uber rich and corporations became enraged at the entire system, and focused their inchoate rage on the elites. Many of these voted for Trump because he was one of the only politicians to channel their anger and alienation. Trump was, in essence, a way to toss a Molotov cocktail into the whole coopted system. Still others were so turned off by the corrupt confederacy that had taken control of government that they simply stopped playing the political game.
That's how Trump won, and why Republicans control most of government--even after the so-called blue wave of 2018. As long as Democrats rely on Republican overreach to win, instead of embracing the progressive policies Americans favor, they will never be a majority party.
The reason party elites are gathered against candidates like Warren, Sanders and AOC in a confederacy of dunces is that they threaten to take away the elites' hold on power and restore it to the people.
Ironically, the mainstream Democrats embrace of candidates like Biden, Booker, Gillibrand, Harris and O'Rourke - corporate centrists attempting to morph into progressives - will do more to keep Trump and the Republicans in power by stoking the cynicism and anger that now keeps them from the majority. Anyone who doubts that, need only look to Hillary Clinton's fate when she attempted a similar faux shift.
Yet Pelosi, Schumer, Hoyer et. al. continue to push centrist Pablum like paygo to an electorate hungry for radical change, in a world that needs radical change.
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
On several occasions, now, progressive candidates have endorsed the idea that we should tax the rich more, in contrast to the Republicans who have been on a decades long mission to reduce taxes on the rich and corporations. Usually, pundits have reacted as if the progressives had lost their mind to advocate such a "radical" if not "communistic" idea.
And the Democratic mainstream typically shares the pundits' incredulity. In fact, when the Republicans started calling the progressives bad names, the Democratic Party went into a collective cringe, and tried to reign in the offending progressives.
They should have learned from Bernie Sanders--the most popular politician in America--confronting the corporatists and conservatives was a better strategy than cringing from their name-calling.
They should have learned from Bernie Sanders--the most popular politician in America--confronting the corporatists and conservatives was a better strategy than cringing from their name-calling.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is the latest progressive to speak out in favor of taxing the wealthy, and predictably, the punditocracy pounced on her as if she was some naive political ingenue, and just as predictably, many of the mainstream Democrats joined them.
As with Sanders, however, AOC didn't go into a swoon when she was challenged on the idea that a 70 percent marginal rate could raise revenue needed to support a Green New Deal. In her 60 Minutes interview, when Anderson Cooper characterized her as "radical," she said "... then call me radical." When Scott Walker completely mischaracterized how marginal rates work in an attempt to discredit her, AOC took him on and destroyed him, rather than going into hiding.
Her courage and conviction has proven to be a political asset, not a liability, as the corporate wing of the Democratic Party would have it.
But here's the thing: after the 60 Minutes interview and AOC's rebuttal of the assault by the forces of the status quo, mainstream Democrats and the punditocracy seem surprised and shocked to learn that nearly 60 percent of Americans support a top marginal rate of 70 percent on the ultra-rich.
Their surprise tells us why Democrats have been losing political ground, why Republicans dominate all three branches of government and most states, and why Americans are overwhelmingly cynical about politicians, government and the political process.
Bottom line: the progressive majority has been there all along, but no one was willing to represent them, or champion progressive ideas.
Bottom line: the progressive majority has been there all along, but no one was willing to represent them, or champion progressive ideas.
A relatively recent article in The American Prospect cites polling by mainstream organizations like Pew and Gallup on a wide range of issues to show how overwhelmingly liberal Americans are when it comes to policy. A few nuggets include:
This level of support can be found for gun control, more humane immigration policies, increased minimum wages, tuition free college ... on and on it goes.
So why is Trump president, and why do Republicans control much of the federal government and most of the states?
The short answer is because Democrats have ceded the debate to conservative corporatists, mostly because they're as beholden to moneyed interests as the Republicans are. And it's not just politicians and the press. The civil institutions we used to rely on to be watchdogs and counterweights to political, economic, and corporate power have been taken over by the elite establishment. As I point out in my latest book, over the last several decades, many unions, environmental groups, think tanks, foundations and not-for-profit public interest groups were headed by the establishment elites who often had little in common with the rank and file they purportedly represented. In many cases they were run by the establishment elite and party mainstreamers and funded by the rich and corporations.
With no one offering a counter narrative, three groups emerged in the electorate. The less informed accepted lies, distortions and deceptions such as trickle-down, supply- side, government-as-the-problem, not the solution, and embraced conservativism.
With no one offering a counter narrative, three groups emerged in the electorate. The less informed accepted lies, distortions and deceptions such as trickle-down, supply- side, government-as-the-problem, not the solution, and embraced conservativism. Others, witnessing the increasing disparity in power and wealth between them and the uber rich and corporations became enraged at the entire system, and focused their inchoate rage on the elites. Many of these voted for Trump because he was one of the only politicians to channel their anger and alienation. Trump was, in essence, a way to toss a Molotov cocktail into the whole coopted system. Still others were so turned off by the corrupt confederacy that had taken control of government that they simply stopped playing the political game.
That's how Trump won, and why Republicans control most of government--even after the so-called blue wave of 2018. As long as Democrats rely on Republican overreach to win, instead of embracing the progressive policies Americans favor, they will never be a majority party.
