SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) speaks during a press conference advocating for the passage of the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act in the House of Representatives. The PRO Act would amend the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and is backed by the Communications Workers of America (CWA) and American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) unions. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
Lately, we have seen criticism of the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act centered on what the bill will mean for independent contractors and freelancers.
Despite the fearmongering by business interests and some freelancer groups, the PRO Act will not destroy the gig economy.
Here are three reasons why:
The PRO Act would expand collective bargaining rights for workers. It would not force any worker to give up their gig or freelance work.
The Act would expand protections under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) to more workers. The NLRA is an 85-year-old law that protects workers' right to join together to form unions or to engage in concerted efforts to ensure better working conditions. When Congress passed the NLRA it was to "encourage collective bargaining, and to curtail certain private sector labor and management practices, which can harm the general welfare of workers, businesses, and the U.S. economy." The NLRA only covers "employees," so workers who are deemed independent contractors are not covered, which leads us to the next point.
The PRO Act would stop employers from misclassifying employees as independent contractors or freelancers in order to prevent workers from banding together or forming unions to negotiate for better pay and working conditions.
The Act would use a legal test, known as an "ABC" test, of three key criteria employers have to meet in order to prove a worker is truly an independent contractor. The criteria include:
"(A) the individual is free from control and direction in connection with the performance of the service, both under the contract for the performance of service and in fact;
"(B) the service is performed outside the usual course of the business of the employer; and
"(C) the individual is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession, or business of the same nature as that involved in the service performed."
The PRO Act would provide workers with the right to join unions and band together no matter where they live if they are deemed employees because the legislation would be federally regulated and enforced.
The Act would not impact rules or laws in states that determine whether workers are employees or independent contractors for the purposes of determining a workers' state income tax status or whether they're entitled to workers' compensation benefits or unemployment benefits.
The PRO Act's name says exactly what it does, nothing more, nothing less. It's about protecting the right to organize.
For additional resources on the PRO Act, check out:
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Lately, we have seen criticism of the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act centered on what the bill will mean for independent contractors and freelancers.
Despite the fearmongering by business interests and some freelancer groups, the PRO Act will not destroy the gig economy.
Here are three reasons why:
The PRO Act would expand collective bargaining rights for workers. It would not force any worker to give up their gig or freelance work.
The Act would expand protections under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) to more workers. The NLRA is an 85-year-old law that protects workers' right to join together to form unions or to engage in concerted efforts to ensure better working conditions. When Congress passed the NLRA it was to "encourage collective bargaining, and to curtail certain private sector labor and management practices, which can harm the general welfare of workers, businesses, and the U.S. economy." The NLRA only covers "employees," so workers who are deemed independent contractors are not covered, which leads us to the next point.
The PRO Act would stop employers from misclassifying employees as independent contractors or freelancers in order to prevent workers from banding together or forming unions to negotiate for better pay and working conditions.
The Act would use a legal test, known as an "ABC" test, of three key criteria employers have to meet in order to prove a worker is truly an independent contractor. The criteria include:
"(A) the individual is free from control and direction in connection with the performance of the service, both under the contract for the performance of service and in fact;
"(B) the service is performed outside the usual course of the business of the employer; and
"(C) the individual is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession, or business of the same nature as that involved in the service performed."
The PRO Act would provide workers with the right to join unions and band together no matter where they live if they are deemed employees because the legislation would be federally regulated and enforced.
The Act would not impact rules or laws in states that determine whether workers are employees or independent contractors for the purposes of determining a workers' state income tax status or whether they're entitled to workers' compensation benefits or unemployment benefits.
The PRO Act's name says exactly what it does, nothing more, nothing less. It's about protecting the right to organize.
For additional resources on the PRO Act, check out:
Lately, we have seen criticism of the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act centered on what the bill will mean for independent contractors and freelancers.
Despite the fearmongering by business interests and some freelancer groups, the PRO Act will not destroy the gig economy.
Here are three reasons why:
The PRO Act would expand collective bargaining rights for workers. It would not force any worker to give up their gig or freelance work.
The Act would expand protections under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) to more workers. The NLRA is an 85-year-old law that protects workers' right to join together to form unions or to engage in concerted efforts to ensure better working conditions. When Congress passed the NLRA it was to "encourage collective bargaining, and to curtail certain private sector labor and management practices, which can harm the general welfare of workers, businesses, and the U.S. economy." The NLRA only covers "employees," so workers who are deemed independent contractors are not covered, which leads us to the next point.
The PRO Act would stop employers from misclassifying employees as independent contractors or freelancers in order to prevent workers from banding together or forming unions to negotiate for better pay and working conditions.
The Act would use a legal test, known as an "ABC" test, of three key criteria employers have to meet in order to prove a worker is truly an independent contractor. The criteria include:
"(A) the individual is free from control and direction in connection with the performance of the service, both under the contract for the performance of service and in fact;
"(B) the service is performed outside the usual course of the business of the employer; and
"(C) the individual is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession, or business of the same nature as that involved in the service performed."
The PRO Act would provide workers with the right to join unions and band together no matter where they live if they are deemed employees because the legislation would be federally regulated and enforced.
The Act would not impact rules or laws in states that determine whether workers are employees or independent contractors for the purposes of determining a workers' state income tax status or whether they're entitled to workers' compensation benefits or unemployment benefits.
The PRO Act's name says exactly what it does, nothing more, nothing less. It's about protecting the right to organize.
For additional resources on the PRO Act, check out: