Opinion
Climate
Economy
Politics
Rights & Justice
War & Peace
The wife and child of Qassem Elawawde mourn his murder in an Israeli strike last week.
Further

Soul Of My Soul: How Many Dead Palestinians Are Enough

Harrowing headlines still spew from Gaza: They have run out of body bags, 96% of children feel their death is imminent, it is the worst slaughter of civilians in history, everyone is starving. Last week, an "icon of Gazan suffering" was killed, like his toddler grandchildren before him, by "the most evil army on earth.” And a year after the murder of poet and teacher Refaat Alareer,his posthumous writings were released. Its searing, plaintive thesis: "If I must die/Let it bring hope."

Still, hope is scant. The death toll has passed 45,000, two thirds of whom are women and children, many (unfathomably, still) shot in the head and chest by Israeli snipers. Also killed are at least 1,000 health workers, 200 journalists, many hundreds of teachers and writers, a people's torchbearers. Health care and homes are decimated, Israel's brutal blockade has left most Gazans without power or water and starving or at least hungry, nearly 107,000 have been wounded or maimed, untold thousands of dead remain rotting under rubble. Almost a year after international jurists declared Israel is committing genocide - ungodly news an indifferent world met with thunderous silence - Amnesty Internationalhas just released a meticulously detailed, 300-page report confirming that yes, it is. They added, "Month after month, Israel has treated Palestinians in Gaza as a subhuman group unworthy of human rights and dignity."

Despite their ongoing, perversely preposterous claims of trying really hard not to kill civilians, from Oct. 8, 2023 onward Israel's war against a trapped, traumatized population has been "by all measures and standards a 'war' against civilians, a war of depopulation, with no precedents in this century," according to U.K-based watchdog Airwars, which tracks civilian harm from aerial bombardment. During its first month, an Airwars report found harm to civilians "incomparable with any 21st century air campaign," with the rate of killings of thousands of civilians, children and entire families at home three to seven times higher than any earlier documented war. Amidst the vast carnage, 96% of children reportedly feel "their death is imminent" in "one of the most horrifying places in the world to be a child." And from ravaged northern Gaza, Palestinian journalist Hossam Sabath imparted the sickening news, "We have run out of body bags to bury the dead."

In the face of Israel's "voluminous crimes against humanity," the Biden administration isobscenely still sending money and weapons to Israel - to date, a record $17.9 billion, with another $20 billion in killing machines approved in August - despite widespread outrage. More shame: Despite the international Doctors Without Borders regularly mourning and celebrating its lost colleagues - with the dark reminder that, "Nowhere in Gaza is safe" - and a handful of U.S. doctors volunteering in and speaking up for Gaza, America's medical establishment has remained largely, willfully silent about the bloodshed. The prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, having finally apologized for its longstanding silence about the Nazi holocaust in a new “Recognizing Historical Injustices in Medicine series, has not published a single article about the devastation in Gaza; nor has it mentioned the words genocide, blockade or Occupation.

With pro-Zionist repression sweeping even the art world - funding lost, exhibitions cancelled, "sensitivity reviews" of Muslim artists - a group of Palestinians in Palestine and the U.S. have filed the first lawsuit against Biden's State Department for breaking domestic human rights law. The suit accuses State of circumventing the decades-old Leahy Law, which bars U.S. military aid to forces "credibly implicated" in war crimes, to continue funding Israel's genocide despite its "overwhelming record of gross violations of human rights." Arguing the agency has adopted "arbitrary and capricious" standards - "The rules were different for Israel" - the suit charges State with embracing a "See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil" approach that ignores Israel's countless crimes in defiance of the Leahy Law." For final proof, the suit, backed by multiple former State Department officials, notes that no Israeli unit has ever been deemed ineligible for aid.

America's complicity, it turns out, doesn't stop there. Writing for Drop Site News, two journalists uncovered both a "Ghost Unit" of snipers inside Gaza that's allegedly killed over 100 people - and boasted they set a long-distance record by "neutralizing" a "terrorist" from 1.26 kilometers away - but a U.S, tax-exempt Friends of Paratrooper Sniper Unit 202 that has raised over $300,000 to buy vests, silencers, stands etc "for the overall welfare of soldiers," part of broader Israeli fundraising that includes the $100-million-a-year Friends of the IDF. "Your support allowed us to get my son and his elite sniper unit the most advanced scopes (to) have an advantage over Hamas," wrote the mother of a unit member from Illinois, helping them "to go into battle (and) come home safely." The unit posted her thanks, also three grainy videos of civilian executions with, “When they meet the 202nd battalion, they are going to regret being born.”

Righteous Khaled Nabhan, who last year movingly mourned his granddaughter Reem, 3, as "soul of my soul\u201d; also killed was her brother  Tarek, 5.  On Monday,  Nabhan was also killed. Righteous Khaled Nabhan, who last year movingly mourned his granddaughter Reem, 3, as "soul of my soul,” when she was killed by an Israeli strike that also killed her brother Tarek, 5. On Monday, Nabhan was killed in another strike. Photos from family

Many Gazans, of course, already do. Hossam Shabat, a rare surviving journalist in northern Gaza, documents in grim detail a recent, hours-long "death march," a mass expulsion from Beit Lahia under heavy artillery shelling and gunfire. Shabat, displaced over 20 times while seeing countless colleagues killed before him, describes dust-covered, tear-streaked children running panicked as warplanes roar overhead. When some pleaded for water, the Israeli soldiers corralling them laughed, instead tauntingly pouring water on the ground. When soldiers detained the fathers in the crowd, their kids screamed in terror, clinging to Israeli tanks that could take them away. A 16-year-old girl and her sister, sole survivors of an earlier airstrike that killed 70, walked until the sister was hit and fell, blood pouring from her. When no help came, the girl left her there: "I was screaming, but no one heard me."

Aid workers also chronicle the anguish - many thousands of small orphans left to fend for themselves, children wracked by nightmares reflecting "a mental health catastrophe (of) multigenerational trauma that will endure for decades," weary, gaunt ghosts of adults numbly "waiting for what comes next." "People are waiting, full of agony, holding on to some small hope," says one. "We are dying slowly." Even amidst so much grief and horror, some losses strike especially deep. On Monday, an Israeli airstrike on Nuseirat refugee camp killed Khaled Nabhan, a "righteous" 54-year-old grandfather murdered 14 months after he became "an icon of Gaza's suffering" when he was filmed tearfully kissing goodbye his bloodied, beloved granddaughter Reem, three, calling her "soul of my soul." Reem died in another strike at Nuseirat that also killed her brother Tarek, five; all three were killed by what Omar Suleiman called "the most evil army on earth."

After his grandchildren died, Nabhan, known as "Abu Diaa," became "a one-man relief agency." Despite his pain, he spent the year "spreading hope" to others hungry, hurting, traumatized. He collected tents, toys, food, clothing; he helped rescuers and medics care for injured Gazans, particularly children; he fed stray cats, played with his surviving grandkids, took care of his elderly mother, and worked as a laborer when he could. His son Diaa: "He starved himself to make sure we had enough food.” His daughter Maysa, mother of Reem and Tarek, said it was her father who daily comforted her after their deaths: "He was everything to us. He held this family together...Even when the bombs were falling, he made us feel safe." Seeking solace, many of those bitterly grieving Nabhan's loss prayed that he and Reem would now be reunited "in the realm of souls where the wickedness of this so-called humanity will no longer reach them."

