Their enormous wealth offers them an outlandishly oversized role in our democracy. It's poisoning both our politics and our media. (Photo: Shutterstock)
Nov 12, 2019
Bill Gates wants you to know he pays taxes.
"I've paid more than $10 billion in taxes. I've paid more than anyone in taxes," Gates told journalist Andrew Ross Sorkin. "But when you say I should pay $100 billion, OK, then I'm starting to do a little math about what I have left over."
Supposedly Gate was talking about a wealth tax 2020 candidates have supported. But no plan yet proposed would seize $100 billion from the philanthrocapitalist anytime soon. Even if it did, he'd still be one of the richest men in the world, with $7 billion left over.
Gates isn't the only billionaire who's worried. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon also has concerns about the rising resentment towards his fellow elites.
"I think you should vilify Nazis," Dimon told Lesley Stahl, "but you shouldn't vilify people who worked hard to accomplish things." Billionaire investor Leon Cooperman, who's become a fixture on CNBC, recently teared up while complaining about the "vilification of billionaires."
Why do the feelings of the 600 Americans that constitute our billionaire class suck up so much media attention?
For one thing, billionaires literally own the news. Buying up media companies is a new rite of passage for the ultra wealthy, like the purchase of the Washington Post by Amazon head Jeff Bezos, or TIME by tech CEO Marc Benioff.
They'll say they're all about editorial independence, but the truth is billionaire ownership can affect news output. When billionaire Joe Ricketts found out the staff of DNAinfo, a network of city-based news sites he owned, was unionizing, he promptly shut down the entire venture out of spite.
So how about a ban on billionaires? Let's tax away their wealth, but let's get them off our airwaves, too. Imagine what we'd learn if corporate media didn't devote entire news cycles to the whims of the rich.
There are more subtle ways in which the rich buy media access. The Gates Foundation, for example, has poured millions in donations into the media over the last several years to raise awareness around the foundation's philanthropic goals -- including its controversial funding of charter schools.
Not all billionaire power is publicly broadcast, however.
In their book Billionaires and Stealth Politics, researchers Benjamin Page, Jason Seawright, and Matthew J. Lacombe document how economic elites have banded together to lobby for extremely conservative policies, like cutting estate taxes, opposing regulations on the environment and Wall Street, and gutting social programs.
Because these moves are highly unpopular, they've done this work in the background.
That means there's a network of billionaires aligned with the Koch brothers, who've poured hundreds of millions of dollars into anti-labor policies. And Rupert Murdoch, the media mogul who changed the media landscape with Fox News. And casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, who's spending his billions shaping U.S. foreign policy.
Their enormous wealth offers them an outlandishly oversized role in our democracy. It's poisoning both our politics and our media.
So how about a ban on billionaires? Let's tax away their wealth, but let's get them off our airwaves, too. Imagine what we'd learn if corporate media didn't devote entire news cycles to the whims of the rich.
You may not have heard, but for the last several months, the sanitation workers at Republic Services have been fighting for higher wages. "I haven't had a raise since 2004," Demetrius Tart told The Guardian. Meanwhile, the company is making a killing from the 2017 tax cuts, and returned more than $1 billion to shareholders through stock buybacks.
The company's largest shareholder? Bill Gates. Workers took their fight directly to the billionaire, protesting outside a Gates Foundation event in September with signs that read, "Bill Gates treats his workers like garbage." He ignored them.
Maybe these sanitation workers could get the airtime instead.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
This column was distributed by OtherWords.
Negin Owliaei
Negin Owliaei is a co-editor and researcher at IPS's Inequality.org. Before joining IPS, she worked as a journalist and digital producer at Al Jazeera Media Network, where she covered social movements and the internet for the award-winning program The Stream.
Bill Gates wants you to know he pays taxes.
"I've paid more than $10 billion in taxes. I've paid more than anyone in taxes," Gates told journalist Andrew Ross Sorkin. "But when you say I should pay $100 billion, OK, then I'm starting to do a little math about what I have left over."
Supposedly Gate was talking about a wealth tax 2020 candidates have supported. But no plan yet proposed would seize $100 billion from the philanthrocapitalist anytime soon. Even if it did, he'd still be one of the richest men in the world, with $7 billion left over.
Gates isn't the only billionaire who's worried. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon also has concerns about the rising resentment towards his fellow elites.
"I think you should vilify Nazis," Dimon told Lesley Stahl, "but you shouldn't vilify people who worked hard to accomplish things." Billionaire investor Leon Cooperman, who's become a fixture on CNBC, recently teared up while complaining about the "vilification of billionaires."
Why do the feelings of the 600 Americans that constitute our billionaire class suck up so much media attention?
For one thing, billionaires literally own the news. Buying up media companies is a new rite of passage for the ultra wealthy, like the purchase of the Washington Post by Amazon head Jeff Bezos, or TIME by tech CEO Marc Benioff.
They'll say they're all about editorial independence, but the truth is billionaire ownership can affect news output. When billionaire Joe Ricketts found out the staff of DNAinfo, a network of city-based news sites he owned, was unionizing, he promptly shut down the entire venture out of spite.
So how about a ban on billionaires? Let's tax away their wealth, but let's get them off our airwaves, too. Imagine what we'd learn if corporate media didn't devote entire news cycles to the whims of the rich.
