SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Bank of America has algorithms that measure how long they can keep customers waiting on hold so as to have fewer workers needed to answer the calls. (Stock photo)
Want to unite conservatives and liberals in the Red and Blue states? Just mention those unreadable computer-generated bills we all get online or in the mail. Overflowing with abbreviations and codes, they are inscrutable, especially health care bills.
If you call the vendors for an explanation, be prepared to wait and wait and wait for any human being to answer or call back, even after you've pushed all the required buttons to leave a voice mail message. The vendors are counting on you to surrender, mumbling that you've got better things to do with your time.
Want to unite conservatives and liberals in the Red and Blue states? Just mention those unreadable computer-generated bills we all get online or in the mail. Overflowing with abbreviations and codes, they are inscrutable, especially health care bills.
If you call the vendors for an explanation, be prepared to wait and wait and wait for any human being to answer or call back, even after you've pushed all the required buttons to leave a voice mail message. The vendors are counting on you to surrender, mumbling that you've got better things to do with your time.
If you're lucky enough to get a human and you disagree about the bill, you know that if you persist against their assurances of accuracy, your credit score can go down. Algorithms can be made to work so impersonally.
A few months ago, the syndicated consumer columnist for the Washington Post, Michelle Singletary, tried to correct errors in her credit bureau's file. She called trying to get through a "hellish nightmare," a "journey to automation hell." Service by algorithm doesn't differentiate between ordinary and prominent customers. Everyone gets the same shaft.
One of the worst companies in not getting back to customer inquiries or complaints is the Bank of America. Sources tell us the Bank has algorithms that measure how long they can keep customers waiting so as to have fewer workers needed to answer the calls.
The very design of computerized bills is a premeditated endeavor by the cheaters. The nation's expert, applied mathematician Malcolm Sparrow - a Harvard professor - wrote an entire book on this subject titled "License to Steal" in which he conservatively estimated that the billing fraud in the health care industry is 10% of all expenses or about $360 billion this year alone!
The anonymous cheaters, hiding behind the corporate web of complexity, keep getting bolder. They bill you for things you never bought or wanted. The Wells Fargo Bank did this to millions of their customers over the years. The bank opened unwanted credit card accounts and billed for auto insurance, for example, imposing sales quotas on their employees. The media caught the bank, finally. Wells Fargo had to pay out money in fines and restitution. The company easily absorbed the payments as part of the cost of doing business. No executive was criminally prosecuted; a few resigned. The Board of Directors was not replaced. And Wells Fargo is flying high today, pretty much unscathed.
Many consumers don't even look at their bills anymore. They just give up and let the sellers, such as the utilities, get direct electronic payments from their bank accounts.
On July 30, 2014, Senator Jay Rockefeller's consumer subcommittee held hearings on "cramming." Here customers are billed for things on their telephone bill they never ordered by firms that somehow got the phone companies to add their charges. The testimony described what has to be seen as criminal billing. Members of Congress turned their backs on the proposed legislation to end this scam while keeping their pockets open to campaign contributions from the wrongdoers.
Credit scores, credit ratings, and grossly one-sided fine print contracts are resulting in the financial and contractual incarceration of the American consumer. In many instances, the corporate lawyers who create these contractual handcuffs make sure that you've "consented" to your "jailing," to your rip-offs, to your giving up your rights to go to court to challenge marketplace abuses. They point to some deeply buried sentence in these contracts that you have never even seen.
Maybe someday such deceit by these lawyers, who are deemed "officers of the court," will be considered legal malpractice.
Well, someone cares! In a groundbreaking report accompanied by a comprehensive proposed model act for state legislatures to enact, California consumer advocates Harvey Rosenfield and Laura Antonini document the thousand and one "non-stop thefts of our money, safety, time and privacy."
If you read through the waves of documented corporate rip-offs, billing frauds, and deceptive promotions, you'll be nodding so much, from your own experience, that you may have to stop and rest your neck.
The authors don't just expose the fraudsters, however. They have drafted legislation to stop the corporate crooks and to protect and empower you in the perilous marketplace of corporate crime, fraud, and abuse.
Read the report (four years in the making) for yourself by visiting the Represent Consumers website. You will see how the eroded civil justice system can be toughened across the board to represent you.