Last week, the anniversary of another painful death was marked with the posthumous release of “If I Must Die,” a collection of poetry and prose by esteemed teacher, writer and mentor Refaat Alareer, killed last Dec. 6 at 46 in a "surgical" airstrike that hit only his sister's apartment where he sheltered with family; the blast also killed his brother, his brother’s son, his sister and her three children. Proceeds from the book of reportage, essays, poems and interviews during the last decade of Alareer's life will go to his surviving family. Published by OR Books, it's "an oral history that reads like an epic poem," a "poetry of witness" serving as "evidence of what occurred," a grim chronicle of Occupation in "granular, human terms" told by "a man of his people" in "writing born of fire" - often in English, to reach a wider audience. It was compiled by student and colleague Yousef Aljamal, who calls Alareer "the giant of the Palestinian narrative."

Born in Shuja’iyya, a neighborhood with a history of fierce resistance to the occupation, Alareer grew up amidst its violence and his grandmother's stories of the Nakba. As a first-grader, he was struck in the head by a stone thrown by an Israeli soldier "smiling ear to ear"; four years later, he was shot by a rubber bullet for throwing stones; over time, he saw relatives killed or maimed. Educated at home and abroad, he taught literature at Gaza's Islamic University, often mentoring young writers; after Israel's brutal response to the peaceful Great March of Return, he became a sort of "peoples historian," editing and contributing to the anthologies Gaza Writes Back and Gaza Unsilenced. He also helped start We Are Not Numbers to chronicle Gazans' collective struggles against dispossession. Always, he believed in the power of storytelling: "As a Palestinian, I have been brought up on stories. It's both selfish and treacherous to keep a story to yourself."

He taught his students Edward Said, Virginia Woolf, The Merchant of Venice; revisiting Robinson Crusoe, he was struck by the likeness of Friday's story to that of Palestinians, told by "a self-appointed, colonial (master) assuming ownership of a land that was not his," and he fought for his people's right to narrate their own experiences and history. Daring to imagine a free Palestine but "chillingly prescient," he saw genocide unfold, his kids go hungry, Gaza become "an "extermination camp." His lastpoemIf I Must Die, to his daughter Shymaa - “If I die/ you must live/ to tell my story...Let it bring hope/ Let it be a tale" - went around the world, especially after Shymaa was killed along with her husband and baby. As "a small measure of justice," Drop Site has been working to publicize Refaat’s book, to "let it fly (like) a kite (and) keep alive hope for a better world." "When will this pass?" Alareer asked as he watched Gaza destroyed. "How many dead Palestinians are enough?" Still, he wrote, "We have no choice but to fight back and tell her stories. For Palestine."

A Gazan man kisses his son, killed in an Israeli assault, good-bye.A Gazan man kisses his son, killed in an Israeli assault, good-bye.SOPA via Getty Images

SEE ALL
The remnants of buildings in Chimney Rock, North Carolina
News

Congressional Report Warns of Climate Threat to US Insurance, Housing Markets

After at least two dozen U.S. disasters with losses exceeding $1 billion during a year that is on track to be the hottest on record, a congressional committee on Monday released a report detailing how the fossil fuel-driven climate emergency poses a "significant threat" to the country's housing and insurance markets.

"Climate-exacerbated disasters, such as wildfires, hurricanes, floods, drought, and excessive heat, are increasing risk and causing damage to homes across the country," states the report from Democrats on the Joint Economic Committee (JEC). "Last year, roughly 70% of Americans reported that their community experienced an extreme weather event."

"In the 1980s, the United States experienced an average of one billion-dollar disaster (adjusted for inflation) every four months; now, these significant disasters occur approximately every three weeks," the document continues. "2023 was the worst year for home insurers since 2000, with losses reaching $15.2 billion—more than twice the losses reported in 2022."

"Rising premiums and this issue of uninsurability could seriously disrupt the housing market and stress state-operated insurance programs, public services, and disaster relief."

The insurance industry is already responding to that stress. The publication highlights that "insurers are pulling out of some states with substantial wildfire or hurricane risk—like California, Arizona, Florida, and North Carolina—leaving some areas 'uninsurable,'" and "in many regions, even if the homeowner can get insurance, the policy covers less than the actual physical climate risks (for example, rising sea levels or more intense wildfires) that their home faces, leaving them 'underinsured.'"

