SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER

Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

* indicates required
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Opinion
Climate
Economy
Politics
Rights & Justice
War & Peace
Martin Luther King Jr. is arrested for loitering in 1958
Further

The Hurting Part: A 'Wait' That Almost Always Means 'Never'

On Monday we mourned and honored the legacy of Martin Luther King Jr., preacher, radical, orator, warrior and leader of America's civil rights movement; on the same dark day, of course, a loathsome churl, antithetical in every way, came to power. In the hope that love and justice will one day prevail - and honoring King's prescient warnings of "a time when silence is betrayal" - we summon his spirit. "We must accept finite disappointment," he said, "but never lose infinite hope."

Painfully, King's anniversary comes as a nation "whipsawed by a madman" moves toward rebuilding the walls of racism, classism, patriarchy and inequity that King and so many righteous Americans fought so hard to tear down. Not since the Gilded Age of the late 19th century, notes Robert Reich, has the country seen such "vast conspicuous displays" of unaccountable wealth and political power flaunted "unapologetically, unashamedly, defiantly" in the name of helping a racist, hate-mongering demagogue recreate state-sanctioned discrimination, inequality and suffering for the vulnerable among us. Trump's crass, clueless bigotry - calling Black Nazi Mark Robinson “Martin Luther King on steroids," claiming "nobody has crowds bigger than me," even "Martin Luther King, when he did his speech" - just highlights the tragedy that is his effectiveness at re-inflaming the hate King spent his life seeking to quell.

Almost exactly 60 years ago, King led thousands of allies on a pivotal, five-day, 54-mile march from Selma to Montgomery to protest Jim Crow laws blocking them from voting. Days before, marchers led by John Lewis had been attacked and beaten by state troopers at the Edmund Pettus Bridge on what became known as Bloody Sunday; Lewis had his skull fractured and later said he was sure he'd die that day. King set out with twice as many marchers, but having reached a compromise with LBJ, stopped at the bridge where police again awaited, led the crowd in prayer, and before marching back to Selma proclaimed, "All the world knows that we are here, we are standing before the forces of power (and) we are not about to turn around...we are on the move now, like an idea whose time has come." Amidst cries of "Yes, sir!" and "Amen!" he told those asking "how long?" that, "No lie can live forever...because you shall reap what you sow."

Those marching from Selma, said Linda Lowery, 74, "wanted America to change for the better." She was 14 when she marched with Lewis across the bridge; chased by a Selma deputy and a state trooper, she ran into a plume of tear gas and was struck from behind before state troopers beat and kicked her so hard she "rose off the ground" and passed out. She woke up on a stretcher being loaded into a hearse, jumped off, and ran. Almost 60 years later, she still remembers the faces of the men beating her; she says they had the same arrogant, impervious look as Derek Chauvin while he knelt on the neck of George Floyd in 2020. "I could not see where anything we had done had made a difference in the hearts of people," she said, other than some "cosmetic" changes. "People gave their lives to make a change. But it has not changed, and that is the hurting part. America has gotten where it is because there is still hate in people’s hearts."

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

Trump, of course, is the arbiter of that hate, its awful exemplar, its malignant founding father. Could King, the ever-hopeful believer, have believed there could ever be a Trump, eagerly marshaling a barren, regressive clutch of bigots, fools and con-men to follow him? "Darkness cannot drive out darkness: Only light can do that," he preached. "I have decided to stick with love. Hate is too great a burden to bear." He praised "the brave children of Birmingham and Selma for putting the 'unity' in 'community.'" "Anybody can serve," he asserted. "You only need a heart full of grace." "Only" seems the operative word here: For some time now, grace has been exceedingly rare on the right side of our political landscape. In truth, King remained aware of the fragility and capriciousness of the movement's white allies, never so elegantly, courteously, wearily expressed in his famed Letter from Birmingham Jail after he was arrested for peacefully protesting segregation.

Responding to a statement of "concern" by eight white Southern church leaders suggesting the protests were “unwise and untimely," King wrote a long impassioned defense essentially arguing, "The time is always right to do what is right." He allowed himself both snark - "Never before have I written so long a letter (but) what else can one do when he is alone in a narrow jail cell other than write long letters, think long thoughts and pray long prayers?" - and bitter, "disappointed" criticism of white faith leaders "more devoted to 'order' than to justice." The pastors had commended Birmingham police for their restraint; he noted they may not have "if you had seen its dogs sinking their teeth into unarmed, nonviolent Negroes." Having negotiated with the city's business leaders, "Our hopes had been blasted...promises made, promises broken," and they took to direct action to "present our very bodies as a means of laying our case before the conscience of the community."