Those of you who wish to listen to Harvey and Laura talk about their battle for American consumers, turn to the Ralph Nader Radio Hour where their interview will be available as a podcast on Saturday, February 26, 2022.
You'll want to take your righteous fury straight to your state legislator with the model statute in hand.
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Want to unite conservatives and liberals in the Red and Blue states? Just mention those unreadable computer-generated bills we all get online or in the mail. Overflowing with abbreviations and codes, they are inscrutable, especially health care bills.
If you call the vendors for an explanation, be prepared to wait and wait and wait for any human being to answer or call back, even after you've pushed all the required buttons to leave a voice mail message. The vendors are counting on you to surrender, mumbling that you've got better things to do with your time.
If you're lucky enough to get a human and you disagree about the bill, you know that if you persist against their assurances of accuracy, your credit score can go down. Algorithms can be made to work so impersonally.
A few months ago, the syndicated consumer columnist for the Washington Post, Michelle Singletary, tried to correct errors in her credit bureau's file. She called trying to get through a "hellish nightmare," a "journey to automation hell." Service by algorithm doesn't differentiate between ordinary and prominent customers. Everyone gets the same shaft.
One of the worst companies in not getting back to customer inquiries or complaints is the Bank of America. Sources tell us the Bank has algorithms that measure how long they can keep customers waiting so as to have fewer workers needed to answer the calls.
The very design of computerized bills is a premeditated endeavor by the cheaters. The nation's expert, applied mathematician Malcolm Sparrow - a Harvard professor - wrote an entire book on this subject titled "License to Steal" in which he conservatively estimated that the billing fraud in the health care industry is 10% of all expenses or about $360 billion this year alone!
The anonymous cheaters, hiding behind the corporate web of complexity, keep getting bolder. They bill you for things you never bought or wanted. The Wells Fargo Bank did this to millions of their customers over the years. The bank opened unwanted credit card accounts and billed for auto insurance, for example, imposing sales quotas on their employees. The media caught the bank, finally. Wells Fargo had to pay out money in fines and restitution. The company easily absorbed the payments as part of the cost of doing business. No executive was criminally prosecuted; a few resigned. The Board of Directors was not replaced. And Wells Fargo is flying high today, pretty much unscathed.
Many consumers don't even look at their bills anymore. They just give up and let the sellers, such as the utilities, get direct electronic payments from their bank accounts.
On July 30, 2014, Senator Jay Rockefeller's consumer subcommittee held hearings on "cramming." Here customers are billed for things on their telephone bill they never ordered by firms that somehow got the phone companies to add their charges. The testimony described what has to be seen as criminal billing. Members of Congress turned their backs on the proposed legislation to end this scam while keeping their pockets open to campaign contributions from the wrongdoers.
Credit scores, credit ratings, and grossly one-sided fine print contracts are resulting in the financial and contractual incarceration of the American consumer. In many instances, the corporate lawyers who create these contractual handcuffs make sure that you've "consented" to your "jailing," to your rip-offs, to your giving up your rights to go to court to challenge marketplace abuses. They point to some deeply buried sentence in these contracts that you have never even seen.
Maybe someday such deceit by these lawyers, who are deemed "officers of the court," will be considered legal malpractice.
Well, someone cares! In a groundbreaking report accompanied by a comprehensive proposed model act for state legislatures to enact, California consumer advocates Harvey Rosenfield and Laura Antonini document the thousand and one "non-stop thefts of our money, safety, time and privacy."
If you read through the waves of documented corporate rip-offs, billing frauds, and deceptive promotions, you'll be nodding so much, from your own experience, that you may have to stop and rest your neck.
The authors don't just expose the fraudsters, however. They have drafted legislation to stop the corporate crooks and to protect and empower you in the perilous marketplace of corporate crime, fraud, and abuse.
Read the report (four years in the making) for yourself by visiting the Represent Consumers website. You will see how the eroded civil justice system can be toughened across the board to represent you.
Those of you who wish to listen to Harvey and Laura talk about their battle for American consumers, turn to the Ralph Nader Radio Hour where their interview will be available as a podcast on Saturday, February 26, 2022.
You'll want to take your righteous fury straight to your state legislator with the model statute in hand.
Want to unite conservatives and liberals in the Red and Blue states? Just mention those unreadable computer-generated bills we all get online or in the mail. Overflowing with abbreviations and codes, they are inscrutable, especially health care bills.
If you call the vendors for an explanation, be prepared to wait and wait and wait for any human being to answer or call back, even after you've pushed all the required buttons to leave a voice mail message. The vendors are counting on you to surrender, mumbling that you've got better things to do with your time.
If you're lucky enough to get a human and you disagree about the bill, you know that if you persist against their assurances of accuracy, your credit score can go down. Algorithms can be made to work so impersonally.
A few months ago, the syndicated consumer columnist for the Washington Post, Michelle Singletary, tried to correct errors in her credit bureau's file. She called trying to get through a "hellish nightmare," a "journey to automation hell." Service by algorithm doesn't differentiate between ordinary and prominent customers. Everyone gets the same shaft.
One of the worst companies in not getting back to customer inquiries or complaints is the Bank of America. Sources tell us the Bank has algorithms that measure how long they can keep customers waiting so as to have fewer workers needed to answer the calls.
The very design of computerized bills is a premeditated endeavor by the cheaters. The nation's expert, applied mathematician Malcolm Sparrow - a Harvard professor - wrote an entire book on this subject titled "License to Steal" in which he conservatively estimated that the billing fraud in the health care industry is 10% of all expenses or about $360 billion this year alone!
The anonymous cheaters, hiding behind the corporate web of complexity, keep getting bolder. They bill you for things you never bought or wanted. The Wells Fargo Bank did this to millions of their customers over the years. The bank opened unwanted credit card accounts and billed for auto insurance, for example, imposing sales quotas on their employees. The media caught the bank, finally. Wells Fargo had to pay out money in fines and restitution. The company easily absorbed the payments as part of the cost of doing business. No executive was criminally prosecuted; a few resigned. The Board of Directors was not replaced. And Wells Fargo is flying high today, pretty much unscathed.
Many consumers don't even look at their bills anymore. They just give up and let the sellers, such as the utilities, get direct electronic payments from their bank accounts.
On July 30, 2014, Senator Jay Rockefeller's consumer subcommittee held hearings on "cramming." Here customers are billed for things on their telephone bill they never ordered by firms that somehow got the phone companies to add their charges. The testimony described what has to be seen as criminal billing. Members of Congress turned their backs on the proposed legislation to end this scam while keeping their pockets open to campaign contributions from the wrongdoers.
Credit scores, credit ratings, and grossly one-sided fine print contracts are resulting in the financial and contractual incarceration of the American consumer. In many instances, the corporate lawyers who create these contractual handcuffs make sure that you've "consented" to your "jailing," to your rip-offs, to your giving up your rights to go to court to challenge marketplace abuses. They point to some deeply buried sentence in these contracts that you have never even seen.
Maybe someday such deceit by these lawyers, who are deemed "officers of the court," will be considered legal malpractice.
Well, someone cares! In a groundbreaking report accompanied by a comprehensive proposed model act for state legislatures to enact, California consumer advocates Harvey Rosenfield and Laura Antonini document the thousand and one "non-stop thefts of our money, safety, time and privacy."
If you read through the waves of documented corporate rip-offs, billing frauds, and deceptive promotions, you'll be nodding so much, from your own experience, that you may have to stop and rest your neck.
The authors don't just expose the fraudsters, however. They have drafted legislation to stop the corporate crooks and to protect and empower you in the perilous marketplace of corporate crime, fraud, and abuse.
Read the report (four years in the making) for yourself by visiting the Represent Consumers website. You will see how the eroded civil justice system can be toughened across the board to represent you.
Those of you who wish to listen to Harvey and Laura talk about their battle for American consumers, turn to the Ralph Nader Radio Hour where their interview will be available as a podcast on Saturday, February 26, 2022.
You'll want to take your righteous fury straight to your state legislator with the model statute in hand.
"Elon and his all-male team lie about Social Security like other people chew gum," said one former head of the agency.
Elon Musk, the de facto head of the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency, was berated anew Friday after insidiously tarring millions of Social Security recipients as "fraudsters"—a tactic critics called part of an orchestrated Republican scheme to destroy the vital earned benefits program.
Musk and seven DOGE staffers—all of them men—appeared on Fox News Thursday, where the world's richest person called the Trump administration's crusade to eviscerate the federal government under pretext of improving efficiency "the biggest revolution in the government since the original revolution" in 1776.