JEC Democratic staff found that last year, "the average U.S. homeowners' insurance rate rose over 11%," and from 2011-21, it soared 44%. Researchers also documented state-by-state jumps for 2020-23. For increases, Florida was the highest ($1,272), followed by Louisiana ($986), the District of Columbia ($971), Colorado ($892), Massachusetts ($855), and Nebraska ($849).

The highest premiums for 2023 were in Florida ($3,547), Nebraska ($3,055), Oklahoma ($2,990), Massachusetts ($2,980), Colorado ($2,972), Hawaii ($2,958), D.C. ($2,867), Louisana ($2,793), Rhode Island ($2,792), and Mississippi ($2,787).

The report ties the rising premiums to "surging" prices for repairs, reinsurers also hiking rates, insurance litigation issues, and rate caps in some states pushing higher costs off to states that regulate the industry less. While JEC Democrats focused on the United States, as Common Dreamsreported last week, the climate threat to the insurance industry is a global problem.

"Rising premiums and this issue of uninsurability could seriously disrupt the housing market and stress state-operated insurance programs, public services, and disaster relief," the new report warns. "Given this rising threat, innovations in climate mitigation and adaptation, insurance options, and disaster relief are essential for protecting Americans and their finances."

The publication points out that "a previous JEC report on climate financial risks discussed other potential solutions like parametric insurance (a supplemental insurance plan that can pay homeowners faster), community-based catastrophe insurance that incentivizes community-level resilience efforts, and attempts to use risk-pooling, data, and AI to better price risk."

The new document also promotes the Wildfire Insurance Coverage Study Act, introduced by JEC Chair Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) "to address these data needs and study wildfire risk, insurance, and mitigation to help Americans make more informed decisions about the risks to their homes," and the Shelter Act, which "would create a new tax credit, allowing taxpayers to deduct 25% of disaster mitigation expenditures."

The report further recommends improvements to several Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) programs, including:

  • Expanding the flagship pre-disaster mitigation grant funding available through FEMA's Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program beyond the nearly $3 billion it received in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) to meet growing demand (only 22 states received funding in FY23; although, applications were received from all 50).
  • Making it easier for states to apply for FEMA's Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, which gives funds to states hit by a disaster that they can use to protect against future damage. The Biden-Harris administration recently streamlined the program's application process.
  • Enacting a National Disaster Safety Board (similar to the National Transportation Safety Board), which would provide data-informed recommendations to help communities become more resilient to disasters.
  • Expanding the Community Wildfire Defense Program, created by the BIL.

The JEC publication comes as the country prepares for President-elect Donald Trump to take office next month after running a campaign backed by billionaires and fossil fuel executives and pledging to "drill, baby, drill," which would increase planet-heating pollution as scientists warn of the need for cutting emissions. Republicans will also have control of both chambers of Congress.

Heinrich on Monday called out the GOP for its climate record, saying that "Republicans have denied that climate change is real for over 40 years, and as a result, homeowners are seeing their insurance costs rise."

"Homeowners in New Mexico have seen their premiums increase by $400 over the last three years because of Republicans' refusal to act," he added, citing the 2020-2023 data. "The longer climate deniers keep up this charade, the more expensive things will get."

SEE ALL
FTC Commissioner Andrew Ferguson
News

Trump FTC Pick Casts Lone No Vote on Rule Banning Deceptive Junk Fees

President-elect Donald Trump's pick to lead the Federal Trade Commission cast the lone no vote Tuesday against a newly finalized rule banning deceptive junk fees in live-event ticketing and short-term lodging.

The rule, according to an FTC release, "targets specific and widespread unfair and deceptive pricing practices in the sale of live-event tickets and short-term lodging, while preserving flexibility for businesses."

