SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi is reportedly still considering a symbolic "show vote" in Congress on an anti-Semitism and "hate" resolution - which would offer all the authenticity and honesty of a Soviet show trial. If Pelosi proceeds, it will prove Rep. Ilhan Omar's point about the inordinate influence wielded over Congress by the "Israel-right or-wrong"/AIPAC lobby and its power to stifle criticism of Israel.
The anti-Omar resolution, whether mentioning Omar or not, was originated by two Democrats who are among Congress's most longstanding pro-Israel diehards: Reps. Eliot Engel and Nita Lowey. Both endorsed Bush's Iraq invasion. Both opposed Obama's Iran nuke deal. Both supported Trump's move of the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem.
"A large number of proud Jewish Americans--raised to believe in civil liberties and open discussion--are appalled by the campaign to muzzle Rep. Ilhan Omar, as well as Speaker Pelosi's role in it. We're also appalled that human-rights-abusing Israel is virtually off-limits to debate."
I'm a proud Jew raised in a liberal family that supported civil rights and human rights. My experience growing up during the 1950s and 1960s was typical of many Jewish Americans. Like many Jews with this background, I've grown increasingly ashamed of Israel.
For 40 years, Israel has been ruled mostly by a series of right-wing governments - more and more openly racist and abusive of Palestinian rights. It's not the land of tree-planting, kibbutzim and "a country treating its Arab minority nicely" that we were sold as youngsters.
That's why a large number of proud Jewish Americans--raised to believe in civil liberties and open discussion--are appalled by the campaign to muzzle Rep. Ilhan Omar, as well as Speaker Pelosi's role in it. We're also appalled that human-rights-abusing Israel is virtually off-limits to debate.
Most Jews--the likes of Stephen Miller and Jared Kushner excepted--empathize with the refugee experience. Only a rare few cannot be impressed by the life story of Omar, who fled civil-war-torn Somalia and came to the U.S. as a refugee at age 12, knowing only two English phrases: "hello" and "shut up." Now a Muslim Congresswoman, she's recently faced hateful bias and threats.
Rep. Omar has made a simple and undeniable point - that AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) and the funding it influences exert extraordinary power over Congress. Disputing that point is flat-earther terrain. The Capitol Hill farce of an "anti-hate" resolution would provide still more evidence on behalf of her argument.
Unfortunately, all the vague media references to Rep Omar's "anti-Semitic remarks" obscure how truthful and non-hateful those comments were. You can see a series of her recent tweets here.
Progressive Jews are rushing to her defense because of tweets like this one that speak for us in a way few members of Congress ever have: "Being opposed to Netanyahu and the occupation is not the same as being anti-Semitic. I am grateful to the many Jewish allies who have spoken out and said the same."
In his Washington Post column "The dishonest smearing of Ilhan Omar," Paul Waldman devastatingly countered the recent attack on Omar over her comment at a town hall: "I want to talk about the political influence in this country that says it is okay for people to push for allegiance to a foreign country."
The initial media frenzy in February over two of Omar's tweets was so huge that it obscured the fact that the uproar was sparked by a total of seven words - and six of those words are the refrain of a famous Puff Daddy song.
It began when Omar retweeted Glenn Greenwald's comment about GOP congressional leader Kevin McCarthy's "attacking the free speech rights" of Omar and Rep. Rashida Tlaib for criticizing Israel - to which Omar, a known critic of money in politics, simply added the Puff Daddy refrain: "It's all about the Benjamins, baby." (Benjamins refer to $100 bills.) When a tweeter asked her who Omar thinks is funding politicians to defend Israel, Omar responded with a one-word tweet: "AIPAC!"
The feeding frenzy over these two flippant but truthful tweets forced Omar to apologize (something Trump has not been forced to do over hundreds of dishonest, racist and/or threatening ones).
Yet if you spend a day on Capitol Hill and talk (off-the-record) with a member of Congress about this topic, you'll hear plenty about AIPAC's awesome clout and its ability to unleash "Benjamins" to bully Congress. Books and articles have documented this truism.
According to the New York Times, AIPAC allies now want to oust Ilhan Omar from Congress and hope to "punish Ms. Omar . . . with a primary challenge in 2020."
