Syrians fleeing the war in their country wait to cross into Turkey. (Photo: Halil Fidan/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images)
From Ukraine to the War on Terror: How Imperialism Turns Displaced People Invisible
For populations within states that undertake massive military aggression, the victims of this aggression often become invisible.
A March 6 New York Times article entitled "Ukrainians Find That Relatives in Russia Don't Believe It's a War" provides accounts of Ukrainians--distressed and in the midst of evacuations--calling their Russian relatives. They find out that their relatives tend to deny that bombs are raining on Ukraine, and revert to Russian propaganda on the need of Russia to liberate the country from a gang of drugged-up Nazis.
In Ukraine, the imperial aggressor is Russia. In the many tangled theatres of the War on Terror, the common belligerent is the United States.
The surrealism and callousness of these Russian reactions are extreme, but the underlying mechanisms are more common than one might think. For populations within states that undertake massive military aggression, the victims of this aggression often become invisible.
In Ukraine, the imperial aggressor is Russia. In the many tangled theatres of the War on Terror, the common belligerent is the United States. To its population--as well as the citizen of western countries that have provided armaments, infrastructure, and diplomatic support for these wars--the people displaced in the context of the War on Terror, for example in Yemen and even Iraq, have been all but invisible, even though the number of the displaced is staggering, even historically unprecedented: As leading researchers of the Brown University's Costs of War project calculated, the war on terror displaced at least 37, and up to 59 million people. This number exceeds the number of displaced people every war since 1900, with the exception of the displacement generated by World War II.
The calculations to arrive of the number of these displaced people, which has been ignored by the global media, are based on a robust methodology. The researchers admit that the events leading to displacement involve a multitude of actors and causes. But they have been at pains to ensure that the displacement that they identified is caused by fighting that involves the US: In Syria, for instance, the researchers only counted the displaced in from five provinces where U.S. forces have carried out military campaigns since 2014.
The experience of displacement is characterized by trauma, bereavement and fear, no matter who caused it. However, the types of processes that render displacement and suffering invisible differ in the west and Russia. In Russia, a top-down propaganda system steered by the Kremlin squashes all dissenting information. There is reporting on the abuses of the War on Terror in the west, but it is often decontextualized and criticism tends to identify specific abuses, depicting them as aberrations that don't diminish the generally benign intentions of the west--the overall pattern of massive displacement unleashed by the War on Terror notwithstanding. Our system of Manufacturing Consent is less crude, but very effective.
Our responsibilities towards the displaced are often unmet: As the continuous defunding of the UNHCR--the UN agency to bring relief to the world's displaced--shows, the people displaced by Washington's counterinsurgency strategists and proxy warlords the world over live in a state of humanitarian austerity, with minimal educational, sanitary and healthcare services as well as protection in these pandemic times. Funding UNHCR would only require a fraction of the funding of military budgets that are skyrocketing across the west.
Pointing the mirror to ourselves as we are confronted by images of the horrors of war and displacement in Ukraine, and calling out our responsibilities as tax payers and citizens in war economies, should not always be derided as acts of Whataboutism. But it's a fine balance: As we think about the parallels and difference between the Russian and our own aggression, we need to repudiate Kremlin attempts to gaslight people shocked by the suffering of Ukrainians. We owe solidarity to the victims of Russian aggression and escalations--as well as to the victims of the violence that our own societies unleashed.
No one is coming to save us. Join with us.
| The world is a pretty dark place right now. Economic inequality off the charts. The climate emergency. Supreme Court corruption in the U.S. and corporate capture worldwide. Democracy in many nations coming apart at the seams. Fascism threatens. It’s enough to make you wish for some powerful being to come along and save us. But the truth is this: no heroes are coming to save us. The only path to real and progressive change is when well-informed, well-intentioned people—fed up with being kicked around by the rich, the powerful, and the wicked—get organized and fight for the better world we all deserve. That’s why we created Common Dreams. We cover the issues that corporate media never will and lift up voices others would rather keep silent. But this people-powered media model can only survive with the support of readers like you. Can you join with us and donate right now to Common Dreams’ Mid-Year Campaign? |
A March 6 New York Times article entitled "Ukrainians Find That Relatives in Russia Don't Believe It's a War" provides accounts of Ukrainians--distressed and in the midst of evacuations--calling their Russian relatives. They find out that their relatives tend to deny that bombs are raining on Ukraine, and revert to Russian propaganda on the need of Russia to liberate the country from a gang of drugged-up Nazis.
In Ukraine, the imperial aggressor is Russia. In the many tangled theatres of the War on Terror, the common belligerent is the United States.
The surrealism and callousness of these Russian reactions are extreme, but the underlying mechanisms are more common than one might think. For populations within states that undertake massive military aggression, the victims of this aggression often become invisible.
In Ukraine, the imperial aggressor is Russia. In the many tangled theatres of the War on Terror, the common belligerent is the United States. To its population--as well as the citizen of western countries that have provided armaments, infrastructure, and diplomatic support for these wars--the people displaced in the context of the War on Terror, for example in Yemen and even Iraq, have been all but invisible, even though the number of the displaced is staggering, even historically unprecedented: As leading researchers of the Brown University's Costs of War project calculated, the war on terror displaced at least 37, and up to 59 million people. This number exceeds the number of displaced people every war since 1900, with the exception of the displacement generated by World War II.