"It does not prohibit any type or amount of fee, nor does it prohibit any specific pricing strategies," the agency said. "Rather, it simply requires that businesses that advertise their pricing tell consumers the whole truth up-front about prices and fees."

FTC Commissioner Andrew Ferguson, Trump's choice to head the bipartisan agency, was the only member to vote against the junk fees rule. In his dissenting statement, Ferguson wrote that his opposition had "nothing to do with the merits" of the finalized rule but was rather a vote against any additional rulemaking by the Biden administration.

"It is particularly inappropriate for the Biden-Harris FTC to adopt a major new rule that it will never enforce, as the final rule will not take effect until many months after President Trump takes his oath of office," Ferguson wrote.

Ferguson has been a consistent opponent of causes championed by FTC Chair Lina Khan, including the agency's rules banning anti-worker noncompete agreements and making it easier for consumers to cancel subscriptions.

Nidhi Hegde, interim executive director of the American Economic Liberties Project, said in response to the newly finalized rule that "banning junk fees is broadly popular across the country because Americans are tired of being tricked by hidden costs that inflate prices and distort competition."

"Finalizing this rule with bipartisan support demonstrates Chair Khan and the commission's commitment to delivering real results for consumers, saving Americans both time and money," said Hegde. "We're pleased to see the FTC work to get this done, and encourage federal and state policymakers to build on this effort to put an end to junk fees once and for all."

With his dissent on Tuesday, Ferguson offered a glimpse of "how he plans to lead the FTC—and how the Trump administration plans to run the independent agencies put in the crosshairs by the Project 2025 plan," political reporter Matt Sledge wrote for The Intercept on Wednesday.

"While calling on the FTC to stop issuing rules until Trump takes office might win favor with the incoming president, it is sharply at odds with positions on the agency's independence that Republicans were putting out just weeks ago," Sledge noted. "As recently as October, the House Oversight Committee released a report dinging Khan for a supposed lack of independence from the Biden administration."

"Since Trump's election, however, Republicans have shown newfound enthusiasm for the idea of bringing independent agencies under executive control," he added. "That vision was laid out in Project 2025."

Since he's already a commissioner at the agency, Ferguson will not require Senate confirmation to become FTC chair once Trump takes office next month.

In his job pitch to Trump's team, Ferguson pledged to use his tenure as FTC chair to "reverse Lina Khan's anti-business agenda" and halt her "war on mergers."

SEE ALL
Mike Johnson speaks to reporters.
News

After Trump and Musk's Attempt to Sink Deal, House Votes to Avert Government Shutdown

The U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill 366-34 on Friday night to continuing funding the government, averting the shutdown that loomed after Elon Musk and President-elect Donald Trump sank a bipartisan spending agreement earlier in the week.

The Senate then approved the continuing resolution 85-11 early Saturday, which will keep the government funded at current levels through March 14. It also included the disaster relief and aid to farmers that were central pieces of the original bipartisan legislation and excluded Trump's last-minute demand to raise the debt ceiling.

However, it was significantly smaller than the original bill—slashed from 1,500 to 118 pages—and the cuts included healthcare expansion for older Americans, a plan to lower prescription drug prices, and an apprenticeship program for young people.

"The precedent that has been set today in Congress should upset every American who believes in our democratic form of government."

"Tonight, in a victory for the American people and a loss for Donald Trump and Elon Musk, the House passed legislation to keep the government open, provide $100 billion in critical disaster relief to communities across America, and fund $10 billion in aid for struggling farmers and ranchers," outgoing Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash) said in a statement.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) also celebrated the averted shutdown.

"We stopped extreme MAGA Republicans from shutting down the government and crashing the economy," he wrote on Bluesky. "The American people have won this round. Far-right billionaires have lost. The struggle continues in the new year."

