Despite running for president and energizing the nation just a decade ago as a center-left candidate with a message of hope and change, Obama seems to think America does not need systemic change, and Democrats should not rock the boat or make any sudden moves. (Photo by Hannes Magerstaedt/Getty Images)
The former president is mistaken if he believes that in appealing to the electorate, Democrats must tamp down their message and advocate for tweaks in the system rather than systemic reform.
Last-minute presidential candidates such as billionaire Michael Bloomberg and former Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, a managing director at Bain Capital, have entered the race in an effort to promote moderation and defeat progressive Democratic candidates who Wall Street fears.
But the party of Franklin D. Roosevelt is actually poised to return to its roots in the real center of mainstream public opinion, in which people believe in an active role for government to improve their lives. In this presidential election season, the party could reclaim the mantle of protecting working people, the middle class and the poor at a time of gaping wealth inequality, when popular opinion increasingly believes billionaires have too much, corporations pay too little in taxes and ordinary people are suffering.
This is why, contrary to the concerns of some political leaders and pundits, most prominently former President
Barack Obama, the Democratic Party does not risk veering too far to the left.
At a recent event with wealthy donors,
Obama claimed the "average American" does not want to "completely tear down the system and remake it," and America "is still a country that is less revolutionary than it is interested in improvement."
Despite running for president and energizing the nation just a decade ago as a center-left candidate with a message of hope and change, Obama seems to think America does not need systemic change, and Democrats should not rock the boat or make any sudden moves.
Democrats on Twitter who reject Obama's warning not to move too far left responded to the former president's comments with the hashtag #TooFarLeft, which at the time became the top trending tag in the US and the third globally, according to
Democratic strategist Peter Daou.
Daou, who started the hashtag, wanted to eviscerate the mainstream talking point that social, economic, racial and environmental justice is somehow a radical position.
Indeed, considering the state of the country, its festering political, economic and social problems and the seeming inability of government to address them, Daou and others who have embraced the hashtag make a good point. America is not well, and ignoring the symptoms of what ails the nation--not pushing too far for change--is what gave us Donald Trump.
Consider the status quo with rising inequality, low taxation on the wealthy and corporations, and the dimming life prospects of millennials.
Earning less money and saddled with more debt than their parents, young people in America,
one study finds, cannot afford their health-care needs and are on a trajectory for a shorter life span than generations before them. According to the study, millennials are facing more chronic health issues, depression and suicide than Gen Xers due to the
economic crisis,Â
student debt, the opioid crisis, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and other issues. The impending health crisis is eroding the earning potential of this younger generation.
Wall Street is frightened at the prospect of a progressive in the mold of
Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren, and some billionaires are having a temper tantrum because they refuse to pay their fair share of taxes.
A number of big money Democratic donors have vowed to
sit out or support Trump if Warren receives the nomination.
Bill Gates seemingly has not ruled out voting for Trump if he would otherwise be forced to pay Warren's wealth tax.
Establishment and Wall Street Dems are misreading the winds of public sentiment if they believe moderation is a winning political strategy for 2020. There is no constituency for a presidential candidate who prescribes half-measures to put out a fire.
And polling indicates that.
For example, a 2019 Quinnipiac poll found that 60% of registered voters support a
2% wealth tax on people who own assets over $50 million. The wealth tax concept enjoys support across political parties and all demographic groups.
Further, according to a KFF Health Tracking Poll,
health care is the leading issue that Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents want the presidential candidates to discuss. Further, according to a poll earlier this year from Politico and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, overwhelming majorities of Democrats and Republicans believe it is
"extremely important" for Congress to tackle student debt.
Even while acknowledging the historic diversity in the Democratic field, Obama urges that candidates rein in their messaging.
"We have a number of women candidates and we have one gay candidate. And those candidates are going to have barriers if they win the nomination, or they win the general election--just like I did,"
Obama said at another event. "You can overcome that resistance if the way you are framing these issues and messages indicate, 'Look, I'm part of an American tradition ... of opening up opportunity.'"
The former president is mistaken if he believes that in appealing to the electorate, Democrats must tamp down their message and advocate for tweaks in the system rather than systemic reform. This, in a country that touts itself as the "land of opportunity," yet has one of the
lowest rates of
socioeconomic mobility.
The party of FDR could very well inspire and energize Americans looking for change with policy prescriptions such as Medicare for All, the
Green New Deal and free college.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place.