The reason party elites are gathered against candidates like Warren, Sanders and AOC in a confederacy of dunces is that they threaten to take away the elites' hold on power and restore it to the people.
Ironically, the mainstream Democrats embrace of candidates like Biden, Booker, Gillibrand, Harris and O'Rourke - corporate centrists attempting to morph into progressives - will do more to keep Trump and the Republicans in power by stoking the cynicism and anger that now keeps them from the majority. Anyone who doubts that, need only look to Hillary Clinton's fate when she attempted a similar faux shift.
Yet Pelosi, Schumer, Hoyer et. al. continue to push centrist Pablum like paygo to an electorate hungry for radical change, in a world that needs radical change.
On several occasions, now, progressive candidates have endorsed the idea that we should tax the rich more, in contrast to the Republicans who have been on a decades long mission to reduce taxes on the rich and corporations. Usually, pundits have reacted as if the progressives had lost their mind to advocate such a "radical" if not "communistic" idea.
And the Democratic mainstream typically shares the pundits' incredulity. In fact, when the Republicans started calling the progressives bad names, the Democratic Party went into a collective cringe, and tried to reign in the offending progressives.
They should have learned from Bernie Sanders--the most popular politician in America--confronting the corporatists and conservatives was a better strategy than cringing from their name-calling.
They should have learned from Bernie Sanders--the most popular politician in America--confronting the corporatists and conservatives was a better strategy than cringing from their name-calling.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is the latest progressive to speak out in favor of taxing the wealthy, and predictably, the punditocracy pounced on her as if she was some naive political ingenue, and just as predictably, many of the mainstream Democrats joined them.
As with Sanders, however, AOC didn't go into a swoon when she was challenged on the idea that a 70 percent marginal rate could raise revenue needed to support a Green New Deal. In her 60 Minutes interview, when Anderson Cooper characterized her as "radical," she said "... then call me radical." When Scott Walker completely mischaracterized how marginal rates work in an attempt to discredit her, AOC took him on and destroyed him, rather than going into hiding.
Her courage and conviction has proven to be a political asset, not a liability, as the corporate wing of the Democratic Party would have it.
But here's the thing: after the 60 Minutes interview and AOC's rebuttal of the assault by the forces of the status quo, mainstream Democrats and the punditocracy seem surprised and shocked to learn that nearly 60 percent of Americans support a top marginal rate of 70 percent on the ultra-rich.
Their surprise tells us why Democrats have been losing political ground, why Republicans dominate all three branches of government and most states, and why Americans are overwhelmingly cynical about politicians, government and the political process.
Bottom line: the progressive majority has been there all along, but no one was willing to represent them, or champion progressive ideas.
Bottom line: the progressive majority has been there all along, but no one was willing to represent them, or champion progressive ideas.
A relatively recent article in The American Prospect cites polling by mainstream organizations like Pew and Gallup on a wide range of issues to show how overwhelmingly liberal Americans are when it comes to policy. A few nuggets include:
This level of support can be found for gun control, more humane immigration policies, increased minimum wages, tuition free college ... on and on it goes.
So why is Trump president, and why do Republicans control much of the federal government and most of the states?
The short answer is because Democrats have ceded the debate to conservative corporatists, mostly because they're as beholden to moneyed interests as the Republicans are. And it's not just politicians and the press. The civil institutions we used to rely on to be watchdogs and counterweights to political, economic, and corporate power have been taken over by the elite establishment. As I point out in my latest book, over the last several decades, many unions, environmental groups, think tanks, foundations and not-for-profit public interest groups were headed by the establishment elites who often had little in common with the rank and file they purportedly represented. In many cases they were run by the establishment elite and party mainstreamers and funded by the rich and corporations.
With no one offering a counter narrative, three groups emerged in the electorate. The less informed accepted lies, distortions and deceptions such as trickle-down, supply- side, government-as-the-problem, not the solution, and embraced conservativism.
With no one offering a counter narrative, three groups emerged in the electorate. The less informed accepted lies, distortions and deceptions such as trickle-down, supply- side, government-as-the-problem, not the solution, and embraced conservativism. Others, witnessing the increasing disparity in power and wealth between them and the uber rich and corporations became enraged at the entire system, and focused their inchoate rage on the elites. Many of these voted for Trump because he was one of the only politicians to channel their anger and alienation. Trump was, in essence, a way to toss a Molotov cocktail into the whole coopted system. Still others were so turned off by the corrupt confederacy that had taken control of government that they simply stopped playing the political game.
That's how Trump won, and why Republicans control most of government--even after the so-called blue wave of 2018. As long as Democrats rely on Republican overreach to win, instead of embracing the progressive policies Americans favor, they will never be a majority party.
The reason party elites are gathered against candidates like Warren, Sanders and AOC in a confederacy of dunces is that they threaten to take away the elites' hold on power and restore it to the people.
Ironically, the mainstream Democrats embrace of candidates like Biden, Booker, Gillibrand, Harris and O'Rourke - corporate centrists attempting to morph into progressives - will do more to keep Trump and the Republicans in power by stoking the cynicism and anger that now keeps them from the majority. Anyone who doubts that, need only look to Hillary Clinton's fate when she attempted a similar faux shift.
Yet Pelosi, Schumer, Hoyer et. al. continue to push centrist Pablum like paygo to an electorate hungry for radical change, in a world that needs radical change.