The bill's passage capped a whirlwind few days in the U.S. House after Musk—the richest man in the world whom Trump has appointed to co-lead a new Department of Government Efficiency—spent all of Wednesday tweeting against the original spending package released by House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Tuesday. After Trump and Vice President-elect JD Vance joined Musk's crusade against the bill, Johnson refrained from bringing it to the floor.

Instead, he attempted to pass another bill on Thursday that would have raised the debt limit through 2027, in accordance with Trump's request. That bill was voted down 174-235, with only two Democrats voting in favor and 38 Republicans rejecting it. Johnson then briefly considered passing individual bills Friday morning before introducing the proposal that finally passed with the support of 170 Republicans and every Democrat except Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas), who voted present.

"We forced President-elect Trump and Shadow President Elon Musk to back down from the 11th-hour demand to pass a suspension of the debt ceiling, a move that would have paved the way for a Trump Tax Scam 2.0 that would once again send trillions of dollars to the billionaires and giant corporations while cutting Social Security and Medicare for working people and poor people to pay for those tax cuts to the wealthiest," Jayapal said. "Democrats forced Republicans to back down and, when we enter a Republican trifecta, it will be on Republicans to deliver all the votes for such a scam. Democrats won’t bail them out—on that or any of their policies that cater to the wealthiest in America at the expense of working people and struggling Americans."

The passage of the disaster aid was celebrated by more than 50 storm and fire survivors who had sent a delegation to Congress last week to share their stories and demand that Congress fully fund recovery efforts, as federal dollars for relief have been delayed by over two years.

"We commend Republicans and Democrats for prioritizing disaster aid—this is how it should be," said Amanda Devecka-Rinear, co-founder of an organization of Superstorm Sandy survivors. "But the maneuvering we just witnessed, including an unelected billionaire holding disaster aid hostage via the social media platform that he owns, once again underscores how precarious the reality is for disaster survivors in America. And we will continue to stand together to get our communities home and whole."

While Devecka-Rinear said the funding "represents a significant step forward," she added that it was "not the finish line."

"Stopgap measures like this cannot continue to be the norm," she said. "We need a disaster recovery system that families can successfully navigate. Survivors deserve reliable, sustainable, and permanent funding."

Zoe Middleton, the associate director for just climate resilience for the Climate and Energy Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists, also called for a permanent disaster-relief solution.

"Communities need and deserve robustly funded recovery programs to get back on their feet in the weeks and months following a disaster," Middleton said in a statement. "Allowing funding for short-term relief to run dry and making communities wait on long-term recovery assistance can push families into debt or leave them homeless and can also cause lasting economic scars on local economies."

She continued: "People across the country are losing their homes and livelihoods to the climate crisis while fossil fuel companies continue to rake in profits. In addition to passing this short-term, stopgap funding, Congress should invest in measures that prepare climate-vulnerable communities for disasters before they strike and permanently authorize Community Development Block Grants to ensure people aren't forced into desperate straits after they've experienced the worst."

The bill's passage also sets the stage for the coming year, in which Republicans will control the presidency, House, and Senate—foreshadowing future fights and revealing the extent of Musk's influence over the future president and Republican lawmakers.

During closed-door negotiations, Republican House members on Friday shared a slide showing a draft agreement to swap $2.5 trillion in spending cuts for a $1.5 trillion debt-ceiling increase next year. Cuts could target essential programs including Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and federal nutrition assistance.

"Republicans are already taking cues from Elon Musk and his DOGE commission and clearing the deck to ram through giant tax giveaways for the ultra-wealthy," Groundwork Collaborative executive director Lindsay Owens said in a statement. "Their plans for the new year are crystal clear: Cut trillions from Social Security, Medicare, and other critical programs to pay for their own massive tax cuts."

Jayapal said that Democrats would need "spines of steel to oppose all of the ways in which Republicans inflict cruelty on America's working people and poor people who are still struggling to get by and deserve so much more."