There are more subtle ways in which the rich buy media access. The Gates Foundation, for example, has poured millions in donations into the media over the last several years to raise awareness around the foundation's philanthropic goals -- including its controversial funding of charter schools.
Not all billionaire power is publicly broadcast, however.
In their book Billionaires and Stealth Politics, researchers Benjamin Page, Jason Seawright, and Matthew J. Lacombe document how economic elites have banded together to lobby for extremely conservative policies, like cutting estate taxes, opposing regulations on the environment and Wall Street, and gutting social programs.
Because these moves are highly unpopular, they've done this work in the background.
That means there's a network of billionaires aligned with the Koch brothers, who've poured hundreds of millions of dollars into anti-labor policies. And Rupert Murdoch, the media mogul who changed the media landscape with Fox News. And casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, who's spending his billions shaping U.S. foreign policy.
Their enormous wealth offers them an outlandishly oversized role in our democracy. It's poisoning both our politics and our media.
So how about a ban on billionaires? Let's tax away their wealth, but let's get them off our airwaves, too. Imagine what we'd learn if corporate media didn't devote entire news cycles to the whims of the rich.
You may not have heard, but for the last several months, the sanitation workers at Republic Services have been fighting for higher wages. "I haven't had a raise since 2004," Demetrius Tart told The Guardian. Meanwhile, the company is making a killing from the 2017 tax cuts, and returned more than $1 billion to shareholders through stock buybacks.
The company's largest shareholder? Bill Gates. Workers took their fight directly to the billionaire, protesting outside a Gates Foundation event in September with signs that read, "Bill Gates treats his workers like garbage." He ignored them.
Maybe these sanitation workers could get the airtime instead.
Negin Owliaei
Negin Owliaei is a co-editor and researcher at IPS's Inequality.org. Before joining IPS, she worked as a journalist and digital producer at Al Jazeera Media Network, where she covered social movements and the internet for the award-winning program The Stream.
Bill Gates wants you to know he pays taxes.
"I've paid more than $10 billion in taxes. I've paid more than anyone in taxes," Gates told journalist Andrew Ross Sorkin. "But when you say I should pay $100 billion, OK, then I'm starting to do a little math about what I have left over."
Supposedly Gate was talking about a wealth tax 2020 candidates have supported. But no plan yet proposed would seize $100 billion from the philanthrocapitalist anytime soon. Even if it did, he'd still be one of the richest men in the world, with $7 billion left over.
Gates isn't the only billionaire who's worried. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon also has concerns about the rising resentment towards his fellow elites.
"I think you should vilify Nazis," Dimon told Lesley Stahl, "but you shouldn't vilify people who worked hard to accomplish things." Billionaire investor Leon Cooperman, who's become a fixture on CNBC, recently teared up while complaining about the "vilification of billionaires."
Why do the feelings of the 600 Americans that constitute our billionaire class suck up so much media attention?
For one thing, billionaires literally own the news. Buying up media companies is a new rite of passage for the ultra wealthy, like the purchase of the Washington Post by Amazon head Jeff Bezos, or TIME by tech CEO Marc Benioff.
They'll say they're all about editorial independence, but the truth is billionaire ownership can affect news output. When billionaire Joe Ricketts found out the staff of DNAinfo, a network of city-based news sites he owned, was unionizing, he promptly shut down the entire venture out of spite.
So how about a ban on billionaires? Let's tax away their wealth, but let's get them off our airwaves, too. Imagine what we'd learn if corporate media didn't devote entire news cycles to the whims of the rich.
There are more subtle ways in which the rich buy media access. The Gates Foundation, for example, has poured millions in donations into the media over the last several years to raise awareness around the foundation's philanthropic goals -- including its controversial funding of charter schools.
Not all billionaire power is publicly broadcast, however.
In their book Billionaires and Stealth Politics, researchers Benjamin Page, Jason Seawright, and Matthew J. Lacombe document how economic elites have banded together to lobby for extremely conservative policies, like cutting estate taxes, opposing regulations on the environment and Wall Street, and gutting social programs.
Because these moves are highly unpopular, they've done this work in the background.
That means there's a network of billionaires aligned with the Koch brothers, who've poured hundreds of millions of dollars into anti-labor policies. And Rupert Murdoch, the media mogul who changed the media landscape with Fox News. And casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, who's spending his billions shaping U.S. foreign policy.
Their enormous wealth offers them an outlandishly oversized role in our democracy. It's poisoning both our politics and our media.
So how about a ban on billionaires? Let's tax away their wealth, but let's get them off our airwaves, too. Imagine what we'd learn if corporate media didn't devote entire news cycles to the whims of the rich.
You may not have heard, but for the last several months, the sanitation workers at Republic Services have been fighting for higher wages. "I haven't had a raise since 2004," Demetrius Tart told The Guardian. Meanwhile, the company is making a killing from the 2017 tax cuts, and returned more than $1 billion to shareholders through stock buybacks.
The company's largest shareholder? Bill Gates. Workers took their fight directly to the billionaire, protesting outside a Gates Foundation event in September with signs that read, "Bill Gates treats his workers like garbage." He ignored them.
Maybe these sanitation workers could get the airtime instead.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.