To the classic charge he and the activists were "outsiders," he said, "I am in Birmingham because injustice is here... Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." As to "unwise," he insisted, "Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed." And "well-timed" protests don't exist: "For years now I have heard the word 'Wait!' It rings in the ear of every Negro with piercing familiarity. We have waited for more than 340 years for our Constitutional and God given rights...This 'Wait' has almost always meant 'Never.'" Years later, his friend and fierce supporter Harry Belafonte told a panel the last thing King said to him before his assassination was that he worried "we are leading the nation on an integration trip that has us integrating into a burning house." "Most politicians I know make promises and then walk into the faces of power and deny us," Belafonte said. "I'm here to look through the ravages of the Democratic party and see if anything is really worth salvaging."

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

Both he and King would find virtually nothing worth salvaging in today's GOP, now greedily cojoined by tech oligarchs Elmo, Bezos, Zuckerberg et al. "Everybody is coming!" Trump crowed as they trudged to kiss the stubby ring. Their lurch rightward was so notable exultant Three-Shirts Bannon called it "an official surrender" akin to the Japanese surrender to Allied forces in 1945. And the money keeps coming. Hours before taking office, Trump raked in $58 billion, on paper, after issuing a $TRUMP meme coin, whatever that is, which accounts for almost 90% of his net worth. The move, which means “anyone in the world" can deposit money into his bank account, was blasted by ethics experts as "the single worst conflict of interest in the modern history of the presidency." Still, meme-based cryptocurrencies are so volatile that, hours after $MELANIA's token landed - Be Best - $TRUMP plummeted 50% from $75 to $30. Cry me a (teeny, surreal) river.

When Martin Luther King Jr. died, he had a net worth of less than $6,000. As radically anti-capitalism as anti-war, he often railed against "excessive materialism" and the false god of money as "a power that corrupts and an instrument of exploitation." Weeks before his murder, he was preparing to launch a Poor People’s Campaign to gain economic justice for "The Other America,” those people, often of color, who "find themselves perishing on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity." Citing government help deemed "subsidized" for the rich and "welfare" for the poor, he decried "socialism for the rich and rugged free enterprise capitalism for the poor.” "God never intended for one group of people to live in superfluous inordinate wealth, while others live in abject deadening poverty," he said. "The problems of racial and economic injustice cannot be solved without a radical redistribution of wealth for all God's children."

What would he make of today's madness - the obscene economic excess and inequity, the flagrant racism and fear-mongering, a political rise celebrated by white supremacist Proud Boys and an unhinged oligarch giving a Nazi salute - no, two Nazi salutes - a new emperor's regime so petty, vindictive and void of substance that within hours he took down the new portrait of a general who criticized him and a government website advising women of their reproductive rights. What a falling off was there. Still, a glimmer of light: Literally minutes before he left office, Biden commuted the life sentence of native rights advocate and political prisoner Leonard Peltier, now 80 and in poor health, to serve the rest of his sentence at home.For 50 years, Peltier had proclaimed his innocence and intergenerational advocates had vowed, "Our resistance will never stop." Peltier: "It's finally over. I'm going home." Martin Luther King Jr.: "Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter." Take care of yourselves and each other. Given the lack of alternatives, onward.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

SEE ALL
Gas company employees work in Malibu, California, after the Palisades Fire
News

Actuaries and Scientists Warn Climate Shocks Risk 'Planetary Insolvency'

U.K. actuaries and University of Exeter climate scientists on Thursday warned that "the risk of planetary insolvency looms unless we act decisively" and urged policymakers to "implement realistic and effective approaches to global risk management."

Actuaries have developed techniques that "underpin the functioning of the global pension market with $55 trillion of assets, and the global insurance market, collecting $8 trillion of premiums annually, to help us manage risk," Tim Lenton, University of Exeter's climate change and Earth system science chair, noted in the foreword of a report released Thursday.

Planetary Solvency—Finding Our Balance With Nature is the fourth report for which the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA) has collaborated with climate scientists. In financial terms, solvency is the ability of people or companies to pay their long-term debts. Co-authors of one of the previous publications coined the phrase planetary solvency, "setting out the idea that financial risk management techniques could be adapted to help society manage climate change and other risks."

Three IFoA leaders—Kalpana Shah, Paul Sweeting, and Kartina Tahir Thomson—explained in their introduction to the latest report how "planetary solvency applies these techniques to the Earth system," writing:

The essentials that support our society and economy all flow from the Earth system, commodities such as food, water, energy, and raw materials. The Earth system regulates the climate and provides a breathable atmosphere, it is the foundation that underpins our society and economy. Planetary solvency assesses the Earth system's ability to continue supporting us, informed by planetary boundaries, tipping points in the Earth system, and other scientific discoveries to assess risks to this foundation—and thus to our society and the economy.

Our illustrative assessment of planetary solvency in this report shows a more fundamental, policy-led change of direction is required. Our current market-led approach to mitigating climate and nature risks is not delivering. There is an increasing risk of severe societal disruption (planetary insolvency), as our economic system drives further global warming and nature degradation.

"Impacts are already severe with unprecedented fires, floods, heatwaves, storms, and droughts," the document points out, emphasizing that human activity—particularly burning fossil fuels—drives climate change and biodiversity loss. "If unchecked they could become catastrophic, including loss of capacity to grow major staple crops, multimeter sea-level rise, altered climate patterns, and a further acceleration of global warming."

The report was released as wildfires ravage California and shortly after scientific bodies around the world concluded that 2024 was the hottest year on record and the first in which the average global temperature exceeded a key goal of the Paris agreement: 1.5°C above preindustrial levels. In the United States, experts identified 27 disasters with losses exceeding $1 billion.

"We risk triggering tipping points such as Greenland ice sheet melt, coral reef loss, Amazon forest dieback, and major ocean current disruption," the new publication warns, adding that "tipping points can trigger each other," and if multiple are triggered, "there may be a point of no return, after which it may be impossible to stabilize the climate."

Food system shocks and more frequent and devastating disasters increase the risk of mass mortality for humanity—including due to hunger and infectious diseases—along with mass migration and conflict, the report highlights.

"Climate change risk assessment methodologies understate economic impact, as they often exclude many of the most severe risks that are expected and do not recognize there is a risk of ruin," the document stresses. "They are precisely wrong, rather than being roughly right."

Specifically, lead author and IFoA council member Sandy Trust said in a statement, "widely used but deeply flawed assessments of the economic impact of climate change show a negligible impact" on gross domestic product (GDP).

However, Trust continued, "the risk-led methodology, set out in the report, shows a 50% GDP contraction between 2070 and 2090 unless an alternative course is chartered."

To mitigate the risk of planetary insolvency, the co-authors called on policymakers around the world to implement independent, annual assessments; set limits and thresholds that respect the planet's boundaries; enhance governance structures to support planetary solvency; and "enhance policymaker understanding of ecological interdependencies, tipping points, and systemic risks so they understand why these changes are needed."

They also underscored the need to limit global warming and avoid triggering tipping points with actions such as accelerating decarbonization, removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, restoring damaged ecosystems, and building resilience.

"You can't have an economy without a society, and a society needs somewhere to live," said Trust. "Nature is our foundation... Threats to the stability of this foundation are risks to future human prosperity which we must take action to avoid."

SEE ALL
Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department's Antitrust Division Doha Mekki.
News

Biden DOJ Sues Major Landlords Over Algorithmic Price Fixing

The U.S.Justice Department on Tuesday announced that it has added six landlords as defendants in an antitrust lawsuit that the agency initially filed against the real estate software company RealPage, which the DOJ accused of engaging in a price fixing scheme that allows reduced competition between landlords so they can increase rents.

At the center of the case is RealPage's "algorithmic pricing software," which generates rent price recommendations using software based on their and their rivals' "competitively sensitive information," which they submit to RealPage, according to an August statement from the Department of Justice regarding the initial complaint.

The new complaint alleges that the six companies—Greystar Real Estate Partners LLC; Blackstone's LivCor LLC; Camden Property Trust; Cushman & Wakefield Inc and Pinnacle Property Management Services LLC; Willow Bridge Property Company LLC; and Cortland Management LLC—"participated in an unlawful scheme to decrease competition among landlords in apartment pricing, harming millions of American renters," according to a Tuesday statement from the Department of Justice.

