SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
President Donald Trump speaks to reporters during a Cabinet meeting at the White House on October 21, 2019 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Ricky Carioti/The Washington Post via Getty Images)
How should the nation respond to an ex-president who has incited an insurrection, brought our democracy to the brink of destruction, and left so much pain and suffering in his wake?
In addition to being convicted in the Senate, which could bar him from running for office again, he shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the cushy benefits former presidents receive.
These benefits were created under the Former Presidents' Act of 1958, which was drawn up after Harry Truman told the House Majority Leader that he was going broke.
The benefits in the Former President's Act now include a yearly pension of over $200,000, an annual $1 million travel budget, an annual $500,000 travel budget for spouses, an office "appropriately furnished and equipped," and staff to operate that office--for the rest of the former president's life.
But what about a twice-impeached former president who did everything he could to attack Black and brown communities, and ended his presidency by inciting an insurrection against the United States government?
Call me old-fashioned, but I don't think someone with that record should receive millions in taxpayer-funded benefits at all, let alone every single year for the rest of his life.
Thankfully, it doesn't have to happen: A simple majority in Congress can pass a law barring this ex-president from the normal perks afforded to former presidents. For the sake of the country, Congress must do so.
He should also be barred from receiving national security briefings now that he's left office. There is no reason that someone this dangerous should be privy to the highest levels of intelligence as a private citizen - especially given his looming legal and financial entanglements with foreign entities. He was already a national security risk in office; as a private citizen, there's no telling what he would do with classified information.
Fortunately, it doesn't take an act of Congress to cut off access to briefings: It's up to Joe Biden, and Joe Biden alone. He has the power to prevent his predecessor from receiving any and all national security briefings. For the sake of America and the world, he must do so.
Regardless of how the impeachment trial in the Senate ends, one thing is clear: Someone who has disgraced the office of the president so maliciously should not reap its amenities for the rest of his life.
No cushy benefits. No national security briefings. No perks for the worst president in history.
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
How should the nation respond to an ex-president who has incited an insurrection, brought our democracy to the brink of destruction, and left so much pain and suffering in his wake?
In addition to being convicted in the Senate, which could bar him from running for office again, he shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the cushy benefits former presidents receive.
These benefits were created under the Former Presidents' Act of 1958, which was drawn up after Harry Truman told the House Majority Leader that he was going broke.
The benefits in the Former President's Act now include a yearly pension of over $200,000, an annual $1 million travel budget, an annual $500,000 travel budget for spouses, an office "appropriately furnished and equipped," and staff to operate that office--for the rest of the former president's life.
But what about a twice-impeached former president who did everything he could to attack Black and brown communities, and ended his presidency by inciting an insurrection against the United States government?
Call me old-fashioned, but I don't think someone with that record should receive millions in taxpayer-funded benefits at all, let alone every single year for the rest of his life.
Thankfully, it doesn't have to happen: A simple majority in Congress can pass a law barring this ex-president from the normal perks afforded to former presidents. For the sake of the country, Congress must do so.
He should also be barred from receiving national security briefings now that he's left office. There is no reason that someone this dangerous should be privy to the highest levels of intelligence as a private citizen - especially given his looming legal and financial entanglements with foreign entities. He was already a national security risk in office; as a private citizen, there's no telling what he would do with classified information.
Fortunately, it doesn't take an act of Congress to cut off access to briefings: It's up to Joe Biden, and Joe Biden alone. He has the power to prevent his predecessor from receiving any and all national security briefings. For the sake of America and the world, he must do so.
Regardless of how the impeachment trial in the Senate ends, one thing is clear: Someone who has disgraced the office of the president so maliciously should not reap its amenities for the rest of his life.
No cushy benefits. No national security briefings. No perks for the worst president in history.
How should the nation respond to an ex-president who has incited an insurrection, brought our democracy to the brink of destruction, and left so much pain and suffering in his wake?
In addition to being convicted in the Senate, which could bar him from running for office again, he shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the cushy benefits former presidents receive.
These benefits were created under the Former Presidents' Act of 1958, which was drawn up after Harry Truman told the House Majority Leader that he was going broke.
The benefits in the Former President's Act now include a yearly pension of over $200,000, an annual $1 million travel budget, an annual $500,000 travel budget for spouses, an office "appropriately furnished and equipped," and staff to operate that office--for the rest of the former president's life.
But what about a twice-impeached former president who did everything he could to attack Black and brown communities, and ended his presidency by inciting an insurrection against the United States government?
Call me old-fashioned, but I don't think someone with that record should receive millions in taxpayer-funded benefits at all, let alone every single year for the rest of his life.
Thankfully, it doesn't have to happen: A simple majority in Congress can pass a law barring this ex-president from the normal perks afforded to former presidents. For the sake of the country, Congress must do so.
He should also be barred from receiving national security briefings now that he's left office. There is no reason that someone this dangerous should be privy to the highest levels of intelligence as a private citizen - especially given his looming legal and financial entanglements with foreign entities. He was already a national security risk in office; as a private citizen, there's no telling what he would do with classified information.
Fortunately, it doesn't take an act of Congress to cut off access to briefings: It's up to Joe Biden, and Joe Biden alone. He has the power to prevent his predecessor from receiving any and all national security briefings. For the sake of America and the world, he must do so.
Regardless of how the impeachment trial in the Senate ends, one thing is clear: Someone who has disgraced the office of the president so maliciously should not reap its amenities for the rest of his life.
No cushy benefits. No national security briefings. No perks for the worst president in history.