SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Justice Denied: US Court Rules Bhopal Victims Can't Sue Union Carbide
“These families have been living with Union Carbide pollution for decades. We remain committed to seeking the justice that they deserve,” said co-counsel Rajan Sharma.
Aug 01, 2014
Victims of the notorious Bhopal chemical plant disaster are still seeking justice after a U.S. district court judge on Wednesday ruled (pdf) that Union Carbide Corp. (UCC) cannot be sued for ongoing contamination from the plant.
The disaster, dubbed "The Hiroshima of the Chemical Industry," began in 1984 when a cloud of poisonous gas, methyl isocyanate, leaked from a pesticide plant whose majority owner was UCC and was operated by an Indian subsidiary, UCIL. Thousands were killed instantly and thousands more in the aftermath. Decades after the plant's closure, nearby residents continue to suffer health impacts including cancers and birth defects.
The suit was filed by EarthRights International (ERI) on behalf of Bhopal residents whose water and land continues to suffer contamination from the plant. The organization states that "UCC largely abandoned the site, allowing toxic wastes to leach into the local water supply."
Judge John F. Keenan rejected the plaintiffs' claim that UCC was a "substantial factor" in the "insufficient and grossly negligent" remediation of the plant, stating that "the manufacturing processes and waste disposal systems to be implemented at the Bhopal Plant were all initially proposed by UCIL."
The plaintiffs had also sought for the state of Madhya Pradesh, which now owns the site, to cooperate in the cleanup.
"Because I conclude that there is no basis to hold UCC liable for Plaintiffs' damage, there will be no court-ordered cleanup in this action, and thus, no basis for enjoining Madhya Pradesh," Judge Keenan ruled.
ERI denounced the ruling as a denial of justice and vowed to continue the fight.
"The evidence demonstrates that Union Carbide was intimately involved in every aspect of designing and building the Bhopal plant, including the waste disposal systems that caused the pollution," Marco Simons, counsel for the plaintiffs and Legal Director for ERI, said in a statement.
"The court's decision discounted this evidence, and it depends entirely on assuming that the manager who oversaw the construction of the Bhopal plant--who said he worked for Union Carbide--didn't really know who he worked for," Simons stated.
"These families have been living with Union Carbide pollution for decades," stated co-counsel Rajan Sharma of the New York law firm Sharma & DeYoung. "We remain committed to seeking the justice that they deserve."
In 2001, UCC became a wholly owned subsidiary of Dow Chemical.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Victims of the notorious Bhopal chemical plant disaster are still seeking justice after a U.S. district court judge on Wednesday ruled (pdf) that Union Carbide Corp. (UCC) cannot be sued for ongoing contamination from the plant.
The disaster, dubbed "The Hiroshima of the Chemical Industry," began in 1984 when a cloud of poisonous gas, methyl isocyanate, leaked from a pesticide plant whose majority owner was UCC and was operated by an Indian subsidiary, UCIL. Thousands were killed instantly and thousands more in the aftermath. Decades after the plant's closure, nearby residents continue to suffer health impacts including cancers and birth defects.
The suit was filed by EarthRights International (ERI) on behalf of Bhopal residents whose water and land continues to suffer contamination from the plant. The organization states that "UCC largely abandoned the site, allowing toxic wastes to leach into the local water supply."
Judge John F. Keenan rejected the plaintiffs' claim that UCC was a "substantial factor" in the "insufficient and grossly negligent" remediation of the plant, stating that "the manufacturing processes and waste disposal systems to be implemented at the Bhopal Plant were all initially proposed by UCIL."
The plaintiffs had also sought for the state of Madhya Pradesh, which now owns the site, to cooperate in the cleanup.
"Because I conclude that there is no basis to hold UCC liable for Plaintiffs' damage, there will be no court-ordered cleanup in this action, and thus, no basis for enjoining Madhya Pradesh," Judge Keenan ruled.
ERI denounced the ruling as a denial of justice and vowed to continue the fight.
"The evidence demonstrates that Union Carbide was intimately involved in every aspect of designing and building the Bhopal plant, including the waste disposal systems that caused the pollution," Marco Simons, counsel for the plaintiffs and Legal Director for ERI, said in a statement.
"The court's decision discounted this evidence, and it depends entirely on assuming that the manager who oversaw the construction of the Bhopal plant--who said he worked for Union Carbide--didn't really know who he worked for," Simons stated.
"These families have been living with Union Carbide pollution for decades," stated co-counsel Rajan Sharma of the New York law firm Sharma & DeYoung. "We remain committed to seeking the justice that they deserve."
In 2001, UCC became a wholly owned subsidiary of Dow Chemical.
Victims of the notorious Bhopal chemical plant disaster are still seeking justice after a U.S. district court judge on Wednesday ruled (pdf) that Union Carbide Corp. (UCC) cannot be sued for ongoing contamination from the plant.
The disaster, dubbed "The Hiroshima of the Chemical Industry," began in 1984 when a cloud of poisonous gas, methyl isocyanate, leaked from a pesticide plant whose majority owner was UCC and was operated by an Indian subsidiary, UCIL. Thousands were killed instantly and thousands more in the aftermath. Decades after the plant's closure, nearby residents continue to suffer health impacts including cancers and birth defects.
The suit was filed by EarthRights International (ERI) on behalf of Bhopal residents whose water and land continues to suffer contamination from the plant. The organization states that "UCC largely abandoned the site, allowing toxic wastes to leach into the local water supply."
Judge John F. Keenan rejected the plaintiffs' claim that UCC was a "substantial factor" in the "insufficient and grossly negligent" remediation of the plant, stating that "the manufacturing processes and waste disposal systems to be implemented at the Bhopal Plant were all initially proposed by UCIL."
The plaintiffs had also sought for the state of Madhya Pradesh, which now owns the site, to cooperate in the cleanup.
"Because I conclude that there is no basis to hold UCC liable for Plaintiffs' damage, there will be no court-ordered cleanup in this action, and thus, no basis for enjoining Madhya Pradesh," Judge Keenan ruled.
ERI denounced the ruling as a denial of justice and vowed to continue the fight.
"The evidence demonstrates that Union Carbide was intimately involved in every aspect of designing and building the Bhopal plant, including the waste disposal systems that caused the pollution," Marco Simons, counsel for the plaintiffs and Legal Director for ERI, said in a statement.
"The court's decision discounted this evidence, and it depends entirely on assuming that the manager who oversaw the construction of the Bhopal plant--who said he worked for Union Carbide--didn't really know who he worked for," Simons stated.
"These families have been living with Union Carbide pollution for decades," stated co-counsel Rajan Sharma of the New York law firm Sharma & DeYoung. "We remain committed to seeking the justice that they deserve."
In 2001, UCC became a wholly owned subsidiary of Dow Chemical.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.