The landlords collectively operate more than 1.3 million units in 43 states and the District of Columbia, according to the agency.

The Department of Justice alleges that in addition to using RealPages's "anticompetitive pricing algorithms," the companies coordinated in a number of ways, including "communicating with competitors' senior managers about rents, occupancy, and other competitively sensitive topics" and participating in "user groups" hosted by RealPage, during which landlords would discuss, for example, how to modify the software's pricing methodology and the companies' own pricing strategies.

"While Americans across the country struggled to afford housing, the landlords named in today's lawsuit shared sensitive information about rental prices and used algorithms to coordinate to keep the price of rent high," said Doha Mekki, acting assistant attorney general for the Justice Department's Antitrust Division, in the Tuesday statement.

Two states, Illinois and Massachusetts, have also joined the suit as plaintiffs.

The American Economic Liberties Project, a group that urges government to confront corporate concentration, touted the updates to the lawsuit, writing Tuesday, "If you mess with the price of rent, be prepared to meet the DOJ on the other side of that scheme!"

Tony Carrk, executive director of the watchdog Accountable.US, said in a Tuesday statement that "corporate landlords like Camden Property Trust, one of the landlord companies included in today's complaint, have reaped hundreds of millions in profits while using RealPage's algorithm, and that's just the tip of the iceberg."

According to the Tuesday release from the Department of Justice, pending a consent decree which must be approved by the court, the DOJ may resolve its claims against one of the landlords, Cortland, which would then cooperate with the Justice Department's investigation and litigation.

SEE ALL
SWITZERLAND-DAVOS-POLITICS-ECONOMY-DEMONSTRATION
News

Even Most Millionaires Think the Superrich Influencing Trump Threatens Global Stability

As the World Economic Forum held its annual summit in Davos, Switzerland, polling released Wednesday showed that even millionaires are concerned about the wealthy's influence over Republican U.S. President Donald Trump, who started his second term earlier this week surrounded by Big Tech billionaires.

The poll, conducted in November and December by Survation on behalf of the U.S.-based group Patriotic Millionaires, is based on the responses of 2,902 people from G20 countries with investable assets over $1 million, excluding their homes.

Around two-thirds of them strongly or somewhat agreed that "superrich individuals interfered inappropriately in media, public, and political opinion in the 2024 U.S. election" (67%) and "the role the superrich will play in Donald Trump's presidency is a threat to global stability" (63%).

"When a superrich elite is determining the outcome of elections purely to protect their vested interests and accelerate profits, it's clear that we are in a terrifying age of wealth extremism."

Pollsters also found that over half of those surveyed believe that extreme wealth threatens democracy and the democratic stability of their country, and that political leaders lack the will to tackle extreme wealth. Nearly 70% of respondents said that the influence of the superrich is leading to a decline in trust in democracy.

Over 70% think that the ultrawealthy buy political influence and disproportionately sway public opinion through control of the media and social media platforms—and that their influence is leading to a decline in trust of the media and the justice system, according to the poll. Additionally, 72% favor raising taxes on the superrich to help reduce inequality and invest in public services.

The poll results were released alongside a letter to global leaders attending the Davos meeting, signed by more than 370 millionaires and billionaires from 22 countries, who argued that "oligarchy cannot be born from the political fear of upsetting the superrich," so "you must tax us, the superrich."

Signatories include American filmmaker and Patriotic Millionaires member Abigail Disney, who said in a statement that "it's easy to see the election of a figure like Donald Trump as an aberration, but that's not the case. Donald Trump—along with his so-called 'first buddy,' Elon Musk—is the final and inevitable conclusion of decades of inaction on the part of world leaders to put a check on extreme inequality."

Musk, a tech CEO and the richest person on the planet, poured over a quarter-billion dollars into reelecting Trump, has often been seen at the president's side since his November win, and is leading the Republican's Department of Government Efficiency, a controversial presidential advisory commission created to pursue GOP dreams of slashing federal regulations and spending.

"It's hard to be optimistic about what lies ahead over the next four years—and maybe more—but if officials want to do something to ensure the stability of our democracies, they need only find the political resolve to once and for all tax wealthy people like me," said Disney.

Other signatories also shared that call, including Marlene Engelhorn, an Austrian-German who co-founded taxmenow and said Wednesday that "the superrich are buying themselves more wealth and more power while the rest of the world is living in economic fear."