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who voted against the continuing resolution, lamented key provisions that had been cut from the spending bill after Musk and Trump's opposition. These included measures to expand primary healthcare, mental healthcare, substance abuse counseling, and nutrition programs for older Americans; boost vocational training for 100,000 young people; and attempt to regulate Pharmacy Benefit Managers, who inflate prescription drug costs.

"These important proposals, negotiated by Democrats and Republicans for months and agreed to by both sides of the aisle, were stripped from this bill by an unelected billionaire named Elon Musk," Sanders said. "Musk, the richest person on Earth, threatened to use his fortune to unseat any member of Congress who would have voted for the original bipartisan legislation."

Sanders concluded: "The precedent that has been set today in Congress should upset every American who believes in our democratic form of government. It appears that from now on no major legislation can be passed without the approval of the wealthiest person in this country. That's not democracy, that's oligarchy."

SEE ALL
Donald Trump and Mike Johnson
News

Free Speech Coalition Vows to Defend Nonprofits From 'Unprecedented' Threat

An alliance of labor unions and advocacy groups launched a new coalition on Tuesday aimed at defending nonprofit organizations from "unprecedented government attacks on free speech," a move that comes amid a Republican-led effort to empower the incoming Trump administration to shutter dissenting organizations.

Americans Against Government Censorship—whose founding members include the AFL-CIO, Oxfam America, Service Employees International Union, and Indivisible—said it was founded to combat the threat posed by bills such as H.R. 9495, which would allow the U.S. Treasury Department to unilaterally strip nonprofits of their tax-exempt status if they're deemed supporters of terrorism.

The legislation, which the ACLU said provides merely an "illusion of due process" for accused groups, represents a potentially existential threat to human rights organizations, news outlets, government watchdogs, and other nonprofits that could be key to uncovering and fighting abuses by the incoming administration.

"This sweeping authority could be weaponized against any tax-exempt organization across the ideological spectrum, depending on which party is in power at a given moment," Caitlin Legacki, a spokesperson for the new coalition, said in a statement. "Presenting a strong and united front against political and ideological censorship is the only way to protect Americans' right to stand up for what they believe in under the First Amendment."

"Any trade union, church, philanthropic, nonprofit media outlet or social welfare organization could become a target if they fall out of favor with the current administration."

The coalition was launched weeks after the U.S. House passed H.R. 9495, with 15 Democrats joining nearly every Republican to push the legislation through the lower chamber.

It appears unlikely that the bill will get a vote in the Senate before the new Congress is sworn in next month, but Republicans could revive the measure once they take control of both chambers and the White House.

On its website, Americans Against Government Censorship warns that "increasingly aggressive activists have been very clear about their intent to use the full force of the federal government to target their enemies and hinder the ability of any opposition to slow or stop their policy agenda—including new efforts to target and weaponize tax status through the IRS."

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is among the Republicans pushing the IRS to revoke the tax-exempt status of a number of nonprofit groups that support Palestinian rights, including Jewish Voice for Peace and American Muslims for Palestine.

Americans Against Government Censorship emphasized that the powers included in bills such as H.R. 9495 "could be weaponized by any administration against any tax-exempt organization across the ideological spectrum."

"Any trade union, church, philanthropic, nonprofit media outlet or social welfare organization could become a target if they fall out of favor with the current administration," the coalition said. "At any time, this agenda would allow a sitting president—Democratic or Republican—to use their power to punish ideological opponents without fundamental due process."

SEE ALL
The Pentagon
News

'Slap in the Face to Working-Class Families': Senate Sends Biden $895 Billion Military Bill

The United States Senate overwhelmingly passed an $895 billion military funding bill on Wednesday as critics blasted what many called misplaced spending priorities and highly controversial provisions that ban gender-affirming health coverage for children of active-duty service members and prohibit the Pentagon from citing casualty figures issued by the Gaza Ministry of Health.

Senators voted 85-14 for the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal year 2025. The following senators voted against the legislation: Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Mike Braun (R-Ind.), Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.). Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), the vice president-elect, did not vote on the bill.

