Rhode Island Gov. Gina Raimondo. (Photo: Fortune Conferences/flickr/cc)
Aug 24, 2019
The evidence is clear that privately managed charters can get higher test scores by culling, exclusion, and attrition. It's equally clear that charters drain resources from the public schools that enroll most students. Most public officials seem to understand that it costs more to run parallel systems, one public, one private.
But not in Rhode Island, where Governor Gina Raimondo is a big fan of charters (she was a hedge fund manager before running for governor). She is eager to expand Achievement First, a no-excuses charter known for high test scores and harsh discipline.
This article by Linda Borg in the Providence Journal lays out the findings of two independent studies that warned about the negative fiscal impact of charters on public schools (one from Moody's Investors, the other from the Brookings Institution, which is erroneously described as "left-leaning").
https://www.providencejournal.com/news/20190822/providences-achievement...
Borg should also have Gordon Lafer's significant study of the fiscal drain of charters on the public schools of three districts in California.
https://www.inthepublicinterest.org/wp-content/uploads/ITPI_Breaking_Po...
Supporters of expanding Achievement First cite a report funded by the Arnold Foundation, a rightwing foundation that zealously supports privatization and opposes public sector pensions. Billionaire John Arnold was an energy trader at Enron.
The recently appointed state commissioner, a member of Jeb Bush's Chiefs for Change, dismissed the controversy as an "old conversation," showing her indifference to stripping nearly $30 million from the needy public schools of Providence.
"State Education Commissioner Angelica Infante-Green, in an interview Wednesday, called this an "old conversation," adding that the expansion plan was approved by the Rhode Island Council of Elementary and Secondary Education three years ago after a contentious debate between charter proponents and critics."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
© 2023 Diane Ravitch
Diane Ravitch
Diane Ravitch is a historian of education at New York University. Her most recent book is "Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America's Public Schools." Her previous books and articles about American education include: "The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education," "Left Back: A Century of Battles Over School Reform," (Simon & Schuster, 2000); "The Language Police: How Pressure Groups Restrict What Students Learn" (Knopf, 2003); "The English Reader: What Every Literate Person Needs to Know" (Oxford, 2006), which she edited with her son Michael Ravitch. She lives in Brooklyn, New York.
The evidence is clear that privately managed charters can get higher test scores by culling, exclusion, and attrition. It's equally clear that charters drain resources from the public schools that enroll most students. Most public officials seem to understand that it costs more to run parallel systems, one public, one private.
But not in Rhode Island, where Governor Gina Raimondo is a big fan of charters (she was a hedge fund manager before running for governor). She is eager to expand Achievement First, a no-excuses charter known for high test scores and harsh discipline.
This article by Linda Borg in the Providence Journal lays out the findings of two independent studies that warned about the negative fiscal impact of charters on public schools (one from Moody's Investors, the other from the Brookings Institution, which is erroneously described as "left-leaning").
https://www.providencejournal.com/news/20190822/providences-achievement...
Borg should also have Gordon Lafer's significant study of the fiscal drain of charters on the public schools of three districts in California.
https://www.inthepublicinterest.org/wp-content/uploads/ITPI_Breaking_Po...
Supporters of expanding Achievement First cite a report funded by the Arnold Foundation, a rightwing foundation that zealously supports privatization and opposes public sector pensions. Billionaire John Arnold was an energy trader at Enron.
The recently appointed state commissioner, a member of Jeb Bush's Chiefs for Change, dismissed the controversy as an "old conversation," showing her indifference to stripping nearly $30 million from the needy public schools of Providence.
"State Education Commissioner Angelica Infante-Green, in an interview Wednesday, called this an "old conversation," adding that the expansion plan was approved by the Rhode Island Council of Elementary and Secondary Education three years ago after a contentious debate between charter proponents and critics."
Diane Ravitch
Diane Ravitch is a historian of education at New York University. Her most recent book is "Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America's Public Schools." Her previous books and articles about American education include: "The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education," "Left Back: A Century of Battles Over School Reform," (Simon & Schuster, 2000); "The Language Police: How Pressure Groups Restrict What Students Learn" (Knopf, 2003); "The English Reader: What Every Literate Person Needs to Know" (Oxford, 2006), which she edited with her son Michael Ravitch. She lives in Brooklyn, New York.
The evidence is clear that privately managed charters can get higher test scores by culling, exclusion, and attrition. It's equally clear that charters drain resources from the public schools that enroll most students. Most public officials seem to understand that it costs more to run parallel systems, one public, one private.
But not in Rhode Island, where Governor Gina Raimondo is a big fan of charters (she was a hedge fund manager before running for governor). She is eager to expand Achievement First, a no-excuses charter known for high test scores and harsh discipline.
This article by Linda Borg in the Providence Journal lays out the findings of two independent studies that warned about the negative fiscal impact of charters on public schools (one from Moody's Investors, the other from the Brookings Institution, which is erroneously described as "left-leaning").
https://www.providencejournal.com/news/20190822/providences-achievement...
Borg should also have Gordon Lafer's significant study of the fiscal drain of charters on the public schools of three districts in California.
https://www.inthepublicinterest.org/wp-content/uploads/ITPI_Breaking_Po...
Supporters of expanding Achievement First cite a report funded by the Arnold Foundation, a rightwing foundation that zealously supports privatization and opposes public sector pensions. Billionaire John Arnold was an energy trader at Enron.
The recently appointed state commissioner, a member of Jeb Bush's Chiefs for Change, dismissed the controversy as an "old conversation," showing her indifference to stripping nearly $30 million from the needy public schools of Providence.
"State Education Commissioner Angelica Infante-Green, in an interview Wednesday, called this an "old conversation," adding that the expansion plan was approved by the Rhode Island Council of Elementary and Secondary Education three years ago after a contentious debate between charter proponents and critics."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.