When the well-funded Israel-right-or-wrong lobby comes after her, we'll likely see a massive counter-movement of progressive Jews and non-Jews "Standing with Omar" - and through the Internet, matching the other side Benjamin for Benjamin.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Speaker Nancy Pelosi is reportedly still considering a symbolic "show vote" in Congress on an anti-Semitism and "hate" resolution - which would offer all the authenticity and honesty of a Soviet show trial. If Pelosi proceeds, it will prove Rep. Ilhan Omar's point about the inordinate influence wielded over Congress by the "Israel-right or-wrong"/AIPAC lobby and its power to stifle criticism of Israel.
The anti-Omar resolution, whether mentioning Omar or not, was originated by two Democrats who are among Congress's most longstanding pro-Israel diehards: Reps. Eliot Engel and Nita Lowey. Both endorsed Bush's Iraq invasion. Both opposed Obama's Iran nuke deal. Both supported Trump's move of the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem.
"A large number of proud Jewish Americans--raised to believe in civil liberties and open discussion--are appalled by the campaign to muzzle Rep. Ilhan Omar, as well as Speaker Pelosi's role in it. We're also appalled that human-rights-abusing Israel is virtually off-limits to debate."
I'm a proud Jew raised in a liberal family that supported civil rights and human rights. My experience growing up during the 1950s and 1960s was typical of many Jewish Americans. Like many Jews with this background, I've grown increasingly ashamed of Israel.
For 40 years, Israel has been ruled mostly by a series of right-wing governments - more and more openly racist and abusive of Palestinian rights. It's not the land of tree-planting, kibbutzim and "a country treating its Arab minority nicely" that we were sold as youngsters.
That's why a large number of proud Jewish Americans--raised to believe in civil liberties and open discussion--are appalled by the campaign to muzzle Rep. Ilhan Omar, as well as Speaker Pelosi's role in it. We're also appalled that human-rights-abusing Israel is virtually off-limits to debate.
Most Jews--the likes of Stephen Miller and Jared Kushner excepted--empathize with the refugee experience. Only a rare few cannot be impressed by the life story of Omar, who fled civil-war-torn Somalia and came to the U.S. as a refugee at age 12, knowing only two English phrases: "hello" and "shut up." Now a Muslim Congresswoman, she's recently faced hateful bias and threats.
Rep. Omar has made a simple and undeniable point - that AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) and the funding it influences exert extraordinary power over Congress. Disputing that point is flat-earther terrain. The Capitol Hill farce of an "anti-hate" resolution would provide still more evidence on behalf of her argument.
Unfortunately, all the vague media references to Rep Omar's "anti-Semitic remarks" obscure how truthful and non-hateful those comments were. You can see a series of her recent tweets here.
Progressive Jews are rushing to her defense because of tweets like this one that speak for us in a way few members of Congress ever have: "Being opposed to Netanyahu and the occupation is not the same as being anti-Semitic. I am grateful to the many Jewish allies who have spoken out and said the same."
In his Washington Post column "The dishonest smearing of Ilhan Omar," Paul Waldman devastatingly countered the recent attack on Omar over her comment at a town hall: "I want to talk about the political influence in this country that says it is okay for people to push for allegiance to a foreign country."
The initial media frenzy in February over two of Omar's tweets was so huge that it obscured the fact that the uproar was sparked by a total of seven words - and six of those words are the refrain of a famous Puff Daddy song.
It began when Omar retweeted Glenn Greenwald's comment about GOP congressional leader Kevin McCarthy's "attacking the free speech rights" of Omar and Rep. Rashida Tlaib for criticizing Israel - to which Omar, a known critic of money in politics, simply added the Puff Daddy refrain: "It's all about the Benjamins, baby." (Benjamins refer to $100 bills.) When a tweeter asked her who Omar thinks is funding politicians to defend Israel, Omar responded with a one-word tweet: "AIPAC!"
The feeding frenzy over these two flippant but truthful tweets forced Omar to apologize (something Trump has not been forced to do over hundreds of dishonest, racist and/or threatening ones).
Yet if you spend a day on Capitol Hill and talk (off-the-record) with a member of Congress about this topic, you'll hear plenty about AIPAC's awesome clout and its ability to unleash "Benjamins" to bully Congress. Books and articles have documented this truism.
According to the New York Times, AIPAC allies now want to oust Ilhan Omar from Congress and hope to "punish Ms. Omar . . . with a primary challenge in 2020."