The DOGE staffers repeated unfounded claims that Social Security is riddled with fraud; that in some cases, 40% of calls to the Social Security Administration phone center are fraudulent; and that millions of people aged 120 and older are registered with SSA.
Acknowledging that DOGE's wrecking-ball approach to government reform is getting "a lot of complaints along the way," Musk said: "You know who complains the loudest, and with the most amount of fake righteous indignation? The fraudsters."
Musk's comments echoed those of billionaire U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who suggested on a podcast last week that only a "fraudster" would complain about a missed Social Security check.
Responding to what she called Musk's "absurd claim," Nancy Altman, president of the advocacy group Social Security Works (SSW), said Friday that "the truth is that Social Security has a fraud rate of 0.00625%, far lower than private sector retirement programs."
"It is Musk and DOGE who are inviting in fraudsters," she continued. "Scammers are already rushing in to take advantage of the confusion created by DOGE's service cuts."
Critics have denounced the Trump administration for sowing chaos at SSA and other federal agencies by planning to lay off thousands of workers, slashc spending, and implement other disruptive policies. Cuts in SSA phone services were reportedly carried out in response to a direct request from the White House, which claimed it is simply working to eliminate "waste, fraud, and abuse."
"The truth is that Social Security has a fraud rate of 0.00625%, far lower than private sector retirement programs."
This "DOGE-manufactured chaos," as Altman calls it, has already led to the SSA website crashing several times in recent weeks and hold times of as long as 4-5 hours for those calling the agency.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass) on Thursday noted that while it would be clearly illegal for President Donald Trump and DOGE to cut Social Security benefits without congressional authorization, there are other ways for the administration to hamstring the agency.
Referencing a new in-person verification rule that was delayed and partly rolled back this week, Warren said:
Say a 66-year-old man qualifies for Social Security. Say he calls the helpline to apply, but he's told about a new DOGE rule, so he has to go online or in person. He can't drive. He has trouble with the website, so he waits until his niece can get a day off to take him to the local office, but DOGE closed that office, so they have to drive two hours to get to the next closest office. When they get there, there are only two people staffing a 50-person line, so he doesn't even make it to the front of the line before the office closes and he has to come back. Let's assume it takes him three months to straighten this out, and he misses a total of $5,000 in benefits checks, which, by law, he will never get back.
"This scenario is a backdoor way Musk and Trump could cut Social Security," the senator added. "That's what I'm fighting to prevent."
Democratic lawmakers and others argue that the Trump administration's approach is "a prelude to privatizing Social Security and handing it over to private equity," as Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said earlier this week.
"Improving Social Security doesn't start with shuttering the offices that handle modernization, anti-fraud activities, and civil rights violations," the senator asserted. "It doesn't start with indiscriminately firing or buying out thousands of workers, and it doesn't start with restricting customer service over the phone and drawing up plans to close field and regional offices."
These and other moves, including the nomination of financial services executive Frank Bisignano as SSA commissioner, belie Trump's claim that he is "not touching" Social Security, upon which 70 million Americans—including nearly 9 in 10 people aged 65 or older—rely for their earned benefits.
So do Trump and Musk's own words. The president has called Social Security a "scam" and Musk recently referred to it as "the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time."
"No one who thinks Social Security is a criminal Ponzi scheme should be anywhere near our earned Social Security benefits or the sensitive data we provide the Social Security Administration," said SSW's Altman.
Over 200 actions are expected this weekend at dealership locations across multiple continents.
Outraged by Elon Musk's devastating contributions to the Trump administration, people around the world continue to target the billionaire CEO's electric vehicle company, planning "Tesla Takedown" protests at over 200 locations for Saturday, March 29.
"Elon Musk is destroying our democracy, and he's using the fortune he built at Tesla to do it," organizers wrote on Action Network, which has an interactive map of the protest sites. "We are taking action at Tesla to stop Musk's illegal coup."
Organizers also have a message for people with ties to the company: "Sell your Teslas, dump your stock, join the picket lines."
Frustration over Musk's effort to gut the U.S. government has impacted the company's value. Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz—who ran for vice president last November—told a crowd at a recent political event that he added Tesla to his smartphone's stock application "to give me a little boost during the day," and urged EV owners to remove the logo with dental floss.