We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference.
Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will.
| |
© 2023 Cable News Network
David A. LoveDavid A Love is the executive director of Philadelphia-based Witness to Innocence, a national organization of exonerated former death row prisoners and their families in the US. He is also executive editor of BlackCommentator.com, and a contributor to the Huffington Post and the NBC News site, theGrio. Follow David on Twitter @davidalove
Last-minute presidential candidates such as billionaire Michael Bloomberg and former Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, a managing director at Bain Capital, have entered the race in an effort to promote moderation and defeat progressive Democratic candidates who Wall Street fears.
But the party of Franklin D. Roosevelt is actually poised to return to its roots in the real center of mainstream public opinion, in which people believe in an active role for government to improve their lives. In this presidential election season, the party could reclaim the mantle of protecting working people, the middle class and the poor at a time of gaping wealth inequality, when popular opinion increasingly believes billionaires have too much, corporations pay too little in taxes and ordinary people are suffering.
This is why, contrary to the concerns of some political leaders and pundits, most prominently former President
Barack Obama, the Democratic Party does not risk veering too far to the left.
At a recent event with wealthy donors,
Obama claimed the "average American" does not want to "completely tear down the system and remake it," and America "is still a country that is less revolutionary than it is interested in improvement."
Despite running for president and energizing the nation just a decade ago as a center-left candidate with a message of hope and change, Obama seems to think America does not need systemic change, and Democrats should not rock the boat or make any sudden moves.
Democrats on Twitter who reject Obama's warning not to move too far left responded to the former president's comments with the hashtag #TooFarLeft, which at the time became the top trending tag in the US and the third globally, according to
Democratic strategist Peter Daou.
Daou, who started the hashtag, wanted to eviscerate the mainstream talking point that social, economic, racial and environmental justice is somehow a radical position.
Indeed, considering the state of the country, its festering political, economic and social problems and the seeming inability of government to address them, Daou and others who have embraced the hashtag make a good point. America is not well, and ignoring the symptoms of what ails the nation--not pushing too far for change--is what gave us Donald Trump.
Consider the status quo with rising inequality, low taxation on the wealthy and corporations, and the dimming life prospects of millennials.
Earning less money and saddled with more debt than their parents, young people in America,
one study finds, cannot afford their health-care needs and are on a trajectory for a shorter life span than generations before them. According to the study, millennials are facing more chronic health issues, depression and suicide than Gen Xers due to the
economic crisis,Â
student debt, the opioid crisis, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and other issues. The impending health crisis is eroding the earning potential of this younger generation.
Wall Street is frightened at the prospect of a progressive in the mold of
Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren, and some billionaires are having a temper tantrum because they refuse to pay their fair share of taxes.
A number of big money Democratic donors have vowed to
sit out or support Trump if Warren receives the nomination.
Bill Gates seemingly has not ruled out voting for Trump if he would otherwise be forced to pay Warren's wealth tax.
Establishment and Wall Street Dems are misreading the winds of public sentiment if they believe moderation is a winning political strategy for 2020. There is no constituency for a presidential candidate who prescribes half-measures to put out a fire.
And polling indicates that.
For example, a 2019 Quinnipiac poll found that 60% of registered voters support a
2% wealth tax on people who own assets over $50 million. The wealth tax concept enjoys support across political parties and all demographic groups.
Further, according to a KFF Health Tracking Poll,
health care is the leading issue that Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents want the presidential candidates to discuss. Further, according to a poll earlier this year from Politico and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, overwhelming majorities of Democrats and Republicans believe it is
"extremely important" for Congress to tackle student debt.
Even while acknowledging the historic diversity in the Democratic field, Obama urges that candidates rein in their messaging.
"We have a number of women candidates and we have one gay candidate. And those candidates are going to have barriers if they win the nomination, or they win the general election--just like I did,"
Obama said at another event. "You can overcome that resistance if the way you are framing these issues and messages indicate, 'Look, I'm part of an American tradition ... of opening up opportunity.'"
The former president is mistaken if he believes that in appealing to the electorate, Democrats must tamp down their message and advocate for tweaks in the system rather than systemic reform. This, in a country that touts itself as the "land of opportunity," yet has one of the
lowest rates of
socioeconomic mobility.
The party of FDR could very well inspire and energize Americans looking for change with policy prescriptions such as Medicare for All, the
Green New Deal and free college.