"We no longer have access to free and fair media; our political and legal systems can be bought; and our democracies are on very shaky ground," added Engelhorn, one of the representatives sharing the letter in Davos. "For all our sake, in every country, we have to tackle this now. Politicians need to show their mettle; they need to tax the superrich."

Scottish award-winning actor Brian Cox, who portrayed a billionaire named Logan Roy on the show Succession, also signed on and said that "recent events have shown that the political influence of billionaires and those with extreme wealth is an extreme risk to society."

"The superrich now manage so much more than money: They manage what we read, what we watch, the information we're given, and ultimately, how we vote," he continued. "When a superrich elite is determining the outcome of elections purely to protect their vested interests and accelerate profits, it's clear that we are in a terrifying age of wealth extremism. Our leaders have lacked the backbone needed to rein in political capture and put ordinary people first. It's time we draw the line and tax the superrich."

SEE ALL
Anti-Citizens United protesters hold signs reading, "Democracy Is Not for Sale" during a winter protest
News

'We Must End Citizens United,' Progressives Say as Ruling Turns 15 Amid 'Growing Oligarchy'

As President Donald Trump triumphantly returned to the White House thanks in part to a tsunami of campaign cash from oligarchs and corporate interests, democracy defenders on Tuesday marked the 15th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that unleashed such spending by urging action to overturn the decision.

In a nation where corporations and moneyed interests already wielded disproportionate power and influence over elections, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commissionreversed campaign finance restrictions dating back to the era of Gilded Age robber barons. The ruling affirmed that political spending by corporations, nonprofit organizations, labor unions, and other groups is a form of free speech protected by the 1st Amendment that government cannot restrict. The decision ushered in the era of super PACs—which can raise unlimited amounts of money to spend on campaigns—and secret spending on elections with so-called "dark money."

In his Citizens Uniteddissent, Justice John Paul Stevens asserted that "in a functioning democracy the public must have faith that its representatives owe their positions to the people, not to the corporations with the deepest pockets," and warned that the ruling "will undoubtedly cripple the ability of ordinary citizens, Congress, and the states to adopt even limited measures to protect against corporate domination of the electoral process."

"Over the last 15 years, the American people have watched with disgust as both parties welcomed the unfettered sale of our democracy and elections to the highest bidders."

Since then, nearly $20 billion has been spent on U.S. presidential elections and more than $53 billion on congressional races, according to data compiled by OpenSecrets. Spending on 2024 congressional races was double 2010 levels, while presidential campaign contributions were more than 50% higher in 2024 than in 2008, the last election before Citizens United.

Ultrawealthy megadonors played a critical role in Trump's 2024 victory. Some of them have been rewarded with Cabinet nominations and key appointments in "an administration dominated by billionaires and corporate interests," as Americans for Tax Fairness executive director David Kass described it.

"Fifteen years ago today, the Supreme Court gave billionaires and special interests unprecedented power to rig our democracy with its disastrous Citizens United decision. Yesterday, Donald Trump was sworn in, ushering in the wealthiest administration in American history," Tiffany Muller, president of the advocacy group End Citizens United, said on social media Tuesday. "Citizens United paved the way for Trump II."

Alexandra Rojas, executive director of the progressive political action committee Justice Democrats, said in a statement that "over the last 15 years, the American people have watched with disgust as both parties welcomed the unfettered sale of our democracy and elections to the highest bidders."

"Citizens United legalized economic inequality as a political tool for the wealthy to exploit," Rojas added. "A decade-and-a-half later, working-class people cannot afford to run for office and everyday voters' voices are drowned out by billionaire-funded super PACs. As long as Citizens United remains the law of the land, our democracy will remain broken."

Justice Democrats noted: "Yesterday, Donald Trump was inaugurated as president in what was maybe one of the most openly corporate-sponsored inaugurations in American history. In just one row seated in front of Trump's Cabinet members, four men had the combined wealth of just under $1 trillion."

"Billionaires and corporations are paying their way to gain influence in the Trump administration and they can expect a massive return on their investment, at the expense of everyday people," the group added.

It's no surprise, say critics, that corporate profits and plutocrat wealth have soared to new heights during the Citizens United era.

"Citizens United allowed corporations to buy candidates and elections. Citizens United legalized political bribery. Citizens United let wealth dominate our elections," the consumer watchdog Public Citizen said Tuesday. "Overturn Citizens United."