Since Musk began dismantling the federal bureaucracy as chief of President Donald Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, critics have protested at Tesla facilities and posted videos on social media about selling their vehicles.
As CNN reported last week, "Despite the record low prices for a Tesla on the used market and a prominent advertisement by the president of the United States, the cars have been having a tough time finding buyers, according to a March survey from Cars.com."
The #TeslaTakedown Global Day of Action on March 29 needs you! Even if you don’t live near a showroom, you can plan an action & fight back. Pick a Supercharger station, a busy corner, a park—just get out there & make your voice heard with a peaceful protest. Info: actionnetwork.org/event_campai...
[image or embed]
— Mark Ruffalo (@markruffalo.bsky.social) March 27, 2025 at 10:49 AM
Earlier this month, Trump held a Tesla sales event at the White House, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick encouraged Fox News viewers to buy stock in the company, triggering an ethics complaint against him. The president and U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi have also described people who have vandalized Tesla property as "terrorists." On Monday, federal law enforcement agencies launched a task force "to coordinate investigative activity and crack down on violent Tesla attacks."
Organizers of the Saturday demonstrations stressed that "Tesla Takedown is a peaceful protest movement. We oppose violence, vandalism, and destruction of property. This protest is a lawful exercise of our First Amendment right to peaceful assembly."
In addition to protests planned across North America and Europe, actions are also coordinated Australia and New Zealand. Supporters are sharing updates about the global day of action on social media—including Musk-owned X—with the hashtags #TeslaTakedown and #BoycottTesla.
"Nobody voted for this, and nobody voted for Elon," Vickie Mueller Olvera, who has been organizing Tesla Takedown protests in the Bay Area, told The Guardian. "He's an unelected superbillionaire and he's a thug."
"I see Elon Musk as hijacking our government, and he's just dismantling everything that we hold dear," Olvera added. "Everything that people have fought long and hard for, like social security, Medicare and Medicaid and our beautiful national parks... it just feels like the rug is getting pulled out from under us."
"First Trump removes any reference of diversity from the present—now he's trying to remove it from our history," wrote one Democratic lawmaker. "You cannot erase our past and you cannot stop us from fulfilling our future."
U.S. President Donald Trump has elicited a fresh wave of anger after he signed an executive order on Thursday targeting exhibits or programs critical of the United States at the Smithsonian Institution, a sprawling network of largely free museums and Washington, D.C.'s National Zoo.
The order aims to prevent federal money from going to displays that "divide Americans based on race" or "promote programs or ideologies inconsistent with federal law and policy," as well as remove "improper ideology" from Smithsonian's museums, education centers, and research centers.
"This is unabashed fascism," wrote the journalist Lauren Wolfe on X on Thursday. Amy Rutenberg, a history professor at Iowa State University, wrote: "Last week, while visiting several Smithsonian museums, I kept wondering how long it would take for this administration to direct exhibits to be pulled. Not long, it turns out."
Another observer, journalist and founding editor of the outlet SpyTalk Jeff Stein, remarked that "Trump goes full-on Soviet with intent to scrub Smithsonian museums etc. of 'improper ideology.'"
The move highlights Trump's desire to reshape not only American politics, but cultural institutions too.
The order, which included an accompanying fact sheet, also directs U.S. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum to reinstate monuments, memorials, statues, and other properties that have been taken down or altered since the beginning of 2020 to "perpetuate a false reconstruction of American history, inappropriately minimize the value of certain historical events or figures, or include any other improper partisan ideology."
The order also specifies that U.S. Vice President JD Vance—a member of the Smithsonian Board of Regents—will be tasked with identifying and appointing Smithsonian board members "who are committed to advancing the celebration of America's extraordinary heritage and progress."
The executive order singles out specific museums, like the African American History and Culture, and a "forthcoming" American Women's History Museum plan to celebrate what the White House described as "the exploits of male athletes participating in women's sports."
"Once widely respected as a symbol of American excellence and a global icon of cultural achievement, the Smithsonian Institution has, in recent years, come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology," according to the executive order.
Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) connected Trump's targeting of Smithsonian to his administration's attacks on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.
"First Trump removes any reference of diversity from the present—now he's trying to remove it from our history. Let me be PERFECTLY clear—you cannot erase our past and you cannot stop us from fulfilling our future," she wrote on X on Thursday.