When the well-funded Israel-right-or-wrong lobby comes after her, we'll likely see a massive counter-movement of progressive Jews and non-Jews "Standing with Omar" - and through the Internet, matching the other side Benjamin for Benjamin.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi is reportedly still considering a symbolic "show vote" in Congress on an anti-Semitism and "hate" resolution - which would offer all the authenticity and honesty of a Soviet show trial. If Pelosi proceeds, it will prove Rep. Ilhan Omar's point about the inordinate influence wielded over Congress by the "Israel-right or-wrong"/AIPAC lobby and its power to stifle criticism of Israel.
The anti-Omar resolution, whether mentioning Omar or not, was originated by two Democrats who are among Congress's most longstanding pro-Israel diehards: Reps. Eliot Engel and Nita Lowey. Both endorsed Bush's Iraq invasion. Both opposed Obama's Iran nuke deal. Both supported Trump's move of the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem.
"A large number of proud Jewish Americans--raised to believe in civil liberties and open discussion--are appalled by the campaign to muzzle Rep. Ilhan Omar, as well as Speaker Pelosi's role in it. We're also appalled that human-rights-abusing Israel is virtually off-limits to debate."
I'm a proud Jew raised in a liberal family that supported civil rights and human rights. My experience growing up during the 1950s and 1960s was typical of many Jewish Americans. Like many Jews with this background, I've grown increasingly ashamed of Israel.
For 40 years, Israel has been ruled mostly by a series of right-wing governments - more and more openly racist and abusive of Palestinian rights. It's not the land of tree-planting, kibbutzim and "a country treating its Arab minority nicely" that we were sold as youngsters.
That's why a large number of proud Jewish Americans--raised to believe in civil liberties and open discussion--are appalled by the campaign to muzzle Rep. Ilhan Omar, as well as Speaker Pelosi's role in it. We're also appalled that human-rights-abusing Israel is virtually off-limits to debate.
Most Jews--the likes of Stephen Miller and Jared Kushner excepted--empathize with the refugee experience. Only a rare few cannot be impressed by the life story of Omar, who fled civil-war-torn Somalia and came to the U.S. as a refugee at age 12, knowing only two English phrases: "hello" and "shut up." Now a Muslim Congresswoman, she's recently faced hateful bias and threats.
Rep. Omar has made a simple and undeniable point - that AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) and the funding it influences exert extraordinary power over Congress. Disputing that point is flat-earther terrain. The Capitol Hill farce of an "anti-hate" resolution would provide still more evidence on behalf of her argument.
Unfortunately, all the vague media references to Rep Omar's "anti-Semitic remarks" obscure how truthful and non-hateful those comments were. You can see a series of her recent tweets here.
Progressive Jews are rushing to her defense because of tweets like this one that speak for us in a way few members of Congress ever have: "Being opposed to Netanyahu and the occupation is not the same as being anti-Semitic. I am grateful to the many Jewish allies who have spoken out and said the same."
In his Washington Post column "The dishonest smearing of Ilhan Omar," Paul Waldman devastatingly countered the recent attack on Omar over her comment at a town hall: "I want to talk about the political influence in this country that says it is okay for people to push for allegiance to a foreign country."
The initial media frenzy in February over two of Omar's tweets was so huge that it obscured the fact that the uproar was sparked by a total of seven words - and six of those words are the refrain of a famous Puff Daddy song.
It began when Omar retweeted Glenn Greenwald's comment about GOP congressional leader Kevin McCarthy's "attacking the free speech rights" of Omar and Rep. Rashida Tlaib for criticizing Israel - to which Omar, a known critic of money in politics, simply added the Puff Daddy refrain: "It's all about the Benjamins, baby." (Benjamins refer to $100 bills.) When a tweeter asked her who Omar thinks is funding politicians to defend Israel, Omar responded with a one-word tweet: "AIPAC!"
The feeding frenzy over these two flippant but truthful tweets forced Omar to apologize (something Trump has not been forced to do over hundreds of dishonest, racist and/or threatening ones).
Yet if you spend a day on Capitol Hill and talk (off-the-record) with a member of Congress about this topic, you'll hear plenty about AIPAC's awesome clout and its ability to unleash "Benjamins" to bully Congress. Books and articles have documented this truism.
According to the New York Times, AIPAC allies now want to oust Ilhan Omar from Congress and hope to "punish Ms. Omar . . . with a primary challenge in 2020."
When the well-funded Israel-right-or-wrong lobby comes after her, we'll likely see a massive counter-movement of progressive Jews and non-Jews "Standing with Omar" - and through the Internet, matching the other side Benjamin for Benjamin.