Positing that "Citizens United turned our democracy into an auction," Congressman Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) wrote on social media Tuesday that "our government is supposed to be of the people, by the people, and for the people—not corporations and billionaire elites. We must #EndCitizensUnited and put the American people back in charge."

Democratic lawmakers have introduced numerous bills, including proposed constitutional amendments, to reverse Citizens United. While Congress has not been able or willing to address the issue, 22 states and the District of Columbia, as well as more than 800 local governments across the country, have passed measures calling for a constitutional amendment to overturn the ruling, according to Public Citizen.

"This is a moment to usher in a new era in the Democratic Party that rejects the growing oligarchy in this country by rejecting the unprecedented level of billionaire and corporate spending that has a stranglehold over both parties," Justice Democrats said on Tuesday. "Now is the moment to tirelessly center working people and expose the big money corruption that Citizens United has brought onto both parties. By rejecting their influence, working-class people may finally have the promise of a party that actually serves them."

SEE ALL
Palestinians walk through the remnants of the Jabalia refugee camp
News

Gaza Cease-Fire Takes Effect After Deadly Three-Hour Delay

Israeli forces killed at least 19 Palestinians across the Gaza Strip on Sunday morning during a three-hour delay in implementing a cease-fire and hostage-release deal that Israel's Cabinet finally approved the previous day.

After over 15 months of a U.S.-backed military assault for which Israel faces a genocide case at the International Court of Justice, Israel Defense Forces (IDF) strikes on Gaza were set to stop at 8:30 am local time, due to a three-phase agreement negotiated by Egypt, Qatar, and the outgoing Biden and incoming Trump administrations.

They did not, with deadly results. Mahmoud Basal, a spokesperson for Gaza's Civil Defense, said Sunday that at least 19 people were killed and over 36 were injured from 8:30 am to 11:30 am. That's on top of the tens of thousands of people the Israeli assault and restrictions on humanitarian aid have killed since the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attack on Israel.

As of midnight Saturday, the Gaza Ministry of Health put the official death toll in the besieged Palestinian enclave at 46,913, with another 110,750 people injured and over 10,000 others missing in the rubble of former homes, hospitals, schools, and mosques, though experts warn the number of deaths is likely far higher.

At 9:17 am on Sunday, the IDF said that it was "continuing to operate and strike terrorist targets in Gaza," adding: "A short while ago, IDF artillery and aircraft struck a number of terrorist targets in northern and central Gaza. The IDF remains ready in offense and defense and will not allow any harm to the citizens of Israel."

Muhammad Shehada, a Gazan writer, called the delay a "last-minute trick" by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and explained on social media that it was "under the pretext that Hamas hasn't submitted the list of three captives it'll release today."

As Shehada detailed:

Israel also reneged on the arrangement needed for Hamas to be able to submit such list; suspending surveillance drones and bombardment in the hours preceding the cease-fire so that it becomes logistically possible for Hamas' members on the ground and abroad to contact each other and figure out which hostages are alive and where without compromising their whereabouts and risking being bombed or raided by the IDF.

Hamas was forced to submit the list under fire and spy drones, which meant Israel exploited this to try to locate and snatch some captives last minute. Israel now succeeded in reaching the body of the soldier Oron Shaul, whom Hamas had been holding captive since 2014.

Ultimately, Hamas submitted the list and the pause in fighting took effect—at least for now—enabling displaced Palestinians to start returning to what is left of their communities and the process of releasing captives to begin with three Israelis and 90 Palestinians. During the deal's first 42-day phase, there are plans to free 33 Israelis taken hostage by Palestinian militants, 737 Palestinians imprisoned in Israel, and 1,167 Palestinians detained by Israeli forces in Gaza.

The three Israeli hostages—Emily Damari, Romi Gonen, and Doron Steinbrecher—were transfered to the International Committee of the Red Cross at a square in central Gaza City. The IDF confirmed that the Red Cross was bringing the women to Israeli troops.

The Associated Press on Sunday obtained from Hamas a list of the first 90 Palestinian prisoners set to be freed. They included 15-year-old Mahmoud Aliowat; 53-year-old Dalal Khaseeb, the sister of former Hamas second-in-command Saleh Arouri; 62-year-old Khalida Jarrar, a Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine leader; and 68-year-old Abla Abdelrasoul, the wife of detained PFLP leader Ahmad Saadat.

SEE ALL