"We do not need to spend almost a trillion dollars on the military, while half a million Americans are homeless and children go hungry," Sanders explained earlier this month.

The peace group CodePink said it was "disappointed" by the Senate's passage of the NDAA, "which allocates nearly $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars to weapons and warfare while essential services like healthcare, education, food, and housing remain underfunded."

"Half of the budget will go directly to the pockets of private military companies in the form of contracts and weapons deals," the group continued. "On top of the massive topline and the large allocation to private companies, the Pentagon has never been able to pass an audit. Much like every Pentagon budget before, this money will be largely unaccounted for, with very little transparency."

"This budget is a huge slap in the face to working-class families who are struggling to make ends meet," CodePink added.

An amendment introduced on Monday by Baldwin and co-sponsored by two dozen of her Democratic colleagues "to remove language that would strip away service members' parental rights to access medically necessary healthcare for their transgender children" failed to pass.

Speaking on the Senate floor on Tuesday, Baldwin said that Congress has "broken" its commitment to the troops "because some Republicans decided that gutting the rights of our service members to score cheap political points was more worthy."

"We're talking about parents who are serving our country in uniform, having the right to consult their family's doctor and get the healthcare they want and need for their transgender children," she added. "Some folks poisoned this bill and turned their backs on those in service and the people that we represent."

Olivia Hunt, director of federal policy at Advocates for Trans Equality, said in a statement Wednesday that "every military family deserves respect and access to essential healthcare—free from the interference of political agendas."

Hunt continued:

Denying lifesaving, medically necessary care to trans members of military families creates profound hardships, forcing service members to make impossible choices between their duty and the health and well-being of their loved ones. Politicizing access to evidence-based healthcare undermines the principles of fairness, dignity, and respect that our nation aspires to. No one should have to choose between their duty and protecting their family.

By passing this harmful legislation, the Senate has failed our service members and their families. This decision prioritizes political gamesmanship over the dignity, rights, and well-being of those who serve our nation and sets a dangerous precedent of governmental overreach into decisions that should remain between doctors and families.

Some advocates including Hunt want President Joe Biden to veto the bill.

"If signed by the president, the passage of the NDAA will mark the first piece of federal legislation to restrict access to medically necessary healthcare for transgender adolescents," Hunt added. "It would be heartbreaking for an administration that has sought to advance the rights of LGBTQI+ Americans more than any other to date, to enact a law that would endanger countless trans youth. We urge President Biden to take a strong stance for trans youth and their families and veto this bill."

Congress has passed the NDAA, which contained a provision banning the coverage of gender affirming care for the children of active duty military. This is the first anti-LGBTQ bill to pass congress in almost 3 decades but certainly won't be the last. This will be Biden's legacy.
— Alejandra Caraballo ( @esqueer.net) December 18, 2024 at 10:02 AM

Human Rights Campaign president Kelley Robinson said that "President Biden has the power to put a stop to this cruelty."

"He should make good on his promises to protect LGBTQ+ Americans, defend military service members and their families, and ensure this country's politics reflect the best of who we are," Robinson added. "President Biden must veto this bill."

The NDAA also contains a provision prohibiting the Department of Defense from officially citing "fatality figures that are derived by United States-designated terrorist organizations" or governmental entities or organizations that rely upon such data. Critics say the measure is meant to censor the truth about Israel's 14-month assault on Gaza, which has left more than 162,000 Palestinians dead, maimed, or missing. Various United Nations agencies, international charities and rights groups, and even the Israeli military and U.S. State Department have cited Gaza Health Ministry casualty figures, which have been deemed accurate—and likely an undercount—by experts around the world, including Israeli military intelligence and U.S. officials.

"In other words," Security Policy Reform Institute co-founder Stephen Semler said of the provision, "it's effectively a ban on talking about deaths in Gaza."

SEE ALL