The calculations to arrive of the number of these displaced people, which has been ignored by the global media, are based on a robust methodology. The researchers admit that the events leading to displacement involve a multitude of actors and causes. But they have been at pains to ensure that the displacement that they identified is caused by fighting that involves the US: In Syria, for instance, the researchers only counted the displaced in from five provinces where U.S. forces have carried out military campaigns since 2014.
The experience of displacement is characterized by trauma, bereavement and fear, no matter who caused it. However, the types of processes that render displacement and suffering invisible differ in the west and Russia. In Russia, a top-down propaganda system steered by the Kremlin squashes all dissenting information. There is reporting on the abuses of the War on Terror in the west, but it is often decontextualized and criticism tends to identify specific abuses, depicting them as aberrations that don't diminish the generally benign intentions of the west--the overall pattern of massive displacement unleashed by the War on Terror notwithstanding. Our system of Manufacturing Consent is less crude, but very effective.
Our responsibilities towards the displaced are often unmet: As the continuous defunding of the UNHCR--the UN agency to bring relief to the world's displaced--shows, the people displaced by Washington's counterinsurgency strategists and proxy warlords the world over live in a state of humanitarian austerity, with minimal educational, sanitary and healthcare services as well as protection in these pandemic times. Funding UNHCR would only require a fraction of the funding of military budgets that are skyrocketing across the west.
Pointing the mirror to ourselves as we are confronted by images of the horrors of war and displacement in Ukraine, and calling out our responsibilities as tax payers and citizens in war economies, should not always be derided as acts of Whataboutism. But it's a fine balance: As we think about the parallels and difference between the Russian and our own aggression, we need to repudiate Kremlin attempts to gaslight people shocked by the suffering of Ukrainians. We owe solidarity to the victims of Russian aggression and escalations--as well as to the victims of the violence that our own societies unleashed.
A March 6 New York Times article entitled "Ukrainians Find That Relatives in Russia Don't Believe It's a War" provides accounts of Ukrainians--distressed and in the midst of evacuations--calling their Russian relatives. They find out that their relatives tend to deny that bombs are raining on Ukraine, and revert to Russian propaganda on the need of Russia to liberate the country from a gang of drugged-up Nazis.
In Ukraine, the imperial aggressor is Russia. In the many tangled theatres of the War on Terror, the common belligerent is the United States.
The surrealism and callousness of these Russian reactions are extreme, but the underlying mechanisms are more common than one might think. For populations within states that undertake massive military aggression, the victims of this aggression often become invisible.
In Ukraine, the imperial aggressor is Russia. In the many tangled theatres of the War on Terror, the common belligerent is the United States. To its population--as well as the citizen of western countries that have provided armaments, infrastructure, and diplomatic support for these wars--the people displaced in the context of the War on Terror, for example in Yemen and even Iraq, have been all but invisible, even though the number of the displaced is staggering, even historically unprecedented: As leading researchers of the Brown University's Costs of War project calculated, the war on terror displaced at least 37, and up to 59 million people. This number exceeds the number of displaced people every war since 1900, with the exception of the displacement generated by World War II.
The calculations to arrive of the number of these displaced people, which has been ignored by the global media, are based on a robust methodology. The researchers admit that the events leading to displacement involve a multitude of actors and causes. But they have been at pains to ensure that the displacement that they identified is caused by fighting that involves the US: In Syria, for instance, the researchers only counted the displaced in from five provinces where U.S. forces have carried out military campaigns since 2014.
The experience of displacement is characterized by trauma, bereavement and fear, no matter who caused it. However, the types of processes that render displacement and suffering invisible differ in the west and Russia. In Russia, a top-down propaganda system steered by the Kremlin squashes all dissenting information. There is reporting on the abuses of the War on Terror in the west, but it is often decontextualized and criticism tends to identify specific abuses, depicting them as aberrations that don't diminish the generally benign intentions of the west--the overall pattern of massive displacement unleashed by the War on Terror notwithstanding. Our system of Manufacturing Consent is less crude, but very effective.
Our responsibilities towards the displaced are often unmet: As the continuous defunding of the UNHCR--the UN agency to bring relief to the world's displaced--shows, the people displaced by Washington's counterinsurgency strategists and proxy warlords the world over live in a state of humanitarian austerity, with minimal educational, sanitary and healthcare services as well as protection in these pandemic times. Funding UNHCR would only require a fraction of the funding of military budgets that are skyrocketing across the west.
Pointing the mirror to ourselves as we are confronted by images of the horrors of war and displacement in Ukraine, and calling out our responsibilities as tax payers and citizens in war economies, should not always be derided as acts of Whataboutism. But it's a fine balance: As we think about the parallels and difference between the Russian and our own aggression, we need to repudiate Kremlin attempts to gaslight people shocked by the suffering of Ukrainians. We owe solidarity to the victims of Russian aggression and escalations--as well as to the victims of the violence that our own societies unleashed.