SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
I've never been a Bob Dylan fan, and the Nobel Prize winner's sale of his archive to Universal Music changed nothing about that. In fact, sing as he might about how The Times They are a-Changing, Dylan's deal, worth an estimated $300 million to him, changed nothing about anything.
But it could have been different.
Dylan, pre-sale, had assets worth an estimated $200 million. Post-sale, he'll have half-a billion. If he lives to 100, he'll have to spend $25 million a year for the rest of his life to spend it down. More, if he invests.
Donated to a movement organization, Dylan's publishing rights could have fueled change-makers in perpetuity.
Come the holidays, Dylan may write some checks to charity. That's nice. People who have money and give some away can help those in immediate need. But they're not changing the times.
The times, and the tax code, mean that those with capital assets are taxed more leniently than those who live off wages. Dylan will pay a maximum of 20 percent on the gains from the sale of his music. The wage-earner doing well will max out at 37%. The tax code rewards charitable donations, but every deduction claimed shrinks what's available to pay for public services like schools and hospitals and libraries--all things that just might help those without wealth get a leg up.
Charity doesn't change the times. Redistributing assets does. As Marjorie Kelly of the Democracy Collaborative says, "Every economy is defined by who owns and controls assets."
What else could Dylan have done? Since 1966, the commercial rights to the song "We Shall Overcome" have been held by a fund at the Highlander movement training school in Tennessee. Highlander has played a role in every times-changing movement from Rosa Parks to Stacy Abrams.
Anyone can sing the song, but the song's commercial use is overseen by a community board, and whatever you think about private copyrights, the royalties have funded decades of grants to Black artists/activists selected democratically.
"It's not complicated to replicate what we've done," says Ashlee Woodard Henderson of Highlander.
But it is game-changing. Donated to a movement organization, Dylan's publishing rights could have fueled change-makers in perpetuity. Now, how about even one song?
I nominate The Times They Are a-Changing. What assets are you shifting this season?
You can watch the Laura Flanders Show and see our recent coverage of food justice at lauraflanders.org. And we're in fundraising mode. If you feel like shifting some assets our way, you can at www.lauraflanders.org/donate.
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
I've never been a Bob Dylan fan, and the Nobel Prize winner's sale of his archive to Universal Music changed nothing about that. In fact, sing as he might about how The Times They are a-Changing, Dylan's deal, worth an estimated $300 million to him, changed nothing about anything.
But it could have been different.
Dylan, pre-sale, had assets worth an estimated $200 million. Post-sale, he'll have half-a billion. If he lives to 100, he'll have to spend $25 million a year for the rest of his life to spend it down. More, if he invests.
Donated to a movement organization, Dylan's publishing rights could have fueled change-makers in perpetuity.
Come the holidays, Dylan may write some checks to charity. That's nice. People who have money and give some away can help those in immediate need. But they're not changing the times.
The times, and the tax code, mean that those with capital assets are taxed more leniently than those who live off wages. Dylan will pay a maximum of 20 percent on the gains from the sale of his music. The wage-earner doing well will max out at 37%. The tax code rewards charitable donations, but every deduction claimed shrinks what's available to pay for public services like schools and hospitals and libraries--all things that just might help those without wealth get a leg up.
Charity doesn't change the times. Redistributing assets does. As Marjorie Kelly of the Democracy Collaborative says, "Every economy is defined by who owns and controls assets."
What else could Dylan have done? Since 1966, the commercial rights to the song "We Shall Overcome" have been held by a fund at the Highlander movement training school in Tennessee. Highlander has played a role in every times-changing movement from Rosa Parks to Stacy Abrams.
Anyone can sing the song, but the song's commercial use is overseen by a community board, and whatever you think about private copyrights, the royalties have funded decades of grants to Black artists/activists selected democratically.
"It's not complicated to replicate what we've done," says Ashlee Woodard Henderson of Highlander.
But it is game-changing. Donated to a movement organization, Dylan's publishing rights could have fueled change-makers in perpetuity. Now, how about even one song?
I nominate The Times They Are a-Changing. What assets are you shifting this season?
You can watch the Laura Flanders Show and see our recent coverage of food justice at lauraflanders.org. And we're in fundraising mode. If you feel like shifting some assets our way, you can at www.lauraflanders.org/donate.
I've never been a Bob Dylan fan, and the Nobel Prize winner's sale of his archive to Universal Music changed nothing about that. In fact, sing as he might about how The Times They are a-Changing, Dylan's deal, worth an estimated $300 million to him, changed nothing about anything.
But it could have been different.
Dylan, pre-sale, had assets worth an estimated $200 million. Post-sale, he'll have half-a billion. If he lives to 100, he'll have to spend $25 million a year for the rest of his life to spend it down. More, if he invests.
Donated to a movement organization, Dylan's publishing rights could have fueled change-makers in perpetuity.
Come the holidays, Dylan may write some checks to charity. That's nice. People who have money and give some away can help those in immediate need. But they're not changing the times.
The times, and the tax code, mean that those with capital assets are taxed more leniently than those who live off wages. Dylan will pay a maximum of 20 percent on the gains from the sale of his music. The wage-earner doing well will max out at 37%. The tax code rewards charitable donations, but every deduction claimed shrinks what's available to pay for public services like schools and hospitals and libraries--all things that just might help those without wealth get a leg up.
Charity doesn't change the times. Redistributing assets does. As Marjorie Kelly of the Democracy Collaborative says, "Every economy is defined by who owns and controls assets."
What else could Dylan have done? Since 1966, the commercial rights to the song "We Shall Overcome" have been held by a fund at the Highlander movement training school in Tennessee. Highlander has played a role in every times-changing movement from Rosa Parks to Stacy Abrams.
Anyone can sing the song, but the song's commercial use is overseen by a community board, and whatever you think about private copyrights, the royalties have funded decades of grants to Black artists/activists selected democratically.
"It's not complicated to replicate what we've done," says Ashlee Woodard Henderson of Highlander.
But it is game-changing. Donated to a movement organization, Dylan's publishing rights could have fueled change-makers in perpetuity. Now, how about even one song?
I nominate The Times They Are a-Changing. What assets are you shifting this season?
You can watch the Laura Flanders Show and see our recent coverage of food justice at lauraflanders.org. And we're in fundraising mode. If you feel like shifting some assets our way, you can at www.lauraflanders.org/donate.